1
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN]FantasyGold[FGC] Working Platform- Fantasy Sports & LIVE Vegas eSports- MNs
|
on: September 27, 2018, 10:16:23 PM
|
CoinNLD always posts this crap when the price runs up a few % so he can scare people into mass selling and knock the price back down so he can buy it back cheaper. Rinse and repeat.
That is realy not my strategy. I'm sorry to hear that my posts get you emotional. The volume is simply to low. The good news brings a nice pump but market is not ready to get bullish. This is a nice pump for masternode holders to sell some coins that have been saved. BTC needs to brake old high before altoin marked to become more alive again. Price dynamics showcases the signs of a typical doom pattern. It wont be long till severe economic slump knocks out this space, and before it happened u better dump ur crypto and switch to trading sriracha sauce on a local online marketplace built by ur neighbor. Sometimes typicality of thinking and negligence I see in other peoples behavior makes me want to kill them. Probably nothing unreasonable about thinking that bitcoin needs another bull run before alts will pick up in general. But that being said, I personally think that FGC has a lot going for it, especially with Topia coming up (which should help volume issues). Obviously the fantasy-crypto hybrid space is starting to get crowded, but this team has shown a lot of dedication.
|
|
|
2
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN]FantasyGold[FGC] Working Platform- Fantasy Sports & LIVE Vegas eSports- MNs
|
on: September 21, 2018, 02:43:34 PM
|
ANNOUNCEMENT:
Dear Community as you know we have been attempting to raise the remaining funds for Cryptopia through a raffle. We want to thank everyone for participating, we came a little short of the 1.70 BTC goal. With that being said we have secured the remaining funds to proceed and list on Cryptopia.
(So Cryptopia here we come, go Fantasy Gold FGC!)
That's pretty awesome, congrats! For whatever reason Cryptopia has become a key stepping stone for most new coins. It's a shame they have such a monopoly, but I'm glad y'all got listed.
|
|
|
4
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Ravencoin [RVN] PoW GPU Mining | Asset Transfer Blockchain (Updated ANN)
|
on: August 31, 2018, 12:52:59 AM
|
This asset can change the world and will help all people become more free and more useful. I believe on this and want to be a part of this.
How can Ravencoin help all people become more free and more useful I'm eager to understand your point. I like that it's not premined like bitcoin so it has the nature of decentralization. hmm, I'm kinda curious too Yeah it's kind of a vague platitude. But I agree the lack of a pre-mine is a plus point. But ultimately, regardless of how much the Overstock CEO loves it, the coin's going to need one unifying vision. Is it trying to replace bitcoin?
|
|
|
7
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Transend Coin | Xevan | POW | MN | Decentralised exchange | 2.0 topic ver.
|
on: April 23, 2018, 08:30:32 PM
|
Hummm I mined this coin for over one month. Too many troubles. Always team making promises!
It's just a fork from Solaris. POS never worked. I guess know that solaris fixed the POS problem TSC will make work. But too late. They keep saying about kucoin. they just have one Exchange and there is basically zero volume
Superblocks they claim it's for miners but actually MN gets a HUGE chunk I don't get it superblocks would not be just for MINERS??? Pool is centralized it's just one
This coin has no value
So far terrible project
You are entitled to your opinion of course, and you may end up being right. But just to be fair: Every coin is "just a fork" of something. At least the Transend roadmap is more tangible than the MN coins saying they will "be a store of value" and a "medium of exchange". Also, I'm excited to see where supernodes takes us. If supernodes don't work, then yes you will have a valid criticism. What does "PoS never worked" mean? I don't recall PoS being promised as an immediate implementation, I recall it being something planned for down the road. You can't criticize the absence of features that are supposed to be absent until later. You know what else doesn't have working PoS? Ethereum. You know why that's a stupid comment? Because no one expects Ethereum to have PoS TODAY. Where do you see the claim that superblocks should "just" be for miners? Again, you're inventing features you want Transend to have, and then criticizing it for not having them. Pool centralization is a problem, I agree with this. Devs need to raise the official pool fee to encourage miners to seek other pools. Feel free to sell your Transend now. The team claims that KuCoin listing is paid and forthcoming. I can't verify the truth of that because I am not on the team. But I'm willing to take the risk (it's a big risk, but I'll put in 1-2 weeks of mining for this kind of upside). Buddy about POS I am not inventing we had 5 UPDATES trying to run the POS and until today nothing. I think you need to follow close the project. You are missing some facts. I wanna sell my coins but nobody wants to buy so how can I do? Do you wanna buy for 0.000058 satoshi let me know I can put on the octaex so you can buy!! it's around 2500 coins Also about the SUPERBLOCKS JUST LOOK TO THE TOP OF THE PAGE MAN SUPERBLOCKS Speacil Reward system for dedicated miners - 1000 TSC So this is not true rewards are lower than 700 TSC for miners it's just a regular block with more rewards for EVERYONE include dev and MN. I don't like this actually!! I am here just saying what I am seeing so far in this project in 2 months. Even once the chain was stuck for 12 hours and the dev was offline team did not know how to fix that. So good luck for us!!! YEAHHH I'll take your word for the PoS thing and withdraw my comment if what you say is true. However, I hardly see the absence of PoS as some kind of critical failing. This is what, less than 2 months old? Waiting 2 months for PoS is a bad thing? About superblocks, your point is still wrong. The superblock system still rewards miners. The fact that is ALSO rewards masternodes does not mean it somehow DOESN'T reward miners. The fact that something went wrong when the dev was offline and the team didn't know how to fix - yes, the fact that there was a software glitch isnt great. But I'll say again it's only a 2-month-old project. It's not like there's a ton of other stuff you could have mined for 2 months and made yourself into a millionaire by now. This next part isn't directed at mtx_demon specifically: if you want to mine and dump to make some good one-month profits, Transend isn't for you, for all of the reasons mtx_demon described. If you want to mine to take a big risk on a huge upside over all of 2018 and 2019, then step right up. And where is new ccminer for xevan?)
Yeah I'm pretty interested in this too, can't wait!
|
|
|
8
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Transend Coin | Xevan | POW | MN | Decentralised exchange | 2.0 topic ver.
|
on: April 23, 2018, 06:35:11 PM
|
Hummm I mined this coin for over one month. Too many troubles. Always team making promises!
It's just a fork from Solaris. POS never worked. I guess know that solaris fixed the POS problem TSC will make work. But too late. They keep saying about kucoin. they just have one Exchange and there is basically zero volume
Superblocks they claim it's for miners but actually MN gets a HUGE chunk I don't get it superblocks would not be just for MINERS??? Pool is centralized it's just one
This coin has no value
So far terrible project
You are entitled to your opinion of course, and you may end up being right. But just to be fair: Every coin is "just a fork" of something. At least the Transend roadmap is more tangible than the MN coins saying they will "be a store of value" and a "medium of exchange". Also, I'm excited to see where supernodes takes us. If supernodes don't work, then yes you will have a valid criticism. What does "PoS never worked" mean? I don't recall PoS being promised as an immediate implementation, I recall it being something planned for down the road. You can't criticize the absence of features that are supposed to be absent until later. You know what else doesn't have working PoS? Ethereum. You know why that's a stupid comment? Because no one expects Ethereum to have PoS TODAY. Where do you see the claim that superblocks should "just" be for miners? Again, you're inventing features you want Transend to have, and then criticizing it for not having them. Pool centralization is a problem, I agree with this. Devs need to raise the official pool fee to encourage miners to seek other pools. Feel free to sell your Transend now. The team claims that KuCoin listing is paid and forthcoming. I can't verify the truth of that because I am not on the team. But I'm willing to take the risk (it's a big risk, but I'll put in 1-2 weeks of mining for this kind of upside).
|
|
|
17
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Pigeoncoin (PGN) – a cryptocurrency network with a new X16S (shuffle) algo
|
on: March 30, 2018, 03:17:19 AM
|
A reminder for those that don't read all pages: the ANN itself says this: On day five, I asked our group of twelve to start onboarding more miners... For 5 days, it was mined by only 12 people. These 12 are going to get rich from your buys. I like how people these days get out of admitting there was a pre-mine. Sometimes it is "oh we were just testing network". But this is a new one: "oh I was mining with 11 friends, so it is not a pre-mine". If the 12 founders think I'm just being a troll, how about you actually either (1) explain why letting 12 people "early mine" makes for a fair launch, or (2) actually make it fair by burning everything you mined in the first 5 days? If your answer to (1) is "we posted a discord link in one place, anyone could have joined (even though only like 100 people look at the place we posted the link)", try again. ALSO: The next day, last night, a GPU randowhale nearly burned down the network. The difficulty on your network adjusts REALLY slow. How many blocks did this "randowhale" take? 3000? 5000? Why shouldn't investors be *TERRIFIED* of this guy dumping? This is the REASON every coin should make a fair launch: if the network had been public from the start, your CPU hash would have been a lot higher than 20 MH, and other people would have been working on a public GPU miner sooner. EDIT: More math: Blocktime is 1 min = 1440 blocks/day. Yet at the time of this ANN, over 23,000 blocks were gone. So no, it wasn't just a "six day premine". 16 days' worth of blocks were taken in those 6 days (because of how slo your difficulty moves).
|
|
|
20
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Pigeoncoin (PGN) – a cryptocurrency network with a new X16S (shuffle) algo
|
on: March 29, 2018, 06:22:08 AM
|
The lack of a fair launch is troubling. 5 friends from discord getting together on a channel that no one has any way of finding and calling it "public" does not make a fair launch. Maybe someone can make a x16s fork called "Hawkcoin", make an ANN FIRST, NOT LAST and set a 48-hour countdown to launch? Edit: you gotta love this gem from the ANN: On day five, I asked our group of twelve to start onboarding more miners... Admits that for 5 days, no attempt was made to grow beyond 12 people. Please, please read that again: TWELVE PEOPLE WERE THE ONLY ONES MINING FOR 5 DAYS. These 12 are going to get rich from your buys.
|
|
|
|