Now are you talking about my God?
What if all these Gods up to now were fake, and I'm the first to discover the real one?
Does your god allow me to murder those infidels that believe in those fake ones? If it doesn't, oh well, I'll just make it up as I go along and do it anyway. In the name of god.  |
|
|
|
Every man, scientist or not, feel the deep need to relate to a deity, to a higher being.
Lolwat I love when people state facts based on not a single proof My turn Every man, scientist or not, knows that the real superior being is the Flying Spaghetti Monster and that other religions were created only to bring fear and shame to the mankind.
|
|
|
|
I really doubt there is any scientific proof to describe god existence.
Who need proofs about unicorn or flying spaghetti monster? Calm down bro Don't dare compare my existing god with the imaginary one from Christians' sick minds |
|
|
|
Ce n'était pas pour viser quelqu'un en particulier mais plus pour discuter de manière générale du sujet (donc la redirection ici), j'en avais parlé un peu plus haut : Il n'y a priori pas de raison de supprimer de message hors spam, par contre je me demande (sujet ouvert, donnez votre opinion) si on ne devrait pas sévir un peu sur les insultes qui font trop souvent déraper certains topics et arrivent un peu trop facilement.. peut être même donner quelques jours de vacances en cas de récidive de la part de certains. Certaines discussions, même si un violentes/déchainées, peuvent être interessantes mais les insultes/attaques personnelles n'apportent souvent rien.
Certains on l'air de penser qu'il ne faut rien faire, je pense qu'il faudrait sévir un peu. Vous en pensez quoi ? Sévir beaucoup |
|
|
|
I do not think all 28 are very active, or some Mod's are only for local language section.
They don't have right to moderating the forum other then their language sub forum.
I see well at least 10 of them are proper moderators and thats still a lot for my opinion. 8 493 195 Posts in 342752 Topics by 354853 Members.
Do you think that this is easy to moderate? They can't be all online at all times. Many reports come in daily I assume everything has to be handled properly. I'm not sure what the daily average is for the number of posts but it probably is high. I'd say the the number is decent, they can manage right? Yeah definitely not too many mods here |
|
|
|
It is even worse guys, I saw some people (they have a red or cyan coin) who have the power to delete threads, edit posts of regular users and even ban people!  How can this be allowed?? I want that power too!  |
|
|
|
|
I'll contact bitstamp to know if it's caused by the script, in the meantime I'll handle that error correctly instead of crashing
And thanks for reporting it!
|
|
|
|
It's sure the problem is the Incapsula software.
The Bitstamp ticker doesn't even contain the currency so it can't have any impact.
Btw I think you should contact Bitstamp to know why you're banned. Maybe you have a malware or something. I am not banned and I don't have malware on my computer. Cloudflare ensures that someone is "real" by making the browser do a small task and asking it for the answer. If it gets one, it's a "real" person, if it does not, you don't get access, because you are most likely a bot, doing a DDoS attack or something like that (and it gives the response I received). I know I am not banned because I can reach " https://www.bitstamp.net/api/ticker/" without a problem. I see I don't get why it works for other people though |
|
|
|
|
It's sure the problem is the Incapsula software.
The Bitstamp ticker doesn't even contain the currency so it can't have any impact.
Btw I think you should contact Bitstamp to know why you're banned. Maybe you have a malware or something.
|
|
|
|
Same as Hero.
Though it would be awesome to annoy people perpetually with my awesome flash animations of 2girls1cup.
You are an administrator, we know you can do it  |
|
|
|
Bitcoin 2.0  |
|
|
|
I have never used Bitstamp, nor visited them, lol. That is strange... Well I guess you won't use it anymore then! By the way, I didn't introduce the 0.2.95: it has the balance checker (only in bitcoin for now) and the Google search instead of the regular one As usual, go to the settings page to test them |
|
|
|
I can't reproduce the bug... Please write the following on line 896: Then send me the result |
|
|
|
|
The bbc_highlight error is because of BitcoinTalk, not the script
And I don't know what happens, are you using the CRX or Tampermonkey? I'll solve that within 2 hours I think.
|
|
|
|
|
Please try with the new 0.2.95
|
|
|
|
I think it can be on Price Ticker. Something like this : USD/BTC = Value | 2 Addresses : Value . To make it much better: when mouse pointer is above ticker, then it will expand and show value of each address.  ~~MZ~~ Not sure I'll show the balance in USD for now (I'd have to check which currency you use, handle the delays of all the request, etc) I'll write the balance in BTC though The Bitstamp ticker doesn't work: Uncaught SyntaxError: Unexpected token < VM371:7063 Which corresponds to: eval("data="+r.responseText+';');What currency do you use? Never mind, it wouldn't cause that error Does the error remain if you refresh? |
|
|
|
Damn, sorry for that guys I just took it as an opportunity to check out the new stuff anyway like the css editor I know it's ugly and empty for now, I'm waiting for people to tell me which properties they would like to modify and I'll put them in the editor |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
