Yacoin was the first Scrypt N coin.
The only difference was the starting N factor.
Fucking noobs.
There are a lot of coins, myriads of coins of all colors, animals, etc. Who the hell in a right mind can remember everything? |
|
|
|
|
I suspect major MON supply already bagholded or bought at this ridiculous price. I have 10K of MON and it's enough for me. The one and only chance to survive is to unmerge MON from VTC and stop this dumping by pools. The difficulty must be adjusted indeed to prevent instamine and don't stop network.
What Boris think about unmerging?
|
|
|
|
Just bought everything up to 0.00000975. Damned miners won't give a chance to anyone. Already 500 sat. again. I don't understand who can be happy selling 20 MON for 500 sat. Seriously, can't understand.
With Vertcoin going to use new algo, the Lyra2 and essentially becoming a new coin Vertcoin 2.0, Monocle may be revived. Monocle would be used as a testbed for Vertcoin 2.0 and would be the first coin to benefit from the new algo. Already, I am seeing some buying/accumulation activities. Why VTC is going to use new algo? Any ASICs released? I am not sure coin can get benefits in price from algo change, once new algo appearing this coin will be lost in a myriads of new scam/shit coins in a month. |
|
|
|
Today QuazarCoin was added to HitBTC with market makers help.You can trade QCN soon, stay tuned. And thanks SATOSHI 0.00000001! NAKAMOTO World™ is home of the world's largest private cryptocurrency portfolio with 25+ years experience of investment & cryptocurrency consulting. So when trading starts? I can deposit, but can't trade. For several days. |
|
|
|
It seems price started recovery. Nice to see. It must be at least 5x times higher and I'll gladly accept more hashrate on http://qcn.hashinvest.net pool. |
|
|
|
Yeah Go Go Go Do not forget to vote in mintpal  mintpal now live about 500 vote again to reach rank 10 KEEP VOTING ! Mintpal voting gonna be closed soon, it does not matter. Try to contact http://hitbtc.com |
|
|
|
What a hell is going on with VTC price?
I think this coin can die if don't change algo to less expensive.
Every coin need pump to live or accumulation, there is no natural demand on coins. There is no such thing "not pump & dump coin". |
|
|
|
Is there anything special you have to do in order to paste your xmr address into the bitmonerod daemon console screen? Im trying to pass the address as a parameter for the start_mining command.
You simply don't have to do it any more. |
|
|
|
more developers = better?  There is no developers, just group of scammers. |
|
|
|
|
Forgot to say, not only BTC address, so will be possible to make a multipool for any PoS scamcoin =)
And also, an interface and instruments to resolve payout issues without spending 3 days on it, because such problem is show stopper and will destroy business.
|
|
|
|
|
BTW, hide mined coins if it's multipool. Hide everything. The happiness is in the dark.
|
|
|
|
- PPLNS option, currently all pulls hurted by pool-hopping
- Hidden ports for miners (my patch on node-cn-pool)
- Easy to customize, separate css, js with custom events, etc
- Fee withdrawal address, automatic with threshold
- Lightweight
- Separate daemon, api and payout daemon
I'll add some items to this list later. BTW, I think multipools sucks, and merged-mining killing coins. If I found a time I'll join your frontend development if you are not against Ember.js frontend. |
|
|
|
а вообще маты намного лучше усваиваемые.
С чего вы это взяли? Обосновать можете? Например, на Хабре не пробовали высказать эту мысль?  Вообще зачем что-то высказывать в уютном гнезде кармадрочеров? Что им можно объяснить и что они могут сказать сами? Пример хабрахабра здесь на форуме это тред Price Dice Campaign, где все лижут задницу своему хозяину. |
|
|
|
Much better than in early days when pools didn't implement minimal payout threshold.
There is no official "promise" from the development team on this, but personally I expect the on disk storage to eventually end up a closer to what is reported by monerochain.info, which means less than half of these numbers. Currently a lot of data is being stored multiple times on disk. Being smarter about how to do that should help a lot. But first we need to get the database interface completed and a reference database integrated (see latest Missives for status). Then people can optimize. Great, if all the dublicated data can be cut out thats good news. As said I dont see the current rate of growth as anything too troubling so with the database implemented and if anyone can optimize further it can only be positive. At least, if there long timeframe, it's easier to implement google snappy configurable compression level. But imo it does not matter, cos it still all in RAM. |
|
|
|
The blockchain bloat was a hot topic on IRC at the end of last week so I decided to start keeping exact blockchain size figures as the charts on monerochain.info can be misleading. I have been recording these at aroun 10:00 GMT and are as follows.
1,516,605 KB 13/7/14
1,544,024 KB 14/7/14
1,606,429 KB 15/7/14
1,628,828 KB 16/7/14
1,646,808 KB 17/7/14
As you can see the blockchain is growing at ~30 mb average a day which is fantastic news if you look back to how much bloat the dust transactions were causing on the chain so kudos to the core devs and pool devs for implementing those solutions. This current rate of growth is much more acceptable for the privacy afforded than the 10x the size of BTC's chain we were heading towards a month or two ago.
As it was mentioned again in another thread and I therefore said I would update the list I was keeping here is the blockchain growth on disk rather than the one displayed on monerochain.info which is significantly smaller than the on disk size. 1,663,092 KB 18/7/14 1,711,573 KB 21/7/14 1,727,554 KB 22/7/14 1,742,269 KB 23/7/14 This gives an average growth rate of ~16MB over the period 18/7 to 23/7 and an average of ~22.5MB for the ten day period 13/7 to 23/7. Im sure you will all agree again that this rate of growth is perfectly acceptable for the privacy and anonymity provided by the protocol and is again a significantly slower rate of growth than the rate when the pools were sending out dust. Much better than in early days when pools didn't implement minimal payout threshold. |
|
|
|
|
Hi, any status updates coming? Price is falling constantly, not profitable to run a pool. Would be awesome to see what promo group have done already.
|
|
|
|
Still missing payout
I sent PM and the same info below:
Constructive Posts Count: 150
Final count: 2295
BTC: 19NTgrinM6o85hXWBcj5rGxo56dZ3p5JcH
Notice: I am using final total posts count for 20th because I filled form at 20th and releated with the same data.
For personal reasons I missed 17th. Please don't ignore your people, this is already a nightmare for me to collect payment in this round. Constant vagueness.
OK, if it's a nightmare go away, it's that simple. Stunna already said that the posts will be carried over to the next month. It's that simple. Please stop replying to my posts. No respect for creepy people like you. |
|
|
|
|
Still missing payout
I sent PM and the same info below:
Constructive Posts Count: 150
Final count: 2295
BTC: 19NTgrinM6o85hXWBcj5rGxo56dZ3p5JcH
Notice: I am using final total posts count for 20th because I filled form at 20th and releated with the same data.
For personal reasons I missed 17th. Please don't ignore your people, this is already a nightmare for me to collect payment in this round. Constant vagueness.
|
|
|
|
Please do not ignore users leaving them without solved cases.
Yeah, I double. My PM to Stunna. Hi, Stunna. Still missing my payout. Filled "Collecting Payment" yesterday and today. I missed 17th due to personal problems. I enrolled last month also posted ITT for insurance, because there were a lot of doubts with form. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=291387.msg7358610#msg7358610// 20th |
|
|
|
|
Yes, I will vote in this system just to stop CAIx scam and offer to ban Stuhlman.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
