As great as this is, this is posted in the wrong section. Mods who have commented on this please be impartial and fair to all other threads and do not give this thread special treatment of the forum rules.
@BitcoinDistributorPlease just shut the fuck up and go away. @otrkid70You're a still a genuine asshole but very glad you'll be around to annoy the hell of me in the future.  ~BCX~ |
|
|
|
If they're going to give him life they should just kill him. He's young, he could potentially live another 50 years in prison. At $30k per year to house a federal prisoner, that judge just cost the taxpayers $1,500,000.00. I hope something bad happens to that judge for wasting all that money. Not critical bad but bad, like tonight I hope he has a really painful bowel movement that ruptures a hemorrhoid.
Well considering the fact he also forfeited $184 Million, I would say the US is ahead on the financial cost for housing him for the next 50 years or so.
~BCX~
Yeah and they auctioned it off or most of it already, haven't they? So housing him for $1.5 million or even $5 million is a real bargain compared to how much money he made them. I guess that makes him a net contributor! Nothing personal but DPR did this "Eyes Wide Open" Is it excessive? maybe so but he rolled the dice and lost. He knew the risk. ~BCX~ |
|
|
|
If they're going to give him life they should just kill him. He's young, he could potentially live another 50 years in prison. At $30k per year to house a federal prisoner, that judge just cost the taxpayers $1,500,000.00. I hope something bad happens to that judge for wasting all that money. Not critical bad but bad, like tonight I hope he has a really painful bowel movement that ruptures a hemorrhoid.
Well considering the fact he also forfeited $184 Million, I would say the US is ahead on the financial cost for housing him for the next 50 years or so. ~BCX~ |
|
|
|
The real cancer aren't who is in the default trust, but the scammer and dishonest person. They should get fu*k out from this forum, because bitcoin is not for them. TECSHARE if you don't trust him put '~' before his username , simple ?
Excluding him from my trust does not remove his fraudulent rating from my trust page, nor does it check his abusive behavior using his position on the default trust. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=915823.0Keep it up and I am going to laugh when I see you posting under a newbie account 'Techshare-banned" whining about getting banned LOL ~BCX~ |
|
|
|
|
The only thing more predicted than the death of this forum has been the death of bitcoin itself.
This has to be thread #99 on this subject I know of since 2010 in these forums.
~BCX~
|
|
|
|
Any good hackers here?
I just turned my laptop on and McAfee popped up this message I've never seen on any of my computers before.
"The following device has logged onto your network":
"IP address: 10.0.1.71"
I'm in Oregon, I googled this IP address and it's from North Carolina.
Is this a glitch or something? TIA
Hmm how did you determine that this private IP which can only exist inside your own network originate from North Carolina? Go to a command prompt and run ipconfig /all and see if you see that address. ~BCX~ |
|
|
|
Monero cons
Original authors are scam artists so other devs have taken it over (for XMR)
Who were the original authors and who are the devs today? ~BCX~ |
|
|
|
I know you guys love talking about me, but this thread is about how Nubbins abuses the default trust system.
(note: Notice how none of the off topic posts are being removed from this thread? Funny how that works.)
ON TOPIC: So have you been successful in convincing anyone other than yourself that Nubbins should be removed? Does the original accusation still stand? If so can you outline why without all of the conspiracy theories of staff persecution? ~BCX~ |
|
|
|
|
Hey Mprep,
This thread is proof positive you are doing it the right way.
I've never had a thread or comment removed by Mprep.
~BCX~
|
|
|
|
|
@OP,
None of this is needed.
The "altcoin wars" thing is highly exaggerated.
Sure, there are some immature people but by far and large most aren't.
Just use the ignore feature.
Free speech is what is needed to prevent scammers, not censorship.
~BCX~
|
|
|
|
I don't think Tecshare is doing it intentionally though, maybe he is, I don't know. I think he just has such a high opinion of himself (wish search wasn't down, I've seen some doozies that make this obvious) that he can't bear to think someone may have chosen to remove him from their trust list, and instead chooses to believe it's a collaborative effort by *the man* to damage him. I've seen it many times in various forms, this type of denial is kind of sad to see.
Isn't this just a very educated, eloquent and politically correct way of saying what I said a couple of weeks ago?
~BCX~Wow is all I can say. Hands down all I can say is Tecshare has clearly demonstrated the most severe pathology of being butt hurt than I ever encountered. All of these threads and psychotic whining is for one thing and one thing only. His ego cannot accept the fact he was removed from the trust and badly wants back in. Techshare is massive butthurt. Anyone else see that? ~BCX~  |
|
|
|
|
Somebody killed somebody over money.
Why the shock?
~BCX~
|
|
|
|
At this point, if Mr Spread does not appeal his postban then I see no reason to reverse it (using the context of a moderation team). But I also think it should be noted that the context of the punishment is not in the spirit of the rule creation.
I would counter that with the spirit of the rule was to prevent any and all insubstantial post related to any give away. Perhaps Badbear or Theymos himself could elaboarte on this. ~BCX~ My only concern with that counter is that it is possible that Mr Spread did not consider the standards of the forum when he started the thread (or perhaps even read them; I am only familiar with it because I read more than I code). Nor am I sure that he would have interpreted the standard as relevant to his motivation (since the rule is geared toward preventing an onslaught of spam, in my interpretation). That said...it is only a concern and I acquiesce to the decisions made by Staff (that sounds kind of weird; my point is I am not going to argue further)...interpretive decisions are needed and perhaps necessary to uphold in relation to the amount of traffic this site has. Thanks for the excellent reply. ~BCX~ |
|
|
|
At this point, if Mr Spread does not appeal his postban then I see no reason to reverse it (using the context of a moderation team). But I also think it should be noted that the context of the punishment is not in the spirit of the rule creation.
I would counter that with the spirit of the rule was to prevent any and all insubstantial post related to any give away. Perhaps Badbear or Theymos himself could elaboarte on this. ~BCX~ |
|
|
|
|
I've been around here for over 3.5 years and can tell you this 100% certainty.
Posting six nearly identical threads will get them deleted no matter where they are.
In addition most people would be banned for a few days.
~BCX~
|
|
|
|
Why not just make a sub-section i reddit you control and giveaway the testnet coins there?
Spreadcointalk is functioning much like your suggestion... I agree that there was a misunderstanding but I am in no position to further appeal Staff. Hopefully it can be ascertained that there was no malice intended with the unintended breach of protocol. I guess I am the only one that can clearly see that "Malice" and/or "value of coins" have NO BEARING on the banning. Any give away, no matter what it is for, that solicits addresses, user names and or responses for for any coins will be cause for banning and thread removal. This is a well known rule over a year old that was stickied by Theymos at the top of the forum. ~BCX~ |
|
|
|
As sign of good faith for all the newbies, I will buy ALL of you dead Bitcoins for $50.00 each.  ~BCX~ |
|
|
|
It doesn't matter if they have no value or not, it's not a mistake. The rules are about curbing the spam that results from giveaways. Altcoin giveaways are not allowed. Most giveaway threads are no longer allowed in the Alternate cryptocurrencies sections. From now on, posting or replying to such threads could result in being banned. Existing threads will be locked.
Specifically, you are not allowed to give people any incentive to post insubstantial posts in your threads. You can't offer to pay people who post their addresses, usernames, etc. You can do giveaways off-site and link to the giveaway page in a thread, but you can't give people any bonus for replying to your thread.
Similar threads are already restricted to Games and Rounds in the non-altcoin sections, but the giveaway-related post volume is so high in the altcoin sections that I've decided to just ban them entirely here.
I honestly don't know how this can be more clear. You should probably post it in English ? ? ? ~BCX~ |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
