|
and what's stopping you from running away with the btc?
escrow or GTFO. potential bidders, beware.
|
|
|
|
lol, yea the random negative trust ratings kind of give it away.
I don't think the last logged in time means very much though
well at least it means something. if it says they were last active "Today, XXX" instead of "October 11st, XXX" then I would have thought carefully before posting them because it can be faked very easily. I think confirmation120 have more alts, though I can't find any good proof of this. I'll post here later when I find one. |
|
|
|
Oh men i just check in scam advisory but i saw its trust score is 88% did you contact the support before you acusing the site....
Go and try it to talk the support maybe theres an issue about the site...
don't rely on scamadviser. there are many complains about their accuracy on the internet. |
|
|
|
are you 100% sure you want to give that as collateral?
I don't see why not? I won an auction from somewhere (A simple google would tell you where). It can be removed if 0.14BTC is repaid and it definitely have a fair amount of constructive posts. it's not about getting it removed. it's about getting that account linked to you. but I guess it should be alright if you can provide a proof that you bought it. |
|
|
|
Hi, I am looking for a 0.4BTC loan for 1month, split into 4 repayment parts (0.12BTC per period). I can provide a few BTCtalk accounts which I bought long time ago or received as loan collateral as collateral. I have 1 potential senior member, 1 full member, 1 negative trust sr member and 1 member as collateral. Signed message can be provided for all of them.I can negotiate the length of the loan though.
Repayment schedule:
19 October (0.12BTC)
26 October (0.12BTC)
2 November (0.12BTC)
9 November (0.12BTC)
Address: 192fqgb5aCKrjNkudGqSWR6Nuu4J8tEMB7
Message: Today is 10/10/2015. I, ranochigo am asking a loan of 0.4BTC for a period of 1month.
Signature:GzPGAvIWRAn2kWyKwSN7F7BuUsL5aNItBuuxFkC5P1azPCXWvnCwHe19Z3DqaGvdJLUXLlAha7f4izO coRtbbRk=
are you 100% sure you want to give that as collateral? |
|
|
|
!!! This user is a Hero Member. If you are expecting a message from this member, then this is a Genuine !!! very, very smart. this guy is.  don't worry about that feedback. people won't take it seriously |
|
|
|
|
can you provide more proof? like PM screenshot and perhaps a signed message from that address. don't think signed message are necessary but might as well do it.
I'm afraid all of that stuff on the OP are not enough to prove anything.
|
|
|
|
His thread is still active. he visits sometimes forum. coins are gone and no product delivered. regardles if its resolved or not in my eyes he is ignorant and in such way will be treated.
he haven't logged back in since 19th september and that's the only time he logged in after you opened this thread. but this have been taking quite a bit of time and now there is another accusation against him. someone on DT should give him a warning. EDIT OP, where are the screenshots you promised? |
|
|
|
There has been a few instances where "normal" people names have been changed.
It's not really mentioned because I suppose staff doesn't want to be overloaded with requests.
correct. that means this thread is unwanted. and pointless have little use. edited after the reply below. my mistake. |
|
|
|
I think many of the gamblers even when they don't have money for gambling but they barrow money for gambling. Do you agree on this?
obviously not. but it's their life and they're free to do whatever they want with it. I'd just give them one warning and that's it. |
|
|
|
|
looks like Vod already gave him a negative feedback.
I looked at the positive feedbacks and found out that all those users speaks the same broken english as JayS and have made no posts about any trade during september (except for min-btc who made a post before leaving his latest feedback).
it is possible that those accounts are all his alts.
|
|
|
|
|
$12 are very small amount to scam considering that he have traded for much more (unless those users are his alts)... I'll PM him and ask him to reply on this thread.
OP might want to add some more proof in the meantime.
|
|
|
|
|
come on, DT people. give this guy a negative trust before he scams again.
he just posted on another currency exchange thread today.
|
|
|
|
|
you could have given the private key of that address to the buyer so that they can sign a message using it.
for the record: I don't believe that your account is already sold.
besides, it looks like mitchell left you a negative feedback because you are selling it, not because you already sold it.
|
|
|
|
just to be sure... what was this post about? is that your address on the receiving end of the transaction or not? I'm thinking it's not your address but better make sure. |
|
|
|
Hello
I just receive 2 negative
Reason: I want to sell my account and I change my password
What's roung with that?
Please removed my negative because I can proof that is still my account
I have my e-mail that is hidden via my profile and also acc from bit-x signature
Please check and reply.
account sales are discouraged so it is really not that surprising to see someone get a negative feedback for that. others might argue that neutral should be enough but in the end it is not wrong to leave a negative feedback when you see someone putting their account for sale. |
|
|
|
checked notlist3d's stats and it worked fine. in case you didn't notice, you have a negative rating. I think you got kicked out of the campaign because of that. |
|
|
|
He said that the account needs to have very good post quality before he bid 0.053 BTC, and have you sent the account name to him? If yes then he may found your account's post isn't of high quality (for example my account's report on satoshiquiz's PAID account checker: http://www.satoshiquiz.com/bitcointalk/getactivity.php?token=14434814013664f58a09 said that my account's post quality is 80.99% good, while account buyers requires 90% as very good). You may check your account at a FREE checker here: http://bctalkaccountpricer.info (however there maybe a queue there makes you need to wait), and make sure it shows 'very good' there. I hope that post wasn't meant for me to answer. I'm not the same person as OP lol. |
|
|
|
So I think you should re-open your auction, or ask the 2nd highest bidder to buy the item.
In my opinion, you should ask low ranked members/negative trust members sign a message of address(es) holding at least the amount he bids. This can prevent that kind of bidding.
that guy have no negative trust and should be a full member when he made that bid. here's the link to the auction. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1184517.msg12482951#msg12482951 |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
