|
thanks. I guess I should make another enrollment post.
Name: Jhanzo
Posts: 162 before I posted this
Activity: 162 before I posted this
Position: Full Member
Coinut username: Jhanzo
|
|
|
|
|
will you accept me now? I want to enroll but I'm asking first before taking off my current signature..
|
|
|
|
I'm not Wardrick.
interesting, I peeked at your profile earlier today and it said your account was last active sometime in July, but you happened to come across this thread just today, at the perfect time. from that, I'd say there's an extremely high chance you are browsing the forums on an alt account at the very least, though it's unlikely the account is wardrick. it was June 5, actually. I'm not surprised that TF posted here. after all, blazr did confirm that he know TF's identity. but! just posting here to tell people that he's not wardick really does seem stupid. he should've known that his words isn't going to prove anything. |
|
|
|
no he shouldn't. and ncsupanda and Grand_Voyageur shouldn't remove their neutral feedback either. Positive - You trust this person or had a successful trade.
Neutral - Comments. Your rating will not affect this person's trust score.
Negative - You were scammed or you strongly believe that this person is a scammer. |
|
|
|
|
it looks to me that both parties were at fault because
1. you said discussed. but you never actually discussed it.
2. the other user really wanted the money and replied without even reading your PM thoroughly.
I think this problem can be resolved if you ask the other user to return that 0.035BTC. if he refuse to send them back, you're free to use it.
that's just my opinion.
|
|
|
|
Thanks man! I've been half heartedly looking for this info for a while but didn't want to start a dumb ass thread asking. My trust score is on 6 & it's light green. So I will be dark green when I'm on 15. Thanks. FYI, your trust score shows as +0 to me and to every member that didn't edit their trust list. |
|
|
|
How can you tell? Is there a way of viewing people's trust lists?
add a user to your trust list and you'll be able to see it clear as day. you'll have to exclude DT and remove other users. Can you give more details? Where do I see it? I've added users to my trust list before and not noticed their trust list appear anywhere. tried to use that with your name (exluded DT) and found that you have trusted 23 users and excluded QS. if that's wrong then I must be wrong. Now this reminds me of the movie Interstellar...  just stay in the background, man. |
|
|
|
How can you tell? Is there a way of viewing people's trust lists?
add a user to your trust list and you'll be able to see it clear as day. you'll have to exclude DT and remove other users. disclaimer I'm not posting from the wrong acc or anything. |
|
|
|
His BCT collateral is (IMHO) worth more than the loan.
not if the account collateral get a negative feedback after OP defaulted on this loan. just sayin'. when the collateral is bct acc, lend only if you can afford to lose it. |
|
|
|
I am not sure if QS and Panthers are the same, but since they will not answer it seems sorta obvious. Escrowing using yourself is not ok at all. Escrow is supposed to always be a neutral 3rd party. I really hope this is not the case here...
looks to me he did said no. You are an asshole and are wrong. taken from his alt's post on the 2nd page. that's a no, yeah? Thanks again vod. Scammers gonna scam. Let's face it, the best scam-busters are scammers themselves, just like hackers.  Vod is one of the best scam-busters too, y'know. /day |
|
|
|
long post
hahahahaha. this guy is so ridiculous I can't even take him seriously. does this means that QS is also PsychoticBoy? awesome. Some of you reading this may wonder what exactly this has to do with me. Not long ago, I was critical of TSP's opinion that others should not be warned about Maidak, who has credible scam accusations against him totaling thousands of dollars. He later followed up with me via PM asking me to delete the critical comments against him, and asked that I post in his meta thread against QS. I told him that I wanted to avoid the drama even though I think he is a scammer. We then went back and fourth via PM with him making very vague arguments that really did not make any sense to me, and I eventually ended it with that it is not my job to get him to agree that he is a scammer. now that is interesting. why would TSP want you to post there? I just saw redsn0w's post on the other thread... could that be the reason? |
|
|
|
Yes.
well, where is it? sorry but I find it hard to believe because I don't see any proof anywhere. also, I won't believe it even if you post a PM quote here without a confirmation from an admin or global moderator. |
|
|
|
The account was removed from DT, I believe. And the fact that RoughLyfe had the account makes me think that the loan defaulted, and either ashish12 is his alt, or ashish12 sold the account to RoughLyfe. knew about the removed from DT part. but the account wasn't used as collateral. also I couldn't help but notice that btczilla is still active from time to time. |
|
|
|
Well, he should at least admit that he was wrong in these one or two cases. And he is getting shady with faking ban and all..  I didn't know this. how did you know he faked his ban? have badbear or theymos confirmed this? *waiting for some badbear=QS theorists* |
|
|
|
Guys what happens if OP don't pay me on time or never?
negative feedback if OP never pay you. if he's late and stalling for weeks you can open a scam accusation and he'll get a negative feedback too until he payback. but some users won't remove the neg. |
|
|
|
OP's been asking for loan without collateral too many times. not trying to say anything, just Caveat Emptor. or whatever the term is for lending. You have negative trust! How could we trust you will return the loan without providing sufficient value of collateral?
what? do you have that newbie with 5 post count who gave a negative feedback without a proper proof in your trust list or something? never mind, sorry. read the wrong list. |
|
|
|
The sad part is Blazr is staking his reputation on someone who has been caught being escrow for self. If he is now supporting that kind of action too then nothing more needs to be said.
where's the proof of that, I wonder? or are you just saying that because of tsp's little assessment? sad indeed.
can anyone make a simpler version of it? that thing is too complicated for me. not to mention that I need to download someone's entire post history. |
|
|
|
Try seeing the OP first, the issue here is not choosing between LBC and bitcointalk, but QS escrowing for himself(and also probably giving positive trust to his alt) . Say QS wants to buy something from me(for ex.), then he would contact me using his alt then tell me to use QS as escrow, and that AFAIK totally beats the purpose of escrow as he can scam me any moment, and even go as far as blaming me thru his main account and alt as being a scammer.
Just an hypothesis here to make you see how serious this matter is.
lol I've been reading this thread since the beginning. see turtlehurricane's 2 posts above. FYI quickseller texted me from an anonymous number tonight and pretended to be a buyer, and he demanded escrow through you. I said I'd only do Localbitcoins so he then went to my new Bitcoin selling thread and posted libel saying I would manipulate LBC escrow to try and scare away my customers. So he is involving you in libel and malicious spying without your knowledge. replying to tomatocage. and like one of the first posters said on this thread. there's no hard proof that Panther32 is really Quickseller. |
|
|
|
|
even if it was quickseller, what is wrong with wanting to use escrow from bitcointalk and no other? I, and most people in bitcointalk that wants to be safe, would probably say the same thing, too.
and cut the defamation crap. people do that all the time in the internet.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
