how to I test mining ?? through desktop wallet ? And how do i know if it is staking properly

I don't support altcoins. When/if Classic actually proposes a hardfork (no such proposal has been made yet) and it achieves consensus to replace Bitcoin (from the entire community, not merely some niche with an agenda), I will add support at that time.

(Also, people who support a reckless hardfork without consensus, ought to seriously consider whether they think the project can actually survive without any competent developers involved...)

και για ποιο λόγο να δωρίσει κάποιος έτσι 15btc?

Μα δεν έβαλε 6.5 fee αλλά 15btc Epic fail!

λάθος τι έχει γίνει εκεί?

ναι και τι είναι αυτο?

I got 6500 coins trying to stake for 48h and no stake and it looks like i never gonna stake.It seems like staking is reserved for top 10 and yes distribution is fucked.

Whenever I read /r/btc I feel like I'm reading /r/SandersForPresident.

Yes. We are working on all this. We are still nailing down the following:

1. Finalize branding, logos, etc., pay the bounty
2. Add enough Website Content to satisfy exchanges
3. Block explorer (probably fairglu's) -- this much of the list will get us on yobit and/or bleutrade
4. We need to decide on where to host the Qt wallets so we can track downloads (not mediafire)
5. Finalize the medium-term development road map
6. Get the whitepaper finished (post bleutrade/yobit, pre bittrex)

It seems like a straightforward list, but we have multiple devs and we have to reach consensus about every little thing.

Once we finalize all decisions, we should proceed through the list pretty fast, although we will pace 4 & 5 to ensure we spend enough time at the smaller exchanges before we move to the larger.

If it will be necessary to raise blocks then it will be, but better raise them later than now because i heard that many vulnerabilities could occur that way, which could endanger the system.

It needs way more testing, and a hard fork is hard to orchestrate and can hurt bitcoin very badly, so its only a last case scenario.

Segwit should increase the transaction capacity to ~180-190% (or even more depending on use cases). This is close enough to a 2 MB block size limit (keep in mind that there is no guarantee that miners won't use their soft limits again). An increase is most likely going to happen, the question is just when.

I'm a lot of things, but that is not one of them.

I assumed that you think that an increase will solve the 'problems'/prevent attacks such as the one that occurred yesterday (which is the case with a lot of people). It is good that you understand that it won't. However, a block size limit increase is not necessary right now as Segwit will be implemented first which should increase the transaction capacity of the network. Theoretically (considering how resourceful some people are) the blocks could be always full.

I never said such. However, I've seen a decent amount of 'people' complaining about /r/bitcoin and using /r/btc even though problems are present on both. Try posting something positive about Core on /r/btc and tell me what happens.

This is just a spam attack on the network, nothing more.

Γεια σας

Σήμερα παρατήρησα σε ένα S7 ότι ενώ έχω βάλει τις 3 προτεινόμενες διευθύνσεις του Antpool στο status βλέπω να έχει και μια τεταρτη και να λέει κάτι για usa hashnet και μια bitcoin address σαν worker name μπλα μπλα και να κάνει mining εκεί.....

Καμια ιδέα?

Ευχαριστώ