Dafuq?
Just came back from a walk/exercise outside, and what do I see? An upward-pointing green dildo.
Ditto. I was busy doing other stuff, then got a nice dildo surprise. |
|
|
|
...current show is actually offensive to some old timers like meself. sigh..
I haven't watched it. The recent stuff sounds so crap that I'll take other people's word for it, and not bother watching. This is what daleks should look like.  And this is probably what they look like today.  |
|
|
|
Yet another exciting step in the ongoing search for extraterrestrial life.Astronomers took a look at three very promising nearby exoplanets using the world's most advanced visible-light astronomical observatory and made some incredible discoveries.
The three exoplanets, similar to those found in our inner-solar system, circle a nearby star called L98-59. It turns out that one of them is only half the mass of Venus (making it the exoplanet with the lowest mass ever measured using radial velocity detection). The second planet turned out to be an ocean world, and the third planet orbits its host star within the habitable zone.
On top of all this, the team may have found two additional "hidden" exoplanets that had not previously been spotted in this planetary system. They discovered a fourth planet and suspect there is also a fifth at the right distance from the star for liquid water to exist on its surface.
The team hopes to further study the promising L 98-59 system in the future with the help of the upcoming James Webb telescope and the Extremely Large Telescope (currently under construction in the Atacama Desert).
The latter is unlikely to be finished before 2027 but is ideally suited for exoplanet research as it may be powerful enough to study the atmospheres of some of the exoplanets in the L 98-59 system.
Altogether we live in exciting times when it comes to exoplanet discoveries. We, for one, are very excited about future research into this captivating star system. Maybe it would be better if extraterrestrial life doesn't find us.  |
|
|
|
Why not an update? I am thinking that even if we were to price each pizza at $25, then two pizzas at our current BTC prices of $39,050 would be about .00128041 BTC for two pizzas.. that is nearly a magnitude (1/10) less than it was in 2017, no? And, surely we are not done yet, for those of us valuing our wealth in pizzas, there is likely going to continue to be more and more value in terms of pizza purchasing power if we accumulate and HODL our BTC in the coming years. In the coming years we might reach 25 sats for two pizzas. |
|
|
|
meh dont worry about spending bitcoin. I have the equivalent of what...5000$ dogecoin socks, who else can say that ? Im the richest mofo in the room if you measure it by sock value
You must have bought the pure cotton ones. You can get cheap nasty nylon dogecoin socks from amazon for $10. Imagine being the guy that ate the bitcoin pizza. One olive of which is now worth $796320.  |
|
|
|
Good bullish momentum They had to try something, didn’t they?? El duderino’s eyes where off the charts and focussed on 3* Michelin ‘t Zilte Cheers  HODLer Mondays….. Does everyone else who works at McDonald's eat 3* Michelin ‘t Zilte? They must pay more than I thought.  |
|
|
|
Amazon denies it will accept Bitcoin only exploring crypto. It was just FUD.  It will be denied right up until the second it goes live. With that said, I never put any stock in this rumor. The price rise was nice, I guess. I'm happy with anything above $30k and a nice slow increase in the price over the summer. $30k is great compared to this time last year. LOL classic bitcoin
I know! And look at it! It's clawing it's way right back up... lol. It was sub £10k a week ago. Anything above £11k is good. |
|
|
|
Back to ramen and McD job?  El duderino seems to eat pretty well, and he says he has a McD job. That pasta truffel flavoured ramen looks quite nice.   Cool red wine Pasta truffel Saturdays Cheers |
|
|
|
Since we are almost in a double chartbuddy time, can someone please explain to me the logic behind this?  And if a vaccinated person has to isolate, got his mix with the “Green Pass” thing (certification of vaccination or negative swab to access some kind of services?) I'm guessing he doesn't want to be some unknown carrier of the disease or virus? I mean, he might have traces of the virus on him even if he himself is immune, and could pass that on to someone else. The virus will not survive long inside his body if infected since he would have the antibodies already, but any virus that is on or about or outside or on the skin could still bounce around to anyone else. Double vaccinated people can still catch it. A double vaccinated TV personality called Andrew Marr caught it at the G7 meeting in Cornwall. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-57640550I had received two doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine long before. I wasn't behaving recklessly - but I did feel pretty much invulnerable.
I was wrong. First, early symptoms of this new strain, first identified in India, are very, very similar to those of a light cold - and it is incredibly infectious, so beware. You may think you have superpowers because you have been double vaccinated. And, yes, the vaccine seems it does protect very well against admission to hospital - at no point did I have difficulty breathing.
But that doesn't mean you can't become infected. |
|
|
|
By the way, I am going to say that I have a problematic BTC address (or maybe a set of addresses) that concern me in terms of how it (they) was established and consolidated.. so still thinking about how to deal with some of my mistakes that were made.. and even hoping that there could be some ways to resolve some of my mistakes that were made.. but thinking and thinking.. without wanting to describe the particulars with too many details beyond just implying size and consolidation concerns.
You probably don't need help and will eventually figure this out, such as either ignoring the dust, or consolidating it all in one or a few transactions, loading up as many addresses or inputs as you can. But just in case, you can ask around here maybe someone knows what to do, or can do, or if its too much work or its possible. If he isn't already using electrum he could export all the keys from his old wallets, then import them into electrum. After that he could freeze any problematic dust addresses, so they can't be spent from. Either that, or wait until the fees are extremely low, then send dust spread across loads of addresses to a single consolidation address. Fees are fairly low at the moment. Today the bitcoinfees website says zero fee transactions can still confirm if you are prepared to wait 95 blocks. It says a one sat per byte fee can confirm inbetween 3 to 64 blocks. https://bitcoinfees.earn.com/*edit*Apparently it's very difficult to broadcast a zero fee transaction. There seems to be a way to trick electrum into letting you broadcast a zero fee segwit transaction, but I'm not sure if it works for normal transactions. https://www.reddit.com/r/Electrum/comments/kt41dq/finally_changed_electrum_code_to_have_truly_zero/You can actually achieve this by using paytomany where you simply leave zero SAT for fees. I've done it in the past.
...it is very rare (5%) to find a node that will allow you to broadcast a zero fee TXN If electrum won't let you generate a zero fee transaction you could try using an offline copy of coinb.in https://coinb.in/#newTransactionYou can download it from the link at the bottom of this page. https://coinb.in/#aboutThis is its bitcointalk thread. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=390046*edit2*If he has an address with hundreds of dust inputs the thread below might offer a solution. https://www.reddit.com/r/Electrum/comments/7qa45a/is_it_possible_to_specify_the_inputs_for_a_given/Any transaction with over a hundred inputs seems to create problems. Using electrum to create transactions with 50 inputs seems to solve this. I hate to even say my problem.. but it is different than the one you are describing or suggesting in terms of dealing with dust or even a bunch of transactions that are combined.. but maybe I could just say if there were some combining of addresses on one occasion, and then moving that whole lump together at one point, then there are already two steps there, so it seems that it may be too late to do anything except maybe acknowledge them all as one owner. I am not really sure if I am currently wanting to attempt to resolve this, if there is even a resolution. This website can guess the linked addresses in a wallet. You enter one address into it, then it guesses the rest. It's run by someone from chainalysis.com, which exchanges and governments use to check where bitcoins come from. https://www.walletexplorer.com/This website also guesses linked addresses in wallets, but I don't think big business uses its services. https://btc.cryptoid.info/btc/You could import the keys to any addresses they missed into electrum, then move those coins to another wallet. That way you could salvage any anonymous addresses you have left. I am going to devolve even further... Might be a stretch, but if you are not using a VPN, and you are searching BTC addresses, and you search a bunch together, might there not be a presumption that the person who searched those BTC addresses is the owner of the addresses? Yes, I am maybe overly paranoid.. but there can be some difficulties in knowing how much privacy we might have if we are not covering up some of our traffic. That sounds sensible, not paranoid. There's a saying that "when you're using free services, if you don't know what the product is, you are the product". Also, if you are using electrum you might connect to a node someone set up to find linked addresses in wallets. There's probably profit in running such nodes for chainalysis.com and other companies like it. You can run your own electrum server/node and only connect to that, or a server/node you trust to counter that. |
|
|
|
This user is currently ignored.
C'mon Billy, this is no time to get bearish on us. We can't stop now. This is bat country.  He's probably a day trader, or a shitcoin shill.  |
|
|
|
By the way, I am going to say that I have a problematic BTC address (or maybe a set of addresses) that concern me in terms of how it (they) was established and consolidated.. so still thinking about how to deal with some of my mistakes that were made.. and even hoping that there could be some ways to resolve some of my mistakes that were made.. but thinking and thinking.. without wanting to describe the particulars with too many details beyond just implying size and consolidation concerns.
You probably don't need help and will eventually figure this out, such as either ignoring the dust, or consolidating it all in one or a few transactions, loading up as many addresses or inputs as you can. But just in case, you can ask around here maybe someone knows what to do, or can do, or if its too much work or its possible. If he isn't already using electrum he could export all the keys from his old wallets, then import them into electrum. After that he could freeze any problematic dust addresses, so they can't be spent from. Either that, or wait until the fees are extremely low, then send dust spread across loads of addresses to a single consolidation address. Fees are fairly low at the moment. Today the bitcoinfees website says zero fee transactions can still confirm if you are prepared to wait 95 blocks. It says a one sat per byte fee can confirm inbetween 3 to 64 blocks. https://bitcoinfees.earn.com/*edit*Apparently it's very difficult to broadcast a zero fee transaction. There seems to be a way to trick electrum into letting you broadcast a zero fee segwit transaction, but I'm not sure if it works for normal transactions. https://www.reddit.com/r/Electrum/comments/kt41dq/finally_changed_electrum_code_to_have_truly_zero/You can actually achieve this by using paytomany where you simply leave zero SAT for fees. I've done it in the past.
...it is very rare (5%) to find a node that will allow you to broadcast a zero fee TXN If electrum won't let you generate a zero fee transaction you could try using an offline copy of coinb.in https://coinb.in/#newTransactionYou can download it from the link at the bottom of this page. https://coinb.in/#aboutThis is its bitcointalk thread. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=390046*edit2*If he has an address with hundreds of dust inputs the thread below might offer a solution. https://www.reddit.com/r/Electrum/comments/7qa45a/is_it_possible_to_specify_the_inputs_for_a_given/Any transaction with over a hundred inputs seems to create problems. Using electrum to create transactions with 50 inputs seems to solve this. I hate to even say my problem.. but it is different than the one you are describing or suggesting in terms of dealing with dust or even a bunch of transactions that are combined.. but maybe I could just say if there were some combining of addresses on one occasion, and then moving that whole lump together at one point, then there are already two steps there, so it seems that it may be too late to do anything except maybe acknowledge them all as one owner. I am not really sure if I am currently wanting to attempt to resolve this, if there is even a resolution. This website can guess the linked addresses in a wallet. You enter one address into it, then it guesses the rest. It's run by someone from chainalysis.com, which exchanges and governments use to check where bitcoins come from. https://www.walletexplorer.com/This website also guesses linked addresses in wallets, but I don't think big business uses its services. https://btc.cryptoid.info/btc/You could import the keys to any addresses they missed into electrum, then move those coins to another wallet. That way you could salvage any anonymous addresses you have left. |
|
|
|
By the way, I am going to say that I have a problematic BTC address (or maybe a set of addresses) that concern me in terms of how it (they) was established and consolidated.. so still thinking about how to deal with some of my mistakes that were made.. and even hoping that there could be some ways to resolve some of my mistakes that were made.. but thinking and thinking.. without wanting to describe the particulars with too many details beyond just implying size and consolidation concerns.
You probably don't need help and will eventually figure this out, such as either ignoring the dust, or consolidating it all in one or a few transactions, loading up as many addresses or inputs as you can. But just in case, you can ask around here maybe someone knows what to do, or can do, or if its too much work or its possible. If he isn't already using electrum he could export all the keys from his old wallets, then import them into electrum. After that he could freeze any problematic dust addresses, so they can't be spent from. Either that, or wait until the fees are extremely low, then send dust spread across loads of addresses to a single consolidation address. Fees are fairly low at the moment. Today the bitcoinfees website says zero fee transactions can still confirm if you are prepared to wait 95 blocks. It says a one sat per byte fee can confirm inbetween 3 to 64 blocks. https://bitcoinfees.earn.com/*edit*Apparently it's very difficult to broadcast a zero fee transaction. There seems to be a way to trick electrum into letting you broadcast a zero fee segwit transaction, but I'm not sure if it works for normal transactions. https://www.reddit.com/r/Electrum/comments/kt41dq/finally_changed_electrum_code_to_have_truly_zero/You can actually achieve this by using paytomany where you simply leave zero SAT for fees. I've done it in the past.
...it is very rare (5%) to find a node that will allow you to broadcast a zero fee TXN If electrum won't let you generate a zero fee transaction you could try using an offline copy of coinb.in https://coinb.in/#newTransactionYou can download it from the link at the bottom of this page. https://coinb.in/#aboutThis is its bitcointalk thread. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=390046*edit2*If he has an address with hundreds of dust inputs the thread below might offer a solution. https://www.reddit.com/r/Electrum/comments/7qa45a/is_it_possible_to_specify_the_inputs_for_a_given/Any transaction with over a hundred inputs seems to create problems. Using electrum to create transactions with 50 inputs seems to solve this. |
|
|
|
Bear trolling.
HODL. |
|
|
|
...
We're counting on you help teach the noobs that Bitcoin brings success and crapto brings failure.
 |
|
|
|
Just saw this video on YouTube where there was a website that used to give out 0.001BTC just for visiting the website. It's crazy, today that amount is worth 32.89$.  The payout began at 5 Bitcoins, then they gradually lowered it as Bitcoin's price increased. That was over ten years ago though. For my first Bitcoin coding project, I decided to do something that sounds really dumb: I created a web site that gives away Bitcoins. It is at: https://freebitcoins.appspot.com/ Five ฿ per customer, first come first served, I've stocked it with ฿1,100 to start. I'll add more once I'm sure it is working properly. *snip* There's a waybackmachine snapshot of it from July 2010. http://web.archive.org/web/20100703032414/https://freebitcoins.appspot.com/ |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
