Bitcoin Forum
May 09, 2024, 02:12:49 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 »
221  Other / Meta / Re: Is Bitcointalk passing information to investigation authorities? on: April 09, 2016, 12:33:31 AM
theymos is a snitch  Shocked


Not sure I would go that far.

Doesn't have much choice if served with a subpoena.

Unless he wants to sit in jail and I don't think he likes anyone here that much!

 Grin Grin Grin


~BCX~

I'm surprised this thread has went this long.  The fact that the site remains up shows it is willing to work with authorities.  If they did not on a site this size it most likely would be taken down.

And as mentioned with BFL with sharing info I think some of working with authorities is good.  It can help some members in certain cases.


Theymos himself has openly posted in this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1027518.0

That he has released information in possession of Bitcointalk to the authorities.

Theymos is located in the USA.

Not complying with a USA subpoena isn't exactly conducive to a life of freedom.


~BCX~


Added: I do believe that Ross Ulbricht and GAW also had info released from Bitcointalk to the American FBI
222  Other / Meta / Re: Can we get a background check here? on: April 09, 2016, 12:25:39 AM

Disclosing accounts with the same IP's wouldn't stop most scammers honestly IMO, because most scammers would be utilizing a VPN, PROXY or TOR of some-kind anyway.




You would also have situations where two unrelated accounts would appear as alts of each other if they by chance had the same exit node on Tor.

Happens all the time here when people use Tor and see and Tor IP ban in place when trying to login.



~BCX~
223  Other / Meta / Re: Is Bitcointalk passing information to investigation authorities? on: April 09, 2016, 12:18:30 AM
theymos is a snitch  Shocked


Not sure I would go that far.

Doesn't have much choice if served with a subpoena.

Unless he wants to sit in jail and I don't think he likes anyone here that much!

 Grin Grin Grin


~BCX~
224  Other / Meta / Re: Is Bitcointalk passing information to investigation authorities? on: April 08, 2016, 11:56:45 PM
Why?
What's wrong with discussing this?
This thread isn't about three letter agencies and their jurisdictions (what they do and what they don't). This will cause unnecessary spam in addition to being off-topic.


The topic is Is Bitcointalk passing information to investigation authorities?

I can promise you the authorities referred to in the title of the OP are indeed various three letter agencies which certainly do relate to the OP and the jurisdiction is releavant.

Why the anxiousness to close off the topic?



~BCX~
225  Other / Meta / Re: Is Bitcointalk passing information to investigation authorities? on: April 08, 2016, 01:30:28 AM
*puts on tinfoil sombrero*

I wouldn't be surprised at all if there are various investigation authorities who have bitcointalk accounts with which they can monitor, observe and look into whatever red flags which may happen to pop up on their radar.


Of course they are.

It would be damn near dereliction of duty on their part if they weren't.


~BCX~
226  Other / Meta / Re: Is Bitcointalk passing information to investigation authorities? on: April 07, 2016, 01:40:47 AM
First of all, I want to say that I am not part of any illegal activities or something similar. I ask this question because I am curious.

Is Bitcointalk.org (the owners/maintainers) passing information to investigation authorities on request for user information in the case of big frauds and scams ( e.g. Mt.Gox etc)?
It depends on where the servers are based.If forum is hosted in US located servers,not compliance with US laws can lead to suspension of hosting account but if it doesn't co-operate with other countries government agencies say Chinese government,then it may only be blocked in China.In short forum is bound to follow the law of country from where it operates but it is its discretion to follow other laws or not

You keep telling yourself that.

The US Three Letter Agencies can reach out and touch you anywhere.

Just ask Kim Dotcom LOL


~BCX~
227  Other / Meta / Re: Requiring Unban, theymos please come in on: April 02, 2016, 05:28:06 AM
Afaik, if the ban is because of insubstantial posting then it's a permaban. There is no way to get your account back. Also since you own 2 accounts, you provably also commited a ban evasion.  I'm not sure tho, but I doubt you will get access to those accounts again.


Yep. He will probably be banned with this name like you said.


~BCX~
228  Other / Meta / Re: Official Request To Restore Deleted Post on: April 01, 2016, 11:48:48 PM
If mine is off topic, so are literally a hundred more in there.
1)Try reporting some and see if you get lucky  Grin .

2)Also , I don't think once deleted the post can be restored.

3) try posting it again and see if any mod deletes it


1) I really have no desire to see others thread deleted. I will leave that to Techshare

2) Wrong, but thanks for the bad information.

3) I guess my Legendary status and five years here screams Newbie. Re-posting a deleted post is ill advised, although I did rephrase the question to be "on topic"

  Grin Grin Grin



I am willing to be the same happened with the comments i was referring to earlier also BCX.
Seems to me he has a friend over here who is quick to do some mod action for him though.

I wouldn't doubt it.

Maybe who ever deleted it will say so.

If not no biggie.

I was just curious as to why.


~BCX~
229  Other / Meta / Re: Official Request To Restore Deleted Post on: April 01, 2016, 12:22:27 PM
How exactly is it on topic on a discussion thread based on Vod's wrongdoings?


The OP is just a basic complaint about Techshare being booted off the DT.

If mine is off topic, so are literally a hundred more in there.


I just thought it was odd but like Hilariousandco stated

it was probably due to Techshare whining about the post.



~BCX~
230  Other / Meta / Official Request To Restore Deleted Post on: April 01, 2016, 02:30:19 AM
I'm just curious if the mod or admin that deleted the post below can elaborate on why it was removed.

It's on topic and is a legitimate question to the OP.

Consider this an official (if there is such a thing) request to restore this post.


~BCX~





Thread - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=915823.msg14347049#msg14347049
231  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Piece of Shit Bitcoiners et al. Hall of Fame on: March 31, 2016, 01:23:29 AM


Had to go back and look again.

For a moment I thought Gleb (RIP PG) had forgotten LEROY FODOR!



~BCX~
232  Other / Meta / Re: Wondering why Trolling is still against the forum rules . on: March 30, 2016, 12:59:56 AM
Often been accused of being a troll.


Never banned  Grin


~BCX~



Added: Welcome back Saltyspitoon, good to see you're still alive!
233  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [OSC]OpenSourcecoin Mandatory Update 7/1/14 on: March 25, 2016, 01:21:36 AM


i'm really busy now with work, but i will try to squeeze some time to recompile the wallets and distribute them. probably with google drive again.



@Hydroponica




Damn didn't even know you were still around.



~BCX~
234  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Leroy Fodor has gone Full-Delusional; StakeMiners is 100% confirmed insolvent! on: March 25, 2016, 01:06:13 AM
How in the hell did I miss this full Leroy Fodor thread!


Leroy.....


How could you lose the 30 pesos little (forget her name) saved up to come to Merica?



~BCX~


235  Other / Meta / Re: VOD should be removed from default trust for systematic abuse of his position on: March 23, 2016, 03:48:43 AM
Techshare was removed from DT after ONE accusation of trust abuse.

Fixed that for you.


Yes you were removed from DT after ONE accusation of trust abuse that uncovered a long undeniable history of doing such.

Plain and simple you got caught.

No one here is going to believe that Badbear, Saltyspittoon and Hilariousandco dumped for you no reason.

What's next, you going to claim Theymos had it out for you?


Vod is still on the DT because he is trust worthy and benefits the community.

Why not you?

Think about it.


~BCX~


236  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: MicroCash. Now in Alpha 2 release. discussion on: March 19, 2016, 02:37:02 PM
Quote
Realsolid: yeah i should have a new alpha out soon

he's often in #mtmox on freenode if anyone wants to chat Smiley


in this case alpha isn't similar to testnet. any coins that may exist now will not exist later..


Hmm I wonder where we've heard that before?

Cough, Solidcoin2, cough


~BCX~
237  Other / Meta / Re: VOD should be removed from default trust for systematic abuse of his position on: March 19, 2016, 02:35:03 PM
Now I know for a fact you aren't even reading anything here before posting, just coming here to go "bla bla bla drama".
1) You can't possibly know this 'as a fact'.
2) This is not the case. This thread has been on my watch list for a long time now, however you can't expect me to remember 28 pages of nonsense either.
3) I asked for concrete examples because of number 2.

My latest post in this thread was just to have a public record that as a result of being forced to stand down by BadBear, he has a grudge and is now stalking me by following me to my other threads, posting off topic, and just plain making shit up about me.
Do you know the meaning of the words "trust abuse"? Following you around the forum and posting in the same threads is "trust abuse" in your world?  Roll Eyes




Of course he does.

Techshare was removed from DT after numerous documentations of trust abuse.

This is just a lingering butt hurt thread from it.


~BCX~
238  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: MicroCash. Now in Alpha 2 release. discussion on: March 17, 2016, 04:03:00 AM

If RS is involved you can bet your bottom BTC that several hundred thousand already exist in a private wallet.


~BCX~


MicroCash doesn't even exist yet.



If there is any one thing I know on this forum, it's Realsolid.

Fair isn't something he does at all.

The guy is a freakin' genius to get you clowns to come back time after time.

Hats off to him!


~BCX~

Side note: If it is in Alpha release, it exist.
239  Other / Meta / Re: Q: Should Lauda *really* be a moderator of bitcointalk A: no on: March 15, 2016, 01:37:12 AM

It was said earlier but worth repeating.

Should Lauda be a Mod, HELL NO!

Global Mod ABSOLUTELY!



I've never had any issues with Lauda and disagreed with this person on several occasions.

I never saw any retribution due to them being a mod.



~BCX~
240  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: MicroCash. Now in Alpha 2 release. discussion on: March 13, 2016, 09:01:25 PM
If you are interested, there is now a MicroCash exchange: https://microcash24.com/
It went online about 1 hour ago.

5 years ago I ran the Solidcoin24 exchange, maybe you remember.

I was curious about how you'd go trading a non-existent coin (not that other coins havent' done that eg simcoin is still trading before it's release). Especially when the value isn't even really determinable atm.

The obvious advantage is that it's a web wallet for MicroCash as soon as it's released. So by buying any ICO style MicroCash the hard work of claiming those coins will be up to the excahnge Wink

Still, here's hoping you add some more coins Cheesy

Here's more discussion on the excahnge
https://microcash.org/forums/threads/microcash24.63/




btw here's where enlightened released his first version august 2011 Smiley https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=40259.0


If RS is involved you can bet your bottom BTC that several hundred thousand already exist in a private wallet.


~BCX~
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!