-snip- Incase we have seed phrases that are not compatible with different wallets, how do I see a complete seed phrase and identity the wallet that generated it?
To add to the above, pretty much all wallets use BIP39 to create wallets, with the exception of Electrum which has its own system[1]. You can still import BIP39 wallets to Electrum though, but an Electrum seed will only work with Bluewallet. [1] https://electrum.readthedocs.io/en/latest/seedphrase.html
|
|
|
You can set custom fees, under the "note to self" you can see how much sat per vByte you're going to pay. Just tap that and it'll give you the options: Fast, Medium, Slow and also Custom which opens a new dialog for you to write, but that's not going to save them, you have to set them each time you send, which makes sense, considering that the mempool's state changes. As for your current transaction, then you can always bump the fee: https://bluewallet.io/high-fees-and-transactions-pending-what-to-do/
|
|
|
If you somehow recorded your deposit address, then when you send your funds there, you will most likely receive them, and you will only be able to withdraw funds, since withdrawals will be available for previously registered users even after July 15, but other services will not be available.
you won't be able to withdraw your coins if you deposited by mistake to an old Kucoin address or will it not appear as a balance? If they accept deposits to old address and request KYC for withdrawals, then this will look different than: while withdrawals will remain unaffected, the announcement notes. This is from kucoin's blog article: For users who registered before July 15, 2023 (UTC), if their KYC is not completed, they will only be able to use services such as Spot trading sell orders, Futures trading deleveraging, Margin trading deleveraging, KuCoin Earn redemption, ETF redemption, and will not be able to use the deposit service (withdrawals are not impacted).
They will most likely reset the deposit addresses (at some point) otherwise what's the point? Because if they don't do that, and the sell orders and withdrawals remain unaffected, wouldn't that mean that users can still deposit using their previously generated addresses, sell and then withdraw these funds?
|
|
|
So we can officially say that there is no more non KYC exchanges for cryptocurrencies or still anything left?
This isn't a big surprise but Kucoin dragged this long to enforce the mandatory KYC requirements when all the other exchanges forced to make those changes years ago.
Question: so this will force the users who never want to comply KYC to use the decentralized exchanges and bring some real volume?
There are still a few ones[1] (which will probably follow the same path sooner or later) but I'm just not sure if they're any good, compared to the exchanges we lost recently (Kucoin, OKX, Bybit) in terms of liquidity, supported coins and network, fees, etc. [1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5414539.0
|
|
|
How much did you pay on fees? I don't believe that blockchain supports RBF so you probably can't do much aside from waiting. It would help if you could post the transaction ID.
Alternatively, you can try and use ViaBTC if your transaction fits their criteria.
|
|
|
Which site is this? I'm not that familiar with the Tron network, but I would imagine you're connected with Tronlink or some other wallet to do this staking? If so, don't you have to confirm whatever action you're trying to do, from the wallet?
|
|
|
كما كنت قد ذكرت في المنتدى الانجليزي منذ قليل، لقد انضمت منصة كوكوين لبقية المنصات التي تطلب توثيق الحسابات، هذا التغيير سوف يكون بداية من الخامس عشر من الشهر المقبل.
السحوبات لن تتأثر و يمكن للمستخدمين سحب أموالهم متى أرادو، لكن من الأفضل القيام بهذا الأمر الان ان كانت عندكم أموال في المنصة، لتفادي المشاكل في المستقبل في حال كان هنالك تغيير لسياستهم.
|
|
|
-snip- Quite right. Exchanges allow you to edit data that is not confirmed with real documents or selfies.
It's not all of them though. If my memory serves me correctly, Bittrex never allowed users to do that back when they enforced KYC so it's probably best to check with other individuals first.
|
|
|
Hello, please don't worry, we don't have this problem. All your trading liquidity is provided by us. There is no third-party situation. Moreover, the exchange is automatic and timely. There will be no stuck situations. If you have any worries, you can try a small conversion to understand our transaction status.
Understood. I have also noticed that none of your app links work properly, they're all redirecting to this page: Where there is nothing but a list of trading pairs. It's also unclear whether you provide spot trading or not. it looks like you do, but the "fees" and "about us" pages make it sound like you only have the instant exchange.
|
|
|
Hello, We truly appreciate your message about our service. The instant exchange function on the home page does not require KYC. Because it does not involve legal currency. There will be no audit issues. If you need to use the credit card to buy coins, you need to go through KYC verification. We encourage customers to use their own wallets. Perform currency exchange. The coins are all in your own wallet. So there is no such audit problem. Because the transaction is automatically processed by the system from time to time.
I think what Jerome was trying to ask is whether you're using a third-party service to provide liquidity, or all of the funds are yours, and if you've built this from scratch yourself. If you are using a third party, this would mean that they are the ones processing the transactions so if they decide to ask the user for KYC, the users have to comply. Correct? An example to give for this is wallets with built-in exchanges like Exodus, atomic wallet, etc. They have zero control over the swap feature, so if any issues arise, the wallet provider can't do anything and the user has to contact the third-party service.
|
|
|
Their site mentions that the protocol has been verified by multiple auditing firms, but nothing links to the audit. There's also no mention of any auditing in their Twitter page.
So as mentioned above, it's probably not worth the risk and you shouldn't be fooled by the founders sharing a picture of their faces either.
|
|
|
لقد تم اعتقال 50 شخص صيني الجنسية في ليبيا (مدينة زليتن) بتهمة تشغيل مزعة تعدين للبيتكوين منذ ثلاثة أيام[1] (و الذي يعتبر أمر غير قانوني في البلد) كما يبدو أن السلطات بصدد التحقيق في أمر مزارع اخرى في العاصمة طرابلس و كذلك مصراتة. ما هي أرائكم حول هذا الموضوع؟ المقال لم يذكر الكثير من المعلومات حول المزعة أو أرباحها الخ لكن أفترض أنها كانت مزرعة كبيرة نظرا لعدد المعتقلين. [1] https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/libya-chinese-nationals-arrested-mining-cryptocurrency
|
|
|
I wouldn't consider anything on this list valid collateral. I don't think anyone cares about KYC, since people can buy these, probably for less than 900$. It's about the ability to sell the collateral if necessary.
So if lend you 900$ and you decide to not repay me, can I resell the Coinbase account for 900$? obviously not.
Verified accounts are probably riskier than anything else because if the account is verified using your real identity, you can always claim it back.
|
|
|
AFAIK, most exchanges pretty much use the same third party to provide on and off-ramp services. KuCoin, Bitget, Binance, ByBit, etc. all seem to use Simplex or Banxa so there's probably not that much difference between them.
How about using Interac-e or Wire transfers? Not an option?
|
|
|
Hi. No - I am not promoting anything. According to your involvement I guess capitalwallet is not trustworthy. They work like this: Broker shows me ther USDT account number linked to them - I deposit USDT to that account. There is no need to open an account as far as I know (Because it shows me a spesific USDT address). Does not matter where I purchase USDT from - it is what I know. With account I mean USDT address.
I'm not saying they're scammers. I haven't tried them myself so I could definitely be wrong, but it's just the way that the user was promoting them. But the way you described this whole process sounds like the service you want to deposit funds to, is just using Capital wallet as a payment processor so I don't think you would have any issues in that case (if you trust this broker you're referring to)
|
|
|
I'm not sure if this is just your way to promote Capitalwallet like this user did a few months back[1] or if you really want to know, but assuming the latter, do you trust whoever you're sending the funds to? What do you mean by they allow capital wallet for payments? Do you need to make an account there and deposit funds? or you're paying for a service that uses Capitalwallet as a payment processor?
Now regarding your second question. If you're from Turkey, you can just make an account on OKX, and buy using your card. Or if you want to use wire transfers, you can try their P2P platform. [1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5259548.msg61345763#msg61345763
|
|
|
|