I vote to get any machine that will start hashing first.
This is a race - the ones who start hashing first win.
I prefer mining bitcoin,
but if they have these TITANS on hand then get them.
no, i think titan isnt ready yet. neptune 2nd batch would be sooner. bitcoin for my vote op is that wasp thing ever coming off? The WPC is still active, the latest board to be produced is the Spondoolies Whiteface mining board. This is a test mining board for the Allied Control Cooling Container project. All current boards are proof of concept tests, currently the only chips being used are ones that will not reach ROI. SWMC is planning on offering preorders for hashing power based on the SWMC Hashing Exchange that is currently being tested internally. When I do offer the GH/s to early adopters, there will be an ROI+ guarantee and some nice bonus included, but again, that is for early adopters only. I wanted to offer a beta version of the Hashing Exchange before I offered any preorders, but we may not be able to wait that long. Many of the big mining companies out there are buying up chips long before the average individual even knows the chips will be available. That makes it nearly impossible to get enough chips that will afford us an ROI by the time those chips are released. All of the big mining companies (including ASIC hardware manufacturers) are moving to a cloud mining platform. It wont be too many months from now and you wont be able to purchase personal miningware at all, simply because it will cost to much to keep up (if we aren't already there and just haven't decided to accept it yet,) or there won't be anyone who wants to sell miningware to you. It is soon to become an only big players league when it comes to Bitcoin mining. That's why I am building the SWMC Hashing Exchange, so we can still be in the game and be just as profitable... To make this work, SWMC will need to raise some serious capital. So the plan is to offer an initial total hashing power of 2-4 PH/s at somewhere around 85¢ a GH/s with an ROI+ guarantee for early adopters. We are currently in negotiations with Allied Control as part of the development of our data center which will be utilizing immersion cooling methods like that which is provided by Allied Control. We are also working on getting access to 5.5¢ kWh electricity. I have dual US/British citizenship, so I am considering basing part of SWMC in The Isle of Man which is a Bitcoin friendly country. It may not look like much is happening with SWMC on your end, but there is a lot of activity on mine. Just to measure your interest, what price point for hashing power would motivate you to preorder hashing power with an ROI+ guarantee from The SWMC Hashing Exchange with the understanding that the exchange is in the development stage and that hashing power may not go live for several months? After sufficient hashing power is being circulated on the exchange, SWMC will never offer preorders again. |
|
|
|
|
Some Batch 0 customers have received their Neptunes, but I don't think that any Batch 1 customers have. What I am sure of, is that our Neptune has not shipped yet and there is no word on when.
Just a point that I would like to make...
KnCMiner has turned to the dark side, they promised 3 TH/s of cloud mining to Neptune customers if there was any delay in shipping. KnCMiner also promised the second Neptune as an upgrade to ensure that Neptune customers would remain profitable. They tried to pull a fast one when the finally did offer the 'Hash While You Wait.'
They buried the details in a bunch of legal mumbo-jumbo at first, but if one where to accept the 3 TH/s cloud mining, you lost the second Neptune... Glad I caught this fact before I accepted the cloud mining offer... They pulled a few other dirty little tricks on me and others as well...
As a result, I will never do business with KnCMiner again... PERIOD!
Can't wait until we are fabricating our own miningware using the WASP design (or any other open-source designs for that matter.)
|
|
|
|
Place Your Vote
Should we convert the second Neptune to a Titan scrypt miner?
Apparently, the performance of the Neptune is unexpectedly disappointing. Looks like KNC has had some issues with their new chip. Although the hash rate at 3.3 TH/s is higher than the Jupiter, the Neptune is under-performing per core compared to the Jupiter, and that is with a FIFTH chip added to the mix... That comes out at just over 486 MH/s per core, just about two thirds that of Jupiter's 716-781 MH/s per core. I am assuming that they have either a high dead core count or that in their rush to ship the Neptune's that they haven't tweaked the firmware well enough... KNC states that the will be offering the opportunity to receive their new Titan scrypt miner instead of the second Neptune. So lets vote on whether or not to take the Neptune or the Titan... All votes count, you must vote or you leave the decision to those who do vote |
|
|
|
Place Your Vote
Should we convert the second Neptune to a Titan scrypt miner?
Apparently, the performance of the Neptune is unexpectedly disappointing. Looks like KNC has had some issues with their new chip. Although the hash rate at 3.3 TH/s is higher than the Jupiter, the Neptune is under-performing per core compared to the Jupiter, and that is with a FIFTH chip added to the mix... That comes out at just over 486 MH/s per core, just about two thirds that of Jupiter's 716-781 MH/s per core. I am assuming that they have either a high dead core count or that in their rush to ship the Neptune's that they haven't tweaked the firmware well enough... KNC states that the will be offering the opportunity to receive their new Titan scrypt miner instead of the second Neptune. So lets vote on whether or not to take the Neptune or the Titan... All votes count, you must vote or you leave the decision to those who do vote |
|
|
|
Just some quick guesswork on the hashing power that the Neptune may provide based on the Jupiter's performance numbers...
1440 cores @ 716 MH/s per core = 1.03104 TH/s per chip * 5 chips (not 4 chips as I previously assumed) = 5.1552 TH/s per Neptune * 2 Nuptune's = 10.3104TH/s for our GB
1440 cores @ 781 MH/s per core = 1.12464 TH/s per chip * 5 chips = 5.6232 TH/s per Neptune * 2 Neptune's = 11,2464 TH/s for our GB
** Of course, we must realize that the chips may perform better or worse than the Jupiter's chips. They may have added a fifth chip to compensate for lower than expected performance of the Neptune chips -OR- They may have added the fifth chip to make sure their customers make ROI+. We'll have to wait and see...
|
|
|
|
|
Just some quick guesswork on the hashing power that the Neptune may provide based on the Jupiter's performance numbers...
1440 cores @ 716 MH/s per core = 1.03104 TH/s per chip * 5 chips (not 4 chips as I previously assumed) = 5.1552 TH/s per Neptune * 2 Nuptune's = 10.3104TH/s for our GB
1440 cores @ 781 MH/s per core = 1.12464 TH/s per chip * 5 chips = 5.6232 TH/s per Neptune * 2 Neptune's = 11,2464 TH/s for our GB
** Of course, we must realize that the chips may perform better or worse than the Jupiter's chips. They may have added a fifth chip to compensate for lower than expected performance of the Neptune chips -OR- They may have added the fifth chip to make sure their customers make ROI+. We'll have to wait and see...
|
|
|
|
Honestly, I'm surprised no one has raised this issue: The most effective place for these road solar panels to work is in locations with low traffic (otherwise they will be blocked and not absorbing sunlight). These same places are often sparsely populated. There is a reason power plants are located near cities. Power transmission is costly and leads to lost energy. It would be far more cost effective to place panels in near cities so less are needed to provide the necessary energy. (It should be noted that the production of photo voltaic cells is hardly a green activity.)
Your first point is addressed on the Solar Roadways website. The second point is valid. |
|
|
|
Can't be as bad as a pothole, surely? Mind, if one was loose then perhaps it could be a problem. I'm sure that all angles will be covered when these are considered, if they haven't been already. Very exciting tech, but I feel that we should be trying this out to replace tiles on roofs first of all  Actually, the cost of replacing or repairing a single panel is minimal compared to the savings that panel will produce: 1. Consider the cost of deicing roads. Solar Roadways deice themselves. [ State and local agencies spend more than 2.3 billion dollars on snow and ice control operations annually. Each year, these road agencies also spend millions of dollars to repair infrastructure damage caused by snow and ice.] 2. Consider the cost of repairing a mile of highway simply because 10% of it is damaged. It may be the case that only 10% of the highway is damaged, but that damage is spread out over that entire mile of road, so you HAVE to replace the WHOLE MILE OF ROADWAY!! With these panels, you only need to replace the damaged part. Most of this damage is caused by snow, ice and rain and not wear and tear from vehicles driving on the surfaces. [ MoDOT now spends about $163,000 to resurface one mile of a four-lane highway, while it takes $4.3 million to build one mile of a new section of a four-lane highway] 3. Consider the cost in lost work and productivity due to rerouting traffic around highway construction zones, delays, congestion, etc... [ traffic congestion in the 439 U.S. urban areas. Highlights from the research illustrate the effects of the nation's traffic problems: Congestion costs continue to rise: measured in constant 2009 dollars, the cost of congestion has risen from $24 billion in 1982 to $115 billion in 2009. The total amount of wasted fuel in 2009 topped 3.9 billion gallons - equal to 130 days of flow in the Alaska Pipeline. Cost to the average commuter: $808 in 2009, compared to an inflation-adjusted $351 in 1982.] 4. Consider that Solar Roadways could, using conservative estimates, produce over three times the electricity that we currently use in the United States. 5. Consider the fact that the US (alone) spends billions of dollars to build and maintain road surfaces that just lay on the ground doing nothing but giving us a (relatively) smooth surface to drive on. That's billions of dollars that will be spent no matter what kind of roads we build, why not make those roads help pay for themselves? 6. Consider the cost of auto repairs caused by wear and tear due to the cumulative effects of poor road conditions. 7. Consider the cost to human life due to poor road conditions. Do we dare put a $ value to that?? How about the fact that these roads can notify drivers and emergency personnel of potential hazards like fallen trees, collapsed roadways, pedestrians, wildlife (deer, elk, moose, elephants,) accidents, drunk drivers... yup, drunk drivers.... [ If a vehicle crosses the center line too many times within a given distance, a ring of LEDs can be drawn around the vehicle, which will travel with it indefinitely. This will warn other drivers of a potential danger and will alert law enforcement officials of a potential problem. It may just be someone tuning their radio, eating a Big Mac, reading a map, or applying makeup (we've seen all of these), but it may also be an impaired driver on his/her way to taking out a family of four. The Solar Roadways could drastically reduce the number of deaths/injuries caused by impaired driving. This too, ought to result in lowered insurance rates for all of us.] As far as starting with rooftops instead, well, that would be a benefit if the cost is right. But the additional savings and benefits involved in building Solar Roadways far exceeds those rooftop benefits even if rooftop solar panels are economically feasible. |
|
|
|
Thank you. Personally, I don't see it being worth it to throw millions of dollars at these guys. A lot of these tests could be ran on a much cheaper platform. If it costs a million dollars to get a some-what working prototype (just needs to be 10ft by 10ft and support the weight of a car), then there's something off about the R&D.
Well, I can see you point and your welcome. The only thing is, if people had that attitude all the time, I don't think the current state of technology would even exist. Its good that we can all make our own decisions about what kinds of things we want to support. They have had done a lot of R&D thus far, they need more money to further the development, that's what they are asking for. |
|
|
|
Whoa, whoa, whoa. We're including networking into this? So, that means there has to be some sort of network communication running along the panels. It can't just be a giant wireless mesh (there'd be way, way too much crosstalk; CSMA/CA wouldn't work with that many connections trying to communicate). This idea is more and more far-fetched.
Honestly, you don't think that the thieves would just jam the signal / cut the cable? Honestly, this idea is as feasible as a space elevator.
You seem bright enough to figure out how it might work. Instead of thinking "That can't be done..." Think "How would you do that?.... Its not so far fetched, your argument is equivalent to saying there are to many people using wireless internet for it to work. On the second point, AS I STATED, it would take some time to remove enough panels to make it worth the trouble (kinda like the Bitcoin protocol, you can brute force the system and insert a double spend, but is it worth the millions of dollars it would take to do so.) OK, so to manage to steal a few panels before the state troopers show up. First you have to get to buy, steal or fabricate the tools (not just the special wrench to remove the nuts, but a hoist and a gas guzzling truck, maybe some friends to help out, you'll have to split you ill-gotten gains with them you know) so you can extract the panels ($$$.) Travel to the location of the theft ($GAS.) Once there you need to work as quickly as possible because you don't know if the closest trooper or road crew is only a mile or so away, so nothing can go wrong. The shielding for the WiFi wont be free by any means and adds more weight ($$.) And once you do all that, you have to transport those heavy panels some distance after extracting them ($GAS.) Oh... and you can't remove the WiFi card because the electronics are embedded into the glass so you'll have to keep the shielding on them... wait... if you leave the shielding on them, will you be able to use them through the shielding?... Ahh... you know what, just writing about this is getting to be not worth it, so actually doing it would be even worse... and god knows about the things I didn't consider could go wrong or the hidden security features that I hadn't a clue about... Never mind, just forget it, I'll just go buy my own....  |
|
|
|
The test wasn't even remotely close to scientific. That test is like pointing a box fan at a house and saying it's tornado proof cause it didn't fall down.
A single bike skid mark, and sneaker wear onto the glass. If you've ever done that on an actual smooth surface, you could do the same thing (wipe off the sneaker / bike mark with water). Try it with a tire mark, see how long it takes.
Unless it's a hurricane, I don't see that helping.
Regardless, they now have the money to go through with more rigorous tests like they planned, and potentially even start the project on a small scale. I guess we'll find out soon enough how well this will work. bluefirecorp makes good points here, but its not like they are hiding those facts and have even address them. |
|
|
|
I've done my homework and two things are not mentioned there: How much will your panels cost? We are not yet able to give numbers on cost. We are still in the midst of our Phase II contract with the Federal Highway Administration and we'll be analyzing our prototype costs near the end of our contract which ends in July, 2014. Afterward, we'll be able to do a production-style cost analysis . Secondary , they have talked about how a car can stop normally or steer on these things but what about tire usage? In the end it might be that we pay lots of taxes on costly energy and we also have a few extra things to change more often due to these innovations. All valid arguments. |
|
|
|
Wow, they are currently at $1,256,771 raised, out of the $1,000,000 they requested, and there's still 6 more days to go. Not bad. i think it's genius. the sun gives us more energy in one day than the whole world uses in one year. i would invest if they were publicly traded.
I'm investing for the sake of mans future, but being able to earn otherwise would be a nice perk. I read an article today about that; it goes into how other campaigners have in the past been bought off by large companies, leaving the initial investors with little or nothing to show for their support, and how that could be avoided: http://falkvinge.net/2014/05/26/solar-roadways-please-learn-from-oculus-mistake-and-become-a-co-op/. That's wonderful, I hope I help them in some small way to reach their goal. Now lets hope they do even better so they can get this tech out and in use! |
|
|
|
It sounds fine with all the positive arguments, but it is sad that there is always only one side of the aspects shown.
What if these pannels get dirty all over the time? You would need an incredible amount of workers to clean them regurlarly. ALL of the roads or grounds ALL over the country. Can you even imagine the amount of workers doing so?
Additionally imagine how long it takes to replace everything with these. The actual amount of roadworks EVERYWHERE.
Don't forget the huge expense in replacing these. One panel gets cracked / stolen / etc... then all of a sudden, they have to replace it, which is a lot more money. Can't be as bad as a pothole, surely? Mind, if one was loose then perhaps it could be a problem. I'm sure that all angles will be covered when these are considered, if they haven't been already. Very exciting tech, but I feel that we should be trying this out to replace tiles on roofs first of all You're driving one day, and a huge section of the road is missing. I'd say that's much worse than a pothole. (Someone stole the 'road' so they could sell the solar cells for a discount on the blackmarket using a fairly anonymous crypto-currency... what's the name of that one that's worth a lot now, hmm.. I can't remember). Now that's a different scenario you're talking about. I guess it depends on what they are mounted on. I think that's where most of the cost comes from, in providing the foundations for these panels to be applied. It's a radical idea, just like Bitcoin, there are going to be suggested problems, sure. But it's up to those with the expertise to find solutions. Theft is an age old problem, though I doubt that these things would sell for much at all, unless you had crazy bulk maybe. Again, do your research. Each panel communicates with the ones next to it via a wireless connection. If one is malfunctioning, damaged or stops communicating the whole network is notified. This accomplishes several things, amongst which are three relevant points: ONE, if a panel needs to be replaced for whatever reason, the road crews are notified. The notification will tell the repair crew EXACTLY WHERE THE PROBLEM PANEL IS. That leads to number TWO, as soon as the panels are tampered with a notification goes out to the base station. It would take awhile to remove enough panels to be worth the trouble. If stolen, the thieves will, at some point, have to travel along the same roads that are made of the panels. Since the panels communicate EXACTLY WHERE THEY ARE via a wireless connection, there location will be know, even when they are being transported. How long do you think it would take law enforcement to find the thieves before they even leave the crime scene let alone while they are trying to get away? And THREE, a nice feature of the panels is that they can notify drivers of road issues ahead (via LED's embedded into the panels,) so a driver would have advanced notice of dangerous road conditions that lay ahead. |
|
|
|
i personally prefer btcjam and cryptostocks, i dont really like havelock (their layout is awful)
btcjam's fee is 30%!!  ROI would be next to impossible. |
|
|
|
Looking at their FAQ page, they did some limited testing for rubber scuffs and skid marks: How are you going to handle skid marks from tires? Won't that block your sunlight?
We weren't able to officially test for that during our Phase II funding from the FHWA as it wasn't in the budget. However, we wondered about that too, so we conducted an experiment. It's not very scientific, but here is what we did:
We took a rubber soled shoe and scuffed a section of concrete and a section of our glass. We used a bike tire to create a skid mark on both the concrete and the glass.
The rubber on the glass came off with the simple wipe of a finger: it didn't stick well to the glass. That wasn't the case with the porous concrete: we may now have permanent skip marks there!
We think that the simple act of the next tire rolling over a skid mark on the glass will be enough to loosen the material, which will then blow off or be removed the next time it rains. We are anxious to do some testing to be sure. So it may not be a problem, but they'll test it to find out and can always come up with a solution if it does become an issue. Thanks DooMAD, bluefirecorp and SgtSpike haven't read their FAQ's. Those objections are covered and reasonably so. Before anyone detracts from the idea, maybe they should do more research. Read their FAQ's here and Watch their videos, Youtube search and here a good video summarizing the whole concept. GE's Focus Forward Films. |
|
|
|
Thanks for the updates. You can show my username too.
All done.
Just a heads up, I am working on submitting an application to Havelock Investments to raise capital for the SWMC Hashing Exchange. This will be a ground floor opportunity to earn a BTC income on the other side of the industry, rather than buying miningware to mine with, owners of shares in the SWMC Hashing Exchange will be earning BTC as a profit share in the Hashing Exchange's miningware and hash sales as well as on the hosting fees. The capital to be raised will be used to finance the physical infrastructure (miningware fabrication and supporting systems.) I have tried to raise the funds directly so as to save on some of the fees involved in an IPO, but there is little interest. So I will try the Havelock route to see if this improves the situation. Thanks! James Thanks! I was an intern at Merrill Lynch in college for a year, the number one thing the big brokers drilled into my head was do not mess around with something without reading absolutely everything because everything important is hidden in the fine print. Please read the Havelock terms and conditions before you list on Havelock. The third and fourth paragraphs are horrible as they directly bar investors and companies that reside in the US, China and Germany, from listing or trading on their platform. That is three of the four largest economies in the world. I swear I remember you said that you are from the U.S., doesn't this immediately make Havelock a non-starter? The "No Advice", "Accuracy of Information" and "No Liability" sections are even worse, as they basically say we don't guarantee the data is true and you can't rely on it in any way shape or form. They can literally invent numbers and just throw them up on their charts and graphs without repercussion. They assume no responsibility for anything at all. Worse yet, the company is based is Panama which has some of the worst investment protection laws in the world. They could seize all your funds or disappear and you will not be able to sue them even if you could find them. Honestly, the whole ToS reads like it was designed for scamming people. If you haven't legally registered as at least an LLC, you could potentially be personally liable and guilty of fraud. Do not list your company on their platform without talking to an attorney or stock broker and knowing your own liability. If you still decided to go the Havelock route, you need to consider at the very least adding an option where you can convert Havelock shares to direct shares like Asicminer does. For example with AM1 shares you can import/export shares between Havelock and "direct" shares. This protects buyers in the event that Havelock collapses, is fraudulant, loses popularity or regulators roll in. Sites like Havelock have zero compliance regulation to protect investors like the SEC/FINRA does for the real stock market (mandatory audits, portability, liability etc). Allowing "direct" shares is a way to make the shares portable, similar to the way that stock certificates make real stocks portable. For example, on Wall Street you can change banks without losing your shares, they just send over the stock certs from your old bank one to your new one. They protect investor from a Mt. Gox or Bear Stearns like collapse, or regulators shutting down the site. Thanks LDR, I wasn't aware of those section since I only just started the process. I'll have to reconsider my options. |
|
|
|
i think it's genius. the sun gives us more energy in one day than the whole world uses in one year. i would invest if they were publicly traded.
I'm investing for the sake of mans future, but being able to earn otherwise would be a nice perk. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
