Low fee. 65 Satoshi per byte is actually lower than the recommended fee of 110 according to https://bitcoinfees.21.co/ and electrum/core if you set the confirmation target to 2 blocks. Just submit your tx here, then sit tight and wait a little longer. This thread might also interest you. It have some other solutions too. |
|
|
|
Your fee is low. You're using 26 satoshi per byte and the recommended fee is 110 satoshi per byte. Use https://www.viabtc.com/tools/txaccelerator/ to make the ViaBTC mine your transaction. I suggest you don't use a fixed fee of 0.0001 BTC for every transaction you make. If you keep doing that you'll get this problem a lot. |
|
|
|
Hey guys, you can hire me to solve captchas.  Rate: 1.2k Satoshi per captcha. PM me with details. I also take other rates PM for that. So 1000 captcha would be 0.012 BTC. That's more than 10 times the average rate you get from captcha solving service sites. If you mean 120 satoshi then PM me. I have just the work for you. |
|
|
|
|
Last diff calculation was at 2.4 exahash average and now we're approaching 3 exahash. I think faster block time is not very unusual with that kind of increase.
|
|
|
|
|
Scams doesn't get moderated. Users will take action as long as there's proof but they won't get banned unless they're breaking a forum rule.
|
|
|
|
I have blockchain.info web-wallet that i want to import to Electrum desktop wallet can i do that?
Also i am kinda newbie . Can i ask what is the best way to use Eletrum safely .I only have one pc that is always connected to the internet.
How to save my Electrum on an offline usb ?
If you don't know how to get your private keys in blockchain.info, just create a new electrum wallet and transfer all your funds to it. Getting non-imported private keys from blockchain.info is a tedious business. You'll get much less headache by doing that. That is really a good option . but can i have a link for how the steps to get blockchain private keys . just for learning. and https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1488375.msg15008846#msg15008846. The second one involves entering your seed on a site. If you're going to do it, download the page and do it offline (See "Offline Usage"). |
|
|
|
Coinbase won't be able to know what you do in a gambling site. From what I read, they monitor the bitcoin gambling site's addresses and see if your address is linked to them. And if it is, you're screwed. |
|
|
|
I have blockchain.info web-wallet that i want to import to Electrum desktop wallet can i do that?
Also i am kinda newbie . Can i ask what is the best way to use Eletrum safely .I only have one pc that is always connected to the internet.
How to save my Electrum on an offline usb ?
If you don't know how to get your private keys in blockchain.info, just create a new electrum wallet and transfer all your funds to it. Getting non-imported private keys from blockchain.info is a tedious business. You'll get much less headache by doing that. |
|
|
|
|
You call that ~6% drop a crash? That happens every week.
|
|
|
|
|
They are probably google sheet links. People use it all the time.
But you should always scan the links for anything suspicious before visiting them.
|
|
|
|
Please be red.  |
|
|
|
can I buy bitcoins from forum members? I could only buy bitcoin with my charge card which I was limited $50.00 a week Yuk!
Yes you can at the currency exchange section. Just be careful of scammers, they like to target new users. Always use escrows. List of them are here and here. Might want to learn more about this forum and do your own research before doing any exchange. |
|
|
|
|
Have you tried entering the address in the search box on blockchain.info address page? Since you were able to sign[1] I'd guess your address is from the old wallet and was imported to the new one, so it should be under the imported addresses section.
Also try looking in the Archived Addresses section[2].
Edit:
And "Used Addresses"[2] section under normal wallets. Works funny and sometimes lists addresses that you never even used for sending.
Edit2:
Just to clarify.
[1] I meant sign a message.
[2] The addresses in those 2 sections won't appear when you used the search box.
|
|
|
|
This includes both the received and the relayed_by fields that I previously mentioned. Where these added by the node that received the transaction? Or where did they originate if not?
Those are the data from blockchyper's node(s). |
|
|
|
The date isn't the date of confirmation I don't believe. I believe it is the date the transaction was received by the node.
Each raw TX includes a 'received' and a 'relayed_by' field that indicates when the transactions was received and what IP relayed it. You can decode a raw transaction to see this information so it is included in the transaction itself. This is present even in unconfirmed transactions and everyone should see the same date for a transaction.
Raw transaction doesn't have all of those. Try looking at one[1]. If it's the date when the transaction was received by the node, people will see varied dates depending on when their node/server received the transaction. And no, I've compared the dates of multiple transactions with the blocktime of the blocks that they were included in. They all match. [1] https://blockchain.info/tx/8514258f73e707f64585aa9fce974dce99994e62692a4451a621f3dacaf37ccf?format=hex{
"lock_time":0,
"size":225,
"inputs":[
{
"prev_out":{
"index":1,
"hash":"f4621217add356ad0ae1ddeecddc24a236aeef73dec80a65430bfd584560c797"
},
"script":"47304402207db793e1674c73cd02f88c977c220076483cf56def726bfaaa0d5b25ef4c27e1022061bfddbd21b57a26a1b608f9a53883800c6e04a88dbadebafec622d1b6845bef0121024b62c14291a74aa8b800bff4b269342d14a1b06ec5029d5e62eae2111c97f342"
}
],
"version":1,
"vin_sz":1,
"hash":"8514258f73e707f64585aa9fce974dce99994e62692a4451a621f3dacaf37ccf",
"vout_sz":2,
"out":[
{
"script_string":"OP_DUP OP_HASH160 c570307825ee31ab46043fd96f586e71b51a5f25 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"address":"1JzxWqqvFbns95BoR1M9vzRoTWLr5qDaFJ",
"value":4830918,
"script":"76a914c570307825ee31ab46043fd96f586e71b51a5f2588ac"
},
{
"script_string":"OP_DUP OP_HASH160 27604a5e30f59c7bc86c39fc4003542089085133 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"address":"14bChs2nPdL4jMhsQvCWk2XSSGiMdt4U6d",
"value":1210615320,
"script":"76a91427604a5e30f59c7bc86c39fc400354208908513388ac"
}
]
} |
|
|
|
|
You mean the transaction date? It's the exact date when the transaction got a confirmation. Everyone will see pretty much the same date (maybe with seconds difference). Anyone can see it but they need to find your transaction first.
No it's not the same as locktime.
|
|
|
|
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Controlled_supplyIf the mining power had remained constant since the first Bitcoin was mined, the last Bitcoin would have been mined somewhere near October 8th, 2140. Due to the mining power having increased overall over time, as of block 367,500 - assuming mining power remained constant from that block forward - the last Bitcoin will be mined on May 7th, 2140. It's not constant. Edit: Difficulty retarget only occurs every 2016 blocks and only take account of how fast the last 2016 was mined, but hashrate can go up and down at anytime and have almost doubled since last year. So if the hashrate rises after the retarget, the next 2016 should be mined faster. Correct me if I'm wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
Yup. The price is back to how it was last month. Kind of disappointing but I sold half of my btc at $1050 right after the first flash crash this month so I'm still happy.
I think this is the bottom, though, now that the thing with the chinese exchanges have calmed down.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
