1062
|
Economy / Economics / Re: Is this The Great Bitcoin Crash?
|
on: August 03, 2011, 09:31:09 PM
|
The crash from 30 already happened. I think people are getting bored with bitcoin, maybe they expected the "bitcoin economy" to rise in no time at all. Too little patience. Maybe after some time speculators got scared about the risks.
|
|
|
1063
|
Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Safebit Bitcoin Wallet - Bitcoin Evolved [UPDATE!!!]
|
on: August 03, 2011, 03:57:07 PM
|
It can be modified, just not re-distributed at this time. I would much rather have a massive effort supporting one free and open source Bitcoin client than having a tug of war between otherwise identical clients over single features. How is it open-source if it has re-distribution copyright limitations? You can make money if you maintain a widely used version through things such as paid support and sponsors such as embedding amazon shopping features (As you appear to show) into the program for some commission or fixed deal. I don't know how you plan to make money though.
|
|
|
1064
|
Economy / Economics / Re: So I met a guy who makes Algorithmic Trading Programs for High Frequency Trading
|
on: July 31, 2011, 03:06:55 PM
|
Second, the free market works because of the price signals represent the real choices of the people. When you distort those signals the outcome is not a free market outcome, even when apparently were done "freely" by someone.
According to your own logic, free market can never happen because "freedom" gives ability to distort signal those signals ( for example speculation in general or HFT in particular ) or many more . Who would want to waste their money distorting prices? High frequency trading algorithms make money buying low and sell high (Or going long low and short high) just like any other trading. Human traders help long term prices buy holding positions in investments which they believe are undervalued for the future. High frequency trading works upon the short term noise.
|
|
|
1065
|
Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Bitcoin Bank
|
on: July 31, 2011, 01:30:36 AM
|
It says it is the first bank which can't be right if it was opened yesterday. I guess they didn't really do their research.
They take fees from transactions and and then give "most" of it back in interest payments. I don't get that at all. What the heck is the point in that?
|
|
|
1066
|
Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Bitcoin Bank
|
on: July 30, 2011, 11:39:46 PM
|
But the bank accounts don't need to be anonymous. You can link credit profiles to them and credit histories (Under permission to help get credit).
|
|
|
1067
|
Other / Off-topic / Re: Got a pension?
|
on: July 30, 2011, 08:41:09 PM
|
I don't see why people don't just save normally and leave enough left for retirement.
|
|
|
1068
|
Other / Off-topic / Re: What os do you use
|
on: July 30, 2011, 08:39:34 PM
|
I use OSX Snow Leopard at the moment. :-)
I have a Macbook but I might get a desktop PC which would help me run things 24/7. If I choose to o that it's either going to be a Mac mini or maybe a Linux PC.
|
|
|
1070
|
Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Bitcoin Bank
|
on: July 30, 2011, 07:21:54 PM
|
An idea would be to create a loan exchange (like it's done in WebMoney), but again it faces the anonymousity. How can I see that 0af6... is going to return a loan+interest and 486d... won't?
I came up with this idea. Shame the idea seems to have been thought about quite a lot. I have ideas for a bitcoin bank and that was one of them. Question is, could a bitcoin bank make money as it is now? There is tens of thousands of bitcoin users but how hard would it be to get those people on board. I would have thought you'd need a rather large amount of people before it would be worth it.
|
|
|
1072
|
Economy / Economics / Re: Something has to be wasted
|
on: July 30, 2011, 01:10:16 AM
|
Mining for gold is also a net waste of energy, from the perspective that gold has nearly zero industrial uses outside of the monetary functions of gold. Societies that produce more than they need to persist can afford to commit resources to such endeavors. Societies that are on the edge of starvation, cannot.
It's mostly used in jewellery and decoration. Only a small amount is used as money, surprise surprise. Apparently anyway. You might want to check that yourself.
|
|
|
1075
|
Economy / Economics / Re: What can we do to improve bitcoin?
|
on: July 29, 2011, 09:29:37 PM
|
Technology gets cheeper all the time but do we hold off purchases until we die? No. Ultimately money is a means to an end and the level of savings will relate to our time preferences. Time preference for food will be high, you don't want to wait until you are close to starvation. You may put off buying a TV to get a bigger and better one later but it depends how much you want that TV now.
|
|
|
1076
|
Economy / Economics / Re: So I met a guy who makes Algorithmic Trading Programs for High Frequency Trading
|
on: July 29, 2011, 09:25:15 PM
|
Tobin tax website? I guessing you are for this monstrosity? It is really a form of 'scalping', and admitted that it serves no role whatsoever to anyone but the person doing the HFT I don't think he knows very much about markets then. As people make money from price changes, prices are smoothed out and reflect longer term pictures (HFT is short term however, longer term is for usual human investment).
|
|
|
1077
|
Economy / Economics / Re: Recession Imminent
|
on: July 29, 2011, 09:20:20 PM
|
cypherdoc I know what you mean, but the USA and half of the world is already in a depression. We never got out. GDP is a horrible measure for growth. GDP only measures economic activity, not growth. It does not say anything about the productivity or sustainability of said economic activity. Also, the GDP we all use is a government statistic, so it should be taken with caution.
Hurrah! Someone knows what they are talking about.
|
|
|
1078
|
Economy / Economics / Re: What would happen to Bitcoin if the World Echnomy went over to Bitcoins
|
on: July 27, 2011, 12:12:23 AM
|
You could transfer bank balances across the bank but not from one bank to another without having money behind it and especially not withdraw it.
Yup, more juggling. Though, when you're just shifting numbers around, it's relatively easy to allow negative numbers. Taking money from an account with zero and giving it to another account, thereby creating new electronic money from an account with nothing (Now is negative). Or rather taking from an account more than is there so it is negative. Well, while this would be illegal (Unless it is allowed by law to a great surprise) I wouldn't be surprised if banks did do this since it's just electronic money. Clever bankers could find loopholes in the system to generate new money without anyone finding out. New money which could go into bank profits. Or would they risk counterfeiting money? If they got found out, wouldn't it be really bad? Especially in the eyes of the public. But the system od electronic fiat money is so screwed up, that I'm sure at least someone has abused or is at least trying or tried to abuse the system.
|
|
|
|