|
Looks like another jackpot hit @ Dwarfpool.
PoW block 364747 awarded jackpot by PoS block 364748.
Payouts seem off though, but not sure...
Happy Mining!
~ Myagui
|
|
|
|
|
I have the AX760, and this one's got a switch near the modular connectors, to enable a 'hybrid' fan mode, that keeps the fan running, even at low power usage. I have it configured this way precisely to avoid overheating the power supply, in case that it is not 'smart enough' to detect that it is overheating while on 0-RPM fan mode...
Doesn't yours have a similar switch or configurable functionality?
Cheers,
~ Myagui
|
|
|
|
Are there any working pools for this coin or is it dead?
There's this one: http://cach.catcoin.czAnd also P2Pool nodes. I suppose you can check which one suits you best here: http://q30.qhor.net:8337/I strongly recommend using P2Pool if you have big hashrate (smaller miners end up with a lot of tiny transactions if doing P2Pool, and typically will have less chances of PoS staking, so P2Pool is not so attractive for a small timer such as myself). EDIT: Oh, and far from dead!  Happy Mining ~ Myagui |
|
|
|
|
That's just how it works Atrides, you can check on the descriptions at the OP...
It is not a bug, it is precisely the expected behavior. (see Q&A, item #2)
Who was the finder (pool worker) address to block 316213 btw?
Cheers,
~ Myagui
|
|
|
|
kaboom!  ~ Myagui |
|
|
|
|
16:20 (Myagui) !calc 450
16:20 <MoneroBot> With 450 H/s you should get 0.64 XMR per Day
~ Myagui
|
|
|
|
IIRC, the GPU instances on AWS are kepler based, which performs poorly with tsiv's code (thus keeping Christian happy ) Would be super if we could at least get some better performance for Maxwell (the 750ti's), since that would not directly interfere with cloud mining operations... Any thoughts Christian? Cheers, ~ Myagui |
|
|
|
You must compile it yourself but right now it's bugged like hell for Windows.
There's a windows compile from one of the trusted members at the cudaminer/ccminer thread. It's not all that buggy, but also far from optimized. As it stands right now, this miner is relying heavily on CPU also, so there's certainly room for improvements (50% CPU usage with 4x750 TIs and an i7 4770 on Windows). The pizza awaits a destination! (though waiting to get acceptance from the bounty author and to see if there is consensus on the miner performance as deserving of the bounty, might require some finishing touches) ~ Myagui |
|
|
|
Hi. When should I panic buy  i believe you're a tiny bit late :-P but you can still buy  Did Jasin "spill the beans" on some conference? I had been happy slowly picking up some more CACHE, but I see the exchanges are having some upwards action again, so wondering if I should go back to mining instead (has been much cheaper for me to buy on exchanges than it is to mine recently)... If anyone has links to the conference media or videos, please post. Cheers, ~ Myagui |
|
|
|
u can earn some BTC in charging your version of Nvidia release since there is no competition from cbuchner1. For example, if u can release your version of crytonight for Nvidia and charge us 0.1 BTC per rig license fee , i am willing to pay for it and i bet cbuchner1 wouldn't release his version since 0.1 BTC per rig is just dust amount for him. Some of us got 2 - 10 rig. Imagine how much u can make per person.
The 1st person to provide an open source nvidia miner for cryptonight (and/or one for AMD), can claim the bounty to which I posted the link a while back (or negotiate a sponsorship value). Others (apart from Christian) have already stated that they are working on it, though I haven't seen any particular claims of performance or even statement of a working implementation yet. In reality, at this point, there's little to none advantage in keeping a miner private, as the AMD crowd has stepped in in force, and difficulty is already through the roof. A binary only release, with a license fee should be worthwhile in the strict business sense, but might be tricky to implement with regards to the GPL licenses involved (not sure I got the right acronym there)... I just hope someone takes that bounty soon (and I would be happiest if the pizza went to Christian). Cheers, ~ Myagui |
|
|
|
We're quickly entering a situation where private GPU miners are cornering the market .. not healthy.
+1... I'm confident that the serious investors that are committed to xmr/cryptonight will soon realize that if not "investing" on the development of a more democratic mining infrastructure, their holdings will remain undervalued. Sooner rather than later, I hope... I don't have the funds to add to the bounty, but I pledge a 10% donation of a month's worth of mining proceeds (with my massive 4xGPU rig) to the author of an open source miner for nvidia. Adding to the above, I pledge to offer said author, 1 medium sized pizza, with 3 toppings of his choosing, and optionally 'extra cheese', delivered to his doorstep, provided that pizza delivery is available in his place of residence. (with apologies to fluffy, no dinner for you tonight...)
~ Myagui |
|
|
|
I'm hinting it could be much higher ~ Myagui Edit: "Say no to clone coins with no added value." This I would sign. But it doesn't apply to BBR or XMR.
^^ This Offtopic: How can I do these things ^^ pointing down instead? Would have saved me the quote |
|
|
|
The thing is, I could already have cashed in bigger on Maxcoin. Much bigger. I didn't know enough about AWS back then.
And I shouldn't have open sourced the miner the hour before the launch. I should have mined for 2 days on hundreds or thousands of GPU instances and only then open sourced it. Instant millionnaire.
Christian, I'm not out to bash anyone that puts in the work to get an advantage over the rest of the crowd, and I certainly respect your well deserved profits. But I have been trying for some time now, to explain how 'destructive' is the process of a closed source miner taking the majority of new coins for any currency (and worse as it remains private).  The sole reason that I stay as far away from BBR as I can, is that I trust that you are making most of the blocks. From an economical standpoint, it makes absolutely no sense for me to invest in a coin that is mostly owned (or mostly generated) by a single individual or a small group of 'privileged actors'. This should be fairly obvious to anyone that's been around for a few alt's that have come and gone carrying the flag of 'the next big thing'. Again my recommendation of a few days back: mine the heck of it for a couple of days (whatever you find reasonable), then hold the stash, and release the miner to the public. This will eventually drive a greater adoption rate, allow for a lot more people to become invested and become interested parties in that currency, and promote community growth as others try to improve on your work, fork it, etc... If the coin has merits, it will sustain greater difficulty, and with it, higher value (long term). As it is right now, you are the strongest single force driving BBR down (inadvertently or not). Do as you will, I wish you the best of luck either way! They are just jealous they can't do the same i guess ... Why blame Christian and his team for doing what they do? Mostly everyone would do it if they were part of it..
And i don't see how they are threatening the coin .. if the miner was out in the wild instead of a couple of high hashrate miner there would be tons of them which would more than likely drive the price down
for anything on the same tech or almost.. Kinda like what happened to HVC as soon as the gpu miner went out.
This makes no sense at all. Fun fact: HVC's most highly advertised technical merit, was that it would be CPU-only, so yes, a GPU miner took it down in value. Once a GPU miner was available, HVC was down to virtually 'no merits' at all to carry it forward. This bares no resemblance whatsoever with the debate here over closed vs open source. How they are threatening the coin: Anyone buying BBR now, is in no small part, just sending money over to Christian's pockets (though not his alone, I'm sure). Do you think that's a sustainable currency?  Cheers, ~ Myagui |
|
|
|
Guys this coin has so much potential. we really need a GUI wallet, this is a huge priority right now. the average person needs to be able to save there coins on there own computer. leaving them on exchanges is risky. and i dont think million dollar investors want to bring out ms dos command lines, it just makes this feel really unprofessional. Im willing to fund it, im sure many more are also, we need to crowd fund someone to smash out a GUI wallet.
You guys are forgetting what monero is, its a coin, a currency, which needs to be easily used. how many people would use debit cards if you had to do a double backflip and solve a rubix cube in 10 seconds before you use it. none. we need ease of use. if the coins not usable then its nothing, just a chunk of irrelevant data in a blockchain.
If we have a 5million dollar market cap on a coin which is basically unusable to the average user, imagine what we could have with a professional approach to it? 100million? easy.
Looks like you haven't read the latest Monero Missive, here you go: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg7386715#msg7386715Point 4 specifically should mostly address your concerns. I think we all want to get to the 'same place', but just don't expect everything to happen magically overnight ~ Myagui |
|
|
|
I love how, in this thread we try to convince one guy why he should release his new software, and we try to convince another guy why he shouldn't release his! Spot on! (btw, my vote is for full disclosure - all software to be released in open source - just happier when the release meets the hardware that I own & run ) ~ Myagui |
|
|
|
|
You really need to type 'save' or 'exit', instead of just closing bitmonerod. If you just close the window or control-C the heck of it, it will not save the blockchain state to disk -> so next time, syncs up all over again.
Cheers,
~ Myagui
|
|
|
|
Forget the XMR mania. Try to see QCN thread. The dev works even harder than the whole XMR team and QCN always has the newest features from which XMR want to copy back like GUI wallet.
Remember, the main selling point of XMR is the first Cryptonote which obviously wrong. XMR is not the original Cryptonote coin, Bytecoin is. IMHO, XMR offers nothing better than QCN. The only reason is XMR backed by a lot of big players in crypto.
I respectfully disagree AizenSou, for way too many reasons to begin listing here, and as I really don't want to have my posts taking part in any sort of 'coin wars'. If you want further details to why I support XMR, say so, and I'll be happy to explain my motivations. Otherwise I'm keeping the details to myself as I'm not trying to promote coin A or B in this particular thread (for that we already have plenty of speculation threads). ~ Myagui |
|
|
|
Oddball suggestion: rename the exe file and change the batch to make it just ccminer.exe, or figure out if it needs some bracketing to get properly called as a variable? Does your other batch file also invoke the executable as a variable, or is it a full path statement? So, suggesting something like: set app='ccminer35-50.exe' Or maybe: set app="ccminer35-50.exe" Out of ideas here! ~ Myagui |
|
|
|
It's now ccminer.exe (dropped the compute level variations) ~ Myagui |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
