Bitcoin Forum
April 28, 2024, 11:26:03 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 [52] 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 »
1021  Economy / Economics / Re: Gold: I smell a trap on: August 24, 2011, 09:15:11 PM
I'm not talking about the buying of gold from central banks, I'm talking about the deliberate devaluation of fiat.

Central banks possibly now see they need gold for when the fiat ponzi schemes collapse.
1022  Economy / Economics / Re: Gold: I smell a trap on: August 24, 2011, 09:00:55 PM
You act as if the actions of central banks mean nothing. Trust me it bloody well does.

Also there is latency between monetary inflation and price inflation. The full effects of previous money creation still needs time to set in. With interest rates forced low and where governments attempt to get banks to lend out as much as possible more and more the effects should show more quickly.
1023  Economy / Economics / Re: Gold: I smell a trap on: August 24, 2011, 08:50:22 PM
Or dear looking t the graphs again. One bust and then a greater one proves deflation will happen somehow, when in reality is that central banks will continue to flood economies with more and more money.
1024  Economy / Economics / Re: Silver shot up. on: August 24, 2011, 08:11:53 PM
Has anyone even mentioned that silver futures are in backwardation? You'd be silly to miss it.
1025  Economy / Economics / Re: Gold: I smell a trap on: August 24, 2011, 08:11:00 PM
Before the recent sharp inclines in the gold price the trend was pointing to $1600 by now. If gold goes down to $1600 it's a very good buying opportunity but I don't think it's going to go down to $1600 because of all the recent factors which is pushing more longer term investors to go into gold. It's only the short-term speculators that will be selling.

Gold has risen quickly recently and so if you were to say it is overbought, it is so on the recent price moves. There is no reason to suggest the long term trend for gold is dead.

there are plenty of reasons IMO to think that its over.  start with my OP and work forward.

I read that you think there is going to be price deflation which is ludicrous.
1026  Economy / Economics / Re: Gold: I smell a trap on: August 24, 2011, 07:15:39 PM
Gold has risen quickly recently and so if you were to say it is overbought, it is so on the recent price moves. There is no reason to suggest the long term trend for gold is dead.
1027  Economy / Economics / Re: Gold: I smell a trap on: August 24, 2011, 07:04:10 PM
Let's say someone invents a new power source which uses silver. Investors begin to go into silver upon the announcement, later the producers of this new power source make large orders and silver goes up and up. The technical peculators will say "Wow, look at this, bubble! It will crash to $10 again obviously, let's short it.". In reality, of-course, it seems a lot of uses for silver are constantly being found. Shame it's relatively rare.
1028  Economy / Economics / Re: Gold: I smell a trap on: August 24, 2011, 03:31:55 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=31IYm0gQS_A
1029  Economy / Economics / Re: Gold: I smell a trap on: August 23, 2011, 09:58:24 PM
I never called you silly or stupid. You made that up and then you continued with your own ad hominem attack. I don't know if you misunderstood or you were getting defensive over your position.
1030  Economy / Economics / Re: Gold: I smell a trap on: August 23, 2011, 09:29:49 PM
Shame I don't have any account which I can do put options because I did think of that.

But anyway, I'll be coming back to this thread when gold reaches $2000.
1031  Economy / Economics / Re: Gold: I smell a trap on: August 23, 2011, 08:31:18 PM


Gold could "correct" in the short term....

I hope so! I've been waiting for a downturn so I can buy.

Looks like it's going back to $1800 for now could go further but be warned that gold is sensitive to small irrelevant things like Bernanke announcing QE3 even though the federal reserve will create money regardless and the ponzi scheme wont end until it comes crashing down.

What appears to happen in markets like gold:

1. Genuine demand from investors and producers pushes price up.
2. Silly speculators see the price doing up and they start buying.
3. Price goes up too high. Speculative bubble.
4. Silly speculators now think the market is "overbought" (Thanks to themselves no doubt) and so they sell. Or they profit-take at certain points.
5. Price comes down.
6. Certain people get annoyed at this. Certain speculators lose out and others win. Investors get annoyed because the price isn't being stabilised by smart short to medium term speculation.

I think technical analysis is only good int he short term. Using it for medium or longer terms is not any good. Technical analysis says something is overbought when it's simply just increasing demand.

I was thinking about selling today but I knew it was too risky to make short term bets. I definitely just want to hold on to gold as central banks kill fiat and more and more people see the benefit to gold.

I agree if you want to short gold in the short term, if you are prepared to do more regular trades but shorting gold for the long term is stupid in my opinion.

Once again...

$40 for SLV will not hold.

Do you disagree with the quantity theory of money? Does the trillions being poured into the money supply of dollars not matter? Dollars are a better investment than gold which has a stable supply? The US debt ponzi scheme, completely irrelevant? Forced low interest rates, really doesn't matter? Buy more dollars with borrowed gold? Dollars are really great?
1032  Economy / Economics / Re: Gold: I smell a trap on: August 23, 2011, 07:09:04 PM
$40 for SLV will not hold.

Do you disagree with the quantity theory of money? Does the trillions being poured into the money supply of dollars not matter? Dollars are a better investment than gold which has a stable supply? The US debt ponzi scheme, completely irrelevant? Forced low interest rates, really doesn't matter? Buy more dollars with borrowed gold? Dollars are really great?

Peter Schiff was right in the end. Just took longer than he predicted.

He's going to be right again, regardless of what happens in the next 3-6 months.

Silver $100+, gold $3000+ within 2 years.

He's good with understanding the fundamentals behind everything. It's not as if he can predict sudden events in advance like the exact changes in fiscal policies and the illogically of speculators so the timing can be wrong with predictions. Of-course he was warning about the housing bubble well in advance and was saying that there was too much credit and not enough savings.

Gold could "correct" in the short term because of speculators being stupid by buying loads and then "profit taking" which they do all the time and they don't realise it's a bit stupid. I should avoid trying to take advantage of short term price changes especially when there is so much uncertainty. I prefer to hold onto gold for the long trend upward.
1033  Economy / Economics / Re: Gold: I smell a trap on: August 23, 2011, 04:41:10 PM
What did he say about PM mining stocks? Quite a few have held back against gold and silver rises so they can be seen as undervalued.
1034  Economy / Economics / Re: Gold: I smell a trap on: August 23, 2011, 04:21:45 PM
Quote
I can’t imagine who is dumb enough to be shorting gold.   People who are short gold or silver have to go and buy to mitigate their losses because now the prices are going up and you are looking at unlimited loss potential when you are short.  There is no way to measure resistance in gold because we are in unchartered territory.  Even if you are short silver there is a big move from $43.50 where it is now and $50, so that’s $6.50 of pain if you’re short.”

http://kingworldnews.com/kingworldnews/KWN_DailyWeb/Entries/2011/8/22_Schiff_-_When_Silver_Breaks_$50_Shorts_to_Propel_it_to_$75-$100.html

The fact the people like you lot are shorting gold makes me think gold we rocket upwards as it breaks through these shorts. Silver too.
1035  Economy / Economics / Re: Silver shot up. on: August 22, 2011, 09:20:17 PM
Actually no. I think I have 0.21btc. Not worth the effort.
1036  Economy / Economics / Re: Silver shot up. on: August 22, 2011, 07:41:04 PM
I'd bet a million bitcoins silver wont go below $20 in the next two years but I don't have a million bitcoins.

I don't know why people say the fundamentals are bearish for silver. Seems to me that silver is too cheap and their are some supply issues as a result. There is backwardation in the futures markets which suggests that those who would purchase silver futures contracts are now being hesitant because of worries about defaults. Too many futures contracts, too little silver?

Silver has industrial use in high tech applications which show promise on the industrial demand side. Many uses are in the growing high tech markets like such as with solar panels. It's a very useful metal and I'm sure there are many new uses for it to come.

And investors see silver as a hedge against inflation, similar to gold.

Where are the issues with the fundamentals?
1037  Economy / Economics / Re: Gold: I smell a trap on: August 22, 2011, 07:27:41 PM
QE means nothing much. It's a label central banks put on a particular package of purchases using new money. When their QE packages end it doesn't mean they stop with the purchases. They just continue doing the same thing. I don't think people understand this.
1038  Economy / Economics / Re: Monday 8/8/2011 Judgement day for world stock market on: August 19, 2011, 07:29:17 PM
a CNBC analyst made a great point.  if the debt downgrade really meant we were going into a hyperinflationary phase then UST yields would be going UP.  instead they are going DOWN which means people are fleeing into UST's despite the downgrade.  this means investors are MORE fearful of another economic downturn and are fleeing stocks and risky assets. 

The ironic thing is that treasuries going from AAA -> AA+ means the average rating of portfolios has lowered. As funds try to adjust weightings to move their average back upward, they will most likely have to ditch BBB- bonds and buy more treasuries (by far the largest high rated bond available).

Treasuries being downgraded could mean that more funds will be buying them.

These funds are completely idiotic. I don't know if there would be any data for this but I bet the federal reserve increased it's purchases of treasuries to prevent yields increasing after the downgrade. You surely can't put this all down to funds and idiotic scared investors?
1039  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: State of TradeHill [Bitcoin.com Announcement] on: August 19, 2011, 04:05:50 PM
Quote
Lastly, we make about 1% instead of the .56% you mentioned; remember, we get the .56% from each side of the trade.

Indeed, I included this.

I think you are doing quite well since you have only been around shortly.
1040  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: State of TradeHill [Bitcoin.com Announcement] on: August 18, 2011, 08:38:37 PM
Out of interest I looked at the data from bitcoincharts.com which gave 70.86 days of data. According to that $2,568,748 was traded on tradehill in USD (There is the liberty reserve data as well which I didn't include). This is $36,251 a day on average. With the 0.56% commissions that is $406 a day extrapolated to $148,190 a year. Considering Tradehill seems pretty good (And compared to mtgox) and bitcoin will likely grow further, that seems pretty good to me. Though when Tradehill started the volumes were higher but have dropped off a bit yet I think bitcoin can grow further.

$148,190 a year seems awfully small to pay the salaries of several employees and all the hosting, security and developmental costs. Some investor(s) must see a very bright future for bitcoin, and be willing to risk a lot in pursuit of their vision.

1. That was an estimate based on if everyone used the 0.56% commissions and ignoring any income from deposits and withdrawals if they take any (Wont be a lot I'm sure) etc.

2. I don't know what their costs are (Running servers can't be too much? I don't know how many employees they have but I thought it was a small operation and the marketing costs will certainly be small) but mtgox is doing about 10 times more (So roughly $1.5mil in revenue) showing there is potential out there and bitcoin should hopefully grow especially as problems with fiat escalate.

3. They clearly want to grow into different areas which should bring new revenue streams.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 [52] 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!