|
1441
|
Local / Altcoins (Français) / Re: [IEO] Loteries Binance
|
on: August 02, 2019, 12:18:51 AM
|
Vos WIN vous en faites quoi maintenant ?
On peut les échanger contre du BNB ?
Oui tu peux vendre pour des bnb ou des btc J’ai vendu 75% à 1500 bnb-satoshi En gros un petit X4 C’est moins que la précédente mais ça fait toujours plaisir. |
|
|
|
|
1445
|
Local / Échanges / Re: Avis BINANCE
|
on: July 28, 2019, 09:39:02 PM
|
pas du tout tu présente ta cni dans la rue ou chez un commerçant pour acheter du pain toi ?
Ok je fais un HS mais c'est pour expliquer un point. Je reviens de 2 mois de vacances. J'ai ete au Liban, je voulais envoyer un colis de baklava ( des patiseries) a mes parents en France. Je n'en ai pas crus mes yeux, deja ils ont voulu verifier le contenu du colis, ils ont ouvert devant mes yeux la boite vaccum packed que le patissier avait fermer hermetiquement. J'ai essayer de les dissuader, mais bon c'est ca ou rien. Ensuite ils voulaient mon passport (pour envoyer un colis !) je ne l'avais pas sur moi, impossible de faire l'envoi. Bon, des fois les regles KYC on doit s'y soumettre. J;ai aussi passe 6 semaines au Qatar. Ils m'on aussi demande mon passport pour envoyer le baklava (j'etais tellement enerve au liban que je les ai garder et ai decider de les envoyer depuis le Qatar). Au Qatar, il faut aussi montrer son passport pour s'inscrire a la salle de sport, avoir une carte sim (meme pour un prepaye). En Nz c'est l'hiver, ma femme a la creve, je vais a la pharmacie et le sirop pour la toux qu'elle a l'habitude de prendre vient d'etre mis sur la liste des produit surveille. Donc si tu veux une bouteille de sirop, il faut laisser, nom complet, address et numero de telephone. Qu'on le veuille ou non, le KYC est partout !! |
|
|
|
|
1446
|
Local / Hors-sujet / Re: Satoshi Nakamoto est-il mort ?
|
on: July 28, 2019, 07:43:28 PM
|
Et que pensez vous du belge (Debo Jurgen Etienne Guido)? https://news.bitcoin.com/another-self-proclaimed-satoshi-appears-in-the-high-profile-bitcoin-lawsuit/Je met un passage qui m'a interpele et me laisse en suspend : Searching the PGP key database on the MIT servers shows that Debo’s key was tethered to the email address Satoshin@gmx.com and other emails with the Satoshi name in them. There are two specific dates that are associated with the key, which include Oct. 30, 2008, and Jan. 3, 2009. Those two dates represent the day before the whitepaper was published online on Halloween 2008, and the birth of the genesis block on Jan. 3. Like Wladimir van der Laan said in his tweet, the MIT server shows he did revoke the 0x18C09E865EC948A1 key on May 2, 2016, as the key was coincidently revoked the same day Gavin Andresen was removed as a Core maintainer. Et aussi une intetview de QORA : https://www.quora.com/Who-is-Satoshi-Nakamoto-and-what-country-is-he-fromThe author and writer of the bitcoin.pdf
I created the genesis, was the originator of bitcoin and blockchain.
I registered in case of dispute and to proof at the right time, the bitcoin.pdf before the date of publication on the internet at a Belgian Notary office. This has legal consequences to proof authorship and copyright, since copyright is granted at creation, not at registration. But registration can be useful to proof the date of creation. This is different with patents.
However those are at the moment, empty words, because proof need to be provided, not words, politics or belief. This will be done in time. And I chose that time.
For this, I have encoded personal data in the genesis block, I have a PGP key
0x5ec948a1 and I have the private key of the genesis block of the blockchain.The genesis block can not be moved or transact, but it can be used to sign a message.
I am the only man in the world who knows how the genesis block is made and composed.
So far many speculation was done about my identity. In fact my identity is not that important because the project is decentralized and opensource.
Dorian Nakamoto was victim of speculation but quickly denied after I posted a message, I am not Dorian…
Later on, Dr. Craig Wright did try (and still does) to impersonate me but the man has no single private key, not even access to my whale wallet. His last steps was to register my (about) 10 years old white paper on his own name in a copyright service in the States. But the people of the government do not check if the registration is valid or proven. As on the white paper there is no bindings with the penname Satoshi Nakamoto and Dr Craig Wright. He launched in 2019 a website claiming to be me, Satoshi Nakamoto and in a desperate attempt to cure his altcoin Bitcoin SV (born from a hard fork of Bitcoin Cash). When the hardfork did happen, clearly losing the battle, he did beg the community to convert Bitcoin (Core) into his BitcoinSV. If he was me, Satoshi Nakamoto, he could use my whale wallet of course. Previously, the man failed to digitally sign with the private keys of the genesis, the pgp key or to transact bitcoin from the whale wallet.
Many other candidates did deny themselves not to be me, like Mr Dave Kleiman, Hal Finney, etc. Some others are in the running to claim to be me, but nobody has the private keys.
It is true I did mine with Harold T. Finney the first blocks in test and finally in production. I own a whale wallet that is considerable large.
The purpose of the whale wallet will be, in time, without to disturb the project and the markets, to fund for about 93 percent of it’s resources to innovation and improvement in general of humankind. I will only assign 7 percent to my own benefit.
I am from Belgium, that is the reason why I did use the German service gmx at that time.
But also because I did not trust the services in the States.
In my country we do learn British English and indeed, we learned in school to use double space after a dot. Something people did remark. Because I was 5 years in the army I speak pretty often in the plural form. I do belief in egalitarianism and the fact that everyone one on this planet is unique, special and should have joy, comfort and freedom to express to that extend it does not breach the freedom of others.
Satoshi Nakamoto is composed of the 15 letters of my first, third and last name using an alternation of a caeserian cypher. When I got the letters I did look up Japanese words to create a meaning that reflects my vision. Sato Shi Naka Moto. Which means, the clear vision (wisdom) is in de center (your heart).
In the early days I did use open proxies, tor to hide my tracks on IRC and boards, including mutt as e-mail client on a remote server to mail with pgp signing. That is also the reason why I do have a PGP key...
I forsee to provide proof this or next year. It depends the markets and my plans,
as when I proof without doubt, it has implications on my privacy.
Satoshin
|
|
|
|
|
1447
|
Local / Débutants / Re: [TUTO] Création et utilisation d'un portefeuille papier
|
on: July 26, 2019, 09:53:23 PM
|
Sauf erreur de ma part, d'après ce que je vois de https://segwitaddress.org/, il n'est pas possible ni de générer d'un coup une quantité importante de clés, ni de chiffrer en BIP38. Existe-t-il le même générateur segwit qui offrirait ces 2 possibilités ? Merci pour ton message qui m'a fait douter et donc me remetter en question et verifier mes informations. Copie/colle du site web All of the functions on this page can be ran offline, by saving this site and running the index.html file, except for the sweep function which requires internet access to check the UTXOs and broadcast to the network. Bulk Keys
Prints in CSV format. 300 will take about 10 seconds.
Amount to Generate:
Tu peux aussi faire du Bech32 Paper Wallet qui est different (bench32 commence par bc1xxxxxxx) du segwit (commence par 3xxxxx). Dans les deux cas, Bitaddress et segwitaddress sont outils crees par la comunaute, ils sont auditable en ligne. |
|
|
|
|
1452
|
Economy / Service Announcements / Re: Cryptopia Cryptocurrency Platform Services and Development
|
on: July 15, 2019, 07:57:37 PM
|
Have you guy seen this Steemit article that has allegedly been written by Rob Dawson ( HEX) I have met Adam twice and Rob once in NZ, I have visited their office once as well. I would be about 75% confident this is Rob's words or at least someone else words but that knows the whole story. What do you guys think ? here is in a version of the story of cryptopia from deve him self hex. I do belive him very much ty to his exchange i know all abuot crypto, i lost alot that crytopia die, that ok. but is not ok that bad guys win they take every thing from us now all we can do is let the world know this story, and hope for better. so guys plz read this story. ** is long but is real
Around January 2014 Adam and I started working on a project as a hobby called Cryptopia which was a website for Crypto enthusiasts including an exchange, mining pools, forums and other features. After the project started to materialize into something starting to resemble a finished product we incorporated the company Cryptopia in July 2014. In December 2014 when we thought we were ready we launched the website live into production. For the next few years we spent all of our free time working on Cryptopia and in 2015 I resigned from my full time job to keep working on Cryptopia while Adam continued at his job and working on Cryptopia in his spare time.
After I had burned through all my savings I needed to look at finding another job, Adam was currently working as a Developer for Intranel. Adam got me an interview at his work, but the day of the interview I instead went to see my parents and told them that I didn't know what I was asking them for but I felt like if I had to go back to working a regular job it was going to kill me. My parents took out $45,000 from their retirement fund to buy shares in the company so that Adam and I could use it to continue to work on Cryptopia.
Adam resigned from Intranel, but they said they didn't want to lose him and wanted to keep an eye on us so they offered a room in their office for rent, which we would pay for by Adam doing sprint code work for Intranel, and when they didn't have work for them they charged us cash. Intranel showed an interest very early on but Adam and I felt that we were handling things just fine on our own for the size we were and the work we were doing and didn't see any need to get them involved.
Intranel continued to show an interest in us, and after the beginning of 2017 when things really started to kick off and we started experiencing exponential growth at a scary pace we started to take Intranel's offers more seriously as neither of us identified ourselves as business men and only wanted to continue doing the development and innovation work we were already doing.
Intranel made us an offer that for 20% the company they would handle all of the business management and development, things like helping hiring and managing staff, paying tax, lobbying for regulator guidance, all the "boring business stuff" and that they would contract us out 4 of their FTEs at a discounted rate while they helped us find and hire staff of our own.
Instead of hiring staff for us they hired staff for themselves and continued to contract them out to us at exorbitant rates even including the agreed upon 30% discount, and put their staff in key managerial positions to allow themselves degrees of autonomy without seeking shareholder or director consent. If and when shareholder and or director consent was ever sought for anything, if the response they got was "No" they would just ignore it anyway.
They immediately set to playing games of divide and conquer and playing he said she said trying to pit us against each other and split us up. They would come to one for a request, get a no, go to the other for a yes, and then play us off against each other. Once we were reliant on the work they were doing for us and the staff they were providing for us they turned around and said they wanted an extra 5% of the shares or they would leave us high and dry with our engagements. To further divide us they insisted that I make up the extra 5% because they thought Adam was worth more to the company than I was.
Adam reached a point of frustration where they were trying to manage him and the work he was doing and how he should do it that he got fed up and resigned. They told me I should take a holiday so I don't get burned out like Adam, while I was away they simply stopped paying me. Not formally dismissed, no change of contract, no nothing. Just stopped paying me, and when I came back they told me they had given away my desk and there physically wasn't room for me in the building anymore, and wouldn't let me back.
After being a shareholder for 1 month, without shareholder or director approval or consent they issued a dividend. Adam and I never received this dividend. They also gave to themselves the same amount proportionately they claimed to have given Adam and I even though we'd been there for years and they had been a shareholder for a month. Again, Adam and I never actually received the dividend they say they issued.
The reason they forced the extra 5% was because they needed the extra shares to be able to block any major transaction the company tried to undertake so that we could not achieve a 75% threshold. They also used their position to veto listing policies in place to maintain the companies integrity in order to list and trade on coins their friends had made.
They sought director consent to create a company in the UK to act as our support desk, which we told them we didn't want them to do. They did it anyway, created it under their own names personally, and then again without director or shareholder consent issued themselves a loan for approximately $300,000 from the company to them personally for "startup costs".
They took on clients using our name for projects we said we weren't interested in or capable of, they assured us they were handling that work for themselves and they were just using our name as partners, they then billed us for that work. They issued invoices from Cryptopia for themselves, approved and paid them. They bled money everywhere they could, we paid for tax on their staff's flu shots? We paid for taxes on christmas gifts to their staff and our company bought the gifts. Everything they were unable to take for themselves they pissed into the wind on needless expenses and luxuries the company could not afford and engagements that ultimately buried us.
They made deals to list coins for a fee in Bitcoin instead of in the exchanges native coin DOT, this had negative impacts on the DOT markets and the ecosystem built around DOT as well as deprived CEFS holders of the DOT they would have received from those listings had they gone through the normal listing process.
They also stripped out all of the functionality from the site that wasn't purely an "exchange", dismantling the eco system that had been built and cultivated around our original slogan of "Your one stop Crypto shop" and aims to be a blockchain services platform and turned it into something completely foreign to the site that had been the initial draw for users.
They tried to sell the company out from under us 3 separate times.
If they had not been removed in November the company would have been bankrupt in December, but we didn't find this out until after we removed them forcibly, no one had any idea the dire situation they had gotten the company into, or that it would not have been able to afford their own next invoice.
I believe the Hack was orchestrated to bury everything they have done, and was planned to happen before we removed them so that it could tidily explain the state they had gotten the company into. And then rushed after their plan was interrupted when they were forcibly removed from the company.
They are now partnered with ANZ a bank that refused Cryptopia banking services, and PWC a firm that was supposed to be providing Cryptopia counsel on various legal matters, working on projects Cryptopia was gearing up to work on.
Source : https://steempeak.com/palnet/@vcdragon/version-of-the-story-of-cryptopia-from-developer-him-self-how-it-start-and-end?fbclid=iwar1gvicszyrsgp8mso03c2ctddkdzvxeqcvtwzd6hrlj7rgpkon-azv-meu |
|
|
|
|
1453
|
Local / Échanges / Re: Cryptopia hack
|
on: July 15, 2019, 07:50:32 PM
|
Salut, Voici un article qui est un peu passe sous le radar. Pour connaitre la femme d'un des deux fondateur et avoir visiter les locaux je dirais que je suis plutot enclin a croire ce que l'article dit. Je pense qu'il y a 75% de chance que en effet l'article est ete ecrit par Rob Dawson here is in a version of the story of cryptopia from deve him self hex. I do belive him very much ty to his exchange i know all abuot crypto, i lost alot that crytopia die, that ok. but is not ok that bad guys win they take every thing from us now all we can do is let the world know this story, and hope for better. so guys plz read this story. ** is long but is real
Around January 2014 Adam and I started working on a project as a hobby called Cryptopia which was a website for Crypto enthusiasts including an exchange, mining pools, forums and other features. After the project started to materialize into something starting to resemble a finished product we incorporated the company Cryptopia in July 2014. In December 2014 when we thought we were ready we launched the website live into production. For the next few years we spent all of our free time working on Cryptopia and in 2015 I resigned from my full time job to keep working on Cryptopia while Adam continued at his job and working on Cryptopia in his spare time.
After I had burned through all my savings I needed to look at finding another job, Adam was currently working as a Developer for Intranel. Adam got me an interview at his work, but the day of the interview I instead went to see my parents and told them that I didn't know what I was asking them for but I felt like if I had to go back to working a regular job it was going to kill me. My parents took out $45,000 from their retirement fund to buy shares in the company so that Adam and I could use it to continue to work on Cryptopia.
Adam resigned from Intranel, but they said they didn't want to lose him and wanted to keep an eye on us so they offered a room in their office for rent, which we would pay for by Adam doing sprint code work for Intranel, and when they didn't have work for them they charged us cash. Intranel showed an interest very early on but Adam and I felt that we were handling things just fine on our own for the size we were and the work we were doing and didn't see any need to get them involved.
Intranel continued to show an interest in us, and after the beginning of 2017 when things really started to kick off and we started experiencing exponential growth at a scary pace we started to take Intranel's offers more seriously as neither of us identified ourselves as business men and only wanted to continue doing the development and innovation work we were already doing.
Intranel made us an offer that for 20% the company they would handle all of the business management and development, things like helping hiring and managing staff, paying tax, lobbying for regulator guidance, all the "boring business stuff" and that they would contract us out 4 of their FTEs at a discounted rate while they helped us find and hire staff of our own.
Instead of hiring staff for us they hired staff for themselves and continued to contract them out to us at exorbitant rates even including the agreed upon 30% discount, and put their staff in key managerial positions to allow themselves degrees of autonomy without seeking shareholder or director consent. If and when shareholder and or director consent was ever sought for anything, if the response they got was "No" they would just ignore it anyway.
They immediately set to playing games of divide and conquer and playing he said she said trying to pit us against each other and split us up. They would come to one for a request, get a no, go to the other for a yes, and then play us off against each other. Once we were reliant on the work they were doing for us and the staff they were providing for us they turned around and said they wanted an extra 5% of the shares or they would leave us high and dry with our engagements. To further divide us they insisted that I make up the extra 5% because they thought Adam was worth more to the company than I was.
Adam reached a point of frustration where they were trying to manage him and the work he was doing and how he should do it that he got fed up and resigned. They told me I should take a holiday so I don't get burned out like Adam, while I was away they simply stopped paying me. Not formally dismissed, no change of contract, no nothing. Just stopped paying me, and when I came back they told me they had given away my desk and there physically wasn't room for me in the building anymore, and wouldn't let me back.
After being a shareholder for 1 month, without shareholder or director approval or consent they issued a dividend. Adam and I never received this dividend. They also gave to themselves the same amount proportionately they claimed to have given Adam and I even though we'd been there for years and they had been a shareholder for a month. Again, Adam and I never actually received the dividend they say they issued.
The reason they forced the extra 5% was because they needed the extra shares to be able to block any major transaction the company tried to undertake so that we could not achieve a 75% threshold. They also used their position to veto listing policies in place to maintain the companies integrity in order to list and trade on coins their friends had made.
They sought director consent to create a company in the UK to act as our support desk, which we told them we didn't want them to do. They did it anyway, created it under their own names personally, and then again without director or shareholder consent issued themselves a loan for approximately $300,000 from the company to them personally for "startup costs".
They took on clients using our name for projects we said we weren't interested in or capable of, they assured us they were handling that work for themselves and they were just using our name as partners, they then billed us for that work. They issued invoices from Cryptopia for themselves, approved and paid them. They bled money everywhere they could, we paid for tax on their staff's flu shots? We paid for taxes on christmas gifts to their staff and our company bought the gifts. Everything they were unable to take for themselves they pissed into the wind on needless expenses and luxuries the company could not afford and engagements that ultimately buried us.
They made deals to list coins for a fee in Bitcoin instead of in the exchanges native coin DOT, this had negative impacts on the DOT markets and the ecosystem built around DOT as well as deprived CEFS holders of the DOT they would have received from those listings had they gone through the normal listing process.
They also stripped out all of the functionality from the site that wasn't purely an "exchange", dismantling the eco system that had been built and cultivated around our original slogan of "Your one stop Crypto shop" and aims to be a blockchain services platform and turned it into something completely foreign to the site that had been the initial draw for users.
They tried to sell the company out from under us 3 separate times.
If they had not been removed in November the company would have been bankrupt in December, but we didn't find this out until after we removed them forcibly, no one had any idea the dire situation they had gotten the company into, or that it would not have been able to afford their own next invoice.
I believe the Hack was orchestrated to bury everything they have done, and was planned to happen before we removed them so that it could tidily explain the state they had gotten the company into. And then rushed after their plan was interrupted when they were forcibly removed from the company.
They are now partnered with ANZ a bank that refused Cryptopia banking services, and PWC a firm that was supposed to be providing Cryptopia counsel on various legal matters, working on projects Cryptopia was gearing up to work on.
source : https://steempeak.com/palnet/@vcdragon/version-of-the-story-of-cryptopia-from-developer-him-self-how-it-start-and-end?fbclid=iwar1gvicszyrsgp8mso03c2ctddkdzvxeqcvtwzd6hrlj7rgpkon-azv-meu |
|
|
|
|
1454
|
Local / Altcoins (Français) / Re: [BNB-SPECU] Binance Coin
|
on: July 12, 2019, 10:00:44 AM
|
Ok alors big news de Binance !!! News 1 : Binance a 2 ans !! https://twitter.com/binance/status/1149613185038577665News2 : encore un quartely ( 4 fois par an) burn, ils ont burn 23 millions de USD ( 808 000 BNB) Voici le recap des burns :  News 3 : ils ont decide de changer le white paper. Explication : le WP disait que 40% des coins ( 80 000 de BNB) etaient allocated pour la team. Mais bloque pendant 2 ans et ensuite ils pouvait avoir 1/5 pendant 5 ans. Just pour avoir ordre d'idee en parle de 2,4 milliards de $ Cz (the big boss) a decide que la Team n'aurait rien et qu'ils allaient utiliser les coins pour faire le BURN. $23M USD equivalent of $BNB, burned from the Binance Team allocations. The only time we "spent" the Team BNB allocation. I will talk a bit more about that in my live AMA, in about 10 min or so. . https://twitter.com/cz_binance/status/1149511132295548928Bon, Si on parle de 1 millions de bnb burn par trimestre - ca fait une reserver de 20 ans de coins a burn. Ensuite uniquement ils acheteons sur le marche des BNB pour aller jusq'au 100 millions de bnb burn du white paper. 8th Binance Coin Burn: From the Team BNB Allocation
Fellow Binancians,
Today, on behalf of the Binance team, I am announcing that we will give up all of our BNB allocations and contribute them towards our commitment to burning a total of 100 million BNB. This commitment starts during today’s quarterly burn, during which 808,888 BNB (currently worth US$23,838,000) is being burned.
This move means the following things:
1. According to the Binance whitepaper, 40% of the total BNB supply (80,000,000 BNB, currently worth about US$2,400,000,000) was allocated to the Binance team, as a reward to the work they have put into building the Binance ecosystem. But now, we are giving that up, and we will contribute this to the BNB burn. We are doubling down on our mission to exchange the world and spread the freedom of money.
2. With this change, we'll still burn BNB based on trading volume on Binance per quarter. But this time, the Binance team has given up our token allocation. We are now committing to building the Binance ecosystem without getting any BNB from the initial allocation. The team will burn their own tokens first. All US$2,400,000,000 of it!
3. The eventual total supply of BNB will still be 100,000,000 BNB. The current total supply of BNB is 189,000,000 BNB, which means that 89,000,000 BNB still need to be burned. The team will burn off the 80,000,000 BNB team allocation first, and the remaining 9,000,000 BNB will be burned by Binance.com exchange.
The burning schedule and frequency will be the same as before. Here’s the breakdown of the past burn sessions.
To recap, this is equivalent to the Binance team allocating 0 BNB to ourselves from the original supply. All BNB we have are either earned through our services or bought with our own money.
That said, the Binance team will likely continue to be some of the largest holders of BNB, as most of Binance’s revenues are in BNB, and we are paid in BNB. These are BNB we earned, and not just taken from the ICO allocation.
While we raised US$15,000,000 worth of crypto during our ICO for operational costs. That US$15,000,000 equivalent in BNB two years ago, which is now worth US$4,200,000,000. On top of that, the Binance team is letting go of $2,400,000,000 worth of value, will burn it, to reduce supply.
This shows that the Binance team is not money-driven. We are here on a mission. Let’s work together to increase the freedom of money.
- CZ https://www.binance.com/en/blog/356254016530468864/8th-Binance-Coin-Burn-From-the-Team-BNB-AllocationMais la ou pour l'instant il a peut etre un loup c'est qu'on ne sait pas si les Team token ( 80 000 000) vont etre donnes puis burn ou si il vont etre achete puis burn. FROM CZ : Human communication is error-prone.
Team allocation (already allocated) will ALL be burned, at the same schedule as before. There is no possibility (or worries) of team's allocation being sold/dumped on the market.
ie, the team took 0 BNB from ICO allocations, 0 "pre-mine". Questions on twitter : Ngl, this says team tokens will be burnt instead of conducting buybacks, not clear whether profits will actually be used to purchase team tokens. Think further clarification is required Wait... Just so it's clear. You guys are going to use 20% of profits (every quarter) to "buy back" BNB that you already own and then burn it??? So not only are you burning your own tokens but you're actually paying for them. Sheesh... Il y a aussi des personnes qui disent que le team abandonne leur token en totalite comme ca ce nest plus une "security" et dans un futur proche ils pourraient metter BNB dans le stock exchange americain.... A suivre !!! Dans tous les cas moi je suis dans le BNB pour du long terme, |
|
|
|
|
1455
|
Local / Hors-sujet / Re: Liste de posts "méritant" mais n'ayant pas eu leur heure de gloire (merit)
|
on: July 09, 2019, 11:14:57 AM
|
Le post de Yogg qui indique un importante vulnerabilite de trezor ... Moi je suis team Ledger https://ledger-donjon.github.io/Unfixable-Key-Extraction-Attack-on-Trezor/Comme ils disent, je vais juste rapidement traduire le TL;DR : TL;DR
An attacker with a stolen device can extract the seed from the device. It takes less than 5 minutes and the necessary materials cost around 100$. This vulnerability affects Trezor One, Trezor T, Keepkey and all other Trezor clones. Unfortunately, this vulnerability cannot be patched and, for this reason, we decided not to give technical details about the attack to mitigate a possible exploitation in the field. However SatoshiLabs and Keepkey suggested users to either exclude physical attacks from their threat model, or to use a passphrase. Un attaquant avec un appareil dérobé peut extraire la seed de l'appareil. Ca prend moins de 5 minutes et le matériel nécessaire coute environ 100$. Cette vulnérabilité affecte les Trezor One, Trezor T, Keepkey et tout les autres clones de Trezor. Malheureusement, cette vulnérabilité ne peut pas être patchée et pour cette raison, nous avons décidé de ne pas donner de détails techniques à propos de l'attaque, pour mitiger le risque réel d'une exploitation de cette attaque. Toutefois, SatoshiLabs et Keepkey suggèrent à leur utilisateurs d'exclure les attaques physiques de leur modèle de menaces, ou d'utiliser une passphrase.   De toute façon, tant que votre modèle de menace inclut le risque physique, que vous ayez un Trezor ou n'importe quoi .. C'est un peu compliqué quoi.  |
|
|
|
|
1456
|
Local / Altcoins (Français) / Re: [LISTE JUIN 2018]Revenu Passif avec les Cryptos
|
on: July 09, 2019, 11:04:12 AM
|
Bonsoir, Je me permet ( Deuxième fois en deux jours ), de déterrer ce topic, car je le trouve vraiment intéressant, et aimerais y apporter ma petite contribution. projet "Miracletele", ~snap~ A titre d'exemple, j'ai gagné +/- 2$ en +/- 2 mois de claim +/- tous les jours  Ca pue le ponzi / scam
Pour ajouter a la liste : Tezos tu peux stake sur coinbase et sur gate (je crois) Sinon tu peux deleguer a un baker et tu n'a rien a faire (8% / an - environ) Stellar, idem tu peux deleguer Waves aussi Sinon BNB et Leo sont deux token qui peuvent presquent etre consideres a revenus passif vu que Binance et Bifinex se sont engages a racheter les coins pour les bruler tous les trimestres.... Un peut comme un buy back de wall street ou du CAC40 Sinon pour les POS (DASH / Pivx / .....) avoir un masternode peut etre complique pour des neophytes, mais il y a des services de masternode partages ou tu a juste a confier tes coins et quelqu'un d;autre gere le Masternode. Attention, pas des clef - pas tes coins .... il faut faire gaffe qu'il ne parte pas avec la caisse !!
Edit modo : Fusion double post. Archive |
|
|
|
|
1457
|
Local / Altcoins (Français) / Re: Et si vous ne deviez garder que 3 ALT ?
|
on: July 05, 2019, 08:10:02 PM
|
Dash car Anonyme et ils bossent sur l’adoption Link car c’est le chaînon manquant entre les blockchain pour la résolution des smart contract Tezos car cette blockchain est plutôt révolutionnaire et évolutive Bnb car le développement de binance peut faire de boule de neige et devenir le standard du future (un de ces quatre ils vont ouvrir une « banque » et payer des interêt et permettre aux gens d’emprunter... disons dans 2 ou 3 ans). Ok ça fait 4 mais bon |
|
|
|
|
1459
|
Local / Altcoins (Français) / Re: [IEO] Loteries Binance
|
on: July 04, 2019, 11:28:12 AM
|
Ca faisait un petit moment que vous parliez plus des loteries de Binance que du BNB sur le topic du BNB. Voici un topic pour les différentes loteries de Binance.
Merci Halab, j'ai revendu la moitié de mon ticket ERD à 108 sat, vivement la prochaine, c'est de la bombe ce lunchpad. Ha oui a 108 sat ? bien joue !! presque le double de moi, j'ai vendu a 66 sat (en fait j'ai vendu en bnb a 0.00022500) J'ai vendu environ 75% de mon bag. Donc je suis en profit et j'en garde sous le coude si le prix monte plus haut dans les jours a venir |
|
|
|
|
1460
|
Local / Produits et services / Re: [WTS] Coldkey™ Genesis Edition -- Cold storage wallets - Edition limitée
|
on: July 04, 2019, 07:20:01 AM
|
|
Je vais t'en prendre 4 ! (MP pour reglement)
Je sais deja ce que je vais en faire :
Une carte pour chacun de mes enfants (meme pas encore conçu) remise a leur 18 ans
Pareil pour les enfants (non encore conçu de mon frere).
Avec a chaque noel/anniversaire (le mien) 10 / 20 ou 50 euros en BTC envoyes sur les cartes.
Par la suite, les cartes elle viendront uniquement "funded" ou alors vous ferrez aussi des cartes vierges ?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
