[ANN] MemoryCoin | CPU Coin | Paid Dev Team | Limited Supply [MMC]

[atp1916]

When using the mmc2.0 minerd cpu miner, you *must* set your --thread parameter to a power of 2. (2,4,8,16,32 etc)

I have a dual 6c/12T xeon machine, and it would not run if i set each batch file --thread parameter to 12 to match the logical cores.

Setting it to --thread 16 per batch file worked and didnt appear to inhibit the performance of each node, even though each node was overspecced 4 threads.

[stas]

Just checked all my cpu's, they all don't support AES-NI. This coin is just only for newer CPU's. Can't afford to buy new cpu's at the moment, so it's useless to mine for me at the moment.

That's not the cause. Older CPUs will only be slower but must still be able to calculate hashes. You have some software problem or faulty hardware.

Try this:

minerd.exe --url http://work.mmcpool.com/ --user *your MMC address* --threads 4

My hardware and software is fine for other cpu mining, ie. PTS, XPM, scrypt jane, etc. This is the first time I ever had an issue cpu mining.

If you see in my older posts, I did have the cmd line done right for the bat file. Might be an issue with the bigger miners finding shares too fast for my cpu's to compete.

I use two regular PC's 2-3 years old... and they mine OK.

[seraphim_bts]

I just posted my application for CSO.
My plan is to create a team of supporters, so there's always someone available.
More info here: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=1653

[Nullu]

Seems interesting. I'll give it a go. I have an i5 3550k overclocked to 4.2ghz. Will the overclock benefit?

[atp1916]

Seems interesting. I'll give it a go. I have an i5 3550k overclocked to 4.2ghz. Will the overclock benefit?

Should benefit quite a bit.  I am not sure there are even diminished returns on more clock speed.

Here are some stats from a few of my CPUs:

Amazon cc2.8 Large
[13:45:43] Stats: 10.095 hash/min
[13:45:46] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Accepted

x5650 @3.4ghz
[07:22:29] Found solution - 11760 / 1968 / 1636249367
[07:22:33] Found share ...f51fe0ced4a01e4f: submitting
[07:22:33] Stats: 4.512 hash/min
[07:22:36] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Accepted

x2 L5639 Xeons @ 2.4ghz
[07:20:35] Found solution - 10299 / 1968 / 1324839730
[07:20:51] Stats: 3.079 hash/min

3770k @4.6ghz
[07:23:35] Found share ...1ceb46262d62062a: submitting
[07:23:35] Stats: 4.158 hash/min
[07:23:39] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Accepted

Note that the 6/12 core X5650 @ 3.4ghz is matching the 4/8 core 3770k @ 4.6ghz.

[Nullu]

Seems interesting. I'll give it a go. I have an i5 3550k overclocked to 4.2ghz. Will the overclock benefit?

Should benefit quite a bit.  I am not sure there are even diminished returns on more clock speed.

Here are some stats from a few of my CPUs:

x5650 @3.4ghz
[07:22:29] Found solution - 11760 / 1968 / 1636249367
[07:22:33] Found share ...f51fe0ced4a01e4f: submitting
[07:22:33] Stats: 4.512 hash/min
[07:22:36] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Accepted

x2 L5639 Xeons @ 2.4ghz
[07:20:35] Found solution - 10299 / 1968 / 1324839730
[07:20:51] Stats: 3.079 hash/min

3770k @4.6ghz
[07:23:35] Found share ...1ceb46262d62062a: submitting
[07:23:35] Stats: 4.158 hash/min
[07:23:39] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Accepted

Note that the 6/12 core X5650 @ 3.4ghz is matching the 4/8 core 3770k @ 4.6ghz.

Seem to be getting an average 2.0 hash/min. Does that sound right? I set Minerd to 4 threads.

[atp1916]

Seems interesting. I'll give it a go. I have an i5 3550k overclocked to 4.2ghz. Will the overclock benefit?

<<snip>>

Seem to be getting an average 2.0 hash/min. Does that sound right?

mmm that seems a tad low (just a gut feeling), i am overspeccing my --thread count due to the miner not liking non-multiple-of-2 core counts.

Ensure that there are no other "heavy" processes running in the background, like say a wallet.

I would think that 3570k @ 4.2 could break at least 3 HPM.

[seraphim_bts]

My 3570k gets around 2hpm. I think it's running at stock speed, but I can't say for sure at the moment because I'm not at home.

[atp1916]

About to add the results of a Amazon cc2.8 large instance.

[Nullu]

Seems interesting. I'll give it a go. I have an i5 3550k overclocked to 4.2ghz. Will the overclock benefit?

<<snip>>

Seem to be getting an average 2.0 hash/min. Does that sound right?

mmm that seems a tad low (just a gut feeling), i am overspeccing my --thread count due to the miner not liking non-multiple-of-2 core counts.

Ensure that there are no other "heavy" processes running in the background, like say a wallet.

I would think that 3570k @ 4.2 could break at least 3 HPM.

Got nothing else running that appears to be taking up any cycles. If it is low, I'm not sure what else it could be.

[seraphim_bts]

Seems interesting. I'll give it a go. I have an i5 3550k overclocked to 4.2ghz. Will the overclock benefit?

<<snip>>

Seem to be getting an average 2.0 hash/min. Does that sound right?

mmm that seems a tad low (just a gut feeling), i am overspeccing my --thread count due to the miner not liking non-multiple-of-2 core counts.

Ensure that there are no other "heavy" processes running in the background, like say a wallet.

I would think that 3570k @ 4.2 could break at least 3 HPM.

Got nothing else running that appears to be taking up any cycles. If it is low, I'm not sure what else it could be.

It's not low.

[atp1916]

And the Amazon ec2 cc2.8 Large

[13:45:43] Stats: 10.095 hash/min
[13:45:46] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Accepted

Not bad.

[Nullu]

Seems interesting. I'll give it a go. I have an i5 3550k overclocked to 4.2ghz. Will the overclock benefit?

<<snip>>

Seem to be getting an average 2.0 hash/min. Does that sound right?

mmm that seems a tad low (just a gut feeling), i am overspeccing my --thread count due to the miner not liking non-multiple-of-2 core counts.

Ensure that there are no other "heavy" processes running in the background, like say a wallet.

I would think that 3570k @ 4.2 could break at least 3 HPM.

Got nothing else running that appears to be taking up any cycles. If it is low, I'm not sure what else it could be.

It's not low.

Ah ok. I'm used to khash rates.

[aorith]

I got a 3570k @ 4.4GHz = 2.36hpm

[atp1916]

wow, HT makes that much of a difference? 

[kbhutto]

And the Amazon ec2 cc2.8 Large

[13:45:43] Stats: 10.095 hash/min
[13:45:46] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Accepted

Not bad.

$2.400 per Hour???

[atp1916]

And the Amazon ec2 cc2.8 Large

[13:45:43] Stats: 10.095 hash/min
[13:45:46] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Accepted

Not bad.

$2.400 per Hour???

Naw, @ .456/h

[kbhutto]

And the Amazon ec2 cc2.8 Large

[13:45:43] Stats: 10.095 hash/min
[13:45:46] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Accepted

Not bad.

$2.400 per Hour???

Naw, @ .456/h

Which Instance Type? I am seeing $2.400 per Hour for On-Demand Instances.

[atp1916]

Amazon paid Spot instance, cc2.8 Large.


As a cautionary note to anyone who may even think about abusing the free $200 AWS credit using fake/temp CC numbers, don't even bother.  

Amazon considers that "deliberate" theft of service and has been sending law enforcement to peoples' doors.  


Also, 1.286k CAT coins for sale.

[superresistant]

Anyone having problem on mmcpool.com ?
All shares are refused for hours.
How to fix it ?