I ave to laugh at the comments of those who can't work a Beam wallet. I think it's probably an error 40 the error is 40cm from the screen Beam has the best in class, most beautiful wallet and is more functional than any other crypto wallet which I have ever used (and trust me, i've used hundreds over the years) I'd go way back to Zimstake to find a more pleasing wallet experience, nothing, i repeat nothing comes close to the usability of the Beam wallet. go FUD some other project, you guys look like bots. The wallet doesn't work well...
My thoughts exactly. I've noticed that it has alot of issues that make it really hard to properly use.
|
|
|
What algo is KMD these days? still mineable on 3Gb GPU?
|
|
|
Swap offer in wallet right now Just need some LTC a block (40) of Beam for 0.4LTC swap token: 3171DnZyunbzxu1j2cgDH1ZqGWtcxsErBWN5J4M51VaNipQKyzHpUtxhBscoyAy2zsMwruQfoS5V5cA ZBLiMBTpSF7DLZVxNtE3rV2EJq6ZBq7xc9F2Xk5iWzxzBzE9sGeZ6k2BSGq5RBKP8uF3JaV6t7fGfUh QDutiPKNd4Qq 6hrs expiry, market rate, be quick! see a how-to here: https://raskul.com/beam-atomic-swaps/
|
|
|
124
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: miniZ, fast & friendly Equihash 144,5 150,5,3 125,4 192,7 210,9 150,5 96,5 miner
|
on: February 01, 2020, 09:19:24 PM
|
many thanks for all your hard work miniZ!
|
|
|
Solo mining Beam using gminer and there is a bug which shows up difficulty in the miner as ~450Millions should be around 200Millions. can be changed manually or can Evgeniy fix the bug please?
thanks.
I should say that this doesn't hinder solo mining, it's just erroneous in the miner screen as to why it shows this when actual diff is less than half of this. which in turn is an annoyance. update, i have decided to take the hit of a few sols and use lolminer, i'd rather factual data when i'm solo mining.
|
|
|
Solo mining Beam using gminer and there is a bug which shows up difficulty in the miner as ~450Millions should be around 200Millions. can be changed manually or can Evgeniy fix the bug please?
thanks.
I should say that this doesn't hinder solo mining, it's just erroneous in the miner screen as to why it shows this when actual diff is less than half of this. which in turn is an annoyance.
|
|
|
Solo mining Beam using gminer and there is a bug which shows up difficulty in the miner as ~450Millions should be around 200Millions. can be changed manually or can Evgeniy fix the bug please?
thanks.
|
|
|
Currently there is an ongoing development on reduction of block reward plus new features. So XDAG is definitely not dead removal of DNET?
|
|
|
Join the Beam Team in Chengdu, for the chance to talk privacy and hear some insights from industry experts Odaily China, Kucoin, Altonomy, BHEX, F2pool and RockMiner August 3rd 14:00, Chengdu
|
|
|
Hi. Hardfork complicate BEAM mining? Dev, do you have information about the Hardfork in Russian?
Hi there we have Russian community channel here: https://t.me/Beam_RU
|
|
|
Advisory:
There seems to be a scam running which advises of a Beam airdrop. This is not a genuine event and Beam will never offer any kind of airdrop. The scam has a telegram bot and fake Beam channels, if you are invited to join these, please report them as scams, they seem to be harvesting user email addresses and ETH addresses.
Please report the following two groups as fake. Give the real groups instead:
@beam_community -> Real group is @BeamPrivacy @beam_announcement -> Real group is @BeamNews
Beam DOESN'T do any kind of airdrops nor will we ever ask any kind of personal information from you. Be careful not to be scammed.
thank you, stay safe out there.
|
|
|
sideways. with patience...
|
|
|
Can one still use this algo to install malware to run on a website so that website visitors mine XMR with the users CPU? Wasn't there any consideration to the algorithm that would negate this specific security issue with XMR and why is this not mentioned in the audit? thanks. Due to the random code generation part of the proof-of-work, a web miner is significantly more difficult to create (though definitely not impossible). Additionally, the 2GB RAM requirement somewhat mitigates the malware issue. this is the kind of response i had hoped to read. thank you for that. Glad that some of us are a little less easily-triggered! peace. Yes, this was not at all an insult to the community as a whole. I think your lucky you got a civil answer at all. But I was abrasive so that is on me for allowing you to bait me. Be assured that won't happen again. no it was a genuine question.. but feel free to see it as fud if you like. my concern is that i had some comparative-crypto website open for a few hours yesterday on my browser and when i returned to my computer, it had almost melted the CPU. I know this type of shady deployment of malware has been inherent within the XMR community in the past so wanted to ask. I think your attitude to the question answered it specifically. thank you.
I refrained from stating 'within the XMR ecosystem, because it is not a fault of the developers, it is indeed people mining XMR via shady malware, which is indeed 'people involved in XMR' = "xmr community members" You got triggered and defensive on my choice of phrase, perhaps you need some time with your head in a good novel or something friend, come away from 'Interent Formus' - it's an awful anxiety-enducing state to be in. Take the advice of your peers: Hueristic, I respect you, but in recent weeks and months you've been frothing at the mouth.
+1, let's keep it civil.
|
|
|
Can one still use this algo to install malware to run on a website so that website visitors mine XMR with the users CPU? Wasn't there any consideration to the algorithm that would negate this specific security issue with XMR and why is this not mentioned in the audit? thanks. Due to the random code generation part of the proof-of-work, a web miner is significantly more difficult to create (though definitely not impossible). Additionally, the 2GB RAM requirement somewhat mitigates the malware issue. this is the kind of response i had hoped to read. thank you for that. Glad that some of us are a little less easily-triggered! peace.
|
|
|
Can one still use this algo to install malware to run on a website so that website visitors mine XMR with the users CPU? Wasn't there any consideration to the algorithm that would negate this specific security issue with XMR and why is this not mentioned in the audit? thanks. LOL, there is NO algo that cannot be mined through javascipt making one is impossible. if you are questioning whether the old cryptonote that was being mined on some websites are still viable then the answer is NO. Sounds to me like your just trying some left handed fuD though so i'll go grab me a few m0ar and wait for the spike. no it was a genuine question.. but feel free to see it as fud if you like. my concern is that i had some comparative-crypto website open for a few hours yesterday on my browser and when i returned to my computer, it had almost melted the CPU. I know this type of shady deployment of malware has been inherent within the XMR community in the past so wanted to ask. I think your attitude to the question answered it specifically. thank you.
|
|
|
Can one still use this algo to install malware to run on a website so that website visitors mine XMR with the users CPU? Wasn't there any consideration to the algorithm that would negate this specific security issue with XMR and why is this not mentioned in the audit? thanks.
|
|
|
So Ellipal wallet is one of the companies accepting beam, will it have beam support in the future if trezor accepts beam?
that would be a decision for Ellipal... Our development on Trezor integration is going really well, at last i heard.
|
|
|
Why would any miner want to burn their coins? Simply enjoy and hodl. You won't be disappointed unless you set out to disappoint yourself.
|
|
|
|