Well to be correct he bought some 50 BTC worth which has lost 80% of its value.  He started believe his own nonsense and became the bag holder.   Need to get a bunch of suckers to cover those losses for him.

My insurance would pay even in case of suicide, if two years have elapsed after plan came into effect. However, I would not do that, as the main purpose of this insurance would be to pay for my cryonic preservation after my death. Therefore I would share the interest in keeping the policy valid by paying premiums AND not killing myself. Why would I do that anyways.


Look, I am trying to appeal to those who are sitting on thousands and this 10-30 would not affect them much. I know how easy it was to get them coins, I was there myself. Medical bills ate them up, sadly. People with class give to charity. But if you dont want that, I still have the insurance as collateral.

Looking for a 0.04BTC loan to buy a new VPS. The maximum amount of time to repay is 1 week. I currently only have 0.7 FTC, cannot provide any other items. Thanks! Could also buy the bitcoins if i cannot return on time. 20% interest
Edit: A guy called nil, a mod on Primedice could also vouch for me.

AndrewWilliams Is lending me, likl3sfuhjh 0.05 BTC. In return I agree to payback 0.06 BTC by 11/25/2013.

15uuf2A9ZkcgTTuFJnZiNZwjkEGDfxwjVS

Posting for reference AndrewWilliams

AndrewWilliams Is lending  likl3sfuhjh .05 - .06 to be repaid 25th

15uuf2A9ZkcgTTuFJnZiNZwjkEGDfxwjVS

Consumers don't want innovation (not that gld aint working on that part), only a small niche crowd of crypto nerds wants innovation.

You misunderstand, it's not about wealthy, those comments are about Bitcoin not solving the problems, so the people end up being beholden to wealthy Bitcoiners under a new currency.  A currency that few have and the majority have to come to the few to get.  Same old thing, just a different fiat.  You apparently don't understand much of our global monetary issues and thus my comments are flying over your head.  I can see you are emotional but that's really your issue.  You are also free to click that little ignore button at any time you choose, to join the rest of the crybabies who I'm glad I don't have to listen to anymore.  

There's a little thing called freedom, maybe you've heard of it.  So I'll continue to post as long as I choose.  I'm not here to be your friend and I don't care if I hurt your feelings.  I say what I want, when I want and if that's too much for you, then kindly stop responding.  If you'd like to have an actual conversation, that doesn't include your feeling getting hurt everytime someone mentions Ripple, I'm more than happy to do that too.  It's your call, sport.  

This is the root of the issue I think, since Vod is in the good ole boy network, his trust is weighted heavier as it is more visible to the mass majority who won't actually look into the details as compared to the retaliatory feedback that was given to him by people not in the good ole boy network.  Perhaps someone in the Good ole boy network should step up and justly give him his just desserts until the matter is cleared, would you be willing to be a negative trust "escrow" Salty until the matter is resolved?  As the fact of the matter is the mass majority won't look into the facts so Vod is wielding e-peen which is wrong, and the simple fact that he has this e-peen for being an "internet policeman".  This will be my last contribution to these... threads, I've already ignored those which deserve it and that's enough for me but someone with authority and maturity needs to step up where they are needed and this system needs a very serious reconsideration/reevaluation for its effectiveness and purpose.

And to those who invited him into the good ole boy network... they should also reconsider their positions on the matter and use their trust ratings with scrutiny and evidence of trustworthiness and not just invite every "internet policeman" they see into the network.

Ok, I can accept ignorance as an excuse.  If you didn't know it was wrong, that's fine.

For the sake of the forum and the staff that have to monitor the "META" subforum, I'll forgive this abuse accusation and start over. 

Well. I guess our Android app, paper wallet, and innovative 51% attack defense is chopped liver.  

I think it's time you stepped up and said "yes, I asked for SSN at the start, but I won't anymore."    After all, I still have two messages of you clearly asking for SSN.

I removed the negative trust after I decided I would no longer take anonymous reports like that.  That doesn't mean I was wrong - the proof still exists, but I promised not to share it.

Ok, so the religion talk is over. Hasn't Vod already given you a reply about this like... 5 pages ago? He doesn't trust you, so he gave you negative feedback. The goal here is to make him not, not trust you, so he removes the feedback (if possible)

I don't know what just saying, remove your feedback is going to do.