The Bitcoin creator was Max Keiser!
|
|
|
Regarding http://bitcoin.advmapper.com:9332/static/1: How can I tell if people are using my P2Pool node? 2: If I don't mine, is there any reason to host a P2Pool node? 3: My GetBlockTemplate latency is rarely/barely under 1 sec, even with just P2Pool and Bitcoind running. Why? CPU usage is almost nothing, disks are SSDs and there appears to be no swapping happening. 4: How do people find a P2Pool node to use, and what kinds of things helps them make the decision about which is best for them? 5: Is the P2Pool network hurting for nodes, or is there a surplus of nodes and it's just miners that are missing? 4) orphan rate and whether DOA is excessive vis-a-vis probable latencies. i used to mine at 200ms pool. with 15s share times, i'd get around 2.5-3% DOA example: p2pool.org latency isn't that bad, yet DOA far exceeds mathematical probability Mine are much lower now too out of 60 shares I have 4 orphan and 4 dead. It use to be a higher.
|
|
|
... -Once the miner is received, difficulty increases 1.5 billion each week (meaning a mining farm approximately the size of KnC's datorhall comes online every week) ...
O'rly?!? Well if everyone didn't drop their purchases KNC wouldn't have so many Neptune's left that they had to go and build a co-lo to house them in and make some bitcoins off them.
|
|
|
Looks like KNC is on track. https://www.kncminer.com/news/news-78KnC Announce ‘Tape out’ of the World’s first 20nm ASIC for Bitcoin Mining STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN — March 5, 2014 –– KnC, the most trusted brand in Bitcoin Mining is announcing they have completed ‘tape out’ of their new ASIC. This is the world’s first Bitcoin Mining Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC) designed using ground breaking 20 nanometer engineering. This important milestone was achieved only 3 months after starting the project, during February 2014. KnC partnered with Alchip and its representative, Advanced Semiconductors Technology (AST), to deliver this advanced 20nm technology ASIC. This tapeout is the 2nd generation of the bitcoin mining ASIC following the success of the 1st, which was delivered in a record time of 3.5 months. This new KnC20nm chip will reduce power consumption of Bitcoin Mining by 43% when compared with the previous generation. In addition, innovations in the design of the communications circuitry allow for 1440 cores, in a 55x55mm package. Marcus Erlandson, KnC CTO, is immensely proud of the teams performance, “The combined efforts of KnC and our partners Alchip means that once again we are bringing to market a world first silicon design and in record time.” Johnny Shen, President of Alchip. “KnC and Alchip have been working together on Bitcoin ASIC design for less than 12 months and in that time we’ve already delivered 2 world-first projects. Collaboration is the key here and the close working relationship between our teams is the secret to our success” Bitcon is maturing and the technology that underpins the Bitcoin network is largely powered by KnC hardware with devices sold in over 100 countries worldwide. To learn more about KnC, visit www.kncminer.comUpdate: I would like to add that Alchip doesn't have an official press release posted on their site about the 20nm chip, their last release was from the Jupiter. But looking through the Jupiter info it doesn't say how cores it is, nor does KNC say how many TH/s on the Neptune so we can speculate what its really meant by a 43% reduction in power.
|
|
|
Is there anyway to setup bitcoin-qt so it subtracts the correct fee from your send transfers without you having to do it manually like multibit does?
Thanks,
|
|
|
Is there anyway to disable the wallet function in P2Pool and have it instead forward the percentage of shares the note is to receive to a different wallet? I have hit a stumbling block; over a week a go I initiated a transfer of over 1/2 a bitcoin and Bitcoin-QT told me I need to account for 0.0004 of the fee, so I did that and ever since the transfer has been in limbo, it looks like bitcoin-qt gave me the wrong fee to account for it if I understand the blockchain correctly. https://blockchain.info/tx-index/7bbbc7b5fac8c2973e9c62a17cead946b9cf1832aac47479799ce566fafabcc1Also I need to figure out if can fix this issue or have I lost those coins? Thanks, correct fee for that is 0.0004, the fee on link provided is 0.00004 chances of getting into a block that is less than 10k (or 27k if it's priority) in size is slim Thanks. I am in the process of moving my P2Pool so I can use pywallet and leave my bitcoin-qt shutdown for a week or so, hopefully the it will be removed from the blockchain then so I can resend it with the correct amount, then move my P2Pool back.
|
|
|
little chance?
Unless you are using rawtransactions or modified your bitcoin.conf file, Bitcoin-Qt should prevent you from creating transactions like this. If you just used the "Send" feature in the User Interface it is very odd that his happened and seems like it could be a bug in the interface. That being said, yes it is quite unlikely that this transaction will be confirmed anytime in the next few weeks. For that matter, it's unlikely that it will be confirmed in the next few months. Most of the peers on the bitcoin network aren't relaying the transaction, so most miners aren't even hearing about it. Even if they did hear about it, it is considered very low priority, so other transactions will be confirmed first. You may want to look into the following process: - Make certain that you are running Bitcoin-Qt version 0.8.6 (if you are not, then upgrade your Bitcoin-Qt)
- Shut down Bitcoin-Qt
- remove the transaction from your Bitcoin-Qt wallet with pywallet
- leave Bitcoin-Qt shut down for a few days until the transaction is dropped from the memory pool of any peers that might have accepted it
- start Bitcoin-Qt back up
- Send the transaction with a proper fee (at least 0.0004 BTC), and without an output valued at less than 0.00006 BTC
Thanks for the info. Looks like I will have to move my P2Pool server to another machine then do what you suggested after I take pywallet to it.
|
|
|
-a bitcoinAddress
do I need to add anything to the bitcoin.conf? Not to change the node fee payment address. -a sets that address, as jedimstr said above. So I don't need the disablewallet=1 in bitcoin.conf correct, only need to add the -a {address} to my P2Pool startup string? No, you don't "need" it... but I use disablewallet=1 anyway since I only use bitcoin-qt (or bitcoin core since that's what we're calling it these days) for it's blockchain RPC and not as a wallet. Note: disablewallet=1 only works on bitcoind/bitcoinqt OMG10 and 0.9.0 rc2 at the moment (that I know of). Not sure what OMG10 is? I use bitcoin-qt 0.8.6 on my P2Pool.
|
|
|
-a bitcoinAddress
do I need to add anything to the bitcoin.conf? Not to change the node fee payment address. -a sets that address, as jedimstr said above. So I don't need the disablewallet=1 in bitcoin.conf correct, only need to add the -a {address} to my P2Pool startup string?
|
|
|
Hey, There are two problems: * One output is smaller than the "dust threshold" (0.0000543). Your change is 0.00001. Many miners won't accept your transaction for inclusion in a block, and many nodes won't even relay your transaction. * Fee should be 0.0004 but is 0.00004, so even miners that would still accept the first problem are not going to rush to confirm your tx... In short, your wallet software failed twice Are you using the last version of bitcoin-qt? You can consider to double-spend the coins if you need them quick. See here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=232979.0Yes I am using the latest version of bitcoin-qt. So are you saying my other option is to just wait it out? Weird that your bitcoin-qt did that! I'd be interested to know why if you figure out. Yes you could still wait, but after a week there is probably little chance now. little chance?
|
|
|
Is there anyway to disable the wallet function in P2Pool and have it instead forward the percentage of shares the note is to receive to a different wallet? I have hit a stumbling block; over a week a go I initiated a transfer of over 1/2 a bitcoin and Bitcoin-QT told me I need to account for 0.0004 of the fee, so I did that and ever since the transfer has been in limbo, it looks like bitcoin-qt gave me the wrong fee to account for it if I understand the blockchain correctly. https://blockchain.info/tx-index/7bbbc7b5fac8c2973e9c62a17cead946b9cf1832aac47479799ce566fafabcc1Also I need to figure out if can fix this issue or have I lost those coins? Thanks, -a bitcoinAddress do I need to add anything to the bitcoin.conf?
|
|
|
Hey, There are two problems: * One output is smaller than the "dust threshold" (0.0000543). Your change is 0.00001. Many miners won't accept your transaction for inclusion in a block, and many nodes won't even relay your transaction. * Fee should be 0.0004 but is 0.00004, so even miners that would still accept the first problem are not going to rush to confirm your tx... In short, your wallet software failed twice Are you using the last version of bitcoin-qt? You can consider to double-spend the coins if you need them quick. See here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=232979.0Yes I am using the latest version of bitcoin-qt. So are you saying my other option is to just wait it out?
|
|
|
Is there anyway to disable the wallet function in P2Pool and have it instead forward the percentage of shares the note is to receive to a different wallet? I have hit a stumbling block; over a week a go I initiated a transfer of over 1/2 a bitcoin and Bitcoin-QT told me I need to account for 0.0004 of the fee, so I did that and ever since the transfer has been in limbo, it looks like bitcoin-qt gave me the wrong fee to account for it if I understand the blockchain correctly. https://blockchain.info/tx-index/7bbbc7b5fac8c2973e9c62a17cead946b9cf1832aac47479799ce566fafabcc1Also I need to figure out if can fix this issue or have I lost those coins? Thanks,
|
|
|
Fell free to ask questions here, if you have them.
Your conversion fee is too high. Every company who does business like this is lucky to make back their initial investment back but never survive much longer after that, were as companies who enter into the market place to snatch up clients offer lower fees and once they have a solid foundation they slowly raise the fees. Think of this way, what's worth more to your business 100 people at 3% conversion rate or 10,000 people (maybe more) at a 1% conversion rate, then in a year's time as more and more people start getting on board you raise the fee. It would be nice if you could find away to offer these cards in North America, not just Europe, and either in USD or CAD.
|
|
|
I'll defend anyone against rumors, amateurish "leaked" documents, and unconfirmed allegations.
It's to everyone's benefit in this community that we have accurate, solid information and not jump to conclusions. Circumstantial evidence is being used to declare MtGox insolvency as a foregone conclusion, rather than just a fairly high likelihood. This is wrong. It is poor reckoning of evidence, even if they do turn out to be insolvent in the end.
For starters if you do the math using the number of Bitcoin's MtGox has reported that went missing if happen since 2011 MtGox would have lost 409 Bitcon's a day; granted Bitcoin's didn't have the same value back then 409 still have alerted accounting (if they were doing any) that money was missing at the end of the month. But lets say the lost the coins later on, losing 750k of coins over 2 to 3 years is a lot that any accountant would see it. So yes it's speculated that Mark likely cooked MtGox books and embezzled the money. Filing for bankruptcy costs money, for an individual it costs about $30k here in Canada, for a company it costs a lot more. Plus all the extra stuff we are seeing not that MtGox has filed in court is costing them big time. So where are they getting the money? Is Mark using the embezzled money to pay for it? These are serious questions people need ask!
|
|
|
It's obvious the funds were stolen cos Mark kept them in a brain wallet with the passphrase 'Starbucks' fking idiot....
He more likely used the name of his cat for the passphrase not his favorite coffee place. Either way it goes to show just how serious Mark took when it came to running his Bitcoin empire.
|
|
|
http://www.bangkokpost.com/news/world/397964/mtgox-opens-call-centre-after-500m-bitcoin-lossThe call centre will respond to "all inquiries to MtGox", the Tokyo-based firm said on its website. "An overview of the situation should be published here shortly." A company lawyer said 750,000 Bitcoins belonging to customers had gone missing, along with MtGox's own store of the currency, which she said was around 100,000 units. That number of Bitcoins would be worth around $477 million, calculated against the price on the Coindesk exchange at 0300 GMT on Monday....
|
|
|
I just installed and ran it on OSX and it doesn't work!
Installed what? YouTube?
|
|
|
|