Bitcoin Forum
May 06, 2024, 05:33:33 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 [48] 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 ... 336 »
941  Other / Off-topic / Re: There was no Big Bang, Truth shall set you free!!!! on: February 21, 2015, 09:49:01 AM
Why do you pick on nextgencoin for using logic to determine that logic can't determine anything, while at the same time you are bigoted against only certain kinds of bigots?

Smiley

Why are you supporting a bigot?

Smiley
942  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [9000 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + VarDiff on: February 21, 2015, 09:09:59 AM
If there is a significant rise by hashrate of some pool, wouldn't that have also some short-term impact on the relative number of blocks that this pool solves?  The difficulty drives the complexity of finding a solution, and if there was only a single miner, this would dictate the rate of blocks solved by that miner.  If there are 2 miners, there is some competition between them, as each block can be solved only once, so some of the work expended by one of the miners would be lost if the other miner solves that particular block.  Intuitively it is expected that the instantaneous relative hash rate would have some impact on the rate of individual solutions - why is that incorrect?

Cheers

Because there is no competition to find a block in the way you think. Every (diff 1) share has the same chance of finding a block. An increase in hashrate by some pool just means that that pool - and the network - makes more blocks.
943  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [9000 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + VarDiff on: February 21, 2015, 06:46:50 AM
It's not 'short term', but a long term trend.  Right now Antpool reports 57.77 PH/s.  Your chart at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=104664.0 shows that DiscusFish and Antpool found about 27% of blocks between Feb 8 and Feb 14. Isn't this simply a case of smaller pools like Slush having a smaller fraction of the overall hash rate?

Cheers

Oh, I see. No, the amount of blocks a block maker solves is related to the block maker's hashrate and the network difficulty, nothing else. In the long term of course difficulty will rise, and what you expect will happen. But in the short term it just means a larger number of blocks solved per day overall. Does that make sense? I know it's a bit anti-intuitive.
944  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [9000 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + VarDiff on: February 20, 2015, 10:26:42 AM
Antpool jumped to 56.30 PH/s  (https://www.antpool.com/home.htm), which could be one of the reasons for poor performance at the smaller pools.

Cheers


Why would that make any difference in the short term?
945  Other / Off-topic / Re: There was no Big Bang, Truth shall set you free!!!! on: February 20, 2015, 09:55:28 AM
We don't really die since all the atoms that constitute us stay on earth but they are used to make something else.


I think that you have a completely different idea of what living is to most people.



946  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1500 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool on: February 20, 2015, 04:27:55 AM
Cross-post from the Spondoolies thread, more relevant here:

centralization incoming Sad

If only everyone used p2pool....... Wink

If everyone did, the share difficulty would be through the roof.  2,222,770,798 if I understand it right..

p2pool is not the answer.

a rewrite perhaps.  but not in its current incarnation.

M

I was thinking about this the other day, actually, and I think I got a good solution to the problem.

p2pool uses a share chain much like the block chain for its reward allocation. This means that if you're mining on a share that isn't the most recent, your work is wasted. The blockchain was designed to solve the timestamping problem for creating a distributed ledger system for transactions, which is why the blockchain has to be serialized. With p2pool, there is no such requirement for timestamping and serializing the shares, so the shares do not necessarily need to be arranged in a chain. The fact that they are was probably mostly just a programming convenience in being able to reuse the bitcoin blockchain data structures. I think a better structure for p3pool shares would be a share tree, where each share references at least one parent share instead of exactly one parent share. That way, work done on shares that would end up marked as stale on the current p2pool (i.e. branching shares) could still be incorporated into the p3pool share tree. Add in a small reward to the miner who found the share for each parent share that's referenced for the first time, and everybody's shares should get incorporated as long as the share is based on the most recent block.

Since miners no longer would need to abandon work immediately when someone on p3pool finds a share, p3pool could target much higher share frequencies, such as 1 per second or faster. This would decrease share variance and allow for small miners to use p2pool effectively, and it would also allow p3pool to grow larger while keeping individual share targets reasonable.

That sounds like it would end up being a proportional reward method, yes?
947  Other / Off-topic / Re: There was no Big Bang, Truth shall set you free!!!! on: February 19, 2015, 09:10:44 PM
The fact is if God is God he can do what the hell he wants.

Can he create a stone that he can't lift?  Grin

He probably doesn't want to.
948  Other / Off-topic / Re: There was no Big Bang, Truth shall set you free!!!! on: February 19, 2015, 08:50:24 PM
Seriously name another religion that predicted something would happen hundreds of years later and it did.

HG Wells predicted that man would go to the moon, and we did. So did Bitcoin (does that count as twice?).


I actually was going to say prophesied, I kind of thought someone might pull me up on using prediction. They are two very very different things.  

Can you explain the difference?
949  Other / Off-topic / Re: There was no Big Bang, Truth shall set you free!!!! on: February 19, 2015, 08:44:49 PM
I don't think they all say that, otherwise what would be the point of hell?

Hell and Heaven are defining points. It's impossible to have a scale with one point only.

Also, there is such thing as apocatastasis. It's another proof that we will all be in Heaven, even Satan.

I'm pretty sure I've read rants by the Westboro Baptist Church promising Hell for gays and unbelievers. Are you saying they're wrong? And if they are wrong, how do you decide which Christian sect is correct?


Ok so you might be happier about Hell for Pedofiles or mass murderers? Firstly Hell is debated by believers but generally you might want to avoid it even if it is just eternal separation from God and knowing you could of been with him.

No as a Believer all men have fallen from the perfection of God. So gays, pedofiles, murderers are all welcome in Heaven if they repent and believe. No sin I believe will condem you but also even believers will be judged for the good they did. Trust me God is way more gracious than humans ever could be. We are the first to bay for blood when we are wronged. God came as a man to earth, I think that shows his compassion and desire to bring all men to himself.

Huh. I just thought you were religious but now I starting to think you're crazy intolerant too. What have gays ever done to incur your wrath? Why do you hate them and believe they need to repent? Of what do they need to repent? Something bible related?


950  Other / Off-topic / Re: There was no Big Bang, Truth shall set you free!!!! on: February 19, 2015, 08:42:37 PM
Seriously name another religion that predicted something would happen hundreds of years later and it did.

HG Wells predicted that man would go to the moon, and we did. So did Bitcoin (does that count as twice?).
951  Other / Off-topic / Re: There was no Big Bang, Truth shall set you free!!!! on: February 19, 2015, 08:36:59 PM
I don't think they all say that, otherwise what would be the point of hell?

Hell and Heaven are defining points. It's impossible to have a scale with one point only.

Also, there is such thing as apocatastasis. It's another proof that we will all be in Heaven, even Satan.

I'm pretty sure I've read rants by the Westboro Baptist Church promising Hell for gays and unbelievers. Are you saying they're wrong? And if they are wrong, how do you decide which Christian sect is correct?
952  Other / Off-topic / Re: There was no Big Bang, Truth shall set you free!!!! on: February 19, 2015, 08:35:03 PM
I have been an atheist for the better part of my adult life, but there is a rather new religion that seems to answer all these questions for me. http://englishrussia.com/2010/02/17/russian-gadget-hackwrench-religion/

Eris is the only true goddess

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discordianism
953  Other / Off-topic / Re: There was no Big Bang, Truth shall set you free!!!! on: February 19, 2015, 08:31:16 PM
If I'm wrong I have Oblivion, If your wrong you have possibly eternal Judgement.

If clerics say the truth then we shouldn't worry about Judgement day. We'll all go to Heaven because God loves us.

I don't think they all say that, otherwise what would be the point of hell?
954  Other / Off-topic / Re: There was no Big Bang, Truth shall set you free!!!! on: February 19, 2015, 08:20:53 PM

Big Bang is only a theory that doesn't explain everything but it does explain a lot.

Gravity is only a theory. Quantum mechanics, what powers your laptop, is only a theory...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theory



Who or what instigated the Big Bang?



Obviously....

Ask where lighting came from 2500 years ago and you'll get an equally ridiculous answer.

Ask the Babylonians and they'll tell you Mardok killing Tiamat was the big bang. That predates the Abrahamic god. Shouldn't it be more valid?




Are you on crack? Seriously we are debating the origins of the Universe and you are comparing the originator or the BigBang as in the same realm as the source of Lightening. Seriously if you want a debate lay off the dumbjuice.

The Babylonians predated the Abrahamic God? Seriously? More crack. You are saying the origins of something are dated from the time we have recorded sources. Shit. So I guess Oxygen which was only 'discovered' and recorded was when Oxygen was started. Before we all simply died within a few minutes. In the words of Homer Simpson Dohhh!

Anymore embarrassing statements and you are dismissed from this adult debate.

I think his point was (although I'm not completely sure) is 'how do you choose which creation myth to believe?'.  
955  Other / Off-topic / Re: There was no Big Bang, Truth shall set you free!!!! on: February 19, 2015, 07:55:01 AM
There's simply not enough information to soundly conclude that God must necessarily exist because you likened the Universe to a watch.  Plausible?  Sure.  Sound?  No.  That's about as clear as it gets.

I'm not even sure it's plausible. Invoking a god because of a lack of either imagination or knowledge (or both) is the ultimate deus ex machina - an difficult problem solved by a being that can solve any problem.

To me this is just intellectual laziness. It's just too easy to say "well I don't understand, so it must be caused by a god of some sort".

difficult != impossible




Well I simply had an opinion based on what I personally believe I didn't ask anyone to changs their view for me. Now I'm being challenged because someone thinks they KNOW 100% even though they are limited in knowledge based on their brain that they had no part in designing.

So please show me your 100% fact there is no God that simply the whole world can say ah ok yo're right there is no God. You atheists are a bunch of pseudo intellectuals wearing long black coats and matrix glasses thinking the whole world doesent get what they get. If you can't be intellectally honest enough to accept being an atheist needs as much faith as believing in God, agnostics I think are worth having a conversation with Atheists have nothing but other people to point at and say see they think this, it must be true. Intelletually moronic.


The onus is not on me to prove a negative. Why not prove there is a god instead?

Provide irrefutable proof of your hypothesis and you'll make a believer out of me. However, I've never seen any proof, and I doubt you have anything new to show me.



956  Other / Archival / Re: Mining pools list on: February 19, 2015, 04:47:12 AM
Organofcorti, great work that you do here - thanks for all the reports. 

On page 1 where you list the p2pool proxy mining pools the last two are down: p2poolserver.com and thash.pl.

Thanks, I've removed them.

Also, where you provide a source for p2pool nodes there is also nodes.p2pool.co.  Could that be added?

Done, also added coincadence.com


Lastly, what exactly is a p2pool proxy server - is that just p2pool merged mining?


In this thread we had a discussion in which we decided that a p2pool proxy server was a node that anyone could use the same way as any other pool, with statistics and so on. It's a way to make p2pool more available for miners with a low threshold for fiddling.

957  Other / Off-topic / Re: There was no Big Bang, Truth shall set you free!!!! on: February 19, 2015, 03:06:45 AM
There's simply not enough information to soundly conclude that God must necessarily exist because you likened the Universe to a watch.  Plausible?  Sure.  Sound?  No.  That's about as clear as it gets.

I'm not even sure it's plausible. Invoking a god because of a lack of either imagination or knowledge (or both) is the ultimate deus ex machina - an difficult problem solved by a being that can solve any problem.

To me this is just intellectual laziness. It's just too easy to say "well I don't understand, so it must be caused by a god of some sort".

difficult != impossible

958  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [9000 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + VarDiff on: February 18, 2015, 10:15:08 PM
At this point, I do not care what you think or know, even whether you might have a point. You've adequately demonstrated to me (thus far today), that your opinion is worth disregarding in its entirity.
If you can confirm either way whether the roving hash-rate is from 13 rigs, that would be your time spent well.
Fair enough. Please feel free to add me to your ignore list if it will help with your disregarding.

Hey Mr. Teal, can I ask you a favour?

When you quote pekatete I get to see what he has written even though he one of a very few I have on ignore.

So would you mind not quoting him? I get sufficient stupid in my day already.
959  Other / Archival / Re: Mining pools list on: February 18, 2015, 10:45:02 AM
ok

can you add to the list in first post then who have proxy mining

P2pool proxies are at the start. All pools identifying as non-p2pool-proxies are in the proxy section at the end. At the moment, the only non-p2pool proxy is Nicehash.

960  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 0.5% fee anonymous solo bitcoin mining! 27 blocks solved! on: February 18, 2015, 10:44:12 AM
If it's something virginal that's required then BFL gear is out if this thread is anything to go by: BFL fucked us over again

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 [48] 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 ... 336 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!