Technocracy with heavy favor towards automation ~= socialism. Start with government to prove a mostly automated front-end and then expand from there. Automation may be more expensive in the short term, but overall, it's a valuable investment. The only hitch is the government "automation" probably should be open source so the people can vote on the "changes" in the code of law. Once we automate government in this way, we can automate industry similar. This way, as an individual, if you want change in a product, you just fork the automation framework to create your own version.  |
|
|
|
https://apnews.com/71d38227507640e796d0db0b9256f038Fake charges. I can't believe the right would use a paid actor to accuse an innocent individual. Absolutely disgusting behavior playing faux victims. There's a reason he's not investigation; there's tapes. Rofl. You have serious problems with logic and reading comprehension. "A spokeswoman for the district attorney would not say why prosecutors declined to take the case from Los Angeles police. Documents supporting the decision were not released because the case was referred to the city attorney and was still under investigation. The city attorney’s office will review the case, a spokesman said." The charges aren't fake, they are being referred to another jurisdiction. As your source clearly states it is still under investigation. Ahaha. The charges were dropped in LA. Now the case will probably pick up somewhere else when his law firm sues some poor Estonian actress who was paid off. The problem is the sheep are too blind to follow this ruthless attack by CONSERVATIVES and their like. When justice prevails, which I think it will, we'll see that this was a whole setup by a certain group who wanted to have the "actress girlfriend" make a scene "for a movie". I'm willing to guess the charges were submitted entirely falsify ("i didn't actually report him, wtf - actress!!!"). The lawsuit will go to find out who actually reported and will lead nowhere, thanks "government". Woo! Wanna take bets on how it'll play out?? Cause so far, I'm up a ton on predicting "eventualities" of events from GOP operations. Take a look at Mueller's "setup". Rofl. I think TMZ is going to have to issue a direct retraction "these events were fake" somewhere eventually. The lawsuit won't really go anywhere, but he'll be proven innocent. CONSPITARDS a decade from now will find this and use it AS ABSOLUTE PROOF he's gulity of a crime, because he was charged with the crime. People like TECSHARE throw out "HE'S GUILTY BECAUSE THEY'RE MOVING THE CASE SOMEWHERE ELSE" when the article clearly states he's not being tried by them. If you look at his side at this point in history, he knows there's tapes that disprove the "supposed" incidence, and the cops seized the tapes; he wants the tapes out in the public ASAP to show he's entirely innocent from this accusation. At this point, we're just waiting for that evidence to become public record to "definitely prove" that the accusations are FABRICATED. |
|
|
|
Trump is as dumb as a bag of rocks but what about the rest of the world, why the fuck are they not sanctioning MBS.
Canada (PM Trudeau) for example said the exact same thing Trump did, "we have a 15 billion dollar light armour vehicle deal with Saudi Arabia so we have to be careful"
Lets at least be realistic Saudi Arabia can pretty much do what they want because the world hates Iran more, sells them arms and buys their oil!
If the world stood up to nations bullying coughexe cutingcough their journalist, about half the world's trade would stop.
|
|
|
|
am just trying to understand why some people in society are still skeptical about climate change even though there are scientific proof.
Pretty much anyone arguing against climate change has investments in accelerating change. That's pretty much the only logical conclusion to why people overwhelming deny the actual, scientific, peer reviewed information. |
|
|
|
https://apnews.com/71d38227507640e796d0db0b9256f038Fake charges. I can't believe the right would use a paid actor to accuse an innocent individual. Absolutely disgusting behavior playing faux victims. There's a reason he's not investigation; there's tapes. Rofl.
|
|
|
|
I've had plenty. I've said nothing incorrect. We are disagreeing on something very fundamental, and I'm not sure why. I don't think you're reading my links or responses which is the problem. You're saying 'OH NO! PRESSURE == BAD NO MATTER WHAT' and I'm trying to tell you; the way hydrogen escapes mitigates those risks. 'BUT LE PRESSURE = BADDDDD' -- wtf, listen to me.... HYDROGEN PROPERTIES MITIGATE RISKS BETTER THAN OTHER CHEMICALS. 'BUT THEY'RE ALL THE SAMEEEEEEEE' wtf... i give up with you. |
|
|
|
Look up hydrogen explosions; find me a link that shows compressed hydrogen exploding similar to LNG or other more dangerous things like gasoline. You can't because it simply doesn't work that way
It doesn't matter if its hydrogen or nitrogen, or metal ball bearings. Pressure is pressure. Its not a matter of it being hydrogen, its a matter of hydrogen fuel requiring a highly pressurized container. If structural damage occurs to a highly pressurized container, explosive decompression occurs. The water heater video from Mythbusters is just pressurized water, yet it still explodes when the pressure goes higher than what the container can handle. *facepalms* I just don't know what to tell you. You need to take a physics class mate. |
|
|
|
Each chemical escapes different. Each compound has different amounts of volumes. It's not just 'OH! LOOK DANGEROUS COMPRESSION ALL EXPLODES DA SAME, HERP DERP'
You need to stop the false equivalency and irrelevancy.
Lets take a step back and make sure there are no misunderstandings here. Cars use the chemical potential energy from the combustion of gasoline to create kinetic energy for the car to move. The whole point of a fuel source, is to convert potential energy into kinetic energy. There is chemical potential energy, pneumatic potential energy, electrical potential energy, etc. To make Hydrogen a feasible fuel source, it needs to be compressed and kept under high pressure. That means you need to keep a pressurized fuel source in your vehicle in order to use hydrogen as fuel. As a basic principal, the pressurized fuel will have two energy components to it. 1) The potential energy from the pressurized tank, and 2) the chemical potential energy from the fuel. We are saying that the potential energy just from the pressure is a hazard when you start applying potential structural damage, such as car accidents. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGWmONHipVoLook up hydrogen explosions; find me a link that shows compressed hydrogen exploding similar to LNG or other more dangerous things like gasoline. You can't because it simply doesn't work that way. Hydrogen just doesn't explode the same way that OTHER high pressure gases explode. They're not even remotely relevant here, but people are so stupid they can't seem to separate the concept of 'UNIQUE AND DIFFERENT GASES'. |
|
|
|
10000 PSI of the chemical matter actually really matters when you shoot the tank.
You literally cannot say "10000 psi tank of whatever == the same no matter what".
The false equivalency is just unwarranted fear mongering.
PSI is a measure of force per unit area. 10,000 PSI of air and 10,000 PSI of nitroglycerin have the same potential energy from the pressure. There is additional chemical energy, but we are just talking about the pressure. Each chemical escapes different. Each compound has different amounts of volumes. It's not just 'OH! LOOK DANGEROUS COMPRESSION ALL EXPLODES DA SAME, HERP DERP' You need to stop the false equivalency and irrelevancy. |
|
|
|
I like how all of a sudden, idiots think nitrogen is the exact same chemical as hydrogen.
Let's base all the fears of previous gas failures on hydrogen because there's other gases that had what feasibly could be similar issues.
So much misguided fear in today's society; such sad.
I used nitrogen as an example in my post, because its safe. My point was that a non reactive inert gas at 10,000 PSI is still a gas at 10,000 PSI. All of those movie scenes you see of people shooting bullets at car's fuel tanks and them blowing up is done with explosives, it doesn't actually work that way. If you shoot a bullet at a 10,000 PSI tank, there are going to be issues. Car crashes don't often cause fuel fires, a crash with a pressurized tank on board would probably cause the entire car to turn into shrapnel. Pressurized containers are spooky when you consider that there are potential major forces that could be applied. I don't know if a fender bender would cause your car to explode, but a highway speed crash very well could, I might need to look into that. Just imagine the consequences of keeping a scuba tank in your car with you at all times. 12 gallons of gasoline or whatever a typical car holds isn't all that dangerous. If it ignites, the car is going to be engulfed in flames. Blow a hydrogen tank, and I'd be significantly more dangerous than an IED. 10000 PSI of the chemical matter actually really matters when you shoot the tank. People aren't reading links, i'm pretty much ready to lock this shit because people are too retarded to actually LOOK at the research done with hydrogen. they broadcast their fears (thanks oil corps). It's a fucking losing battle against the morons. You literally cannot say "10000 psi tank of whatever == the same no matter what". The false equivalency is just unwarranted fear mongering. |
|
|
|
|
Ahaha, idiots think propane is hydrogen. That's great.
Jesus christ, someone needs to learn chemical elements and chemical compounds. "THESE ARE DANGEROUS CAUSE DEY SEEM SIMILAR BEING GASES"
The amount of retardation though; like no wonder the infrastructure isn't deployed with retards spreading the FUD.
|
|
|
|
It's a six pages test, a huge waste of time, I know what I am already
then don't fucking post here. this isn't a thread asking "what's your political views" but where do you fall on the political compass. Your post is spam because it's entirely off-topic, and now we've gone fucking meta on the bullshit. you're a huge waste of my time. |
|
|
|
|
I like how all of a sudden, idiots think nitrogen is the exact same chemical as hydrogen.
Let's base all the fears of previous gas failures on hydrogen because there's other gases that had what feasibly could be similar issues.
So much misguided fear in today's society; such sad.
|
|
|
|
Both these shitposters are useless ^ Damn, should have made it self-moderated.  You asked for an opinion I told mine, I am a polycentric centrist, you made a shitty thread embedding an image and you call others useless lol Rofl, I told you to take a test and post the results. you didn't. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
