Thanks! However I don't see myself in the campaign spreadsheet. Can you fix it?

Just left the seller a negative feedback on selling hacked account. However since I'm not in the default trust, I'll remove the feedback once a trusted member give him a negative trust.

$50 card is 10BTC?! I think you mean $10 inBTC. Please fix it.
Also, you have a typo (bolded), and please fix it.

It is because the stress test is in progress and block 363266 is an empty block, making many tx stuck there... BTW today will be a memorable day because of this record, stating that bitcoin is at a new level!

If you don't want any you-think-trolls (however they aren't - just you think we are) to post in your thread, you may start a self-moderated topic, and normally no one will post in your thread and only serious ones will post. However I think that there mustn't be anyone lending you that much.So what?

Me too... I supposed to have my payout from my sig. campaign few hours ago, however it is still unconfirmed until I've sent my transaction with extra fees (I've paid 20000 satoshis for just a 3xx byte tx!) and the sig. campaign's payment and my payment confirms in the same block, with my tx just after the sig. campaign's tx (so all the participants should thank me for paying extra fees to let their tx to be confirmed ). I think such tests should stop immediately, and none of them should be carried anymore. Please stop spamming the blockchain.

He alwayd asked me to give him a trust after he gives me a loan.
Below are the 2 PMs that he give me:
I've just left him a neutral feedback regarding this.

First, your account don't worth 0.5.
Second, BTCJam account isn't a valid collateral.
Third, because you have negative feedback, you won't get the loan for invalid collaterals.
Please don't spam the forum with false loan requests.

Today, there is a stress test on bitcoin, and lots of transactions have been made (>7k unconfirmed as of the time of writing), however there are still empty block: https://blockchain.info/block/0000000000000000088390da860e3624e9c6f3162dcce3f2f166bb371e018de7 (height=363266). So I don't think empty blocks should exist as they make people waiting for confirmations wait even longer!

Nope, there is still a pool mining empty block now See block 363266 (link: https://blockchain.info/block/0000000000000000088390da860e3624e9c6f3162dcce3f2f166bb371e018de7)
I don't know why while there are so many unconfirmed transactions, but they still mine empty blocks!!!

In my personal experience, I've started my cloud mining from my very first faucet earnings. However the ROi period is long, so I've cashed out my GHS and stopped my cloud mining that time. However, since I have extra coins from my signature campaign, I've invested in two sites now and I have about 32 GHS of hashing power now.However, mining is now not a efficient way to earn bitcoins, though it was few years ago. In my opinion, cloud mining is better than equipment (if the site is safe and not scam), because you don't need to manage the equipment yourself.

Nope, not all ponzi get popular. Many of the newly emerged ponzis are being identified and people won't invest in it at the beginning. What I could say is scrypt.cc's owner is very lucky. Less than 1 in 1000 ponzis could become as successful as scrypt.cc.

That's not only @freebee. The 2nd jackpot, which target is also 0.00, the winner @ohyeah also made a 101 satoshi bet to win the 0.56BTC jackpot. Perhaps they are going to fix the positive expected value that makes them loss???

I've noticed that the minimum amount for getting 40% of the jackpot changed from 100 satoshi to 1000 satoshi. Is this true, or it is just a mistake of the jackpot FAQ? Because the last jackpot win is a 101 satoshi bet while winning 40% of the jackpot.

I think that Chile should win the match, because, first, by fifa.com, Chile's global ranking is at 19th while that of Peru is at 61st. Second, Chile is the 'home' team (because they're hosting the Copa America) while Peru is 'Away'. Home team have an advantage because of stadium/climate/fans' support etc.

The trust ratings from DefaultTrust (depth 2) matters because they affect the value of the account and it will affect the reputation because a 'Warning! Trade with extreme caution' tag will appear at the profile and the user's posts if they have negative feedback from trusted members. However almost no one will care on 'Untrusted feedback' (i.e. feedback from people not from DefaultTrust's trust list), especially for those have no reference and stating fake things/trolling.

A Jr. only worth 0.005-0.01. What is your budget on the account? You can get a Sr. for 0.2BTC. Also, by 0.04BTC you could get a low quality Full Member (which normally worth 0.05) or a high activity Member.

Someone have marked your account as purchased/hacked/stolen. Also as of your rank, it is not worth for someone to risk 0.017 because the depreciation of the account due to negative trust don't go to that amount. However when you're a Sr. Member, then the depreciation reaches that amount (assuming that the account haven't been marked as purchased/hacked/stolen). I have loaned 0.015 here with no collateral successfully only by offering a 33% interest. Also as your account have a 'Untrusted' negative feedback (not DefaultTrust), even if you offering this as collateral, myself won't lend you 0.017 because it don't worth the risk.

I used to refuse any site that requires me to make a 2FA security setting, because I'm using the sites on my phone while I need to scan the QR code also using my phone... Until a site which force me to add 2FA, so I've been started to use the secret key option of the app (while I don't have to scan the QR code).

BTW, will the forum start the 2FA with the QR code one, or the forum will give the username+secret key to us to input?

After you reached the Full Member rank, go here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=avatar and you can add/change your avatar. However if someone lower than Full Member enter that page, it will show up an error.