Bitcoin Forum
April 30, 2024, 10:58:55 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 [58] 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 »
1141  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Idea: Diablo III Bitcoin Auction House on: May 21, 2012, 08:31:07 PM
Mt.Gox is not a company that has grown larger through Bitcoin?

I thought about mentioning MtGox, but there are several reasons I didn't that I don't want to start  flame war about here. Suffice to say, all companies grow larger through Bitcoin but some grow artificially and remain unhealthy.

I disagree. Bitcoin so far represents a free market. There is nothing artificial about that.

I think free markets are only free when the parties involved in them understand that it's free. Right now a good majority are still clinging to their old habits of centralization, insurance, backing, reversals, trusting strangers, etc.

The parties involved are only participants. It's the market controls or lack thereof that determine whether or not the market is free. And throughout history people have struggled with the issue of appropriately placing trust.
1142  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Idea: Diablo III Bitcoin Auction House on: May 21, 2012, 08:21:29 PM
Mt.Gox is not a company that has grown larger through Bitcoin?

I thought about mentioning MtGox, but there are several reasons I didn't that I don't want to start  flame war about here. Suffice to say, all companies grow larger through Bitcoin but some grow artificially and remain unhealthy.

I disagree. Bitcoin so far represents a free market. There is nothing artificial about that.
1143  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Idea: Diablo III Bitcoin Auction House on: May 21, 2012, 08:11:15 PM
Bitcoin in itself is an experiment, which only started 3.5 years ago, so the fact that most of the sites and businesses around it aren't full fledged corporate projects is understandable.

The internet started as hobby project too, it was just a matter of finding good uses for it. The same goes for bitcoin.

The same does not yet go for Bitcoin, as the difference so far is that large companies become larger, and small companies became large through the internet. That has not happened much in Bitcoin yet.

Mt.Gox is not a company that has grown larger through Bitcoin?

And besides Mt.Gox, name a Bitcoin company that is more than 2 years old. It took longer than two years for three of the Internet's juggernauts to really grow and be profitable: Google, Yahoo, and Amazon I know just off the top of my head.

Quote
Amazon was incorporated in 1994, in the state of Washington. In July 1995, the company began service and sold its first book on Amazon.com — Douglas Hofstadter's Fluid Concepts and Creative Analogies: Computer Models of the Fundamental Mechanisms of Thought.[11] In 1996, it was reincorporated in Delaware.
1144  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin Island on: May 21, 2012, 05:24:03 PM
This 'island' has been up for sale a few times on ebay and never met the reserve.

Note that this is a 'rush, cash only sale' they claim they have no time to wait for banks that should be a huge red flag.

Here's the real price of that island and the real brokers that are selling it:
http://www.privateislandsonline.com/cayo-iguana-nicaragua.htm

Another huge red flag is this guy used to sell scammy weight loss pills where the bulk of his feedack comes from. Then of course there's this:
"    Follow-up by swabby-ret (May-03-12 10:45):
    YOU SOLD ME A RAT AND ROACH INFESTECONDO ON FOREST CITY RD. YOU ARE A DISGRACE! "

It also claims there are employees there, well you'd better research Nicaraguan laws because you probably have to keep them employed or pay out severence.

You're crazy if you think this is a legit sale and will only cost $127,000.
If you want that cheap (and economic paradise) then look into Ecuador land or North Cyprus

Finally, someone with half a brain in this thread.

I think that's a bit harsh. I don't think anyone had moved past more than musing at the thought of our own island.

EDIT: Actually @BitAvenue seemed to have been seriously considering it Wink

Total Received   1 BTC

Almost there.
1145  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin Island on: May 21, 2012, 03:03:49 PM
FAQ Update

the fee seems huge for so little work...

Fees have been lowered to 0.3%.
On a 5 BTC ($25) contribution, the fee would be 0.015 BTC (8 cents).
On the total 40,000 BTC goal, the fee would be 120 BTC ($600).

verify the identities of those in charge

My identity is not hidden.

Five acres is very small.

If we can't manage to crowdfund a 5 acre island, we probably can't crowdfund anything larger.

considering that we're talking about glorified sandbars

This island is definitely not a glorified sandbar, as you can tell by the picture.

Quote
Not enough incentive

Contributors of 50 BTC or more will receive VIP invitations to an inaugural beach bash held on the island.  This will be a 3-5 day event combining partying and relaxation while sleeping under the stars and enjoying the warm weather and ocean breezes.

floating island...
...once ready I think we can churn out land for about 20$/m^2.

$20 / m^2 is equivalent to $400,000 for 5 acres.
Seasteads have to be rebuilt periodically as well.  Islands don't.

just buy an old ship.

The world's largest ship has a footprint of 5.8 acres and cost $1.2 billion to build, the equivalent of 25 times the entire Bitcoin economy.


I do admire you for addressing the questions and concerns in a constructive manner. That said, I'd like to see this conversation continue, but time may be of the essence, for the island may be sold before ducks are in a row here.

~Bruno~


I don't think we've settled on two important preliminary questions: 1) is this (or any) island what we want/need? 2) Is an ebay auction the best way to buy an island?
1146  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin Paper Notes idea on: May 21, 2012, 02:45:44 PM
I don't see the blockchain being used for the majority of transactions as Bitcoin evolves. I'll re-post what I said in this thread where WalletBit was asking for advice:

Hi Kris,

I talked about the need for a PayPal version of Bitcoin in a post/eBook I did called How to Grow Bitcoin. I'll touch on the key points.

A simple person-to-person pay service I think will come about naturally, and is essential. The root network/blockchain is NOT how the majority of transactions should take place. It's too cumbersome, slow, and won't scale to handle the majority of transactions for the world anyway. Transactions should be done by updating the rows of a database somewhere. Simple.

Such a service should look and behave pretty much exactly like PayPal, except be for Bitcoin. Anyone with an email address can send payment to anyone else with an email address. They log in, enter the address to send to, and the transfer happens instantly. Simple.

Depositing money into a user's "BitPal" type account is done by the blockchain, as are withdrawals. Other deposit/withdrawal options such as integration with exchanges like Mt.Gox can exist for convenience too. But withdrawals and deposits won't happen often because the majority of the Bitcoin ecosystem uses "BitPal" for transactions.

Two more crucial points: all transfers are completely free. Profit can instead come from premium services such as merchant features, and or advertising. Also, such a service is NOT a bank, and might limit number of bitcoins stored to say 1,000, simply to keep things simple, secure, and focused on transactions.

I think WalleBit could become this type of service. I'm sure such a system will come about at some point either way. I had even considered the undertaking myself, to ensure it comes about.
1147  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: [WARNING] Bitcoinica Claims Process is insecure on: May 20, 2012, 10:03:07 PM
It has been compromised in the past, so it likely will again in the future. You should simply just not use StartCom, especially after you've been hacked yourself. StartCom should have been completely blacklisted in browsers.

Comodo, USER-TRUST, and even Verisign have also been compromised in the past, and there's no chance that they'll be removed from browsers because they're so popular. Lots of governments also have their own probably-insecure CAs which are accepted by all browsers. The CA system is a lost cause.

Did everyone watch the video @zer0 linked above?

http://youtu.be/Z7Wl2FW2TcA

I think the Convergence system is what everyone should be pushing toward.
1148  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Jered Kenna's 20Mission Project [Video] on: May 19, 2012, 02:28:44 PM
OMG  Shocked
1149  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin Island on: May 18, 2012, 07:21:24 PM
Quote
In January 2010 Wirtland proposed to acquire land by consent from Nauru. If successful, it would be the first case of a peaceful formation of a new country 'from scratch', making Wirtland potentially eligible for international diplomatic recognition according to Article 1 of Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States, provided that it can also meet the requirements of a "permanent population" under the control of a government.
What do you think? How about new free country/free town/free bitcoin island?

More info on Wirtland:

http://grou.ps/witizens/videos/1266229 (video Fox45 News)

http://www.wirtland.com/ (home page)

Well, it's certainly interesting and I think Bitcoin, the first real Internet currency, should certainly be the official currency of Wirtland, the first country that exists only on the Internet.

Apparently, their population is 2,031 as of 1/11/2011. Adding bitcoiners and Libertarians into the mix could certainly boost that, but I do think soil is needed. Seasteading, as mentioned earlier in the thread, looks interesting too:

Quote
Seasteading is the concept of creating permanent dwellings at sea, called seasteads, outside the territory claimed by the government of any standing nation.

What we really need is to combine all three of these: Bitcoin + Wirtland + Seasteading = Awesome?
1150  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin Island on: May 18, 2012, 06:29:18 PM
From the looks of the images on eBay, you have a handsome home surrounded by a landscaped property. Not much room there to build anything else.

No, no, that's not right.  Look at the map.  Five acres is much more than just that.  The pics don't show all of it.

Besides, just for perspective, you know what else sits on one acre?  The Burj al Arab.

Five acres is very small.  Are we sure it isn't in hectares?

A hectare is 2.471 acres, so that would make it 12.355 acres, which still seems small. I think we need something at least 25 acres.
1151  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The essence of Bitcoin and legality. on: May 17, 2012, 10:34:03 PM
For anyone to tell me that I am not allowed to share that which I've created with anyone else is something that I would consider to be a free speech issue.

Forget free speech, what about freedom, period?
1152  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The essence of Bitcoin and legality. on: May 17, 2012, 08:48:28 PM
Quote
For example, this could mean a legislation requiring this sort of agreements to have backdoor for the government.

And the parties to the agreement will politely give government the finger.  Smiley
1153  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin Island on: May 17, 2012, 08:21:16 PM
Let's just buy an old ship. Much cheaper, more convenient, suitable to many different biz at once, and infinitely more amusing.


Pirate Ship Black Raven by Mr. T in DC, on Flickr

A ship would be more amusing, but not more comfortable. I guess it depends which is preferable. I started imagining possibilities for the island... I can see it now: an inviting Casino by the water hosted by StrikeSapphire, cocktail waitresses, courtesy of GirlsGoneBitcoin, in white t-shirts with a golden Bitcoin symbol splashed across their chests. Exciting 24 poker tournaments from SealWithClubs....

I think it could be a good thing  Wink


But @mollison has some good points. I like to think @benjamindees's heart is in the right place, but I would prefer a more thoughtful approach too. There is nothing wrong with a blank canvas and crowdsourcing input, but that's for the theoretical side. When moving on to the practical side it should get more organized. Some sort of corporate structure with fiduciary responsibility to shareholders seems natural.
1154  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Escrow arbiter needed on: May 17, 2012, 06:41:04 PM

I believe it got DDose'd, but it's again up now.
1155  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Escrow arbiter needed on: May 17, 2012, 06:22:57 PM
There is also BTCrow.com

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=21544.0
1156  Other / Off-topic / Re: Diablo 3 - servers going live in a few hours! on: May 14, 2012, 09:53:28 PM
Maybe now ogrr.com can grow as originally promised?
1157  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: [ANN] Propster - start a tip jar for someone else or any project you like on: May 14, 2012, 09:52:14 PM
How about this:

-- anonymous bitcoin donations made to the tip jars BTC drop address can not be auto-converted to USD
-- bitcoin sent through a Propster account can have a configuration setting (allow auto-convert to USD). So only that portion of the donations will be auto-converted.

Would that work to satisfy both policies ?


I think that makes things to complicated. I'm just saying if someone is getting free money they shouldn't mind jumping through a hoop or two to get it. If you don't put up the hoop, though, they will just take the money and go back to business as usual.
1158  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: [ANN] Propster - start a tip jar for someone else or any project you like on: May 14, 2012, 07:30:25 PM
Looks good but I don't think "collected by Bitcoin" is going to have much affect.

If someone approaches me on the street, hands me a $20 and says "Collected by Bitcoin," I'm going to say thanks, put the $20 in my pocket and think that was weird as I enjoy a twenty dollar lunch somewhere and return to normal thoughts.

I'd leave the funds in Bitcoin with instructions on how to easily claim them. I think that would be much more effective.
The first time, yeah. After a few times you'll start wondering who is this Bitcoin fellow who keeps collecting money for you.

To continue the analogy, if that man on the street told you that he's got some bitcoins for you and that it's really easy to collect them, you'd say "ah, ok, you see that mean over there? He'll be happy to hear all about this..."

Well, the street analogy is actually generous as people do tend to pay more attention to other people.

I'd pay even less attention to a message at the end of an email. The point is I'd notice the money most. So use that to our advantage. Say here is free money BUT only if you unlock it...
1159  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: [ANN] Propster - start a tip jar for someone else or any project you like on: May 14, 2012, 07:05:25 PM
Looks good but I don't think "collected by Bitcoin" is going to have much affect.

If someone approaches me on the street, hands me a $20 and says "Collected by Bitcoin," I'm going to say thanks, put the $20 in my pocket and think that was weird as I enjoy a twenty dollar lunch somewhere and return to normal thoughts.

I'd leave the funds in Bitcoin with instructions on how to easily claim them. I think that would be much more effective.
1160  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: I'm leaving Bitcoin on: May 14, 2012, 06:39:38 PM
I failed at one thing though, that is generating value for the society. Bitcoinica did create a place for people to trade more efficiently and provide liquidity to the market. However, speculation is a zero-sum game (or negative-sum, strictly saying). I know there can be many justifications for Bitcoinica's value, but all of them are against my intuition and values.

Good luck-- I share your view that coming up with better ways of playing zero-sum games is not the way to make the world a better place.

I have to say, this really is total fail.

Voluntary trade is absolutely not a zero-sum game.  Everyone benefits.  And, in the real economy, efficient and complex trade requires price stability, something that Bitcoin didn't have before Bitcoinica.  Stabilizing the Bitcoin price is a huge accomplishment.  It builds a foundation for the creation of immense value going forward.  I have no doubt that this will become a textbook example of speculation working for the benefit of an entire economy, as it should in a truly free market.  I almost can't even imagine what would make you think otherwise.

It's amazing to me the number of people in this community who joined what Satoshi billed as a "decentralized currency," only to completely fail to understand what that meant.

This isn't an investment.  It isn't a payment processing network.  It isn't a ponzi scheme.  It's an economy.  And, granted, right now it's an economy built on drugs and knick-knacks and web services.  That's okay.  Rome wasn't built in a day.  Tides turn slowly.  There are milestones that must be reached before Bitcoin can become what it was intended to be.  And, granted, Bitcoin is different things to different people.  That's fine too.  But, really, I would expect a much broader view to be expressed by some of the people most responsible for Bitcoin's success.

Because that's what I see in the Bitcoin economy right now, success.  It might not feel like it.  The price isn't shooting up spectacularly.  Mining is more difficult than it used to be.  There is little innovative new software development.  Bitcoin services are under attack.  But believe me, it's there.  It's in the 10,000 BTC loan recently fulfilled.  It's in the solidly stable value despite 30%+ inflation.  It's in the immense network difficulty and the delivery of FPGA mining cards.  It's in the total resiliency of Bitcoin in the face of immense public and government scrutiny, while still challenging an immoral and corrupt fiat currency regime that has failed the world.

Bitcoin is clearly an idea whose time has come.  I know that backlash is growing.  I know that obstacles remain.  But don't give up before seeing it happen.  Every day that Bitcoin exists, it succeeds.

+1
Pages: « 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 [58] 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!