I dont know... 5 LISK per block is enough reward for delegates?
I think 5 LSK per block is too much, but thats just my opinion. I think 5 lisk per block is the right reward imho  . |
|
|
|
I sent lisk from polo, transaction says complete but nothing under ark; If my deposit shows up after the 70% bonus time is over do I still receive the 70% since the deposit address was created during the 70% bonus time?
Can someone clarify this?
I think if your transaction will be broadcasted in the lisk blockchain during these 1:30 h you will receive the 70% bonus, otherwise you will receive the next bonus % (which is 40%). |
|
|
|
1. Mainchain stabilisation ✅
The most important milestone for many users this year is the stabilisation of the mainchain, and the subsequent activation of community forging. With that, we will also enable forging rewards so that delegates are able to finance community projects, and foster a growing ecosystem.
2. Merging Lisk-CLI into the Lisk App SDK
The Lisk-CLI tool in its current form will cease to exist. We will rewrite the application, and merge its functionalities directly into the Lisk App SDK, providing a self-contained development package, and reducing our development effort from two repositories to one. The planned merge and rewrite of Lisk-CLI, will make blockchain application development easier to manage, and also lower the barrier to entry for new developers.
3. Lisk App SDK stabilisation
Stabilising our sidechains and making it possible for developers to start working on blockchain applications, is a major step towards achieving one of Lisk’s core goals. We shall therefore undergo major changes in our Lisk App SDK, making sidechains not only stable, but also reliable.
During this step we will split every sidechain into a single, independent database. As of writing, every installed sidechain has their own tables within the same database as the mainchain, this comes with many disadvantages. Running every sidechain in its own separate database allows developers to achieve high scalability independent of the mainchain. It also makes everyday sidechain administration easier and straight-forward.
Another important task is the implementation of a secured and protected virtual machine for blockchain applications. This way the JavaScript code of the application will run in an encapsulated environment, securing the computer from any harmful application.
Currently, sidechains also need to be verified whenever they are launched. We will implement the same quick-load feature as it exists on the mainchain, and remove the need for constant re-verification, making sidechains easier to administer and deploy.
So step 1 of Phase 1 is done right?
Not yet, the standby delegates are waiting the block N° 1'451'520 so they can start to forge . |
|
|
|
Yesterday I got this error:  |
|
|
|
Thanks for the reply Lauda, so at the end it's only to avoid to lose precious time every time someone ask if an account is banned or not ... isn't it? Other reasons (from your point of view?).
That's pretty much it. It should save time for pretty much any party involved in addition to removing redundancy and inconsistency. This helps people that are hunting account farmers, spammers or just any other kind of rule-breaking users. I could see potential harm in doing this with temporarily banned accounts, but it seems pretty okay to do it with permanently banned ones IMO. Personally, I am quite happy if some bullshit poster stops posting. Whether it was a temporary ban, a perma ban, or that user stopped posting on his own is of no interest to me, just like the content of their posts. On the other hand, you say that placing a tag to a banned user will save time and effort. But withholding info regarding who banned that particular user and for what exactly could actually lead to even more waste, since users may start asking questions and nagging mods...
Right now spammers just stop spamming after a perma ban, and no one gives a fuck about themThis, I think there isn't at all a real/valid reason to see who is banned or perma-banned (always imho). |
|
|
|
What type of wallets support storage of ICN tokens? Can they be stored using a Ledger Nano S? Or do they have to be stored on the ETH Mist wallet?
If the ledger nano s supports eth than you can send your token directly to your ethereum address (aka your ledger ). The important is to not leave your iconomi token on an exchange, but instead in your personal ethereum address. |
|
|
|
"segwit": {
"status": "defined",
"startTime": 1479168000,
"timeout": 1510704000
Ho fatto un po' di confusione con i tuoi quote e non ho letto dovutamente. Comunque il primo timestamp dice: 2016-11-15T00:00:00+00:00 Quindi è il 15 di novembre con l'orario di Greenwich, l'altro timestamp è dopo un anno. Non parte direttamente il 15 Nov, ma al primo retarget dopo quella data. Quindi potrebbe parte il 17-18-19 Novembre, questo perché non si può sapere con esattezza la data precisa di un retarget della difficulty. Quindi hanno scelto di stare un po larghi, giusto per dare qualche giorno in più a chi volesse (ai miner) di aggiornare il client. Il secondo timestamp è la deadline, i dev core pensano che un anno possa bastare per l'attivazione di segwit. |
|
|
|
Yeah in the beginning I was only curious but lately I've changed my mind and I don't personally care to know if someone is permabanned or not. Just read through the thread again. A simple example, of what happens to me personally (but not very often, since I'm not a global moderator) are reports of users that are already permanently banned. This has happened a fair amount of times this year. This wastes time of both parties involved. It would also help people like:
Thanks for the reply Lauda, so at the end it's only to avoid to lose precious time every time someone ask if an account is banned or not ... isn't it? Other reasons (from your point of view?). |
|
|
|
When you make it public that someone is banned, you make them vulnerable to imposters impersonating them in order to make it appear that the banned user is (attempting to) evading their ban.
What damage would that do to a user that is banned permanently already anyway? You are be thinking about temporarily banned users, which would be banned longer/permanently if evading their ban? Even if a user is banned "permanently" they can potentially have their ban lifted some time after their ban is instituted. It is not uncommon for these types of requests to be granted absent ban evasion attempts. Also, just as it is not difficult to impersonate a user from an admin's point of view, it is not difficult to impersonate a user from the public's point of view. So someone could make it appear to admins that an account is evading a perm ban, and get said account banned, while making it appear that said account is an alt of a 3rd account to the public, and making this account show as being banned would only add credibility to this. Interesting, now I also think the ban (perma-ban) should not be visible to the other users... just for security. It's not useful, otherwise Lauda can you post (again) some arguments in favour of your 'request'? Thanks. |
|
|
|
I was recommended to create a thread and check whether there was demand for the user rank 'Banned'. I'm aware that this has been suggested and denied by BadBear in the past. With the addition of this rank I see a fair amount of potential in aiding the analysis and fight against spam & account farmers done by the community. However please note that, in this suggestion we are only considering users that are permanently banned.
So: Any thoughts, suggestions, concerns? Is this a good or a bad idea?
Bad idea, I suggested this few months ago (maybe more than 1 year ago) and BadBear said it was a bad idea :/. I don't remember why, maybe privacy reason... at the end only the user that is banned must decide to reveal to the others his 'ban status'. |
|
|
|
Lisk to Give Out Forging Rewards to Promote Competition, Arms Race Among MinersLisk is set to introduce a new feature called “forging rewards” in early December, in order to create a more competitive ecosystem for its stakeholders. The development team behind Lisk believes community forging will allow it to become a more efficient, secure and reliable network. Lisk is a unique alternative to Ethereum, in that it is based on a consensus algorithm called the Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS). In DPoS, blocks are mined or generated by stakeholders, or investors that hold the highest amount of LISK. Within the network, these majority stakeholders can vote for or elect 101 active delegates, who are responsible for protecting and securing the network. The white paper of Lisk reads: “The Lisk network is secured and/or protected by 101 active delegates. Each delegate is elected by the stakeholders of LISK. Once voted into the list of active delegates they are given the authority to generate blocks. Every Lisk stakeholder can be a part of the electoral process, by placing votes for delegates in their favour, or by becoming a candidate themselves.”
https://cointelegraph.com/news/lisk-to-give-out-forging-rewards-to-promote-competition-arms-race-among-miners
|
|
|
|
I specifically bought Lisk for the investment into the ARK. I trust these guys. The next time I will invest my Lisk and BTC only in projects created on the Lisk platform.  Why Lisk price dropping? About ark? No one will be pumped because too many Lisk on coluld poloniex wallet. (30M tokens).  People should withdraw from the poloniex exchange its own Lisk on personal wallet and keep for a long time.  Quoted for truth. 30M coins is way too much, what if polo got hacked? Big problems... These 30M LSK are in a cold wallet. A cold wallet can be hacked. http://www.coindesk.com/bitfinex-bitcoin-hack-know-dont-know/https://news.bitcoin.com/bitfinex-us-regulation-cold-storage/A real cold wallet can't be hacked from remote, please stop  .... PS: cold means that isn't on internet, it's offline. |
|
|
|
This reminds me of when the weak hands sold ETH under $1 to invest in other shitty ICOs.  Why people continue to post the ethereum chart for every new project/coin? lol Just to believe in a pump like the eth. pump? |
|
|
|
I heard rumors that ICONOMI will be on a polo this week?
IT nonsense. Polo told that they add next year After release.just wait some weeks and icn price crashes under 10k.than you can buy when did polo said that? i think the fact that poloniex still didnt added ICN is enough to conclude that they will never add it... it's like waves, months after launch and they still have hope to see poloniex list it. Nah... the iconomi team said that icn will be added to a big exchange very 'soon' and there is (at the moment) a NDA, so the only thing we should do is wait. |
|
|
|
Love or hate it, Poloniex is the current equivalent of Nasdaq for Altcoins.
Saying that Kraken is enough for ICN, is like saying that the Mexican stock exchange is enough for some stock.
You're missing the point that majority of investors don't even pay attention to new stocks till they're listed on Nasdaq (Poloniex in this case)
I think the same, kraken is not the best for the altcoins.... iconomi needs at least poloniex. (After bittrex & all the other minor exchange). you keep seeing ICN as alt-coin, and keep nudging about when polo.. stop crying already! If you thought you can short ICN for 3-4x profit, you are not such a good traders as you think you are. go pump some other shitcoin I'm not crying, iconomi is an alternative coin /ethereum token... what's wrong with you? |
|
|
|
Any updates about polo addition? Why devs don't give proper clarification about this?
They did, and multiple times. For example:
...Polo is completely irrelevant...
WTF is this guy talking about? Poloniex irrelevant?! Can we vote to fire this Jaka dude from Iconomi? People invested to trade on Poloniex, not on some low volume exchange.Not true at all, the iconomi team didn't say "invest in icn, so you will be able to trade on polo" but yeah... a lot of users are waiting poloniex (that's sure) most importantly the whales. |
|
|
|
Love or hate it, Poloniex is the current equivalent of Nasdaq for Altcoins.
Saying that Kraken is enough for ICN, is like saying that the Mexican stock exchange is enough for some stock.
You're missing the point that majority of investors don't even pay attention to new stocks till they're listed on Nasdaq (Poloniex in this case)
I think the same, kraken is not the best for the altcoins.... iconomi needs at least poloniex. (After bittrex & all the other minor exchange). |
|
|
|
Thanks for Info!
Yep i read the whitepaper but i dont know, are the ico coins on kranken the same like the one from the crowdfunding?
with dividends later..
In order to receive the icn dividends you must hold your iconomi tokens in your personal ethereum address, that's obvious . What if one has half in myethereum and half on iconomi wallet? Does he need to move them in one place? No I don't think he needs to move them in one ethereum address, but why should 'you' (for example) divide your iconomi tokens in 2 addresses? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
