|
Probably got them from newegg last week. I'll have 75BTC on tues, if the exchange rate holds I'll take one.
|
|
|
|
At this point i will be going by reputation on the #bitcoin-otc system, and the 'trusted members' thread on the forum. I don't have either of these. Do I need this to send you bitcoins? Isn't the trust on my end? I need around $1K. |
|
|
|
|
Well I now have 2 payouts and had none 2 hours ago, so idk what is going on. Was there no subsidy payments today? My everything crashed overnight and I didn't notice until a few hours ago so that may have caused me some issues.
|
|
|
|
well this isnt working for me...
I used to mine about 0.6 btc/day. ive been mining at p2pool for 1.5 days now and still no payment. the console shows 0.28 btc if block found.... so instead of 0.9 btc, i earn 0.28 in the same time?
Where does the rest go....?
If you were getting 0.6/day before and you're at 0.28/block at .50 days/block now, that's 0.56/day so you are at the same pay level, remember payout/block is what you get per block not per day. And someone needs to start poking if we haven't found a block yet...I haven't checked since last night. |
|
|
|
Have I missed something?
Yes, you missed that the debate isn't over weather or not to implement multi-sig transactions, but rather which protocol change is best to implement - and there are several, with support from different developers and pool operators. |
|
|
|
And the people who use deepbit, or any other pool, are in effect voting by proxy. That is the individuals miners choice.
As for the solution in search of a problem comment, the less tinkering with something that works, the better. I don't think we should be messing with the foundation of the way bitcoin works. It just feeds the seed of distrust.
We now have encrypted wallets what else do we really need to secure our transactions? Sending a message to my smartphone will really help that much? Smartphones can't be compromised? Really?
Sam
If you don't think we should be messing with the foundation of the way bitcoin works then why are mining at a pool which is for changing the foundation of the way bitcoin works  |
|
|
|
|
Good to see we are finally getting more women into Bitcoin...
|
|
|
|
|
If you are not mining and just want to support a particular development over another try buying hashing power from a GBLSE or other mining company/person who is supporting what you want. Then you get a return.
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds good how it is. All my GPU's go to the same pool and login. Thanks for the work.
|
|
|
|
pools and kernels are set in your cgminer_opts line, no need to set them again on each gpu. if you want per gpu pool configuration, you'll need to configure it inside cgminer. bamt does not interfere with or control cgminer's pool management.
cgminer doesn't allow for per gpu pool configuration, unless you run separate instances. You're only launching one right, otherwise you would need opts line at each gpu? I always deleted all the stuff I didn't use from the .conf, just made it easier. Can't wait to get my new gear to test it on. |
|
|
|
|
So if I want cgminer to handle everything all I need is cgminer_opts: <...> in the .conf and cgminer: 1 on all the gpu's? No clocks, fans, pools, or kernels on each gpu?
|
|
|
|
|
If you use cgminer or BAMT there are monitors available.
|
|
|
|
Setting up cgminer on all 18 rigs now!!!!!!!!! Looks like lodcrappo earned the bounty I put up. Will be coming this weekend!  Did I pledge to that? Either way, I won't be able to test for over a month. Please post if cgminer is working correctly and I'll send some BTC. |
|
|
|
win 7 and cgminer.. im at 8 connections on bitcoind never goes higher. should I set it lower?
No don't set it lower. Your port isn't forwarded. And with that processor and RAM I doubt you can run Windows alone without spiking the CPU. If its a dedicated rig change it to Linux or upgrade hardware. Just my suggestion, someone else may have a different one. |
|
|
|
nothing else is run on mine.. dedidicated miner.
What OS and miner? And have you tried limiting bitcoind connections (-maxconnections=x)? |
|
|
|
|
I think it's going to depend on what else the computer is used for. I moved my bitcoind and p2pool nodes to a dedicated rig with a sempron and 2GB ram and haven't seen the error yet (only been a few hours). The computer they were on is more powerful but being used for many other things and I would get dozens of errors every hour.
|
|
|
|
Well it would seem like you have all the bases covered when comparing to mtgox and other exchanges yet there's one area that everyone ignores or doesn't think is relevant that could significantly set you apart from everyone else and that's TRANSPARENCY.
Have a transparency page that shows:
-how many users are signed up
-how many of them active in the last 1/7/30 days
-how much fiat is deposited
-how much btc is deposited
-show volume of new deposits for 1/7/30 days periods
-show volume of new withdrawals for 1/7/30 days periods
-show all orders, all of them, none of the dark bs
-show us your entire profit history
-show us the entire costs of running your business
-show us everything, be as transparent as you can without it becoming a security risk
Then you'll really set yourself apart from the rest.
+1 except profits. But really I don't trade huge volume and use direct Dwolla deposits and withdrawals on 2 other exchanges. I don't want to pay Bitinstant another 2% so I don't use your exchange. |
|
|
|
|
Re: Frizz23 if p2pool was running the subsidy payments should have came in. How are you launching p2pool? Are you using -a <address> with the same address every restart?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
