 The hammer is ready?  Hey look it's cool Thor, before Disney/Marvel turned him into slovenly, blubbering fatty mess Thor. You do surprise me with watching marvel movies  I agree I hate the fat making as well !!!! How about this this fatman batman?  or this fatman?   I like his utility belt. The original Captain Marvel creator also created Fatman the Human Flying Saucer. However, he didn't have a utility belt stuffed with food. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatman_the_Human_Flying_Saucer |
|
|
|
The hammer is ready? Hey look it's cool Thor, before Disney/Marvel turned him into slovenly, blubbering fatty mess Thor. You do surprise me with watching marvel movies I agree I hate the fat making as well !!!! How about this this fatman batman? or this fatman? |
|
|
|
It is true. This only applies to people subject to US taxation (citizens and residents) and it doesn't matter where they dump the coins.
Yes, you owe the tax whether you sell or not. It is the same for U.S. stocks when a company goes public, original employees of the company are often given stock in the public company and they owe tax on the value of the stock on the day the company goes public whether they sell or not. This normally means they have to sell some of the stock to pay the taxes due.
What if a fork isn't on an exchange on the day it's created? Does that mean it is treated as zero value? Most Bitcoin forks struggle to get on an exchange within weeks of their creation. Some never even get on an exchange. |
|
|
|
Hmmm my response "Why don't you go fuck yourself?" to Whiteboys post was also deleted.
So it's not just responses to Fatty that gets deleted. I'm starting to think that someone is pulling my leg.
And I still have no clue as to who is doing it. The moderator (Infofront) isn't doing it.
And as far as i can judge I'm not breaking any of the WO rules, remember this is a self moderated thread with special rules.
I Really would like to know who and why.
Isn't there a thread management history for admin/staff? There's a public deletion history here, but it doesn't show who made a deletion. https://bitcointalk.org/modlog.phpThis is Arriemoller's post deletion record. Delete reply: Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion in topic #178336 by member #159292 |
|
|
|
btc dominance at 66.6% (spooky!)
some correction from 71.4
My activity just hit 1666 too. Couldn’t be more doomed, check your btc’s quickly..... hopefully they are not transferred into Bsh*t or some other meaningful coin..... I think transferring them into doge would give me a better return than Bsh*t . |
|
|
|
btc dominance at 66.6% (spooky!)
some correction from 71.4
My activity just hit 1666 too. |
|
|
|
Plaintiffs David Leibowitz, Benjamin Leibowitz, Jason Leibowitz, Aaron Leibowitz, and Pinchas Goldshtein individually and on behalf of all others similar situated, bring this action against iFinex Inc., BFXNA Inc., BFXWW Inc., Tether Holdings Limited, Tether Operations Limited, Tether Limited, Tether International Limited, DigFinex Inc., Philip G. Potter, Giancarlo Devasini, Ludovicus Jan van der Velde, Reginald Fowler, Crypto Capital Corp., and Global Trade Solutions AG. tldr: <<<gov>>> suing tether yes, priced in, just popcorn According to squatter if it's a RICO lawsuit it's likely to get thrown out of court before it even begins. Unfortunately for plaintiffs, there are onerous requirements for the complaint to show that there is enough evidence to allow the lawsuit to move forward as a RICO case. Judges take a dim view of efforts to turn what look like ordinary state law claims into federal cases by claiming a RICO violation. For that reason, RICO cases often don’t survive the pleading stage. [...] RICO lawsuits are tempting. They allow a plaintiff to sue a variety of defendants by claiming that they acted together and seek an award of triple damages, a bonanza in some business disputes that can run into millions of dollars. But these cases should also come with a bright red warning sign: Tread lightly or see your case thrown out of court before it even gets started. Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/16/business/dealbook/harvey-weinstein-rico.html |
|
|
|
What is in the air that's bringing all these old stagers out of hiding? It's welcome but mysterious.
Bourbon and linseed oil. This quote from last July should explain things. Wha'd I miss?
This.  |
|
|
|
This is fine.
That's what doggie in the fire is saying, too. what a coincidence. Yet he was right every time when referring to Bitcoin. I don't see the room really burning down to its ashes, it's just some heat to clean out the weak hands.  Buy the dips. |
|
|
|
I’m not even remotely bothered about price action like this any more. Just use it to accumulate, even if it’s relatively small amounts.  Remember this? In retrospect it didn't matter much if you bought at $480 or $432. Keep buying the dips.  That was my first awful bear market. I was suicidal (not really but very sad). NotLambChop was posting those memes every day, the evil bastard. I was sitting on huge losses back then. Well he/she isn't posting those memes any more, and today you are sitting on 20x more than you spent at those prices. |
|
|
|
I’m not even remotely bothered about price action like this any more. Just use it to accumulate, even if it’s relatively small amounts. Remember this? In retrospect it didn't matter much if you bought at $480 or $432. Keep buying the dips. |
|
|
|
WO meetup pioneers pithy motto: "our opsec is atrocious (except for a couple people) but we had a fucking great time and everyone was very cool".
Don't tell me some of you forgot to wear this disguise.  |
|
|
|
I think we will finally see 11k again. Will probably sell at 11.5k (bought at 9.5k) and buy back below 10k if I can.
Are you playing with 100% of you BTC stash, or some smaller amount? Frequently it is not good to sell too much of your stash and then wait for the price to come back down to your selling point. That's what happened to Roach at $700 and that is what happened to jonoiv at $6k. And proudhon at even less than r0ach (I think). And kwukduck at $10 a Bitcoin. |
|
|
|
In US in a larger, but not most expensive city, you have to have $3mil minimally to maintain a middle class lifestyle while not working.
I heard that in posh areas of San Fransisco you would be lucky to get this for $1m. image clipped Not in Sanfran, but those are (900K-1mil, small, but OK to live in): https://www.zillow.com/san-francisco-ca/?searchQueryState=But it's a picture of a brick toilet (shithouse). Who wants to live in a brick shithouse? I dunno, Eric Cartman, perhaps. Or, he will rent it out at $10K/mo as a 'cozy, but nice place for deep thinkers'. Maybe he could rent it out at $10K/mo as a 'cozy', but nice place for incontinent deep thinkers in San Fransisco, because SF is sans public toilets.. |
|
|
|
In US in a larger, but not most expensive city, you have to have $3mil minimally to maintain a middle class lifestyle while not working.
I heard that in posh areas of San Fransisco you would be lucky to get this for $1m. image clipped Not in Sanfran, but those are (900K-1mil, small, but OK to live in): https://www.zillow.com/san-francisco-ca/?searchQueryState=But it's a picture of a brick toilet (shithouse). Who wants to live in a brick shithouse? |
|
|
|
In US in a larger, but not most expensive city, you have to have $3mil minimally to maintain a middle class lifestyle while not working.
I heard that in posh areas of San Fransisco you would be lucky to get this for $1m.  |
|
|
|
You must be joking.
>$1m net worth is only upper lower lower middle class.
>$50m net worth is only upper class.
>$100m net worth is upper upper class.
>$1000m net worth is upper upper upper class.
I don't know where you live but in where I live you are pretty much rich with a million bucks. Of course there are factions in high class too. I didn't say $1m is upper high, but that's the starting point. Even though It doesn't mean anything to many people like you nowadays, the dictionary says you are a HNWI if you have >= $1m. Apprently investopedia agrees with me: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/h/hnwi.aspA $1m is shit nowadays. You need at least $3m to live a modest lifestyle for the rest of your life. Maybe it could be argued that >$1m net worth is upper upper upper lower middle class, but that's pushing it. |
|
|
|
And yeah you want to enjoy the good things while you're young, not when you are a washed up hulk at 50. :-)
Yeah young and poor is ok. Rich and old is ok. Old and poor, not so much. 50 is not "old."  50 is "middle aged." Also, being poor sucks at any age. I know from experience. (Although I am supposedly not poor but lower middle class. Sill sucks.) When Bitcoin hits a new post halving ATH your new wealth will advance you to upper upper lower middle class. You can't really say that. That really depends on his BTC numbers. He may advance to high class as well. $100-300k net worth is what I'd consider low mid class (that's probably where he is right now) Not poor, but not exactly rich neither. Can't spend his shit as he likes which is a tight situation. A x10 increase in BTC may push him to "high class" if he is %100 btc right now. $200k > $2m. >$1m net worth is what I would call, "high class" $500k-$1m, upper mid $300k-500k, mid $100k-$300k, lower mid <$100k, pretty much poor That's how I think it anyway. You must be joking. >$1m net worth is upper lower lower middle class. >$10m net worth is upper upper lower middle class. >$20m net worth is lower lower upper middle class. >$50m net worth is lower lower upper class. >$100m net worth is upper upper class. >$1000m net worth is upper upper upper class. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
