Latest posts of: TomiJerry

In some cases, you can agree with the administrator about deleting the signature with STAKES preservation, see also how other participants behave, but if administrators do not react at all, ask the general manager a question. But this is more like a dead project without continuation.

Many investors, in anticipation of the end of the bear market, have chosen an observant position, considering exceptional projects with minimal risks.

With the advent of a special regulatory body, fraudulent ICOs can really disappear. But this will not solve the problem completely, since any project has many obstacles to success. And what difficulties can an ICO have in the regulatory process?

The best experience consists of numerous trials and errors in real market conditions. This experience is almost impossible to extract from textbooks or trainings. Due to the errors accumulated in the memory, you analyze the maximum possible number of risks and make the right decision with minimal losses.

Increasingly, we are witnessing manipulations with the KYS procedure, which spoils the mood of the hunters, and causes some distrust. Probably, from the very beginning it makes sense to ask the manager a question in order to eliminate irritation and not waste time in vain. Now there are many similar projects, choose fair and legitimate projects.

Of course, those who are worried about their savings in times of crisis will rush to think about promising cryptocurrencies. This also applies to investors from other industries. But the opposite effect is also possible due to serious manipulations with cryptocurrency, which is caused by a general panic and is temporary.

In a bear market, even experienced investors prefer to reduce risks by investing in several carefully studied projects, mainly due to fraud.

Without a doubt, ISO is an excellent mechanism for honest and talented developers. Fraud is difficult to completely eradicate. But the crypto community will handle it in the future. And in general, the investor becomes smarter and more cautious, leaving less chances to useless and fraudulent projects.

If you devote enough time to research, it is quite possible to choose a decent honest ISO with a lively professional team, open to dialogue, with an understandable technical document, realistic plans and quite achievable goals.

Indeed, many crypto enthusiasts are tired of waiting for the bull market. But, nevertheless, it should be noted that the crypto potential is many times higher than the current market price, and the market is constantly actively developing. It's just that many players have already managed to get used to the best state of the market, and therefore at the moment they are experiencing discomfort. Cryptography is only gaining strength and power. And in fact there is no reason for despair.

It remains only to sympathize with all trusting enthusiasts. Fraud has risen to a new level, taking in the hands of almost all active bounty hunters. And this means that you should be as selective as possible in choosing projects and spend more time studying, so as not to be left with nothing.

A strange project is not so dangerous from the point of view of non-standard ideas and technologies, and most often because of the curvature of reality and the unobvious approach to management, as well as solving tasks, which creates the impression that their true intentions do not coincide with the stated

To participate in unpredictable projects based on the principles of anonymity, courage is not enough. Nevertheless, those who have gone through all the difficulties of this bear market can already boast of the ideas of a determined and enterprising player. What is very important for successful work in the crypto-space.

For example, if it is not possible to ask any questions personally to the organizer or the main developer, not to mention the lack of a proper open dialogue with other team members. This is enough to reflect on the legitimacy of this ICO.

For example, if it is not possible to ask any questions to the organizer or the project personally, this is already a sign, not speaking already about the lack of proper dialogue with their assistants.

Due to all the difficulties of the market, it has become extremely difficult to discern an interesting promising project from the crowd. Either the project is already a copy of the already existing one, or the organizers hide the true intentions. And behind the innovative idea is either just a collection of money, or fraud. ICO needs updates

This bear market has really tested many players for strength. Lovers of easy money are gone, most projects with inefficient and unnecessary ideas are also excluded. Thus, the market is a little cleared of debris before starting a new take-off.

If you are deceived, then in no case do not despair and next time devote more time to research. And if you have any doubts about the project, turn your attention to another project. Try to personally communicate with the organizer. Truly legitimate and worthy projects, as a rule, are led by people who are open to constructive dialogue and do not hide their true intentions.