|
Well, this is much tighter game than I expected. I can't see the Dolphins winning this one, but their defense is doing much better containing the Bills than I would have thought. Most of use picked the Bills on the pool, only three chose Miami to cover the spread... There's still half a game left to play, so, we'll see what the second half has in store.
|
|
|
|
LFC_Bitcoin wins the 2nd week; not bad for a guy who probably can't name a single player in the league  Are there many that can? Hey now, there are plenty of Americans on this board. But most of them probably still don't know who Lionel Messi is.  I happen to know there are at least a couple of guys from Europe who frequent this forum and are quite astute when it comes to football.
Week three coming up, and yet again we have some very lopsided spreads. Dolphins at Buffalo, Packers at Cleveland, and Saints at Seattle. I'm also starting to distrust the really small spreads, they can be just as misleading. |
|
|
|
I have no idea how you came up with that address.
It's on the account's profile page. There is no explanation required because its exceedingly obvious what happened. Frankly I just wonder why they thought they were going to get away with it.
The new owner is getting away with it. Odds are Carollzinha isn't going to dump him for that tag, nor for spamming shitposts. He may never be accepted into another sig campaign, but as long as he's getting a few sats from the stake campaign, he probably doesn't care. |
|
|
|
First, I’m not making up any story.
First off, made up story or not, you're an utter fool if you think anyone is going to hand over $6.5 million to a complete stranger, a new acquaintance, or even longtime friend without a proven track record. Vod is asking you to show proof of previous experience. Without it, I can think of a million things I'd rather do with my money than hand it over to someone who's dream is to make himself rich by risking other people's money. Flip the tables, and think this through... Here's some more advice; don't be a retard. Digging your heals into retardation won't change how foolish of a request this is, and I've seen some doozies during my time here. They don't end well for the retards. If you care about your account, lock or delete that retarded thread you posted in the lending board. The old guard don't take kindly to newbies asking for $65 without collateral, let alone $6.5 million. It's up to you but if you don't take my advice, someone will surely come along and "spice things up" on your trust page. |
|
|
|
|
1. MIA
2. BUF
3. Touchdown
4. Yes
5. Under
6. Yes
7. Yes
8. 1st
9. Under
10. BUF
|
|
|
|
I needed the loan last week. I ended up selling my iphone for much less then I should of to get the money together on short notice. I no longer need the loan. you can close this thread if you like. I never wanted to buy trust, I never wanted to scam anyone.. honestly ive never ripped anyone off in my life, but I have been myself ripped off and scammed many times. I know what it feels like and I am not that person. mark my account with negative trust if you like to prevent me from scamming anyone in the future if it makes you all feel better. I know its rare in this space to encounter honest people.. and that is precisely the reason I am no longer active in this space.
I know my account was started in 2013 but I first bought bitcoin in late 2010 I saw the first silkroad I watched the energy around blockchain technology shift and the scammers and charlatans flock in and ruin it all. I bought my first bitcoin from a miner via paypal. mtgox was the only exchange, there was a way to buy bitcoin on this game called secondlife where you would exchange the in game currency (Linden dollars) for Bitcoin But I could never work out how to do it. Back then Crypto was mostly Silver stackers, libertarians and privacy and tech enthusiasts. Now its just scammers, its like a big shitty casino and I hate it. and that's why my account isn't active because I have nothing to contribute I have no reason to be here and I have nothing to add to the conversation.
But lets be clear. I have never and will never scam anyone. and every crypto project I ever supported I wholeheartedly believed in. End of story.
There are plenty of good people still involved in bitcoin, and plenty of reasons to remain or get involved. You can still learn and contribute to the growth of bitcoin, and it doesn't require that you remain active on the forum to do so. Yes, there are lots of scammers, which is why you've been questioned this way for your request. Anyway, you have to lock this thread yourself, the link is on the bottom left hand side of this page. It's only visible to you since you're the one who created the thread. |
|
|
|
Why didn't we do this this year, or dd ya'll and not invite me?!
We're doing it and I invited you like three times! Check your PMs. Yeah I like the Lions over the Bears simply because I'm a bears fan and until we get a good qb and prove it, I always expect a 6-8 win season. Show me otherwise mfrs. ughhh.
That must have been tough to watch. I was thinking the Bears would keep it close, but 31 points doesn't qualify as close, not even in hand grenades or horse shoes. 31 points is like a combined score prediction!  the yellow cap will be mine.
This is football, not Fußball.  |
|
|
|
|
1. Be marcotheminer
2. Sell accounts
3. Watch as those accounts scam other members of the community
4. Be implicated through blockchain connections
5. Deny all responsibility and accountability
6. No more profit
|
|
|
|
|
This weekend has some tough picks, at least for me.
The Ravens are favored by a whopping 12 points over the Browns. The Ravens are a powerhouse, but the Browns held their own against the Bangles last week. The Browns always seem to show up when playing the Ravens because, well, if you know you know. Then there's the defensive collapse of the Ravens in the second half of their game against the Bills. I hate large spreads, they're always misleading and there's way too much parity in the NFL.
The other one is the Lions over the Bears by 5. Again, on paper the Lions should walk away with it, but they looked horrible last week, and Bears didn't.
I don't know, maybe I'm over thinking it. I should just flip a coin like suchmoon apparently does.
|
|
|
|
|
The upset I'm expecting this week is Bears over Detroit. The other one; the Niners are still favored over the Saints in New Orleans, even though Brock Purdy and George Kittle are out. That could turn into an upset, but I hope I'm wrong.
I'm struggling with the Browns at Ravens game on the pick-em pool. Not because I think the Browns are going to win, but I don't know if the Ravens are going to cover +11.5. I hate big spreads like that, they scare me. The Ravens are a dominant team in NFL terms, but very few games are out right blow outs like that.
|
|
|
|
~
Ah, yes. I knew there was something familiar about this gaggle of trolls who just popped up. To answer your question: Fuck off, there's nothing you can do to get a loan without collateral. |
|
|
|
They don't like newbies on this site, they think we're all scammers.
We were all newbies on this site, once upon a time. The difference between those who become members of the community and those who get ridiculed usually comes down to why they're here to begin with. If you come hear to learn, ask pertinent questions, share knowledge, or contribute to meaningful discussions you'll be welcomed by many. If you come here looking for handouts, or money "up front," you'll be labeled a scammer because, well, that's what scammers do. |
|
|
|
Shit happens bro, all good. If my claim goes through for him I’ll give him back. I will just need Nico and King Henry in return 😎
Will you settle for Ray Davis? |
|
|
|
|
I made a bone headed mistake with my last trade. I dropped Keon Coleman, when I meant to drop Khalil Shakir. Coleman clears waivers on Wednesday and I want him back, nobody grab him please. You guys are all stacked on WRs anyway, so show a little kindness for the village idiot.
|
|
|
|
I have to assume he is dead. The far left need reigning in, they are violent and unhinged. Something has to be done.
Although I consider myself conservative well right of center I never liked Charlie Kirk's message. I agreed with him on principal on many subjects, but he always struck me as "controlled opposition." A paid influencer who's job was to unironically further the divide between the "left" and "right." Keeping the masses bickering about nonsense while his benefactors screw us all, regardless of our political affiliation. We're occupied arguing with him about transgenderism, meanwhile our children are still paying for their worthless educations, unable to find meaningful work, struggling to pay rent, and have abandoned the dream of ever owning a home. And neither political party is interested in fixing any of that, because both Democrats and Republicans would essentially be biting the hand that feeds them. |
|
|
|
But I have had several loans on here and every single one has always been paid; with excess fees if it was late.
In light of what transpired after the last loan I gave you, I would not have given it to you if I knew then what I know now. Even if you aren't the same person behind the 2double0 account who defaulted, or the StedSM account who defaulted, there's blockchain evidence linking you to those accounts. I suspect there is a possibility you are not the same biological entity, but rather you sold those accounts to scammers. That doesn't absolve you of anything because you facilitated scams. You are keeping your involvement a secret because regardless of how you were involved, it's untrustworthy behavior. Loan defaulter or not, you've made your bed and now you'll have to lay in it. |
|
|
|
also who are you the tell me i'm wasting my time by playing video games
They guy who's tired of you begging for money. everyone has a hobby of their own no ? or are you that superior ?
I have hobbies, expensive ones. Motorcycles, mountain bikes, hunting, 4x4s, computers... You know how I got all that shit? Working. You know how I didn't get any of that shit? Playing video games and begging for money on the internet. |
|
|
|
Awhile back, when I was very active, I would have given you a negative for trust mining, AKA buying trust. Most users, (if not all), that buy trust are planning to scam. Maybe I need to be more active.
I had the same reaction as you to that post, but I gave the guy the benefit of the doubt (for now.) He's been relatively inactive for longer than I've been around, so maybe he's just not hip the contemporary cultural norms of the forum. Either way, I'm still not convinced the account wasn't hacked or sold, so I feel a neutral tag is warranted. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
