Your research is based on a fictional book called "The Bible".

Talk about pure garbage...

hi any good news today?
2 day left the platform will be launch. are you ready ?

I agree with most of your points. However I don't think we are alone. To think that life only happened on this planet is pretty egotistical. Clearly it happened and is happening on many planets all over this galaxy and others.

I watch a video and what I got out of it is that if I don't believe in flat earth then I'm an idiot. Got it. IMO I would be and idiot to believe that one video. I'll go watch more some of the stuff these guys say is pretty funny.

Nice imagination boi, but Earth stays on its axis and Moon rotates around it. Ez as hell.

That video is misleading and poses a false hypothesis. It doesn't take into account the vast distances between the Earth and the stars.

It also doesn't address my point about the north and south star appearing stationary to two observers, or that you could travel from the north to the south and see Polaris disappear and Sigma Octantis appear, with both stars appearing stationary in relation to all the other stars.

The video's hypothesis (of spirals etc.) would only work if the stars were much closer, and we could see their movement as the Earth travels through space. It's similar to when you drive at high speed and objects in the distance don't appear to move, because they are so far away.

longterm??  lol noob with 5 posts predicts future!!

You have no heart do you? You give tons and tons of text.... Couldnt you find some nice fragments? But ok.... I will read thru it not to make trolls happy. And please... that movie is so not on subject the first minutes... tell us where does the movie refutes the arguments please.

Flat earthers.... be kind to us. What did we do to you so you just point to some boring, long lectures. I gave up on 5 minute of not answering the question just bragging about kids and flying humans. Could you give us short answers next time?

Soooo here's another conundrum for you flat earthies to explain.

Consider the pole star (Polaris) and the south star (Sigma Octantis). Polaris is visible directly overhead if you are situated at the north pole, all the other stars appear to rotate around it, while Polaris appears stationary. Sigma Octantis is visible directly overhead from the south pole, and again, all the other stars appear to rotate around it and it appears stationary. Both are visible from the equator.

If the Earth isn't spherical, how could multiple observers see the same stars appearing stationary in different hemispheres? You could travel from north to south, and gradually Polaris would begin to dip below the horizon, while Sigma Octantis would emerge. But both would appear stationary in relation to the other stars.

If the stars are some sort of projection, then this projection would have to change dynamically based on where the observer was situated. Not only that, but with multiple observers it would have to be somehow customized to each observer. How can this be explained with the flat Earth theory?

The globalists run the fiat currency system.

Why it aint so? I say it is. Try to debunk me. Im not flat earther that run away from questions. Why it is not hollow with internal sky and and its own sun? Propably even 2 suns and one is dead. Thats what masons believe, so Ive heard. Im not a mason, let alone 33rd degree or above mason, so I cant be sure. If I would be a mason I wouldnt tell you either way.

Well... If the earth would have 2 suns thats alive and working... all the talks about earth revolving around the sun would have no ground what so ever. Right now it have a grounds only because its logical. But everyone that is into logic knows that explanations in logic does not need to be true. So yeah... science dont tell lies, because one can lie only about facts not the explanations. People just does not know facts so they cant check it themselfs thats why everyone believes in round earth.

Actually scientists lied once. With the moon experiment "proving" newton was right about his constant in the universe. They were not on the moon so they could not prove anything from the moon perspective. Yeah that was a lie. Once.

And yes flat earthers are even worse because what they say is completly illogical so you dont need facts to say they does not know what they are talking about.

Even the official scientists have to agree that the heat patterns in the sky shows that the earth is the center of the universe. They are almost right. The earth is the boundaries of the universe, but nevertheless the most important point of refference. No sorry, the center of the universe is the most important point of refference, but its realy close to earth - in the middle of if it, so.... yeah.

The flat earthers does not have the explanation why would someone lie about the nature of the universe. Its about the creator that is inside. They want to lie to you that he is some far far far away galaxy like in some starwars. Why would they lie to you about the creator? They are afraid you will ask him to help against the evil doers of the world.

Yeah you might say, what bullshit do I say. Do I have any evidences for that? Yeah... the ones you can check yourself.

you with your Moon Boots
LOL

I am not that excited about the price. I ain selling bellow $8
I am excited about the platform access

You seem to be a little bit bitter. Have you sold already?

No I'm not searching for "bogus monkeyman science papers" (whatever they may be), just some some sound, empirical evidence of the FE theory.

This thread is full of people like you trying to use scientific reasoning to explain your wild theories. If the science behind your theory is sound, then where are the academic papers? If flat Earth was true, you could become a millionaire by writing a paper with solid evidence to prove it.

Why don't you do it? I'm serious, if you know so much about the science behind the flat Earth theory, write a paper and get it published! You could become rich and famous, and go down in the history books for eternity!

After reading through this thread I realized that there are many stupid bitcoiners. So what happens to the water at the edge of the world? Does it just fall off or is it recycled by fairies?

Aah, still no scientific papers (peer reviewed or otherwise) on this theory I see?

Just link upon link of sketchy youtube videos, mostly with the signature spooky music, overedited production, biased narrative and subtle belittling of the opponents of the theory.

Science motherfuckers, do you speak it?

You flat earth jokers use such limited science to try to debunk globe earth.

Then you try to limit God by saying that He didn't create an endless universe full of angels, that we call stars.