Get your product on our front page on the lead up to this event to gain maximum exposure. Limited places available. |
|
|
|
|
Wow another one bites the dust very sad to see your pool go seems we're losing pools more and more now I fear we're wandering into the unknown and dangerous territory with less pool sad to see you go and wish you the best on whatever you turn to next.
|
|
|
|
|
What about Qubes OS I have yet to give this a shot to see how it runs in that environment but I suppose if you have a juicy enough spec you could run more than one client in the VM's it creates.
|
|
|
|
For the love of god yield bitcoin lol  Dono how long you've been going and at what hash but that's not many shares. I have 67651195620 shares from 43 th after 1.5 months. When I "found" that block from the bad server I had only 23030196752 shares after like a month or 2 It's all luck of the draw. Years... Still had some S3+ on there from back in the day they don't have much hashrate at all moved to a V9 only now retired the S3's for good there tucked away to become history some day! |
|
|
|
Thank you @Reatim  |
|
|
|
|
Are there any spaces left on the campaign?
|
|
|
|
For the love of god yield bitcoin lol |
|
|
|
|
Not only this but every month they push adverts to users for BAT token only for the majority of people getting the message.
Sorry please try again next month.
So not only are they now pushing there own referral links build in but they also require you to KYC to get your BAT tokens.
So privacy browser that :
1. Fails to provide the tokens to users who have advertising active.
2. Require you KYC you private personal information to withdraw (if your lucky enough to be able to claim you BAT)
3. Embed there own referral links to binance into there browser.
Brave is losing touch with there core idea and selling out next stop selling user data...
Sort your shit Brave!
|
|
|
|
|
CK Solo Block Hunters New List.
0.0625 BTC buy in for the chance to earn 0.625 BTC on a successful block solve
1) MagicByt3 - Pending Payment
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8 )
9)
10)
Get your names in guys let's push
|
|
|
|
We could lower this to 0.1 per user if everyone thinks 0.125 is too much.
That was 1% of the 12.5 BTC Block. So now shouldn't it be .0625 for the 6.25 BTC Blocks? Good call os2sam I would be happy to mod the amount down to this to suit. @ 0.0625 x 10 = 0.625 BTC |
|
|
|
Don't know how many from this list are still game but here is the High rollers list from the last pool topic. If your no longer wanting to be on the list below please let me know! CK Pool - High Rollers - 0.125 BTC Buy in.
1 ) hiaxis 0.125 BTC - Payment Pending
2 ) VRobb 0.125 BTC - Payment Pending
3 ) jimjam123 0.125 BTC - Payment Pending
4 ) MagicByt3 0.125 BTC - Payment Pending
5 ) Katun 0.125 BTC - Payment Pending
6 )
7 )
8 )
9 )
10 ) We could lower this to 0.1 0.0625 per user if everyone thinks 0.125 is too much. **EDIT** Let's drop the amount to .0625 BTC to enter as per os2sam's post on the next page. |
|
|
|
Come on block where are you! |
|
|
|
What I see here is that the MagicByt3 is too stubborn and insists it is a issue that needs fixing  In fact, if it is fixed the way he suggested, it would create a real hole in the flag system. If the flag can be created easily by a self-moderated topic, the evidence within it may be distorted, one-way editing. Someone created a flag for you with a self-moderated topic, you appealed there, and they deleted your post. After all, your opinion is not considered and you will be unjust. What do you think about it? I also don't see any difficulty when creating a new thread to associate with a flag. Moreover, you have not answered the question, why do you want to create a flag on the dead account (more than 3 years with main account and 2 years with alt account)?  I answered your question 3 times... It seems you signature guys just like to try get as many large post's in as possible.. Without reading my reply.. |
|
|
|
You cannot flag a topic that is self mod that's the issue.
But topic or posts can be deleted and in that case you loose all the evidence in the flag. Just take for example your last flag https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1780When I want to check the topic where it's explained why that user is scammer, topic is missing, it has been deleted it seems. So how can I support the flag if i don't have some evidence? I see that you made 23 flags so far, I hope you haven' t made all of them the same way. A lot of the topics I flag are for users posting stolen credit cards for sale or bank transfers the topics end up being deleted by the mods as I report them as fraud as a service so a lot of them end up with missing topics. I don't see the point in opening a separate topic for these as they are against the forum TOS and the flags are to alert users so most of them do not require a whole separate posts to be created. |
|
|
|
|
I made it clear why I needed to add a flag this pool is stealing hashpower and block rewards.
A quick 2 sec read over the commented will show people asking where there reward went well it went directly to the pool OP..
And there seems to be no way to quickly set the flag without opening a new topic but I think your missing the point..
at this point there is no reason to open a new topic as the user has not logged in for a long time but if I flag the user maybe some new miners may spot it and not mine there and lose there blocks.
You cannot flag a topic that is self mod that's the issue.
|
|
|
|
|
The flag system asks for the topic link by default you can't just flag without it so if the scammer just makes his topic self mod you cannot add it to the flag system which is a major flaw in the system.
I'm sure there are many abusing this now and it means that I am unable to flag the user's topic for scamming users.
I hope the admin will look at this and change the flag system so this users topic and any self-mod topic can be added as people are losing a lot of money there and there is no way to flag it to warn new miners.
I hope my screenshots prove what I am saying.
|
|
|
|
neither of his accounts have been on for a while - the main one off line since 2017 and the new one offline since Nov 2019.
Maybe something happened to him? who knows? but the point everyone here makes over and over is that the pool cannot be trusted as it is not paying correctly. Everyone needs to STOP mining here.
Someone is in control over the pool there was a time the pool had a update while everyone was waiting for answers also the pool went down for 2 days a few months ago then suddenly came back online so someone is at the helm of this pool there just ignoring the topic. Suppose we will know when the funds all get moved away from the pool wallet. |
|
|
|
I think to cater that is you may post a scam accusation first on the said account then link that to flag him. You can create a flag using a link on a person's trust page.
I think that's a good find on you because if you have created a self mod accusation thread about him and link that to flag the account that will not still effect. I think you found a good bug, I don't know if this has been found already on the trust flag thread of theymos but I guess it was the first time I heard it. By the way, the trust flag system will celebrate its first anniversary by tomorrow. Thank you I would agree this is a bug there should be no reason you cannot flag a user just because they have started the topic with self-mod. I hope theymos can fix this to include topics that are self-mod if you can't flag them scammers will just abuse that by starting the topic with that option enabled and it means no one can issue them with a flag. I also attempted via the users trust link and it also popped up the you cannot do this error. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
