Involving in business both with random guys and those we know has different scenarios. Why because there are some certain business we will loved to do with those closer to us and vice versa same goes for other people we do not know and we will still make business with them. In aspect of buying crypto currency or digital currency is better to stay away from unknown individuals and not to do that business with them, we rather take ourselves to the exchanges and get our deal done through p2p or any other means because making business with unknown users outside exchanges comes with a lot of risk so let avoid it.
The irony here is that the two parties in the OP’s story know each other, while when you make a trade on a P2P platform you only know what the platform chooses to share about the other party with you. Personally, I would still buy those coins even if they are sold at a discount because I believe in Bitcoin’s fungibility and that it’s one of its main fundamentals. I also believe that tainting coins by exchanges is not right. Howevet, I wouldn’t buy them if I knew they were stolen as I can’t/don’t want to encourage criminals.
|
|
|
The trend today is that online crypto casinos and bookies are already licensed
It’s not really a trend but more of a necessity. In these days, you can’t start a business (be it a casino or anything rlse) without acsuiring a license in order to operate legally. Casinos and other service providers consider it a priority to get a license not only because they want to be in compliance with regulators but also to gain customers’ trust. When it comes to KYC, things may differ from one casino to another. Some may enforce identity verification for all their customers while others may be a little bit more lenient and only request it when it’s really needed like when withdrawing a large amount of money or if they suspect any suspicious activity related to one of their customers.
|
|
|
Luck is something we don't have to rely on everytime because their are other players that are relying on that too. It is better you gamble for the actually results that will come as a result of your input on different games you have bet on. Gambling is not for those that are not ready to accept the result that come with their betting.
I read your comment multiple times, especially the quoted part, and I couldn’t quite get your point until I read CryptSafe's reply. It seems you are talking about good luck, or more precisely “good fortune”. Because when you say we can’t rely on luck in a luck-based game then that doesn’t really make much sense. Whether you accept the result of the bet or not doesn’t matter much because that won’t change your luck. So, whether you believe in it or not won’t make any difference.
|
|
|
Welcome to Bitcointalk, Gamblr.io! I just visited your website on my phone and, to be honest, I didn’t quite like the color scheme. For some reason, it didn’t seem very appealing. Maybe it’s just my taste! Gamblr… I don’t know why but the name rings a bell! Sorry, but for how long have you been operating and do you have an other announcement thread on this forum? I’m curious because the name of your casino seems familiar to me.
|
|
|
It’s clear that you were deceived by the fake reviews and ratings on Trustpilot. I found that the fraudulent platform IeByte received a 4.2/5 rating That’s correct. They have a good TrustScore on Trustpilot, but if you check the reviews, their total number should already be considered a red flag. How can a company that claims to have been operating since 2016 (according to what they wrote on their website's footer) have only 28 reviews in total? Besides, the very first review they received was posted just a month ago (again, they claim to have been operating since 2016)! Not everything you read on review websites should be trusted because their ratings can be easily manipulated. In the case of Trustpilot, the TrustScore isn’t that reliable. You need to focus more on the total number of reviews and how genuine they are.
|
|
|
(فريق ساتوشي)
هذه العبارة اثارت فضولي حقيقة! لو سلمنا جدلا ان ما تقوله صحيح، هل تعني بهذه العبارة ان ساتوشي كان يعمل ضمن فريق و لم يطور البيتكوين بشكل منفرد. ام انك تقصد انه كان هناك فريق من المعدنين او الاشخاص الذين امنوا بفكرة ساتوشي و انخرطوا معه في المشروع منذ ايامه الاولى؟ سيكون من الجيد لو وضحت هذه النقطة لانها مسالة مهمة جدا و حصلت في فترة لا توجد حولها معلومات كثيرة رغم كل الجهود التي بذلت للوصول لمثل هذه المعلومات. مجددا، اتمنى ان توضح هذه النقطة، على فرض ان ما تقوله صحيح و قد حصل فعلا، رغم تحفضاتي على كثير من المعلومات التي ذكرتها.
|
|
|
نفس الشيئ كما مع اي قرض اخر سواءا اخذته من منصة تبادل، بنك او شخص يقدم هذه الخدمة. مثلا، عندما تقدم طلب قرض من احد البنوك فانهم يطلبون منك ضمانا قبل الموافقة على طلب القرض. عادة الضمان يجب ان تكون قيمته اكبر بنسبة معينة من قيمة المبلغ المقترض. مثلا في حالة البنوك، يكون القرض عبارة عن مبلغ مالي و الضمان يكون شيئ تمتلكه مثل سيارة، قطعة ارض، منزل.. تكون قيمته اعلى من قيمة القرض. في هذه الحالة، لماذا لا تقوم ببيع ما تعتزم ان تقدمه كضمان و تستخدم ثمنه في اي غرض تحتاجه و لاجله قمت بطلب القرض! تفسير الاخ kavelj في الاعلى صحيح و ارجو ان المثال الذي اعطيتك اياه يجيب ايضا على تساؤلك.
|
|
|
مجهود اكثر من رائع اخي يحيى و اشجعك على مواصلة القيام بمثل هذه المبادرات. كذلك، لا يمكن ان افوت الفرصة بدون شكر الاخ NotATether على مساهمته في تحميل الاضافة على متجر كروم. بالمناسبة، اتمنى ان يصبح نشطا مجددا في القسم العربي.
شخصيا، لست من محبي الاضافات لانني استعمل جهاز ذو مواصفات متواضعة و اي اضافة، مهما كانت بسيطة، يمكن ان تجعله بطيئا جدا بشكل مزعج. لكن اعي جيدا قيمة هذه الاضافات و ما توفره من سهولة للتعامل مع المنتدى. اتمنى ان يقوم مدير المنتدى بالتعديل على المنتدى لاضافة بعض الخاصيات التي توفرها هذه الاضافات حتى يمكننا الاستفادة منها دون الحاجة لتحميل اي برامج او اضافات خارجية.
|
|
|
?? ساناقش كل نقطة من النقاط التي تطرقك اليها باكثر تفاصيل. اعطني بعض الوقت
|
|
|
Why is it only applied on accounts that have not completed kyc?
Very good point! In the email they sent to their customers (obviously, only the owners of dormant accounts), they claim that they are enforcing KYC and adding this measure for security reasons. This is quite interesting, because how would this make those dormant accounts more secure and why ate already verified accounts considered more secure? I can think of of just one logical explanation which is when there is a dispute over the ownership of an old account. In this case, they have no reliable way to verify who is the real owner if that person didn’t pass kyc.
|
|
|
I like to think of mine as money spent on having fun, and just like having fun the benefit is usually the experience you get from it.
Couldn’t agree more! Thinking of money spent on gambling as lost money (even if you don’t really mind losing it) is the wrong mindset. It’s not lost money, rather, it’s money you spent in exchange for something else you need more, which is having fun. The moment you start thinking of money spent on gambling the way you think of money spent on any other activity or service is the moment you will start enjoying gambling and you won’t get depressed when you lose. Well... no need to make it too complicated, just "gamble what you can afford to lose".
|
|
|
Thank you for pointing that out, logfiles. At least now we know which game this user has played and we don’t need to make replies based on guesses. After all, there aren’t many games on which you can apply the fibonacci strategy. Still, without knowing the base bet, although we know the losing odds (1%), we can’t calculate the length of his losing streak. So, we can’t say if it’s reasonable or not. In any case, he needs to understand that those strategies (fibonacci, martingale...) do not work. This has been discussed multiple times and all he needs to do is to look for topics where this has been discussed to better understand why those strategies can’t hep you beat the house.
|
|
|
You apparently don't understand that I was ignored and that's why I created the topic. I've already sent them all the necessary documents. By the way, what proofs are you talking about?
So, you are saying they replied to you just because you created this topic? If you can prove that, then that would be really interesting! Based on previous similar cases, the best you can hope for is that they would allow you to withdraw your initial or your latest deposit. Unfortunately, it’s a bit hard to prove you didn’t do any of the things they are accusing you of. But since you still can access your account, then I suggest trying to document everything, especially the history of your sports bets..
|
|
|
lol at the end I tried and lost 200USDT in less than 5 minutes, the chances of loss were 1%. Very suspicious at the first try...
Without knowing your base bet, it’s almost impossible to calculate the chances/odds of losing that much. Can you tell us what was the base bet and which game you played? You asked whether it was okay to apply certain strategies but you didn’t wait to get an answer and decided to do it anyway (without even knowing if it was allowed)! By the way, you could have got the answer to your question by simply reading the ToS (which is highly recommended) or by asking customer support.
|
|
|
Since it’s not your wallet, my advice, as c50lc suggested above, is to not waste your time trying to brute force it. You will just waste your time and energy. If it were a bip-39 seed, or if you at least knew the derivation path, then brute-forcing three missing words seed could be fairly feasible. But without those information, the number of possibilities increases exponentially. You know one of the addresses and that’s a good start, but if it’s not among the first derived addresses, this information becomes worthless. It’s not your wallet, so don’t waste your time trying to brute force it. Just friendly advice.
|
|
|
...
That would make your wallet a bit more secure but it doesn’t make it as safe as a fully air-gapped wallet. The moment you connect your wallet to the internet, even for just a few seconds, you can no longer call it air-gapped. Still, what you are doing can be considered a good practice since you use that device only to make transactions and never to browse the internet. This way, you are avoid clicking on phishing links or being directly targeted by cyber-criminals. What I suggest is to turn that device into a fully air-gapped one and use it only to sign transactions offline.
|
|
|
After reviewing player feedback and analyzing performance, we’ve decided to remove some of the original in-house games and instead focus on keeping only the most reliable and trusted providers.
I believe it would be good if you told us the exact reason why you removed those games, just for the sake of transparency. And if I remember correctly ( and please correct me if I’m wrong), there was just one in-house game on your casino. As you said, practically all casinos offer games from the same providers. So, other than the way you treat your customers (which is of course a very important thing), original games are one of the things that make a casino stand out from its competitors. So, you should probably reconsider your decision and add those games back after you fix whatever bugs/glitches they may have.
|
|
|
I visited the link you provided, but for some reason the Play button on that page does not work. If I click on it, it redirects me to the Telegram app, but it says “username not found”. So I couldn’t access the mini app from there. Could this be due to an issue with the referral code? Anyway, I accessed the app from the link shared above and the game is quite fun. You can use the earned tokens to play the listed games (and you can increase your earning by completing some easy tasks). My question is, is it possible to convert or exchange those tokens for other cryptocurrencies, or is this option not available yet?
|
|
|
A friendly advice to PapaBet OR, as an official representative, you should never take things personally. I sensed some tension in your replies and, to be honest, that doesn’t look very professional. Even if a user hasn’t made a deposit on your casino, he still have the right to ask questions and share his concerns here. If you are confident in the quality of your services, such comments shouldn’t make you angry, and you should be able to address them calmly and professionally. Again, this is just a friendly advice and you are free to do whatever you like.
|
|
|
but it kinda does works like that, the luck that got you that long winning streak is going to end at some point, and the house edge will start eating your balance. If it’s a luck-based game, then no one can predict the outcome of the next bet. Each bet is independent of the previous one, so there is a chance that each bet could be a winning one indefinitely. Again, this would be true, although improbable, if the game is completely fair and based purely on luck. i think that's some kind of gamblers fallacy… i mean, if you are playing a luck based game like plinko, it's you vs the casino bankroll. so when you win, the casino loses, and when you lose, the casino wins. other players winning/lossing have zero effect on you.
Yes, you are correct. Other players’ bets have zero effect on your own bets, just like your previous bet has no effect on your next bet.
|
|
|
|