Barek, das ist hier Withdrawal Baustelle. Robert666 kann sich noch nicht so klar ausdrücken.  Ah, gut, dann ist alles besser als ich befürchtet hatte. Die SEPA Überweisung sollte ja klappen. |
|
|
|
|
You realize that what you describe is an insurance provided by the credit card company?
In your scenario where BTC is widely used, such an insurance could be bought separately.
Who knows, maybe credit card companies will even offer this insurance.
|
|
|
|
Merkwürdig. Ich kann ohne Probleme Bitcoin abziehen. Trotz nicht verifiziertem Account. Halt max. 100 BTC am Tag. Oder gilt das nur für neue Accounts: BTC withdrawals sind für (dreistellige Zahl hier eintragen) Stunden gesperrt - aus "Sicherheitsgründen" *hust hust*
Es kommt drauf an, wie man die BTC erworben hat. Wenn das aus einer SEPA Überweisung ohne Legitimation kommt, dann gibt es wohl eine 30 Tage Sperre. Changing/resetting the password, changing of the e-mail. For the purpose of security. Hold up to 3 days. It cannot be removed.
Depositing money from the payment systems with a high fraud activity. Hold from 1 to 7 days. It cannot be removed.
Depositing money through the wire transfer. The time of the hold is from 1 month. It can be removed by providing your IDs through the ticket.
@OP: Nach meinem Verständnis is SEPA Withdrawal unkritisch (habe ich aber selbst noch nicht gemacht), weil da ja das "Risiko" beim Empfänger liegt. |
|
|
|
|
I think your best bet is to have one ticket only and update it if you feel like you have waited too long without a reply.
Also remember there is a language barrier and their support is not necessarily fluent in English. Keep things simple, polite, and don't take offense if something is not immediately clear. A good example for a translation mistake is the "invoice of transfer". I bet it now makes sense when you think about it.
|
|
|
|
So i wired some money to mt.gox and received an email saying:
-----Your Deposit has been put on hold as a result of our confirmation process.
-----In order to finalize the transaction we require invoice of the transfer with your name and address written on the document.
No details as to what exactly the invoice is to say nor and address to send to were given, whether it needed to be from me or my bank, hard or digital copy, etc.
Several support things have been sent in which have all gone unanswered.
Is this normal behaviour? Has anyone else encountered this and if so, what did you do?
Wow, haven't read of that one. I bet they want a scan of your bank statement, which typically has your name and address on it. But don't banks only send those out once per month? Maybe you can request it from your bank for a fee? Then I would remove all irrelevant transactions and other private details. Basically, they have to make sure that the account the money comes from belongs to you. It's a money laundering issue. Future deposits from the same account should not be delayed. It would be nice if they announced that beforehand, so one could verify an account before sending and freezing money. As to where. There is a support website where I bet you can upload it. Sadly, they are not the fastest to reply. Was the chat any useful? |
|
|
|
Umtauschen hat geklappt. Eigentleich ganz leicht. Was muss bei der Überweisung auf ein Konto bei Address rein? Da wo die Bank rein physisch sich befindet, also die Anschrift? Was muss bei Description rein? :-)  Description is eine Beschreibung, die dir hilft deine Bitcoin Adresse zu identifizieren. (z.B. Mein Bitcoinkonto) Bevor du das Address Feld ausfüllen kannst, musst du dir eine Bitcoin Adresse erzeugen. Zunächst ein wenig Hintergrundinfo. Bei Bitcoin gibt es (nahezu) unendlich viele Konten. Jeder kann sich einen zufälligen Kontoschlüssel erzeugen. Wichtig ist hierbei, dass es (nahezu) unmöglich ist den Kontoschlüssel von einem bestimmten Konto zu erzeugen. Daher kannst du anderen Leute deine Kontonummer (die Bitcoin Adresse) sagen ohne, dass sie dadurch Zugang zu deinem Konto bekommen. Willst du nun Bitcoins in dein Konto übertragen, so musst du die Bitconi Adresse dazu angeben. Ganz wichtig ist, dass du deinen Schlüssel geheim hältst und gut aufbewahrst. Wird er gestohlen over verlierst du ihn, sind deine Bitcoins weg. Daher würde ich dir den Electrum Bitcoin Client empfehlen ( http://electrum.org/). Nach der Installation erstellst du eine Geldbörse (wallet). Hier werden dann die Schlüssel zu deinen Konten automatisch gespeichert. Wichtig: Ich empfehle dir den Wallet Seed ( http://electrum.org/seed.html) zu notieren. Damit kannst du die komplette Geldbörse wieder herstellen (was natürlich bedeutet, dass ein Dieb damit auch an deine Bitcoins kommt). |
|
|
|
|
Also don't forget that the Bitcoin infrastructure needs to grow. Mining hardware, exchanger permits, ATMs, .... All this takes time.
Slow and steady wins the race.
|
|
|
|
|
Also note that Namecoin's primary use is not that of a currency but rather a a decentralized generic name/value datastore system.
For example, Namecoin can be spent to register .bit domains.
|
|
|
|
|
All I'm saying is that users have no benefit of using both BTC and LTC. The only ones profiting would be exchangers.
Time will tell if it's going to be BTC or LTC (or some other virtual currency).
|
|
|
|
I'll bite, before this ends up in the Alts subforum.  The price will be determined much earlier. I still think the outcome is either much higher than now, or forgotten. Litecoin is too similar to Bitcoin. For the user, there is hardly any difference. Litecoin has higher fees (which may change) and Bitcoin has more utility. So for now, it looks more like Bitcoin will be the one to make it. |
|
|
|
|
Most (all?) exchanges take not fee in China, which makes transaction volume a poor indicator for interest.
Litecoin is highly speculative. I would not be surprised if people use it as a form of gambling.
With Bitcoin there is a long term expectation and a good number of buyers will be investors that buy once and then plan to hold for a while.
|
|
|
|
In a way, you are in the same situation now. Yes, it has gone up in value drastically, but it may also continue to go up in value drastically. Or it may fail. You should come back to the thread in a year and tell us what you ended up doing.  |
|
|
|
Another perk for the Japanese: next day withdrawals from Mt. Gox. |
|
|
|
http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/8109/how-does-one-attain-1-000-connections-like-blockchain-infoBitcoin by default will not make more than 8 outgoing connections, and -maxconnections only controls how many incoming connections you allow. Feel free to set this higher, but it will take time before others connect to you in large numbers.
Please don't change this, as there is no need. Connectable peers on the network are a scarce resource, and essential to the decentralization. If people go try connect to all of them like some sites do, we'll very quickly run out.
In case you're a merchant or miner, you perhaps want to set up a few fixed connections to trusted others (see the -addnode command line/config option), but having more connections does not mean stronger verification (the reference client always verifies everything) or even faster relaying (as you'll slow down by distributing new blocks and transactions to all your peers). It is mostly a matter of providing a server to the network.
If you are starting out from scratch, there is a torrent for a bootstrap file out there that will save you time.
|
|
|
|
|
Take a look at Armory. It acts as an extension of bitcoin-qt and has much better transaction control.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
