Should be ok now, let me know how you go
it didnt like my worker, made a new worker and now its working.... |
|
|
|
cant seem to solo this coin, especially with the only pool going on and offline atm.....
solo it.... i would, how ever antminers are not 100% the easiest to configure for solomining.... |
|
|
|
|
Miner still wont connect.... very wierd now...
|
|
|
|
|
good, althou my miner still wont connect.... seems wierd.... i managed to get my workers and accountmade before it went down...
|
|
|
|
cant seem to solo this coin, especially with the only pool going on and offline atm.....
Mining seems to be ok. Just front end issues. My miners have been hashing away i cant connect to get the details to actualy hook my miner into it lol.... i just need the address and port/ can you share? stratum+tcp://cc.coinfreaks.com:3333 ty difficulty is low, might as well get as many as i can before it gets discovered and hit an exchange lol... 200gh dont go far these days |
|
|
|
cant seem to solo this coin, especially with the only pool going on and offline atm.....
Mining seems to be ok. Just front end issues. My miners have been hashing away i cant connect to get the details to actualy hook my miner into it lol.... i just need the address and port/ can you share? |
|
|
|
|
a working pool would be nice.....
|
|
|
|
|
cant seem to solo this coin, especially with the only pool going on and offline atm.....
|
|
|
|
"BlackCoin's value may grow to $40 per coin by the end of 2014. "Lets hope it will be like they say  one decent pump with natural growth that is probably possible more earlier. |
|
|
|
Im new to mining.. could someone tell me how many coins or m/hash can i earn in a 280x card a day? i will mine on blackcoinpool.com thanks!  how many cards do you have? |
|
|
|
|
cheap and nasty, poorly made not to mention.... very little research done into long term useage and correct setup.....
|
|
|
|
|
the multipool payouts are much to be desired atm, 154 BC earnt over roughly 24 hours with 4mhs and 200ghs pointed their way.....
|
|
|
|
|
does 283 BC sound right for 200ghs and 4mhs on the multipool? seems alittle low to me....
|
|
|
|
|
we have past Darkcoin on market cap, but not value per coin..... $ 0.037 still feels very low for this coin.
|
|
|
|
|
I would love to see BC hit around $0.50-$1.00 with natural growth, i believe BC has the power to wipe most shitty ALTs off the face of the planet.....
|
|
|
|
We'e back to number 4 for 24h volume on coinmarketcap!
Yes, I think we really have a jewel in our hands here. This could get big. Really anxious to see what friday will bring + the other article from Iconic Expert whats so special about friday? i keep seeing this carp about it... |
|
|
|
I don't really have anything against X11, but the reasons I suggested Scrypt-N instead are as follows:
1. It's easier to implement (very closely related to Scrypt, so less work for the developer).
2. It's more widely supported by mining software than X11 at this point.
3. It's adjustable, so if Scrypt:2048 (the current level VertCoin and others use) isn't enough in a couple of years, it can be adapted as many times as needed to stay ahead of ASIC's.
4. The mining period for LiteBar is very short at only 5 years. Scrypt-N provides plenty of ASIC resistant properties to cover that short period of time.
5. This is debatable, but Scrypt-N is more "proven" then X11. It's been suggested by some (including the LiteCoin developers) that the X11 algorithm is more easily translated into ASIC hardware than other ASIC resistant efforts.
I know X11 is the new hotness, and I agree it would be a step up from Scrypt, but transitions like this are already challenging.
LiteBar is starting to show some growth, so it's important to not change things too drastically or too quickly.
The good news is that we're several months away from Scrypt ASIC hardware still, and most of it will be pointed at LiteCoin at first. So there's some time to deal with any potential threat.
the wait time isnt that far for scrypt asics..... month or so roughly |
|
|
|
I agree that x11 should be implemented. The way i see it, if newer coins don't adapt the technology, they will surely be doomed.
X11 algo is alot more ASIC resistant compared to scrypt-N... considering most people display the difficulty curve of scypt-n which could very well allow ASIC developers to "MOD" or redesign scrypt ASIC miners to do that algo as well. |
|
|
|
I'm a big supporter of LiteBar, but I've been thinking about a potential threat. Scrypt ASIC's are coming soon, and while a long established currency like LiteCoin may be able to handle that change, LiteBar could be very vulnerable with its very short mining period and small total number of bars. (Both of which are key features, that distinguish LiteBar from other currencies.)
I'd like to propose to the developers that they consider a hard fork to using Scrypt-N in the near future to counter this problem. All the same software (sgminer, cudaminer, etc.) now supports Scrypt-N and it's a change that has actually boosted the value of other currencies that went from Scrypt to Scrypt-N. We want to keep the mining of LiteBars fair - it would be disasterous if it became centralized to only a few select miners with ASICs.
What do you other LiteBar supporters think?
maybe swing more towards the X11 algo, more efficient in power, scypt-N isnt always as good as its cracked up to be sometimes. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
