OP, @YoMixScam, it would be very useful if you could confirm what you stated here. icopress has already suggested that you somehow publish a letter of guarantee to be sure that your claims are correct.
If you don't want it to be public, you can do it through private correspondence with one of the verified members here, whose words we don't doubt.


The thread containing the mentioned post has been viewed 1540 times since its opening. icopress's post was seen much fewer times. So the news went almost unnoticed by a large number of members.
The information was transferred to the altcoinstalks forum in a thread that has been viewed 3300 times so far. Also, a very small number of different people saw such info.
Even with research, it is quite possible that he would not have come across this discussion.

I see this problem of lack of information partly in theymos' decision to ban mixers and open discussions about them. Without the mixer ban on Bitcointalk, I'm sure everyone would have been warned much earlier in a much more transparent way.


It happens.
Until just a few months ago, Yomix was very present here and considered a stable service. I have used it myself a couple of times.

It is definitely better to be synchronized with the time zone of the forum.

note: I'm glad that you finally presented your tools here.  Or maybe you did earlier, but I didn't see it.

There may not be a lot of people using the faucet, but there are still some. I claim that faucets are useful, especially for all those new to the crypto industry, who will learn more about bitcoin transactions, addresses, fees...
Also, the faucet script itself does not have to serve exclusively to bring direct profit, it is often used, for example, as a way for the website to have regular visitors. More traffic on the website brings some other benefits.


Nulled crap always ends up causing more problems than the script itself costs

theymos reshuffled DT and made a mess 


It would be really useful if the banned members were automatically excluded from the possibility of being selected for DT. Banned accounts should be prevented from having any influence on the forum.
btw. Another collectable user, with a lot of positive tags, who screwed things up. Those lads would have to be more moderate and careful there.

What happened to you has nothing to do with crypto. You have been deceived, just as if you bought rotten bananas.
It is obvious that you don't have enough knowledge about the whole thing, forex trading, and you certainly don't know much about crypto. $250 it's not a lot of money if you learn some lessons from it. So, for example, you will not go tomorrow to buy a screwdriver and decide to be an aircraft mechanic, because you saw somewhere that they make good money.

They have passed verification and analysis on Bestchange, so I'm convinced that they couldn't lie to them for the years of existence. The official information on their page on the Bestchange website says that they are 3 years and 6 months old. So completely different from everything that is mentioned in this thread.
In this case, for now, I trust Bestchange, although it is quite unclear to me what this manipulation is about 

However if affects the market, it will certainly recover. What is good, it is better to happen as soon as possible and to remain without the possibility of manipulation.

How accurate are these data?
According to Arkham Intelligence, the US Government account holds much more, 212.862K BTC or $14.42B


https://platform.arkhamintelligence.com/explorer/entity/usg

Earlier I suggested that they implement a swap between currencies, which could be one of the solutions so that users can choose a coin for withdrawal with the lowest fee.
I'm not sure how technically feasible it is at Blackjack.fun casino, but I've seen it at other casinos.

The increase in the number of merit sources may be conditioned by the previous results. Perhaps a more detailed analysis would give a clearer picture of how the merits are distributed and the possible effects of that.

I assume that this statement is not just made up, maybe it is time to tone down the drama surrounding the new merit sources.

I'm sorry for your loss. Unfortunately, this is over and no one, not even Exch, can help you. Immediately after the first confirmation, the purchased coins were sent. User funds are not kept for a long time on this exchange, and everything is automated, so the chances it will freeze any transactions are zero.


You are asking the question in the wrong place. There is no coin freeze on Exch.


They find out about it only after the exchange is complete, like the one in the @matrixconnor case. Unfortunately, by then it is already too late to do anything. Everyone should take care of their money, they should not expect that someone else will do it for them.

Did I understand correctly, the funds you are talking about were sent directly ^{from Tornado source} to Binance?
I know of earlier cases where Binance requested verification for funds deposited directly from the mixer, while it was not the case for mixer -> wallet -> Binance. It is the same starting address where the funds came from.

Since you adding closed services, you can add [banned mixer] also. They are out of business and their website is offline. Everything was preceded by some bad decisions here, which resulted in negative feedback on the forum.
You can find more https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5479766.0

I hope that you will explain a little better when it comes to negotiations, since what you stated here is quite unclear. But if you were to guess, I assume you are looking for a marketing agency. If it's only a referral commission as a way of calculating payment, I'm not sure that it guarantees success.
Anyway, the first one that came to mind is AB de Royse777 who manages a marketing agency and is active on various platforms https://r7promotions.com/

I poked at them on Twitter and Reddit, we will see if they are interested in it at all. A very sad story for an exchange.

I don't know what the amount is, but have you thought about consulting with lawyers? Cex.io is a legitimately registered service, and as far as I know, Bulgaria is a full member of the EU, so such a process could be feasible.

It is better to do your own research than to trust these automated services ^{based on AI} which takes some irrelevant facts to determine the scam score.

Maybe you are a fan of cloud mining and that is why you insist that you have such a category at all, but it is a very sensitive territory and I would only consider them if I had personal experience with them.

This should be the official slogan of the cex.io exchange.
I have come across at least 50 feedbacks that say the same thing, their support is poor, in fact, it is almost non-existent. It has been like this for years and it is obvious that it does not affect the improvement of their service.

86 - examplens

A possible solution for this problem could be a system like the one used by banks. Where everyone is obliged to give a proportionate amount of deposit to the central bank and these funds serve as cover for any disputes that may arise. This would perhaps encourage exchanges to take more careful care of their users' entrusted funds.


Don't confuse accusations of money laundering because they didn't have rigorous KYC with misappropriation of user funds.


Did you hear about Bitstamp?
There were no significant dramas related to them. Bitstamp was founded in 2011, 13 years ago. So it's possible

Here is the best solution. You are to deliver the functional product that he requested in the initial agreement, and he is to pay the amount agreed on that occasion. It can't be too complicated.
This is about attempted fraud, certainly he should not ignore the whole thing.

April 2024, bounty hunters continue to spend their time on something that has declared itself as a project, and it is called "Solana SSHIB".