Check this new Beam block explorer Multilingual explorer with data charts! beam.tokenview.comyes it's very nice indeed. good work put into it. would be nicer if it would load quicker for me too. we are fixing the loading issues at the moment, btw, may I know your location? sure thing. Scotland UK. |
|
|
|
Treasury coins are not taken from the 80 per block, it's actually from an additional 20 coins per block emitted once each month so nowhere near your calculations above.
Okay, thanks for the info. Missed that part... So it would change the calculation to: 20 * 60 = 120 Beam per hour * 24 * 365 = 10.5 million Beam for the first year. The following years (2-5) it will decrease to 10 Beam per Block = 5.25 million Beam per year * 4 years = 21 million Beam If that is correct, they'll get approx. 31.5 million Coins in 5 years. So for the time being, that makes it 876k coins per month, or about 430680$. To be honest I trust the team to hold the coins more than the miners, but ain't that a bit too big amount? This should be enough to pay about 80 employees and 20 executives. Thank you for your kind words. The treasury emission is transparent as it can be, without anyones need to calculate any of these things. if you check the beam block explorer you can clearly see https://explorer.beam.mw that the monthly emission of treasury coins is as you rightly observe NEXT TREASURY EMISSION COIN AMOUNT: 876,000 Beams However, this is again divided between the following parties and it is in no way a running float of $430k for the development of Beam.  So let's look a little deeper into this... *goes off to make a vlog and explain it in simple terms*  |
|
|
|
just switched to 1.3n5 and found a decrease of 40w across the rig with no drop is hashrate. amazeballs!
Very interesting. I upgraded also and actually saw zero drop in wattage on my 8-card rig. I know, I know, it's because i'm using Win10!  Which version did you switch from? dunno been afk a couple of days and it was running on mmpOS. |
|
|
|
|
just switched to 1.3n5 and found a decrease of 40w across the rig with no drop is hashrate. amazeballs!
|
|
|
|
Hello, is there any Ambassador from Beam? I would like to apply for this position but I canīt imagine what is his job. Please PM me if you can answer my question. Thank you! please can you fill in the web form at https://www.beam.mw/ambassadors and a member of the team will get back to you in due course. thank you. |
|
|
|
|
Treasury coins are not taken from the 80 per block, it's actually from an additional 20 coins per block emitted once each month so nowhere near your calculations above.
|
|
|
|
will the app auto update if it's already installed? |
|
|
|
|
is there a final release with fixes ready to go?
i'm a little confused with all the 1.3 versions. unsure which one i need to use.
for info, i've been running 1.3+ on mmpOS for around 50 hours now and it's flawless.
|
|
|
|
v1.3n+ and v1.3n++ (beta build, Apr 28 2019 12:28:20) CUDA 10 versions doesn't work on sparkpool, see picture above.
Sparkpool is displaying that there are too many rejected shares, but it's not reporting it back to miner, so in miner it looks good, but on poolside >95% of shares are rejected (or stales).
Then I left it to mine on leafpool and it keeps mining fine for more than 8 hours.
Only thing I noticed is that at some point it hits 100% CPU usage and stays like that, I need to investigate this more.
CPU: Celeron G3930 (@2.90 GHzm 2C/2T)
RAM: 4 GB
Virtual Mem.: 64 GB
GPUs: 1x 1080ti MSI Gaming
5x 1080 inno3d twin X2
OS: Windows Server 2016 (version 1607, OS Build 14393.2273)
Nvidia driver: 419.17 (CUDA 10.10)
MSI Afterburner (for OC): 4.6.0 -> noting this as it can be cause of 100% CPU usage, because on 1080ti fanspeed readings in miniZ console becomes 0%, maybe there are conflict between querying Nvidia-SMI stats from miner and Afterburner, idk.
Hi hogwash.89m, Thank you for the detailed information. We are looking to what is happening with sparkpool. We have updated the testing file with few more small corrections. miniZ.exe --version output: miniZ v1.3n++ @ cuda v10.0, Apr 28 2019 20:05:51If you try it out let us know how it goes. Cheers also been mining BEAM on sparkpool, latest version (1.3n2?) stil has issues with rejects there, 186 accepted 0 rejects according to miner 5.57% invalid 1% stale on sparkpool with high invalid/delay notification. rig of mixed cards 2*1080, 2*1080ti 1*1070ti win 10 8GB RAM 64GB Virtual Memory allocated running at 60% power through MSI afterburner no issues noticed at sunpool Some pools run redirected servers from outbound locations - which in turn may show you a fast ping at terminal, but in reality the ping at pool is way higher. If you are using the asia server of spark then your ping will be correct, otherwise consider mining at a server closer to your actual locality. |
|
|
|
Proud to have been a part of the @beamprivacy AMA with @BeamCTO earlier this month. Full audio of the event can be heard here:  |
|
|
|
Im also having the same issue as above where the miner is mining locally but shows offline in the pool while mining beam on sunpool.top. Ill try and help any way that i can just let me know how
I doubt it's the pool. Mining on pool.btc.com. It happened randomly.
Cheers.
Hi BIOLERUP4LIFE, ARTRN, Thanks. Yes it does not seem to be pool related. Did you notice an increase in cpu load when it happened? Cheers i had a thought on it.. is it at all possible that the devfee might be slightly buggy and sticking - I can't think any other reason why the miner would continue but would go offline from specified pool? Hi rgsnedds, It does not seem to be related. This was one of the first things we checked. It seems to be related whith some changes we introduced with the new algo. We keep digging. Thanks. Cheers no worries thanks for the response on it. it was the only thing i could think of but if it had been the case then it would have stuck on the 4minute initiation of the devfee, not after 5 hrs . good luck finding the issue. |
|
|
|
Im also having the same issue as above where the miner is mining locally but shows offline in the pool while mining beam on sunpool.top. Ill try and help any way that i can just let me know how
I doubt it's the pool. Mining on pool.btc.com. It happened randomly.
Cheers.
Hi BIOLERUP4LIFE, ARTRN, Thanks. Yes it does not seem to be pool related. Did you notice an increase in cpu load when it happened? Cheers i had a thought on it.. is it at all possible that the devfee might be slightly buggy and sticking - I can't think any other reason why the miner would continue but would go offline from specified pool? |
|
|
|
|
responsive support here. if i had any merit, i'd use it ^
mmpOS have deployed n1.3+ and it seems to be working fine.
it would be helpful if you can push out advisories on updates to the mmpOS guys, they are upcoming in this field.
thanks.
|
|
|
|
i'm presuming you are running on Windows?
yes Overclocking is really a matter of personal preference, depending on how much power you are happy with your card drawing, at stock clocks (without adjustment) you will see the card pull max power. I suggest that you should clock as low as the card will go and step up until you are content with the power limit you want to use. I have a similar card in a 1070ti and i run it at +120 core clock +400 mem clock and power limited to 120w again, it's personal preference and where those are the settings that I use, another may prefer different on the same card. |
|
|
|
Hi Beam miners, Do you know that you can mine Beam using miniZ miner? miniZ is a fast and friendly Equihash Cuda miner. https://miniz.ch * Supports Equihash <144,5> <150,5> <192,7> and <96,5> * miniZ is compiled for Linux and Windows * Cool console output and telemetry monitoring * miniZ GUI Launcher v1.0 (Windows) * Supports most mining pools * Developer fee: 2% Equihash 150,5: * GTX 1050 Ti 4GB ~7-8 Sol/s * GTX 1060 3GB ~13-15 Sol/s * GTX 1070 Ti 8GB ~27-30 Sol/s * GTX 1080 8GB ~28-29 Sol/s * GTX 1080 Ti 11GB ~38-41 Sol/s * RTX 2070 8GB ~31-35 Sol/s * RTX 2080 Ti 11GB ~58-64 Sol/s Use Cuda 10.0 versions with the RTX GPUs. For other GPUs you should test and see which performs best. For more information, download, and support check the website: https://miniz.ch/FAQ and UsageDownload miniZ miner here: https://miniz.ch/download/Follow us Twitter https://twitter.com/miniZ_miner Bitcointalk https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4767892.0
Happy BEAM mining! Can you share the OC for the cards? I am getting on MSI 1080 8GB only around 25 Sols with 70% +100/+500 i'm presuming you are running on Windows? |
|
|
|
if you smart enough maybe you will rip off claymore? xD
you can't help but make these comments, can you? remind me what you see as 'ethical' again please? uhuh. you probably shouldn't be discussing ethics, given your track record. |
|
|
|
not spamming, just offering constructive criticisms regarding your efforts to rip off other developers work.
without proof it's just spam, GMiner contains only code developed by GMiner developer team, don't come back without proof. we can also promote GMiner in other miner's threads, but we don't do it, because it does not ethical. if you smart enough maybe you will rip off claymore? xD proof you even forgot to remove the text comment lines from the ripoff of lolminer. so now you are denying it?? GTFO DO NOT SUPPORT THIS PROJECTAlso now a new OP in Scam Accusations - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5112857.new#newI hereby accuse gminer devs of copy/pasting another dev hard work to reap fees for themselves.GMiner CUDA Equihash Miner v1.34
Fee is 2%
tsk, and to think i gave the OP merit.. when it seems the done thing is to just rip off others work and double the dev fee? nice AMD miner, by the way. your users can find the original here (with half the fee) https://github.com/Lolliedieb/lolMiner-releases/releasesLOLMINER KERNEL:  GMINER KERNEL:  I find it abhorrent that this dev has lowered himself to just ripping of the hard work of Lollie.. a highly respected algorithm designer who works a full-time job whilst trying his best to provide a low fee AMD miner for the community. sickening. Avoid Gminer. It's a copy/paste and no better than a shit-fork. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
