I have no relationship with  www.asmallorange.com other than to say that i have used them for about a dozen projects both personally and as part of packages for clients, and i have had zero issues with them.  Great performance (I think their servers are 100% SSD-based now, among other perks), no downtime in all the time i have been using them (over 2 years).

Support is very responsive, and price is fairly reasonable, though not the cheapest out there. 

The site works for me, posting from a client's office overlooking the national mall in Washington DC...

LTCD

Did you see DickVelcro's latest spectacular cock-up?  MDTSpain from the trustedcrypto team approached him to help fix LTCD's codebase and got the usual Vic "I will ban you go awayyyy" welcome in return.   

I can't believe how badly this guy can crap in his own bed, even when a coder from a well known and generally admired dev crew (MWC, SUPERcoin, a couple others) offers to help out,  vic managed to ruin that opportunity with his winning personality once again.

Hey man this is somewhat off topic here, but I noticed you approached the  "dev"  of another coin to help it out,  and got a nice warm welcome from that colossally arrogant and clueless dickface in return.

For the love of alll that is SUPER please stay far away from that turd and the worthless shitcoin he is in charge of.   It will take resources off SUPER and as a former holder of the other coin, who moved their support to SUPER precisely because I was disgusted with that other coin's boneheaded management, I would be very disappointed to see that coin waste the TC team's efforts even with a casual glance let alone serious time commitment. 

Trust me (if you haven't seen enough already),  that guy needs to be left to rot in the forgotten back pages of the ANN board.   Do not help him for your own sanity's sake.

Amateurs censor, professionals influence.

http://www.reddit.com/r/netsec/comments/2p6knv/amateurs_censor_professionals_influence_sock/

Found it, thanks!  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=209035.1380

Looks like the name was spelled differently (Nybble) in some previous incarnation.  Apparently a switch from Scrypt to Salsa or Habanero or whatever. 

This forum's built-in search is almost as useless as Reddit's.

The forum search brings up nothing.  I am trying to find the original ANN threads for some really old shitcoins that are miraculously still traded for some research on coin proliferation and i get bupkis on Nibble.  Anyone know where the original post was ..uhh.. posted?

Background lurker here,  been following Vidio for a few weeks because the 10,000 foot concept is not a bad one, but the execution is a lot less than I imagined it would be (I thought, from the general description, that it was going to be a decentralized video broadcasting content system that used  its own coin currency to pay its nodes to stream on-demand video - turns out it's just a website with a coin-based paywall.  yawn).   So I stayed away, though I made a suggestion a while back about working with RDD because they also have a video site and an enthusiastic content-creation community - but their site is not pay-based so i wondered if Vidio could fit in there somewhere. Probably a longshot. 

 Still, 300-400 sats seems like a cheap place to buy in and that's where I am now.  Just a toe dipped in, because I basically agree with what you are saying and don't want to risk much.  I do think the coin is somewhat undervalued at 300 sats, even with the snail pace of progress and the probably meaningless website hit counts being shown here.

I, for one,  thank Vic for trying to buy up the price of the coin and clear out the low sells i had from 190 to 210.   Those are the easy 3 and 4 figure ones,  tho....   My 5-6 figure sells in mid 200's and up are not so cheap to get rid of   Most bagholders stuck in this coin bought way, waaaaay above that so he's not going to make anyone happy any time soon.   I'm in profit on this coin for months (the kickstart bump 2 or 3 months back after the romanian gypsy drama, from 1100 to 1700+,  was also me) so I can sit on these sells forever, and I probably will.

LOL.  same old same old.  I forgot this phony clown was still around, still doing the same "I'm just an innocent victim of FUD for trying to be a light in the darkness" song and dance since the last time I ran across one of his other scam projects back in like January.   Pretending to be above it all and then deleting even mildly uncomfortable or off-message posts left right and center, which is why the fool gets so many angry PMs in the first place.  There used to be a scam-identification post in one of these boards that listed 10 or so bullet points that marked the most obvious signs of a scam, and this bholzer's projects checked off half of them right out of the gate.  Constant promises, moving goalposts, calling valid criticism of broken promises and missed targets "FUD"  and "trolling",  coins with no technical merit that are just trying to latch on to some bandwagon of the week fad,  appropriating others property (celebrity fame)  for their own gains,  and offering a few laughable pennies in return as "thanks"  for signing the celeb on to a merch contract without their express permission.  You name it.  

Just ignore him.  Waaah cry to mommy forum admins to come tell everyone to leave who isn't coming back anyway.  I'll still post in there at opportune times when truth needs to be spoken to power, I know from experience that the admins get tired of enabling scammers and won't do anything about critical posts that are provably true, in fact abuse of the 'delete' button by a mod has led to threads getting locked on numerous occasions. There's no infinite right to scam here (though scumbags can get away with a *lot*).
But it's time to wait until things start getting stupid again and the lies are transparent enough that even the admins can't ignore them.  For now, the price is doing all the talking.    

FYI don't dump everything you have,  take some profits if you can and then just leave most of it on the sell order books piled high and deep.  This hurts much more than a one-time dump and they have to buy you out to get rid of it, which is sweet, sweet justice.  And don't keep drawing attention to his thread,  let him sit there talking to himself and the other two unfortunate dolts left in that community who haven't figured out what's happening to them yet.

Sorry to hear that.   The dev is a typical liar and pretends to be mature until someone posts anything the least bit critical, or even curious, and blam,  instant stick in the ass mall cop. 

In the future, when you see a self moderated thread that contains a mysterious lack of critical posts, and many zero-content "bump" posts  by the thread moderator and pals,  DUMP and then RUN AWAY. 

I actually bought a few on the last trip down to 170's.  Like several hundred thousand few    Most (as in 70%+) of the bids on the Cryptsy sell book from 300 sats to 200 and even down to 180 are mine. 
I will keep the pressure on this shithead until his coin is flattened to 10 sats and delisted,  or he will have to pay me off and buy me out to get through it.   Censoring my posts is free, but censoring my market position is gonna cost him.

Wow, so Vickwad is not only a self stroking asberger's syndrome mall cop -  he's is also a duplicitous, back-dealing, fuckwit liar?   No way, I never woulda guessed!

It's almost as if Libertarian is a term for people who have Socialist views, but who refuse to recognize (or are just too self-centered to acknowledge) the economic input of a society larger than that which can be confined within the space of their own two footprints.  Anti-social Socialists, you might say. 

The guy was nominated to be in charge of a coin that was a joke from day one,  by a handful of clueless bagholders who couldn't even get get pumpers to be interested in that stinker.  The blind electing the blind.

Now he's all alone in a dead thread, sinking permanently rapidly into the forgotten double digit pages of the ANN board, "managing" a coin that has no future and an embarrassing past, and his own self-moderation idiocy to thank for it.

Let him rot there until Cryptsy puts that turd on the short list for removal starting Dec 15th. Best punishment is to let him suck wind all by himself IMHO.  

A "dev" who cannot code at all (and I mean not even HTML), who cannot solve conflict problems, who cannot deal with community heat from frustration with non-performance because he's a just useless sack of shit who took over management of a coin nobody with any sense will go near?  A coin that is a flat out lie right there in its name (it's got nothing to do with LiteCoin  nor Dark, no anon, etc.  100% generic vanilla scrypt schitcoin)?

How, pray tell,  could this be a scam?   

This is what i mean by it is a simulation of interest, not actual interest.  It's just mimicking the "last mile" part of how interest payments work, not the rest of the underlying economic mechanism that drives the market to set interest rates in the first place.  

I'm not trying to criticise stake, as it has its own crypto-specific economic niche (securing the network), but it's not actually "interest" at all.  Crypto still needs a genuine lending mechanism in order to have a way to earn interest as the rest of the financial world would understand it, and it's a big missing piece in the ecosystem.

You missed step 0:  recognize the kind of in-the-dark, information-starved, gambling addicted audience you are dealing with

Stake is not interest.  It is a superficial mimicry of interest..  Coins cannot earn interest until one of them comes up with a way to lend them at a contract interest rate and have them still be spendable,  but revokable (or rate adjustable) if the terms are not met.  This would never work with anonymity unless it becomes possible to enforce the contract terms on an anonymous wallet or address through some kind of escrow mechanism.  Even then there's no way to estimate default risk and thus set an interest rate to lend them at.