@EBK1000: MojoMix already works?
All you can do is try. I am trying now. But, I would recommend using 2.3. I am trying now. If you try and have some problem then please feed back. There should be enough 2.3 masternodes to mix. |
|
|
|
I'm having hell of a time installing daemons on Windows OR Linux. Can someone please give me a hand? I couldn't build mojocoind for windows and can't locate mojocoind for linux
The link to the linux monocoind you can find in the OP. It is currently v2.2, but should be updated soon. If you want to compile the recent v2.3 or the daemon is not running because of the wrong dependencies (e.g. on ubuntu 16.04), you can compile from source. If you notice the build notes ( https://github.com/MojocoinV2/mojocoin/blob/master/doc/build-unix.md), everything should work. I'll try to get links to ready built daemons up in the next 2-3 days if you have trouble building one. |
|
|
|
the fix for overflow wil be active after the block 84,000 or already is active ?
Fix will be activated at block 84,000 w/ the rest of the fixes |
|
|
|
IMPORTANT UPDATEMANDATORY UPGRADE TO MOJO V.2.3 BEFORE BLOCK 84,000 (AROUND 28/08/16)We have released the new source for v.2.3 w/ the following fixes and changes to the PoS / masternode system. 1. Fix from the PoS Reward. 1,5% >> see below for the updated PoS scheme 1.b Fix for PoS reward for big amounts (overflow error) 2. Add new POS Reward for Year 1-5 >> see below 3. Change the Masternode Reward for year 2-3 >> see below 4. Change POW Reward to 5 MOJO / block 5. Hardfork switch after block 84,000 6. MinCoinAgeError fix This should resolve the staking issues and the below is new PoS / masternode sceheme: PoS values: Year1: 20% annually - 50% masternodes share (1 year from block 84,000) Year2: 15% annually - 60% masternodes share year3: 10% annually - 70% masternodes share year4 onwards: 5% annually - 70% masternodes share The MOJO v.2.3 for Windows is ready >> LINK
Mac-qt 2.3You MUST UPGRADE TO VERSION 2.3 before block 84,000 (roughly 28/08)
Linux daemon v.2.3 will be out very soon. Thank you Does this mean that Masternode block rewards will become significantly higher as of block 84,000? Yes, the PoS value was set wrong in v.2.1 and 2.2 so that wallets only got 1.5%, this has been increased to 20% so MNs will get 50% of all stake reward on the network. This then means that a "normal' wallet will get 10%, so if you stake 100,000 MOJO, you should get around 10,000 MOJO annually. Will the required MN balance remain at 20,000 MOJO per MN? (And thanks for the clarification. I'm getting more MOJO) The collateral is 200,000 MOJO |
|
|
|
IMPORTANT UPDATEMANDATORY UPGRADE TO MOJO V.2.3 BEFORE BLOCK 84,000 (AROUND 28/08/16)We have released the new source for v.2.3 w/ the following fixes and changes to the PoS / masternode system. 1. Fix from the PoS Reward. 1,5% >> see below for the updated PoS scheme 1.b Fix for PoS reward for big amounts (overflow error) 2. Add new POS Reward for Year 1-5 >> see below 3. Change the Masternode Reward for year 2-3 >> see below 4. Change POW Reward to 5 MOJO / block 5. Hardfork switch after block 84,000 6. MinCoinAgeError fix This should resolve the staking issues and the below is new PoS / masternode sceheme: PoS values: Year1: 20% annually - 50% masternodes share (1 year from block 84,000) Year2: 15% annually - 60% masternodes share year3: 10% annually - 70% masternodes share year4 onwards: 5% annually - 70% masternodes share The MOJO v.2.3 for Windows is ready >> LINK
Mac-qt 2.3You MUST UPGRADE TO VERSION 2.3 before block 84,000 (roughly 28/08)
Linux daemon v.2.3 will be out very soon. Thank you Does this mean that Masternode block rewards will become significantly higher as of block 84,000? Yes, the PoS value was set wrong in v.2.1 and 2.2 so that wallets only got 1.5%, this has been increased to 20% so MNs will get 50% of all stake reward on the network. This then means that a "normal' wallet will get 10%, so if you stake 100,000 MOJO, you should get around 10,000 MOJO annually. |
|
|
|
Are there any windows daemons available? If not, when can we expect them?
You can build one yourself. There are instructions in the GitHub repo. |
|
|
|
I sent some coins to yobit,coinexchange and livecoin with 200 confirmation but they haven't received in any one of them yet. what's the problem?
We have advised against using YoBit. DO NOT USE YoBit. I have no idea what wallet version they are running. Livecoin and Coinexchange should be running 2.1 or 2.2 both of which are compatible. You need to run at least 2.1 and now you need to upgrade to 2.3. |
|
|
|
IMPORTANT UPDATEMANDATORY UPGRADE TO MOJO V.2.3 BEFORE BLOCK 84,000 (AROUND 28/08/16)We have released the new source for v.2.3 w/ the following fixes and changes to the PoS / masternode system. 1. Fix from the PoS Reward. 1,5% >> see below for the updated PoS scheme 1.b Fix for PoS reward for big amounts (overflow error) 2. Add new POS Reward for Year 1-5 >> see below 3. Change the Masternode Reward for year 2-3 >> see below 4. Change POW Reward to 5 MOJO / block 5. Hardfork switch after block 84,000 6. MinCoinAgeError fix This should resolve the staking issues and the below is new PoS / masternode sceheme: PoS values: Year1: 20% annually - 50% masternodes share (1 year from block 84,000) Year2: 15% annually - 60% masternodes share year3: 10% annually - 70% masternodes share year4 onwards: 5% annually - 70% masternodes share The MOJO v.2.3 for Windows is ready >> LINK
Mac-qt 2.3You MUST UPGRADE TO VERSION 2.3 before block 84,000 (roughly 28/08)
Linux daemon v.2.3 will be out very soon. Thank you
|
|
|
|
EBK1000, is there a chance to get the updated client today? Otherwise I have to wait only 2 days (because of the splitting), then the positions are small enough to prevent overflow  . The latest one is v.2.2 (pre-release) that solves some problems. There are links in the OP. The next version is 2-3 weeks away. The v.2.2 (pre-release) does not solve the staking reward overflow bug  : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1366963.msg15887506#msg15887506Yes, unfortunately, you will have to wait for the next full release, should be 2-3 weeks |
|
|
|
EBK1000, is there a chance to get the updated client today? Otherwise I have to wait only 2 days (because of the splitting), then the positions are small enough to prevent overflow . The latest one is v.2.2 (pre-release) that solves some problems. There are links in the OP. The next version is 2-3 weeks away. |
|
|
|
Well, it seems to me that you could have 2147483647 different index numbers if it's a 32 bit number. i.e. 2 billion 147 million 483 thousands and 647. I think this index splitting that occurs on occasion is a 'red herring' and not an indicator of anything wrong. I am still looking into it.
2147483647 = 2^32 is not a big number. IF the coins of each index would split every 24 hours, the end WOULD be reached after 32 days. The index splitting does not occur on occasion, it is reproducible for coin amounts per index greater ~1250 MOJO. See here: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/mojo/address.dws?MA8o6ZSKaAHwrAVqqwQXkXhKZzJeWQpC8Q.htmBut I think you're right, that seems to not to be a problem. No, you're missing the point, you can have 2,147,483,647 index numbers per a single transaction. The index number points to a balance "position" within that one transaction. So, unless an output splits into more than 2,147,483,647 index numbers in one transaction there is no issue. This was only really an issue for masternodes as the masternode daemon will look for a single UTXO within one index number to verify your collateral. So, this problem was solved by setting the switch staking=0 for masternodes ONLY. Does that make sense. |
|
|
|
If the code is well working, so it's not.possible to split to zero. Normally it will go back to one big pile. Almost all coins have this.
Steve
Good to hear this Well, the split you are referring to is the UTXO after stake into different index numbers but the coin balance to still held in one single MOJO address. You still have the same amount you had before the stake reward + the stake reward as an unspent output in the same address. The index number doesn't really matter. I am investigating this. I don't think it's an issue that one UTXO in one address has several index numbers. Also, this doesn't always happen and it seems to be an old issue. Have a look at this PoS TX where it doesn't happen. https://chainz.cryptoid.info/mojo/tx.dws?60917.htmThe stake doesn't split into two different MOJO addresses. The index number is a 32 bit integer so you can have almost unlimited index numbers. Does that make sense. Although the UTXOs are after the stake in the same address, the count of index numbers could be doubled with each stake. This would mean, there could be a problem after a minimum of 32 days (because of the int32), if there are no more indexes. But probably this is a theoretical problem. Your example shows no splitting. Here you can see the same: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/mojo/address.dws?MAkVtpysByXLEQSYoRuFuaitgGN93XAcxD.htmThe coins only splits up to block 47683. - maybe because of a maximum of indexes reached (here 4) or - maybe splitting only takes place with coin amounts (per index) greater a treshhold (here between 2500 and 1250 MOJO) The last point is more likely, because here you can see more then 4 indexes: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/mojo/address.dws?M8Ap669FBWKTR2XaZTWPZtPj8aitsBmhH5.htmWell, it seems to me that you could have 2147483647 different index numbers if it's a 32 bit number. i.e. 2 billion 147 million 483 thousands and 647. I think this index splitting that occurs on occasion is a 'red herring' and not an indicator of anything wrong. I am still looking into it. |
|
|
|
If the code is well working, so it's not.possible to split to zero. Normally it will go back to one big pile. Almost all coins have this.
Steve
Good to hear this Well, the split you are referring to is the UTXO after stake into different index numbers but the coin balance to still held in one single MOJO address. You still have the same amount you had before the stake reward + the stake reward as an unspent output in the same address. The index number doesn't really matter. I am investigating this. I don't think it's an issue that one UTXO in one address has several index numbers. Also, this doesn't always happen and it seems to be an old issue. Have a look at this PoS TX where it doesn't happen. https://chainz.cryptoid.info/mojo/tx.dws?60917.htmThe stake doesn't split into two different MOJO addresses. The index number is a 32 bit integer so you can have almost unlimited index numbers. Does that make sense. |
|
|
|
|
We are working on a fix for the stake reward etc. and it shouldn't take too long. Just to let you know that I am off on a holiday for around 2-3 weeks so there may not be that many updates as I will only have my phone and may be off-line for periods of time. We expect to have something new out end of August. Hang in there...
|
|
|
|
|
We will release a new wallet tomorrow with some fixes. V2.2, this is not a hard fork.
|
|
|
|
Just a quick update, we have identified and fixed the PoS issue and we are running some debug wallets that seems to stake as they should. There are still a few minor issues to sort out but expect an update / upgrade in the next few days. Once an updated wallet with the PoS fix is out we will start working on the spork system and get that up and running.
ED: We have a MOJO v.2.2 that we are testing now that will have the PoS fixed....
WOW....awesome news...Thats crypto...everything is experimental. The most important part is always the leader and maintainer behind a coin. He should never give up. EBK1000, great and you can start with ur missions. Greetz Steve Thanks to you and your friend we seem to be back on track.... |
|
|
|
I have requested yobit.net about tenth time but they are not yet responding. Yobit.net withdrawal issue is causing sell off there and causing pakcoin graph at coinmarketcap.com downwards. That's disgusting
YoBit CAN NOT be trusted. Me, as a coin dev, have tried to contact them, but they do not answer. DO NOT USE YoBit!!!! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
