I just made a transaction, I am quite satisfied with the whole process. Maybe I'll write a complete review somewhere.
What confuses me is entering the Refund address, which is not mandatory, but can be added later. However, during the process, I did not have the opportunity to enter it afterwards. Did I overlook it and why is it not mandatory? If a refund of the address was required, would I have to request a refund from support and what does that process look like?

I admit that the explanation on the website is not the most specific.

Is everything ok with the [banned mixer] clearnet page?
On my side, the site is not available on two different browsers (Chrome and Opera), while the Tor site is online and active.

---

Of course, you can, but wouldn't it be better to check a little before you write the first thing that comes to your mind? @coupable already answered that the campaigns were planned much earlier, but of course, you couldn't check that, could you?

note: these are rhetorical questions, you don't have to answer, I would even appreciate it if you refrained.



What are you talking about, man?
Most forum users consider you a troll, only in this thread do you show how superficially you conclude, so why would anyone take these suggestions of yours seriously?

note: these are also rhetorical questions, you don't have to answer, I would even appreciate it if you refrained. I'm not even going to answer you, so once again I'm asking you to refrain from further replies.

theymos decision to ban mixers was forced due to numerous investigations and the seizure of mixers by the authorities, and all this is to protect the forum. As both he and the forum are under US jurisdiction, if the US bans crypto casinos, it will be reflected on this forum as well. Looking at what is happening, it is not an impossible scenario at all.

Gambling is already quite dominant on this forum and such a trend continues because it seems that this industry has best adapted and implemented crypto-currencies. Certainly, I can't shake the impression that gambling and all discussions about it maintain the "popularity" of this forum to a considerable extent.

I completely forgot that you did the signature design as if an entire eternity had passed. Some of these designs are among the best I've seen on the forum, why did you even stop with this service?
Certainly, good luck with this service, although I am not sure about the perspective of business with signature campaigns here.

It is questionable to leave negative feedback based on suspicion or assumptions. There is no clear evidence.
With or without negative tags, Ratim's/Symmetrick account no longer enjoys the reputation it once had, so they do not disturb anything in his status. Based on the large number of already written posts and the fact that he is still active in the largest local community, that makes him interesting for campaign signatures.

The payrate is probably determined based on activity and forum attendance. If 4 out of 8 mixer signature campaigns move there, it will definitely cause more activity on the Altt forum. Greater activity and attendance cause an increase in the payment rate in campaigns. The opposite can happen to the Bitcointalk forum, because let's not lie, at least 50% of the traffic here is thanks to signature campaigns.


Everything looks like a gentle introduction to KYC on the forum and limits it to only KYC services. Don't be surprised if you soon see a ban on advertising for NO-KYC exchanges, and even casinos.

Here is the full repayment.
Due to extraordinary circumstances, there is an extra tip
250 USDT sent. tx id: 23ecbc30fc3a3da1d9c14e14120a57623c25ff6243f00bca82fc25f1ec7c8013
ups, 249 (-1 fee)

thanks shasan 

Good news from Tumbler.
However, I must point out one wrong statement that I read in one of your blogs. When we talk about choosing the best Anonymous Bitcoin wallets, Ledger can't possibly be in close competition here. We all already know many of their shortcomings, but just yesterday someone published an analysis of their application and the results are in great contrast to privacy and anonymity for all users of this wallet.
They collect every piece of information about the user's activities within the wallet, from the most common scroll to assets.

Here is a Twitter thread: https://x.com/rektbuildr/status/1732542258698694875?s=20

@dkbit98 exposed it on https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5370521.msg63289409#msg63289409

Sve zavisi iz kojeg ugla gledas. Moze se reci da je drugi najaktivniji forum o kriptovalitama, a to vec zvuci mnogo bolje. 
Inace je u osnovi posvecen altcoinima i tokenima, pa je razumljiva pretpostavka spamfesta, bar sudeci po onome sto vidimo na ovom forumu u alt kategoriji.

Evo malo poredjenje bitcointalk i altcointalk

Why are you two spamming this thread? The raffle is over, we have a winner, so there is no need for this. Just look at a few posts above.

Here's my case, luckily it was a miserable amount, but still my money.
I had some tokens worth $10 there. In the regular withdrawal process, it would cost me part of those tokens and that would be max. $0.5. After their notice, I was curious to go through the process, so I went to clear that account, but the withdrawal of that token was disabled. I contacted support and they soon enabled the withdrawal, but this time the fee was around 50 USDT.
Now tell me that is fair and honourable behaviour.

I will definitely give them negative feedback everywhere, we don't need such petty swindlers

There has certainly been a change in his approach to giving sMerit. He spent 200 merits in just 32 seconds, on some very old (iconic) posts, and accounts that have not been active in any discussion for a long time. You can't blame him, it's satoshi, laszlo, etc... but I'm still under the impression that this is not what is expected from a merit source.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=2627711



He also reminds me of someone, but since I ignore most trolls, I didn't manage to recognize who it was. Just another account to ignore. I'm even surprised that so many more experienced members enter into a discussion with him.
Don't feed the troll.

The Sinbad site also is gone, and all kinds of promotions stopped, but the thread was immediately archived.
This only supports my proposal that the mixer threads should remain, without the possibility of promotion.

In any case, you should get a reply from irfan_pak10, even the best thing would be if he expressed his opinion here.
It's a bit of a delicate situation because Irfan was not part of the deal you're presenting here. Given that he also offers an escrow service, it may not be the best image that he arbitrarily disposes of the user's funds. You have to understand his side here.

Is there a possibility to get RaselShorif to announce himself in this thread and possibly confirm that he is willing to pay off the debt?

from my end, I supported your flag and gave negative feedback.

Chipmixer ANN is still active, even though the discussion there has been reactivated. I'm not sure if it's constructive at all.

Is there any basis at all to discuss the possibility of minimal presence in all services, without the possibility of advertising and links to their web pages? I made a suggestion here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5476162.msg63278935#msg63278935
Such an approach would make things easier for all members of the forum, and the concession to these services would be minimal.

Finally, if there are abuses or too many omissions, a restrictive rule like the one announced in this thread can always be applied.



Honestly, I don't think they care about some kind of red tag on the forum. The forum's reputation is for us, the active members of the forum, and whoever was behind that account will probably forget it in a month, if not already.
Certainly, those feedbacks seem to be incorrect.

U početku je zemlja bila užarena masa...
Ajd da baš ne idem tako daleko, ali ako se u bilo kojoj priči spominje DOGE, ja tu nikako ne bih izostavio stari dobri, pomalo zaboravljeni Litecoin. Valjda sam nostalgičan, ali sećam se vremena samo BTC; LTC i DOGE.
Brze transakcije i pri tom jeftine. Ne sećam se da je imao radikalne skokove/padove cene mimo marketa. Isto tako, čini mi se da svaki servis, menjačnica bilo šta, nakon implementiranja Bitcoina sledeći na redu je LTC. SVakako bih ga uzeo u obzir u svim analizama.

Of course, you can. Just check that the link is not already exposed in the OP and be sure to put them in the code frame, so that they are not clickable. We don't want to give them additional advertising.

I haven't updated this list for several months, but that doesn't mean there aren't new scammers. Added 30 new domains to this blacklist.
Stay safe and don't believe all extra profit offers.

7 Dec. '23, Update log:

to be continued...

Ma sigurno to nije eksluzivno njegova licna odluka, vec na osnovu nekakvog konsenzusa Bitcoin zajednice. On kao tehničko lice je predstavio tu odluku, ali nije je on doneo čitajući twitter uz kafu. Trenutno Ordinalsi dominiraju i odvlače sve u krivu stranu i to mora da se koriguje, a verujem da rešavanje nije moguće tako što će ljubitelji ordinalsa samo obećati "evo nećemo više preterivati, časna reč".


Slažem se ako se može dati još funkcionalnosti ekosistemu, zašto da ne. Ali ne tako što će se preuzeti cela mreža i marginalizovati osnovna svrha, posebno ne u svrhu pravljenja image-hosting mreže. Ovo mi izgleda kao da se staje u zaštitu traktora koji vozi kupus autoputem, pri tom iza sebe napravio kilometarsku kolonu, ali zašto da ne, vozilo je, ima točkove a još ako ga opali cena kupusa možda i bude dobra zarada. Mada i taj kupus nije baš najneophodniji, već je zanimljiv samo onima koji ga vole jesti.

Trenutno su mi PayPal transakcije 30+ puta jeftinije od btc. Možda treba da mi je uteha bolje da rudari zarađuju nego neka prokleta multikorporacija poput PP, ali bar je dečici omogućeno da se zabavljaju sa svojim avatarima.

When you say that you are ready to bear the consequences, do you know that anyone who wears that avatar and is not a gang member has to pay 0.015 weekly?
This is a pay-or-be-paid campaign.