Are the rumors true that one of the developers of Augur is having a mental breakdown? It was said that he was tweeting weird stuff saying that Ethereum is a Russian honey pot or something, and also that Vitalik controls Ethereum totally making the platform not ideal for dapps. Maybe that is what's making the price fall, that developer could be dumping right now.
Not a developer but the PR (I suppose), more info here: https://web.archive.org/web/20161118165909/https://twitter.com/TonySwish |
|
|
|
So, we can expect another dump, when forging start in 2 days?
15,000,000 LSK, thats about 41,000 new LSK in circulation every day ?
Correct me if I am wrong
In circulation doesn't mean that all the delegates will sell their ~480 LSK every day (or at least I hope so), but yeah it means that there will be more than ~48k LSK everyday. |
|
|
|
when will card be operatioonal again, i wanted nto purchase something but it wont work
We are currently experiencing problems on the card vendor side.Please do not use your Advanced Cash cards for ATM and shopping transactions at the moment. According to our card vendor, there are certain third party system outages that prevent normal transaction completion. You may also encounter errors while trying to perform card-related operations inside your account, including creating new cards. We are monitoring the situation and will be updating you as it develops. This news is of yesterday (I suppose). |
|
|
|
did the team got access to the ICO funding ?
No, they don't. They will be able to receive the funds after the first forged block (with reward). proof that it ever existed? lol  ~as a picture of the screen featuring a coinbase wallet don't fly ...just sayin'  #what's the wallet address with the ICO funds? I don't know, the only thing I know is that they have used the coinbase vault service (so I suppose the bitcoins aren't all in one bitcoin address). Maybe Max aka LiskHQ can give you an exhaustive reply to your question. |
|
|
|
did the team got access to the ICO funding ?
No, they don't. They will be able to receive the funds after the first forged block (with reward). |
|
|
|
man, how hard to understand.
polo is not listing any ethereum tokens. not one of them.
they are an exchange, so they cant handle dividends payment anyway.
on the other hand they are usa based. if they sell tokens on their platform, which represent a stakeholder value, they are screwed from the regulatory side, because they dont have the license to do that - Kraken do.
Aaaand what about REP (augur)  ? which makes not much sense though. REP functions mostly the same as ICN, so it can't be for legal reasons Yes of course, it's not due legal reasons. I still think that it is due the NDA between iconomi and poloniex, there isn't any other possible valid reason. but why would you want to keep your stuff off of an exchange? I don't really know, maybe waiting the effective launch of the iconomi platform. |
|
|
|
yeah, ethereum looks more and more like forkereum. And it doesn't like it is the last one. It would be really good if other chains were considered. But which one? CounterParty?? Maybe? 7246 BTC market cap and 11 BTC daily trade volume. No crypto asset has ever traded at a higher market cap than the platform it lives on. Bitcoin blockchain would be too expensive to use, so Ethereum is currently the only choice of vehicle to take us to the moon. ICN could always launch their own blockchain if they really needed to. For now, it's more efficient to let the Ethereum developers focus on maintaining a blockchain instead of hiring developers to do it in house. Aren't you worried with all these weekly forks? Stability is crucial at this stage. Ethereum is still in 'beta' so I think there is not any problem, it's not stable yet  . |
|
|
|
man, how hard to understand.
polo is not listing any ethereum tokens. not one of them.
they are an exchange, so they cant handle dividends payment anyway.
on the other hand they are usa based. if they sell tokens on their platform, which represent a stakeholder value, they are screwed from the regulatory side, because they dont have the license to do that - Kraken do.
Aaaand what about REP (augur) ? which makes not much sense though. REP functions mostly the same as ICN, so it can't be for legal reasons Yes of course, it's not due legal reasons. I still think that it is due the NDA between iconomi and poloniex, there isn't any other possible valid reason. |
|
|
|
that fucking carteling situation, still ruins the whole idea of delegates But this is just a section in lisk forum where the delegates can imagine. And most of them are very active community members since the beginning. and whats then? they decided to vote on each other right from the begining. There is pretty little chances to a new comer to get involved its clearly a cartel this only works if they have enough lisk. the ark guys have a lot of lisk and will vote their own delegates. and i think there are some other with a huge amount of lisk. and yes. i don't like the voting system neither. It costs millions of $ initial investment to startup a competitive Bitcoin mining operation. Ethereum mining is similar, with big investments in hardware, datacenter, electricity. It is hard for new comers to get a delegate spot, that's just the nature of a capitalist system. Imagine if they changed it to 2000 delegates, so everyone could run a delegate. Then there would be very little incentive to collect Lisk, form groups of supporters, and add value to Lisk in order to get a delegate position. yes thats capitalism. the rich get richer. and the richer become even richer. and what is happening here and with other cryptos is that decentralation disappears. It's happening everywhere, decentralisation doesn't mean everyone can or will be rich. It's like first come, first served for example with Bitcoin (the early adopters/miners). You can't blame them only because they found (mined and bought) bitcoin before you or am I wrong? |
|
|
|
I don't post often over here but I've been very active in Lisk.chat and Lisk forums over the last months. For those interested, I updated my delegate proposal for the contest. It include all the links to my community services, guides, scripts, etc. https://forum.lisk.io/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=143Hey Gr33nDrag0n, I know you are very active on lisk chat  btw great proposal. Good luck for the contest! |
|
|
|
Good news! This is a good news, will received dividens for holders icn. Its time to buy some ICN again. I have not seen it is very good news, of course we also want to see ICN really added to other trading sites like poloniex Poloniex will most likely add ICN once the ICNX & ICNP funds platform is released this December. ICN won't be under 100k sat for much long... Once Devs announce official launch date, those sell walls will be bulldozed over in a jiffy... Someone is gonna lose his ICN so cheap. man, how hard to understand. polo is not listing any ethereum tokens. not one of them.they are an exchange, so they cant handle dividends payment anyway. on the other hand they are usa based. if they sell tokens on their platform, which represent a stakeholder value, they are screwed from the regulatory side, because they dont have the license to do that - Kraken do. Aaaand what about REP (augur) ? |
|
|
|
Updated my lisk delegate proposal and added a 5% of the future forged funds to be sent to the lisk community funds , this is the proposal: - https://forum.lisk.io/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=185Remember also to take part to the community delegate contest, click here for more info... |
|
|
|
I found this http://segwit.co/Can someone explain this in easy terms? If you run a bitcoin node to are supposed to signal segwit support? how do you do that?
edit: Why would you not support or not support it? I thought it was a no brainer. Increased capacity more efficient etc. What am I missing?
Only the miners can signal segwit through the mined blocks, your node will be counted only as a segwit node (0.13.1 bitcoin-core). |
|
|
|
Platform lisk is ok,vote to lisk delegate is cost 1 lisk if real forging wil start.if dont want my vote is ok.i wil not pay from my own money to vote delegat. With only 1 LSK you can vote max 33 Delegates , so to vote 101 delegates you will need only 4 LSK. |
|
|
|
|
If at each retarget there will be 101 not-segwit blocks .. then SW will not pass to the nexts status, which is called locked.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
