Zanima me jel ima ovdje admina na tome forumu? Prije nekoliko dana sam reportao jednog idiota sto je stalno spomijao F*** rijec u postovima i vrijeđao nas , do danas nije banan..
Jel to znaci da nitko ne prati postove sto ljudi pisu? [...] Inace: da. A moderator "Other languages/locations" sekcije je Cyrus. Ali odmah moram dodati dat je ta sekcija takodje najteza za moderiranje jer se mogu kladiti da Cyrus ne zna sva ta jezika...  |
|
|
|
I thought about this overnight and I decided to change my negative to a neutral. The OP did paste the source code of his project and I believe he was just trying out his programming skills, as I do from time to time.
The reason the rating remains a neutral is because people should be aware this person has no problems writing malicious software. I can totally agree with that. Thanks for your feedback/time/explanation... |
|
|
|
[...] E.g.: if on a deep-web marketplace someone is offering drugs or weapons for sale for BTC and he's got a "good" reputation - always delivering on time, as advertised and quality stuff - would you neg. trust him "just" for the offer...  As I've previously said, I don't have a strong stance on this. This also raises the question whether we tag all/some people for doing something that is clearly illegal? I would say it depends on the particular case (as you're trying to point out?). However, someone who has been much longer in DT should be able to give you a better answer than me. That (your stance) is obvious (and thank you for noting my point), but that's actually why I asked Vod...  |
|
|
|
C'mon, this is BTCT and BTC we're talking about (so, no, certainly not church).
Therefore the odds of it being used for 'genuine' purposes is much lower. That was the conclusion that out of the initial assertion. I would argue "the other way around"; because it is BTCT we should "stick together" and "understand" each other more. E.g.: if on a deep-web marketplace someone is offering drugs or weapons for sale for BTC and he's got a "good" reputation - always delivering on time, as advertised and quality stuff - would you neg. trust him "just" for the offer... (And mind you, I live in a liberal country and definitely support recreational drug use [not abuse] and I love going to the shooting range and hunting...) |
|
|
|
How do you "know" that, Lauda? [...] I personally don't like this "guilty 'till proven innocent" attitude...  Maybe if you shared it in a church, they'd be more people using it for 'genuine' purposes. I guess, we could also allow malware since it can be used to test your own system? Nobody has claimed that anyone is 'guilty' here. [...] There's no factually right stance on this either. Well, don't you think that a negative trust rating by a DT member is "a bit over the top" then... C'mon, this is BTCT and BTC we're talking about (so, no, certainly not church). Maybe I'm missing something (and I would gladly be pointed towards that), but this really seems "over the top" (by Vod) to me...  |
|
|
|
[...] We all know that this one won't be used for legal purposes.
How do you "know" that, Lauda? I personally don't like this "guilty 'till proven innocent" attitude... [...] There's no need to play the devil's advocate.
That need is always present... |
|
|
|
[snip] Anyway... Someone with a PACER login who's willing to check out the docket on Bevand v. BF Labs Inc. et al. RE: "Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations" and reporting here about it, would be highly appreciated... |
|
|
|
[...] This is not going to happen online.
The official way of communication with financial and other institutions (which btc-e is) is through Regular Mail. Sorry, but this simply is not true; I own businesses across three different countries and I do almost all my "communication with financial and other institutions [...] through" the internet and not snailmail... [...] Why would anyone believe you actually own half a million dollars? [...] You do understand that during 2012 the average BTC/US$ price was less than $10,-!?! Any comparison to "own[-ing] half a million dollars" is just funny. [...] (the wallet was used in 2012!).[...] |
|
|
|
Nope, that is "only" a temporary receivership order, and was lifted after the case was investigated and a settlement was agreed upon... A case brought against them at this point would be like me trying to sue Montgomery Ward or Mervyn's. [img] I'm not that well versed in USA law, but "here" in Europe a case concerning "Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations" would certainly go even beyond a possible bankruptcy and directly onto the principals (as private persons). As far as I can see "the fat lady has not sung yet"... |
|
|
|
[...] Eto, knjigovodja zna bolje nego službenik... tipićno. Srećom naći Direktora! |
|
|
|
[...]The author of any virus is held responsible for all it's usage - both civilly and criminally. Vod, a keylogger is not (yet!) a virus... You allready acknowledged that by removing the word "virus" from your negative rating. Now - I think - it's time to remove the negative rating entirely... |
|
|
|
[...] Thanks for your opinion, new person. Can you explain some positive uses of a keylogger? [...] What if you ran a business and warned staff they would be logged ? [...] Yup, that's how I [have been] use [-ing] them [for years]. Got'em installed on all my company PC's and my employees actually sign for it... Really don't understand a negative trust rating on this... |
|
|
|
I think there is some dispute whether the keylogger is actually a virus or not. I removed the "virus" part of the feedback. Sorry Vod, but I have to ask (after reading https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1769689 too): what is wrong with someone writing a keylogger? There are plenty of normal/legal uses for a keylogger (I have them installed f.i. on all my employee's company computers and they actually sign for it). It's like saying " BTC is illegal/wrong"... I honestly don't understand why you gave a negative trust rating because of that... |
|
|
|
I just noticed a "new" lawsuit against BFL (and its principals) at: JUSTIA Dockets and Filings: Bevand v. BF Labs Inc. et al. The "Nature of Suit: Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations" sounds interesting enough... Anyone still around with a PACER login to check out the full docket? |
|
|
|
Zdravo! Pisem seminarski rad na temu bitocin i nije mi jasno kako da prevedem termin "soft fork" i "hard fork", ima li ko neku ideju?
Alo, preporucio bih vam da postavite pitanje u Hrvatskom delu formuma. Malo (puno) je aktivniji od ovog Srpskog... Ili pitajte direktno koristnika Laude, koji je poliglot i aktivan clan. |
|
|
|
Recover?!? A newbie with a trust rating of -64!!! That must be some kind of record... There are 3,657 newbies with negative rating. The worst is magic max with a rating of -1024WoW... I see him even at -9999, good find... And sad. Yeah, sad too... |
|
|
|
[...[Primjetih I javih se MareConti.hr, dogovorio sam informativni sastanak, morati ću još samo dogovoriti termin. Srećno!  |
|
|
|
[...] Vec smo registrovani u RH, u Nizozemskoj i na Gibraltaru [...]
Jesi li razmišljao o otvaranju firme u UK? [...] Pa zar Gibraltar ne pripada više UK...? Zezam se... jednostavno mi je bliže. |
|
|
|
okey, en dan nog, waarom? Ik wil niet voor Zeta of BitBustah spreken, maar ik kan me wel een paar voorbeelden bedenken waarom iemand anoniem wil blijven: je wilt graag naar de hoeren maar bent getrouwd (zeer discutabel en in mijn ogen immoreel, maar niets illegaals aan...); of je wilt wat gay-porn bestellen en maakt je zorgen over toekomstige vervolging vanwege jouw seksuele geaardheid (wanneer er eenmaal een nog grotere idioot democratisch wordt gekozen); of... of... of... [vul zelf maar in]. |
|
|
|
[...]Jesi li razmišljao da firmu otvoriš vani ?! Di jos vani? Vec smo registrovani u RH, u Nizozemskoj i na Gibraltaru (ajd Svicarsku necu jos ni spominovati... ) |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
