Thanks for the link to the topic I seem to have done most of what is here actually having a full blown email debate with bitmain over the issue. No more bitmain for me this really was the last straw with them.
Seems there are lots of people with this issue on the V9's which tells me for sure this is 100% bitmain shoddy workings. I noticed that the controller boards are completely different from any other machines I have had they do no have any beagle boards on them and seem to be of a new type.
I find it strange there is no reporting of HW errors on the device thought this could also be a dirty trick from bitmain to mask high error rates in the machines as this 45% reject ratio seems to be consistent from the reports.
|
|
|
I rented 12PH for 5 hours. Best share 75694530195 not even close.
I saw that and was wondering who tryed it. (my result so far: 4,754,115,935 with 4GH XD ) solopool +3P at the moment of viewing but whoever that is: I wish you luck! Its all about luck Good luck to the next Big rental And to us little guys here soloing Nice share with 4GH! Keep-calm, Hash on, and wish hard. Was holding hope someone was going to hit when the mempool had like 40k tx's the other day was some nice full blocks there!
|
|
|
I couldn't find any errors and failures from the kernel logs it seems that your miner is running fine. Have you tried to check if you have internet ping lose?
It might be an unstable internet connection or your PSU is not giving enough power.
You can try to use the built-in Diagnostic tool from the network tab in the miner and also, try to reboot or restart your internet modem and test it again.
Thanks the ping seems fine I checked my networking and all seems fine I have a very low latency connection and limited run's on my networking My L3's all seems to be fine along with my D3's. Spoke with CK about the miners I bought a bunch of them none of the dash boards seem to show best shares or even in cgminer-api via ssh they all say 0 with around 35/45% rejected ratio over 48 hrs. Bitmain blamed the pools (I know this not to be the case) . then said I needed to install new firmware on them which I did since then they have been much worse than previous. CK said something about mining to the power of 2 and the driver might be the issue I pressed bitmain on this but was left with no reply. Has anyone a custom firmware for the bitmain asic's? Or is there a way to fix this driver issue? I seem to recall someone fixing the firmware for older miners but can't think where or who it was now. Thanks
|
|
|
It looks like a pool problem have you tried to switch first to other pool? You can try the kano pool first and let's see what will be the result, you can check their official thread from here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=789369.0Also, if you can access the dashboard can you copy the whole kernel logs and paste it to http://pastebin.com/ and paste the url here to review. You can find the kernel logs on the system tab. Thanks BitMaxz Tested on Ck Pool CK Solo Kano BTC.com ViaBTC AntPool all have the same results here is the kernel logs. https://pastebin.com/wzKakuKUThanks in advance.
|
|
|
I received the email, but I cannot read the language it is in. Oh god "stable" coins *cough* scam lol.
|
|
|
MRR states it's an issue with the rented miners not working with ASICBOOST I'm not sure what the issue is I do not think this pool requires ASICBOOST but that is what they tried to say.
They are full of it, their system just can't handle the connection. Last time I rented from them, about 2 years a go, they had the same exact issues. A rental would continuously start and stop. Apparently it had something to do with their system requiring a specific difficulty range and couldn't handle the automatic difficulty adjustment of this pool. Had similar issues with MMR while renting here seems ok if you select individual miners but any of the larger power rentals seems to always start stop.
|
|
|
Miners seem to be rejecting a high number of shares over 40%. [0] => SUMMARY [Elapsed] => 177508 [GHS 5s] => 4052.96 [GHS av] => 4048.40 [Found Blocks] => 0 [Getworks] => 3299 [Accepted] => 45356 [b] [Rejected] => 36636[/b] [Hardware Errors] => 0 [Utility] => 15.33 [Discarded] => 41413 [Stale] => 0 [Get Failures] => 0 [Local Work] => 289299115 [Remote Failures] => 0 [Network Blocks] => 303 [Total MH] => 718623268684.0000 [Work Utility] => 102965.92 [Difficulty Accepted] => 168514180.00000000 [Difficulty Rejected] => 136107012.00000000 [Difficulty Stale] => 0.00000000 [Best Share] => 0 [Device Hardware%] => 0.0000 [b] [Device Rejected%] => 44.6807[/b] [Pool Rejected%] => 44.6807 [Pool Stale%] => 0.0000 [Last getwork] => 1542544539 No HW error's showing on the hash boards though updated the firmware of them but still very high reject rates. also note that the miner seems to never have its best share show on the hardware though the pool side detects this and shows. Bitmain blame the pools, (Which its not) then ask for firmware update, Now no reply from them. Faulty hardware? Excuses? Any ideas?
|
|
|
Was there not reports too of issues with the chips during development? I was sure there was a source that said the wafers were failing.
Could this be a reason to limit how many a customer can buy so they don't end up with 1000's of warranty repair or replace in the next few months.
|
|
|
Daily Bump - hashing service and miner rentals also available.
|
|
|
i'm try to go on de.ckpool.org with rent of 12Ph .... for 4 hour ... block for me... came on!! how i can set diff on user?? thanks
If you use an incompatible rental service that refuses to work on port 3333 try port 4334 so, just try port 4334, good Luck! now i'm on with 19 ph rented on port 4334 .... thanks but i think not luck That was some push last night this one really is a stubborn one.
|
|
|
Don't forget how much money you'll have to put into maintenance and repairs to keep it running at spec for that whole time. Bitmain gear isn't built to last for two years.
From what I hear they had issues with the chips and wafers so this is good advice unless you enjoy looking at a machine while parts are away for repair or replace.
|
|
|
"diff": 201.0, "
Damn that came fast last i looked it was at 185
come on you stubborn block
would agree, been a while since we saw over 200 though. almost 4 months now guys. 3 months 27 days ago "shares": 2623211193, "bestshare": 53999534193.04651,
|
|
|
scrypt diff reported from cgminer (in L3 frontend) is several orders of magnitude higher than nethash.
Thanks for that. Was thinking there might have been a bug causing that when i suddenly saw a 700 trillion number!
|
|
|
Well defo the best share i've had yet!
"shares": 1192111334, "bestshare": 53999534193.04651,
|
|
|
/qmake.conf: No such file or directory
check for your qmake config it seems to be missing
run
qmake --version
and post the output
|
|
|
it means you have not set Merged mine to your own doge address
do -p x:DOGEADDRESSHERE
make sure to include the : once you do this it will change from POOL to SELF.
Good Luck
|
|
|
I have seen them submit blocks while rented over MMR - So I would guess that they can submit blocks.
|
|
|
Hey.! I have been solo mining LTC for a while now noticed some of my best shares on my rigs is 1073730365 yet the LTC diff is only Litecoin Difficulty: 8,349,684 Would this not have been a block solve? since its above the network target? I have a few machines that seem to be producing best shares in the billions range but they never submit any blocks.
|
|
|
anyone else having issue with no best share showing and no nonce values on the GUI of the V9's I have a load of then and none ever show the best share I have updated them with the firmware from bitmain site but still nothing.
|
|
|
Yea I suppose I could do that but I used to have a bunch of s3's on here but they have recently been put to rest as I got a bunch of V9's in, so really is like I just upped the amount of lotto tickets I'm buying the electric bill stems from LTC block hunting and my A3s and D3's https://imgur.com/a/nz3N8HN
|
|
|
|