|
Du hast deinen Nachnamen unten nicht ausgegraut.
|
|
|
|
Your transaction seems not to exist. https://blockchain.info/tx/14d4f66e7b5095ac808b2bab17525d9a7671d2806630fa3eee0816b70e232a49Try running bitcoind from the command line with the -rescan option. On a side note, the minimum fee is 0.0001 at the moment. Not inclucing this may result in your transaction to be delayed significantly (it may still be included eventually). https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=219504.0The default fee policy can be overridden using the -mintxfee and -minrelaytxfee
command-line options, but note that we intend to replace the hard-coded fees
with code that automatically calculates and suggests appropriate fees in the
0.9 release and note that if you set a fee policy significantly different from
the rest of the network your transactions may never confirm.
|
|
|
|
Litecoin is a miner's wet dream. No pesky ASIC miners and 8 times the coin generation of Bitcoin. Oh, and fees to dream of. Minimum fee is 0.02 LTC, though it seems not uncommon to charge more (btc-e charges 0.1 LTC). Yummy, yummy. So please, let people buy Litecoin at their hearts content.  Repeat after me ... "Litecoin is the silver to Bitcoin's gold". |
|
|
|
That's great. It's how Bitcoin spreads.  |
|
|
|
|
Thanks for linking it.
Not something we usually get to read about.
|
|
|
|
If people want to buy, let them.  In fact, Litcoin are currently generated 8 times faster than Bitcoin. Fire up those graphics cards! |
|
|
|
|
Be especially careful with scrypt-based altcoins.
Whoever creates the first ASIC für scrypt, has the option is control the blockchain.
|
|
|
|
For large amounts, you may want to be the only one with access to your coins. MtGox/Coinbase keep the coins for you and you ask them to transfer them to a wallet. You have no control over your coins. Blockchain.info does not store your private key, but rather allows you convenient handling of your wallet through the browser. Theoretically, they could alter the Javascript your browser executes and misdirect funds, for example. http://bitcoin.org/en/choose-your-wallet |
|
|
|
Which of my questions can't be answered? I think I could answer them all myself if I looked into the code.
You asked what would happen if someone didn't use the reference implementation. If someone does their own thing, only that person could tell you. The wiki says relaying uses the same rules as block inclusion. So TX that do not meet the criteria are not relayed. Miner behavior. Only the miners could tell you that. You might get answers if you post in the respective threads for the pools. Who knows, maybe they are thinking about offering services for including transactions you directly send to them. I could imagine there is going to be a market for that in the future. I wasn't aware. Have you tried "If you have questions or would like help with the process, drop by on #bitcoin-wiki on freenode IRC. Notice that the channel is not very active, so be prepared to stick around for a few hours before you get a response." |
|
|
|
Okay, what if you're not using the reference implementation? Is this a restriction on propagation, or mining, or both, or what? Are these hard limits, or are they just approximations? What specifically happens if you send a transaction without fees with an output smaller than 0.01 BTC? What if you send it to someone running a reference client? What if you send it directly to the miners? Same questions with regard to a transaction 10,000 bytes or bigger. What about the changes which are in GIT to eliminate the 0.01 BTC limit?
What about transactions which are non-standard for reasons other than fees? You can see them in the blockchain, so there must be some miners that accept them. Who accepts them? How do you get them to these miners? How much do these miners charge for them?
I could go on and on. If someone wants to get rid of that $8 fee, instead of complaining about it I'll go fix it. If someone has the power to manually put me in the "trusted" group without paying 0.01 BTC, my username on the wiki is the same as here.
Many of your questions cannot be answered. You might get more useful information if you describe what you want to do. What $8 fee? |
|
|
|
|
Very nice.
Similar operations need to happen all over the world.
|
|
|
|
So we get our cake and eat it too. As it stands in Bitcoin, we don't get cake and we don't ever eat. Cash out early before it is too late. Ooooh, now your replies make sense. Guess it's time to click that highlighted link below your name. |
|
|
|
If they don't include feeless transactions in an altcoin where the tx fee is set to 0 by the protocol, then the altcoin dies and they don't get paid perpetual coin rewards any more (worthless bits). Thus the miners of such a designed altcoin have an incentive to include every transaction, if the block size is unlimited in the mini-block chain design as I have suggested.
So you are saying you would rather have a non-decreasing block reward and no transaction fees (miners need some incentive to mine)? In other words, you would prefer every coin holder to pay for transactions, instead of the person who wants to make the transaction? Can't have your lunch and eat it, too. |
|
|
|
And if transactions fees are significant, the system is subject to the Transactions Withholding Attack.
The issue of transaction spam is really not much different than DDoS prevention. You must rate limit and you need the mini-block chain design. Indeed I am beginning to see we should eliminate the transaction fee entirely.
The fee system as as fair as it gets. If you want the miners to perform a service for you (include the transaction in the block), you pay them to do so. The fact that any miner can include any number of transactions guarantees competition and low fees for the users. It's really not rocket science. |
|
|
|
I see. At least that makes more sense.
Why would they put a global average for other currencies converted to USD? For example, that would make the average higher because China's Bitcoin price is higher than USA's.
If I'm buying something in America, I'm not buying it in China or with Yuan.
I suppose the only explanation would be that Bitcoin is a global currency and can't be separated from a single country?
You're not making much sense. It's ok, you missed the global average label. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_use_of_the_US_dollar |
|
|
|
|
Really depends on how many bitcoins you are keeping there.
If it is a couple weeks pay, then losing it will ruin your day/week, but not your life.
If it is (much) more, you might want to look into proper ways to secure it. (Armory/Electrum deterministic wallet backup printout, ...)
|
|
|
|
My main wallet is sitting on an offline linux box using Armoury . Encrypted to hell and back. For encrypted pen drives, I like using the Ironkeys. Another vote for Armory. |
|
|
|
|
Das ist die falsche Richtung. Es muss einen Grund geben, warum es schwer ist Euro nach BTC-E zu überweisen.
Ziel ist es ja die günstigen BTC von BTC-E woanders zu verkaufen.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
