Pot calling the kettle black if I've ever seen it.

I'd like to bet on who gets (correctly) banned first, smoothie or Spoetnik.

Jinn buyers, according to the claims made in this post. I don't know whether they are correct or not, nor do I know whether your posts are correct. I only know what I read.

According to that dictionary definition, people purchasing or expending money on IOTA tokens are also investors, unless you are going to prohibit IOTA tokens from ever being traded (not sure how that would work) and only allow them to be used as network access. They offer "potential profitable returns, as interest, income, or appreciation in value".

Lawyers will have to work out the legalities, but when it comes to the English language and matters of substance, they are clearly investors.

 

Hard to believe when they were promised "profit-shares".


You saying it now (either here or in your disclosure documents) does not make it so.

Indeed, your game has become such a joke to all rational observers, that I doubt you will continue it.

Not that I'm aware of no. He said he decided to start a company to help promote Monero, but I'm not aware of any such promotion actually happening by such a company.


Since you are some sort of sociopath or maybe just stupid, you wouldn't understand this, but innocent people do apologize when they make mistakes and people end up getting hurt as a result. Making mistakes does not make someone guilty, it makes them human.

Updated staking. Down a bit after the withdrawals, and stake weight on the network is up as well. Current average about one stake every 3 hours.

Yes if you do that you won't be able to mix when you spend it (obviously). You will still be able to spend it though.

Maybe we will add some kind of warning to the wallet, or an option to generate multiple smaller outputs. That is not done yet.


I don't understand what you mean about "this exact output".

The rule is somewhat complicated, and I don't even remember the details. There are some conditions about how mixable and non-mixable inputs can be combined. The idea is limit use of non-mixed inputs but also not prevent people from spending their coins. There is also a sweep_dust command in the wallet to help combine large amounts of dust into a mixable (and more usable) form easily.

You are correct of course. Monero has many other important features besides privacy, that's just the best known. Either way Spoetnik's delusional fantasy deliberate trolling about 100s of other coins having the same features is completely wrong.

That seems like out of memory (Linux "OOM killer"). You can try the pruning branch which uses somewhat less. You can also try adding a bit of swap on your system. If the shortfall isn't too large, swap will help without performance being too terrible. Installing the dphys-swapfile package on Ubuntu will manage swap automatically for you, not sure if there is a non-manual swap solution on other distros.

Monero was only launched (in a very rough state) 19 months ago. The new version that has been in heavy development for a year is a vast improvement and isn't even released yet (though many are using the prerelease test versions).


There are only a tiny handful of viable coins (with ongoing development) that have any sort of credible claims of blockchain privacy. Only a few cryptonotes are still remotely viable in terms of ongoing development and are also the only solution that is fully trustless (no third party mixing). Shadow cash (cryptonote-derived) may be viable, but I'm not sure how ongoing their development is still. There are a bunch of mixing-based solutions (Dash, joinmarket for BTC). Bitshares has a partial solution (not sure if deployed) with CT. Nxt has something, I'm not sure what. Zerocash may someday exist, then we can consider it.

These are all distinct from Monero is various obvious and important ways. Even ignoring the other differences, there are not certainly not hundreds with credible privacy solutions at all. Maybe 5-10 at most.

Not necessarily, no, but the technology will still be important.


The real world doesn't work that way. Business collaborate one day and compete the next (or even the very same day). Even when collaborating they don't want to share all information, and certainly not with every member of a group. To control access to information once access to the blockchain has been granted at all, privacy features are needed.

Permissioned blockchains will often need privacy, just as the current example (or maybe more near future, but I'm not sure of the deployment schedule) of the Liquid permissioned blockchain does. Depending on the nature of the use cases for the permissioned blockchains, there may be some exceptions (explicitly public records perhaps).

Furthermore, I'm not even sure there will be too many successful permissioned blockchains. In the past, there were many proprietary closed networks. A few still exist, but most communication now happens over the regular internet. Not even VPNs, but web services with access keys. The need for many interconnections may in time make these closed/semiclosed systems impractical and/or cost-ineffective even when the interaction takes the form of blockchains.

And yet the market cap is 30% higher than it was a year ago.

Then you should simply sign off here. Bitcointalk.org users can discuss it among ourselves.

I don't read nxtforum, so that means nothing to me. I haven't seen any stalking on this thread at all. I've seen you avoid the questions about conversion of the JINN asset into IOTA, and the quoted promise that the JINN asset would be legally converted into profit shares.

Was that quote false or out of context?

Don't bother he is sigspamming and/or mining up his activity rank. You can always identify these folks in that they have a paid signature campaign and their post history is full of one liners on a bunch of different topics where they are uninformed or barely informed.

The repo is here: https://github.com/bryan-mills/bytecoin

Looks like it was forked from Bitcoin as of April 1, 2013, and no Bitcoin commits from after that were ever merged.

It wasn't enforced, and the power-of-ten denominations weren't used below a certain value threshold.


No because they belong to many different people.

The PoW algorithm uses some data from each block as a scratchpad (memory accessed in the process of computing the hash value). As the blockchain gets longer this scratchpad gets bigger.


I'll leave that to others who know the code better.

There are outputs with uneven amounts such as 0.0002452113 that won't necessarily match any other outputs.

In the future every output will be a multiple 1-9 of a power of ten, and indeed there are only a limited number of those (roughly 150, though the number in common use will be much smaller) and all except the very largest amounts will have many available.

Ah yes, I forgot that detail. But CKG pays dividends in moneritos...