Make world great again

Well i have cleaned up the forum as a start

Fuzzybear

Page Not Found
The page you are looking for might have been removed, had its name changed, or is temporarily unavailable. Please try the following:

If you typed the page address in the Address bar, make sure that it is spelled correctly.
Click the Back button in your browser to try another link.
Use a search engine like Google to look for information on the Internet.

haha, funny picture.
everything is a matter of perspective! based on your previous comments i am sure you meant this as to be seen from left to right but the "car" seems to be heading down if you look at it from right to left

It'll happen this year I am sure. I've hodled long enough not to worry about it.

I honestly do not believe this is true at all.  For one thing, the altcoin market tends to be a good canary in the coalmine.  If there's a flood of new interest in bitcoin, there's typically a flood of new activity in altcoins as well.  The alt markets are currently imploding with volume going down to nothing, so it sure doesn't seem like there's a flood of new people in bitcoin.  The price of bitcoin is also a lot higher, so small guys who want to purchase one bitcoin could have done so when it was $200-400, but it takes a pretty large leap of faith to buy one when the price is $1000.

If anyone is moving the price of bitcoin around, it's the usual suspects of Chinese mining cartel, Digital Currency Group, Pantera Capital, Winklevoss, fraudulent exchanges, etc.  One thing that's a giant red flag to me is that ever since Bitfinex goxed, the western price is still determined by that insolvent, scammy exchange with all the big moves occurring there and not places like Bitstamp.  There's no market maker on earth who is going to risk his funds at an insolvent exchange like that, yet with Finex being the market maker, this tells me the people running these fraudulent exchanges might be the main people moving price.

Finex has a great history of walls going plus or minus 4000ish coins at random from a single entity in the past and as of very recently.  Would you store $4 million on Bitfinex post Finex goxing?  I sure as hell wouldn't.  It's probably the exchange owner/employees themselves.  Here was Finex's walls right after they came online after they goxed everyone.  The sell side is clearly all from one single entity (around ~3600 coins), likely from the exchange owners since nobody on earth is gonna keep all those coins stored there right after they stole everyone's money:



Nothing ever changes.  Karpeles controlled the Bitcoin price, then he passed the baton onto another exchange owner.

considering selling at current price (makes decent profit) and putting in a stop order to buy back in case price rises above 1015...

This looks like an interesting time for BTC brothers, I think it is time we get governance under control. Some coins will assist in bringing these solutions to light and I encourage all of you Bitcoin maximalists to read this piece: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1788901.0

Good day.

Bitcoin Forum > Alternate cryptocurrencies > Altcoin Discussion

I think it should be bloked imediately, if they don't we are under attack by a potential Hal/Hal family impersonator. Block the account and then if it's really someone from Hal family that has the password, they can easily contact theymos in reddit or something and prove it, until then the safe thing to do is to block it imo.

I hope Hal cleaned his PM story.

+Rating Earnings: 5 Shares
 +Hunterbunter,1LHVxAkzcN8BzSdrT7J2W3CCpiz5Rgj72E,5-Leader(+5 for being the leader)

Three years ago, Bitcoin stabilizing around the $1K mark seemed like a dream.

Now look at it.

Where could we be three years from now??

Onward and upward to $5K!  

This is excellent question because I think devs get most of block reward.

If someone wants to help develop the project, how does that work currently? If we make price go up would devs get interested again? I want to help bring this currency back to life.

Monday- huge dump begging new reality here   

This only applies to a large number (about one billion, in the example 739 099 918 DVC) if all the funds are accumulated at the same address DVC.
When sending via QT wallet, owner will be warned about the amount of commission. If you send out from daemon "devcoind sendtoaddress", in this case, without warning, all the remains will go to the fee.

I showed the results of research blockchain what was on the block 237497.
Time: 1466623710 (06.22.2016 19:28:30) - at the time was the current wallet.
1Jw3SwT14VkHhxg74aVWQxTCZnTAonV2Fu lost all of his coins.
This money mined on address 1HM1haADUGW9zxNQz6n2x7A5W7PB1n2TVn.
But on the block 237717 http://block.d.evco.in/block/77491fbea625f78fdbcc6cf54439e5347df53e675142dc70ec3c7cd9b1bb8bb4 he also lost their.
I think that this should check and test developers in testnet.
But the DVC holders just be careful not to keep everything on the same address and do not trust the automatic sending.

In this coin has a bug: if one address contains several million DVC, then when you send any number of coins to another address all balance of funds will be sent to the commission.

It already was, see in this block:
http://block.d.evco.in/block/62e938e77d8d472339c747b8015070c365efa3625927ca5fc7465acb40bbf1a8
http://explorer.devcoin.info/devcoin/block/62e938e77d8d472339c747b8015070c365efa3625927ca5fc7465acb40bbf1a8

When sending from the address 1Jw3SwT14VkHhxg74aVWQxTCZnTAonV2Fu to address 18TPy9LQjnhgMPN9M6XG3pD1mjeuBDeEK7 amount of 9999999 DVC fee was 729099919DVC

Transaction
http://block.d.evco.in/tx/6024431ed948c748e28ae99232c301824e4bb8b1bd1708cede3fa0fd847ec514
http://explorer.devcoin.info/devcoin/tx/6024431ed948c748e28ae99232c301824e4bb8b1bd1708cede3fa0fd847ec514

Probably need to store smaller amounts at different addresses, approximately 100K at the one address.