|
Anyone?
Just dropped to BTC.035
-Dave
|
|
|
|
Looks like there is a full node up at 24.212.140.163.
Odd, that is the only one I see also. But all 3 of my nodes *are* up. Have to check this weekend as to why. They are not even talking to each other. -Dave |
|
|
|
|
Just lowered the price and added free shipping CONUS
-Dave
|
|
|
|
CONUS Shipping only.    Just the miner is included. You will need a PC / or RPi to run it. And a 400 Watt or better power supply. BTC.04 shipped. now BTC.035 now BTC.03 now BTC.02 now .0175 -Dave |
|
|
|
Imo one of the most interesting and great looking "low/medium-budget" coins. Hadn't I bought two recently (waiting for the shipment to arrive) I would buy this one.
Good luck with the sale.
Agreed my friend So buy it. You know you want to.  -Dave |
|
|
|
You get the coin you see in the pictures. BTC0.05 shipped     Thanks, Dave |
|
|
|
I was cleaning up and found an orb. $25 makes it yours shipped CONUS. Yes it I know it's not worth it, but between the cost of shipping and time to box it and drive it to the post office I can't go lower....  -Dave |
|
|
|
It's definitely a good starting point. I would remove the donation link for now. (We all get to work for free, for now.) I would think that it would be best if everyone working on it / discussing it did it here. Some things we can do in PM, but for the most part make it full public here of who is doing what and when. This way nobody can come back and say Dave did this or Chicago did that or someone else did the other thing. It's all out and in public, and if nobody says anything, and it gets done in a way they they don't like then it's on them for not participating. Also, as I said before given a few days time I can provide the hosting. I just need to spin up a VM or 2. -Dave |
|
|
|
I'm open to suggestions if anyone else has any ideas. It's probably going to be slow going as it's a free time project and I really don't have any free time. It's been over a month since I nuked my test box try to get a block explorer working and I have not even had time to re-image it.
Hi DaveF, How far did you get with the Abe installation before nuking the test box? I'm up to the point where I have fcgid installed and am trying to make Abe work through mod_fcgid so I don't have to call http://example.com:2750 to see the chain. The problem I'm running into is with Apache v2.4 and trying to avoid mod_cgi or ScriptAlias from getting in the way of the Abe script being executed with mod_fcgid using a handler for the Abe script. I'm pretty sure I had it right "just once" and then went to test another change in the configuration and then never had it working again and always coming up with a 500 even though permissions on the filesystem were seemingly good. I figured once I had Abe going at its best then I'd take a look at the Insight block explorer too. Best Regards, -Chicago If you got it working just once you are ahead of me. I followed the step by step build. (actually found a youtube of it) Once it was running I went to 127.0.0.1 page (yes I built it on a machine with a gui) and as soon as I got there the MySQL daemon threw an error and died. I wiped the DB and redid it, same thing. Figuring that I because had put in an older version MySQL for compatibility reasons and that was the issue on a new OS I went to Postgre and that although not causing an error it just did nothing. Pulled out both db and started fresh with the latest version of MySQL again and the latest version of Python everything fully up to date and then for some reason I could not get the coin daemon to run. It had been fine up until then. So some update that got installed during the 5.7.17 MySQL update or the latest Python update was causing an already compiled app not to run. So I started to roll back packages 1 or 2 at a time, I did a reboot every time. Somewhere along the way, bam, reboot loop. So I walked away from it "for a few days" That was over a month ago... -Dave |
|
|
|
2) Release wallet with based on updated code
Hi DaveF, Noodlyappendagecoin is "not too old" considering there are plenty of much earlier v6.3 clones out there. Though for the users who do not compile on their own, an updated wallet linked against the latest openssl wouldn't be bad. There are probably easily updated Qt and boost dependencies which could be incorporated into an updated build too. Are you thinking about updating Noodlyappendagecoin w/ something close to the v8.7.5 Litecoin sources or more interested in the v13.2.1 Litecoin update? For what its worth, the build process w/ the v8 Litecoin clones is difficult using Gitian because the recipes are based on Ubuntu Lucid containers and Lucid went end-of-life. I was looking at the workflow this past weekend for using the Gitian recipes from back when our version of code was more current and there are lots of little work-arounds to do just to accommodate Lucid going end of life. The other thing about the build recipes for the v8 clones are the much earlier OS X SDK which had been employed. The Gitian recipes in v13.2.1 use a relatively more modern SDK for the OS X build and have proven to be really reliable. The only problem is the recipes from the newer builds aren't exactly compatible w/ our v8 Noodlyappendagecoin code because Bitcoin switched to Autotools w/ builds after v8. What are your thoughts on where the code should be updated? Best Regards, -Chicago I was thinking v13.2 for a few reasons. 1) It shows we are up to date using up to date tools / code not just pulling off another old clone. There is NOTHING wrong with cloning old coins and some of the ones that popped up over the years have been good and caught on. As a mostly hardware guy I just feel if you run the latest code things are better, there are more current discussions of issues and it's easier to move forward to implement other newer ideas. [The sound of 1000's of screaming programmers are heard in the background] -Dave |
|
|
|
I have been working on a plan to see if we can bring this coin back to life. A plan (Well not much of one but a plan) 1) Start work on the website / working block explorer. (.net / . info domains that I bought last year) 2) Release wallet with based on updated code 3) See if anyone mines / difficulty spikes. 4) Possible wallet changes (POS / different algo / whatever) 6)  . 7) Yes, YoBit sucks and $300 (give or take) to get it on an exchange is a lot but it's a start if people actually seem to be interested. We can pool some funds together. 7a) If we are going to go on an exhange I pubically burn the 1,000,000,000 coins that I have.  I'm open to suggestions if anyone else has any ideas. It's probably going to be slow going as it's a free time project and I really don't have any free time. It's been over a month since I nuked my test box try to get a block explorer working and I have not even had time to re-image it. -Dave |
|
|
|
Isn't 50,000 BTC only equivalent to 3000 byteball?
A bit more then that but not much more. -Dave |
|
|
|
Hi Dave,
The 32 bit wallet works. What could be the reason that the 32 bit version works whereas the 64 bit version not?
At a *guess* since the NUC is low power device, it's using an Atom / celeron / pentium CPU. The newer compilers have to be told that said app might be running on them (or older 64 bit CPUs). If you don't they assume that there are CPU features that are available that are not really there. Sometimes the app gives a useful error, sometimes it does not. And sometimes it just crashes and dies. If your NUC has an i3/5/7 then I have no idea. -Dave |
|
|
|
Hi Dave, Hi I have been trying for more than a month now to get Byteball running on an Intel NUC PC running Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit. It installs just fine but crashes 1-2 seconds after I start it. It doesn't get to the agreement screen or the type of client choice screen.
It also crashes when I try to run it as an admin. I tried to rename the byteball folders in Byteball, nothing changes. Is there a way to activate trace logs so that I can diagnose why it is crashing? Or does it need certain prerequisites to run (.Net Framework?).
I had the same behaviour from 1.8.2 up to 1.9.0. On another PC Byteball just runs fine. Help?
Thanks,
I have it running on a base Win 10 install with no issues. How much free HD space do you have? The byteball data directory is now a bit over 5 GB. I know some NUCs only had 32gb SSD drives. Take out space for OS and other things that might be an issue. Also try both the 32 bit and 64 bit versions. -Dave I have 250 GB free on the hard drive. Don't think this is the issue. I only see a 64 bit version for Windows on the download page. Where is a 32 bit version? Thanks, -Dave |
|
|
|
Hi I have been trying for more than a month now to get Byteball running on an Intel NUC PC running Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit. It installs just fine but crashes 1-2 seconds after I start it. It doesn't get to the agreement screen or the type of client choice screen.
It also crashes when I try to run it as an admin. I tried to rename the byteball folders in Byteball, nothing changes. Is there a way to activate trace logs so that I can diagnose why it is crashing? Or does it need certain prerequisites to run (.Net Framework?).
I had the same behaviour from 1.8.2 up to 1.9.0. On another PC Byteball just runs fine. Help?
Thanks,
I have it running on a base Win 10 install with no issues. How much free HD space do you have? The byteball data directory is now a bit over 5 GB. I know some NUCs only had 32gb SSD drives. Take out space for OS and other things that might be an issue. Also try both the 32 bit and 64 bit versions. -Dave |
|
|
|
|
Possibly stupid question. I might just be missing it.
For the 7th and later rounds the BB / BTC ratio will be changed. Will the bonus 20% for existing BB still be there or will that change also?
Thanks,
Dave
|
|
|
|
"In particular, the units deliver 75TH/s mining power from an electricity consumption of 1500W. The energy efficiency is improved further by the chips being endothermic-they absorb energy heat from the surrounding rather than give it off. global warming/climate change? SOLVED. genius i tell ya, genius!! -Dave |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
