Bitcoin Forum
May 17, 2024, 12:45:54 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 [86] 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 ... 639 »
1701  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Do You trust Tether (USDT) Stablecoin? on: February 19, 2023, 12:13:28 PM
As it stands right now, USDT has withstood the test of time and trouble, so yes, I would trust it. Next up is USDC and then maybe BUSD

USDT may be old, but that doesn't mean it's going to last forever. After all, it's a centralized stablecoin. If the issuing company is unable to deliver as promised, then USDT will lose its peg for good. Basically, any centralized stablecoin is at risk of going all way down the drain. If it's not backed by the US government, don't count on retaining its stability anytime soon.

You'd be better off selling your crypto to USD directly for complete peace of mind. It seems that regulators will tighten their stance against stablecoins, so maybe there's hope after all? Just my opinion Smiley
1702  Economy / Economics / Re: Economic implications of a US-China-Taiwan conflict on: February 19, 2023, 12:05:34 PM
I find it hard to assess whether time is running in favor of China or not. In the end China is highly dependent on a well functioning global economy, but if every country is now investing heavily in military equipment and defense, there is less money to be spent on Chinese products as well.

Today at the security conference in Munich China emphasized that territorial integrity is to be respected by everyone in the world, but that was also implying that Taiwan actually is a part of China and they would only take back what belongs to them anyway. They will now also start a peace initiative regarding Russia and Ukraine, but they haven't really specified what that is going to look like. It didn't sound very convincing and the US made clear that they have their doubts. As far as I know it was quite a heated debate between Chinese representatives and US representatives.

China needs the world's support to help sustain its economy. Otherwise, it will be the end of its "empire" for good. For what I know, this could all be drama between the world's biggest superpowers (China and the US). It's not about words, but rather the actions they take in real life. And so far, there's no indication there will be a conflict between the two countries over Taiwan anytime soon.

Depending on how the Russo-Ukraine war ends, China will decide whenever to proceed with its ambitions of invading Taiwan or leave everything as is. For the sake of the entire planet, it's best for China to remain in peace with both Taiwan and the US. Otherwise, WW3 will go full speed ahead. No one can predict the future, so we can only hope for the best. Just my opinion Smiley
1703  Economy / Speculation / Re: What will happen to BTC price if the US defaults? on: February 19, 2023, 12:01:54 PM
There are a bunch of candidates as replacement and Euro is not among them. In fact in the future Europe's economy falls apart faster and worse than US economy as it is already evident from the inflation, recession and deindustrialization going on in the two continents.
Unfortunately one of the biggest replacement options seems to be Yuan! Then it would be China that abuses its power an ruins the world instead of US...

I can't imagine the Chinese Yuan becoming the next reserve currency in the world. It will give unfantomable power to China beyond comprehension. If that happens, China will rule the world. I don't think the USD will get out of its current position without a fight. Nothing lasts forever, so it's likely the world will have another reserve currency in the future (hopefully it won't be the Yuan).

What will that mean for Bitcoin, is an excellent question. The crypto market is tied to the USD (although many coins can be traded for other Fiat currencies), so a collapse of the USD might boost prices all the way to the moon. BTC would probably be in the "millions" if that happens. We're still early to the game, so why not keep buying and "holding" BTC to plan ahead for the future? Just my thoughts Grin
1704  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Is it worth staking stablecoins? on: February 18, 2023, 09:29:15 PM
Stablecoin is centralized, if you don't fear the risk of holding a stable coin, why don't you use an intermediary exchange to stake? I mean, if you already trust USDT and USDC, then there's no reason you shouldn't trust Binance, Binance is still more reliable than both of those stablecoins. If you want daily passive income, then you can stake, but if you are willing to hold for long term profit, bitcoin will be better choice. Even though I still use USDT, I don't feel safe using them long-term.

Binance is good, but with the SEC targeting Kraken for providing staking services, I'm afraid other crypto exchanges will begin closing their doors to US-based customers. The only solution would be decentralized staking through "De-Fi" lending protocols such as Compound.Finance and Curve Finance. These platforms are safe enough to stake stablecoins long-term (so far), but I'd proceed with caution, especially when stablecoins could easily lose their peg in an instant.

At least, staking on "De-Fi" pays better than saving money in a bank. The rewards are higher, but the risk of loss is also higher. You'd need to make a balance just to prevent losing everything "in a blink of an eye". With money still flowing across "De-Fi", adoption will continue to grow at a slow and steady rate. Who knows if "De-Fi" will challenge "Ce-Fi" in the future? Smiley
1705  Economy / Economics / Re: How much longer until paper money is no longer in circulation? on: February 18, 2023, 09:18:34 PM
Paper money will definitely be phased out but not because the government invented some CBDC bs but rather because its old world money. What we are going towards is a future of Bitcoin and crypto. CBDC will merely be one out of many options and it definitely will not be the prominent one.

People and even governments are starting to understand that Bitcoin is the next generation of money and once it is globally adopted, we will see a new future of finance.

Even the government acknowledged this simple fact indirectly by attempting to copy Bitcoin with their own version.

We're in the 21st century, where everything is heading towards complete digitalization. The advent of computers, the Internet, smartphones, and crypto/Blockchain tech should lead us to a cashless society within the not-so-distant future. Change is inevitable whenever you like it or not. Paper money is known to transmit diseases, and harm the environment. A full-fledged digital currency solves this. Not only a digital currency would eliminate the need to print money, but it will also enable governments and central banks to have better control over your transactions. The transition from paper money to a CBDC would be a slow and steady one, as there's a lot of people who don't want to change their old ways.

Who needs CBDCs when we already have stablecoins, anyways? They serve the exact same purpose of digital Fiat. If you want the full experience of using a digital Fiat currency (especially the USD), then stablecoins are for you. But if you want complete control of your money, then Bitcoin would be your only choice. Who knows how our economic landscape will look like decades from now? Just my opinion Smiley
1706  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Will FTX make a comeback? on: February 18, 2023, 08:55:20 PM
It seems SBF is not alone in trying to bring back FTX. After all, he seems to be treated more as a baby than a criminal. It seems like powerful personalities are trying to assemble back FTX for him. Well, without necessarily bringing back the customers whole again. He should be incarcerated right now. Instead, he's probably Netflixing and browsing the net.

Anyway, Binance was also involved in a hacking incident, a KYC leak, kicked out from certain countries, even investigated for possible criminal violations, and others and yet it remains to be the top exchange today. So I would not be surprised if a relaunched FTX would also rise to glory once more. We never learn our lessons.

Binance may have suffered a series of unfortunate events, but that hasn't stopped it from being the largest crypto exchange in the world because it has a lot of money in its reserves. It can do anything it wants. Not like FTX, where it lost everything it had after the FTT crash. I believe all empires will eventually fall, so we may be witnessing the collapse of Binance in a distant future. Who cares about centralized exchanges if crypto was designed to be free from middleman? It's a "Peer to Peer Electronic Cash System" after all.

The constant failures of centralized exchanges, tells us it's time to look for decentralized alternatives that are much safer and reliable for day-to-day use. DEXs may have their set of issues now, but they're at least a solution for those wanting to trade big amounts of crypto without worrying about having their funds disappear overnight. With or without FTX, crypto will be here to stay for a long, long time. Just my thoughts Grin
1707  Economy / Speculation / Re: What will happen to BTC price if the US defaults? on: February 18, 2023, 08:50:10 PM
I remember 20 years ago, before I invested or was involved in anything market related, they posted some debt/per person in the USA and it was crazy high. That was 20 years ago. People were saying that they had no choice but to default, did they?

No and they won't default anytime soon. They will just keep raising the debt limit and keep printing money. I don't think anyone wants them to default. It'll create more suffering than we already have. Plus the bonds are not showing any proof of defaults yet.

The US can't keep raising the debt ceiling forever. There's a limit to everything. If they keep doing it, the American economy would be vulnerable to hyperinflation. That would mean a weaker USD within the not-so-distant future. It would be best for the US to pay its national debt first, before thinking of raising the debt ceiling.

Whatever happens, I think BTC will win in the long run thanks to the way it was designed. Deflation counteracts inflation, so technically, BTC price should go up in the long term. As more USD are added in circulation, its value will depreciate over time. That would be Bitcoin's opportunity to shine. Considering that Fiat currencies are a disaster right now, it's very likely Bitcoin will reach $1m as predicted. Who knows if we become the next Bitcoin millionaires? Just my opinion Smiley
1708  Economy / Economics / Re: Economic implications of a US-China-Taiwan conflict on: February 18, 2023, 08:46:56 PM
How to put this? May be the war rumors is actually a rumor to keep things tidy and neat for the years to come. Most of the USA's import is coming from China and most of the world's leading brands are relying on China for their virtually unlimited workforce. How cheap other countries can go when they have to finish the work? There are multi national companies which already have biggest conglomerates with the US base and China base together. They definitely have bigger commercial relationships rather than political one's. The war can broke out for any dumb reason and that's not the point here. But USA knows very well they have more than 50% reliance on the China's assets which includes raw materials as well.

I might be speaking in terms of commercial aspects here but let us not forget, world revolves around the money and money only trades when you have real stuff to sell.

Whenever brands like Tesla, Apple, Microsoft tried to move their giant manufacturing faculties elsewhere they were first slammed by various rules and regulations. However, china is country with only one goal and thats to produce and get those dollar funds in their treasury. The dominance is huge.

It's like both the ends are tieing the knot and no one wants to let go. War? Pretty sure its gonna take while.

There are big economic interests between the USA and China, so the prospects of a full blown war are very low. I think China will wait until the end Russo-Ukraine war, to make a move. If Ukraine wins, then China will think twice before deciding to invade Taiwan. But if Ukraine loses, then it's likely China will proceed as planned. It seems that Ukraine is winning, so don't count on the US entering a conflict with China over Taiwan anytime soon.

Let's hope things will settle down by 2024, so the world can get back to the way it was. Peace, prosperity, and health to all of humanity. Otherwise, it'll be the end for good. Who knows what the future holds for all of us? Just my thoughts Grin
1709  Economy / Services / Re: [Crypto.Games] ★ Signature Campaign ★ Hero - Legendary[Full] ★ on: February 18, 2023, 08:43:14 PM
Paid

Received. Thanks a lot! Grin
1710  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Is it worth staking stablecoins? on: February 16, 2023, 10:31:10 AM
honestly staking stablecoin at this point just not worth it because everyone else also wants to stake theirs that it makes the apy relatively lower, basically it's just enough to combat inflation but not enough to actually make real profit, if you think you only want to combat the inflation then maybe this is for you but if you want to generate profit then forget it already.

That's the way the algorithm works. The more people are staking, the lower your returns will be. But if there are more people borrowing than those lending (staking), rates will be higher than usual. At least, you'll be earning more than just saving your money in a bank. If you choose a good "De-Fi" platform that's audited by a security firm, then your coins will be safe for years on end. That depends if you follow the necessary security precautions to protect your coins against hacks and/or theft. "De-Fi" comes with a lot of risks, so I'd advise anyone to proceed with caution.

I think I'm better off staking stablecoins on "De-Fi" apps running on the ETH blockchain. It's a much safer bet than placing all of my hard-earned money on competing chains. "De-Fi" apps are constantly being improved by devs, so I wouldn't be surprised if it challenges "Ce-Fi" sometime in the future. Who knows how far this industry will go? Just my thoughts Grin
1711  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Rumors that US SEC would like to ban crypto staking on: February 16, 2023, 10:26:21 AM
Yeah for now it's just a ban on centralized staking, like Kraken and Coinbase did. It doesn't affect liquid staking service like Lido and solo staking for now, but who knows. It's unlikely but the SEC might be going for them too in the future.

In fact, the market is taking this as a good news for liquid staking tokens (e.g. LDO, RPL). This news, along with the upcoming Shanghai update, was the catalyst for the brief pump a few days ago although most of the upside has been retraced now.

They will begin by targetting every centralized exchange that provides staking services to US-based customers. Then, they will escalate to decentralized staking protocols by imposing a fine to the original developers of the project. That is if they're able to successfully identify such developers. Just because it's "decentralized", doesn't mean it's immune from government interference. Only a combination of decentralized and censorship-resistant techniques would render governments' efforts worthless.

I'm afraid there will be more pain ahead for crypto-related businesses in the US. If regulatory pressure continues, there will be an exodus of US-based crypto companies to other regions of the world. Maybe it's time for the UK or El Salvador to become the next crypto hub for businesses to blossom? I wouldn't worry much about the SEC, as long as crypto/Blockchain tech remains decentralized and censorship-resistant. Just my opinion Smiley
1712  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Will FTX make a comeback? on: February 16, 2023, 10:18:30 AM
First of all, we need to understand that FTX scammed all of us and the scammers usually do not return our money. So if anyone thinks that SBF or ftx will return all this money , it Is not going to happen.

The game plan by the scammers can be that they will want to re-enter in the market with a promise to again make an exchange and later return people money. I hope people do not believe thier false promises if they ever come up with such a plan to regain customers confidence and also again start collecting money from the people.

If investors join themselves to form a class action lawsuit, then SBF would be forced to "make them whole again" one way or the other. That's if they win the case in a court of law. But I don't think FTX will ever make a comeback since its reputation is already destroyed. No investor would trust anything related with "FTX". A re-branding would be the only path forward for the exchange's revival plan.

I wouldn't care more or less about FTX, since we have many alternatives to choose from. The recent series of unfortunate events only made Binance bigger and stronger than ever. But that doesn't mean it's immune from collapsing sometime in the future. All of the centralized exchanges could disappear overnight for unknown reasons, so it's best to only deposit the amount of coins you're willing to trade just to be safe. Who knows if decentralized exchanges win at the end? Just my thoughts Grin
1713  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Monero to PoS? on: February 16, 2023, 10:13:50 AM
With the SEC targeting exchanges for allowing staking you never know what might happen in the future with the POS hype train, the developers will be reviewing that development and hopefully will not make a bad decision on moving to POS that might make them easier for the authorities to target a privacy centric project.

The SEC can target centralized staking easily, but it's going to have a hard time doing the same with "De-Fi" staking platforms. They might try to go after developers, though. But their chances of success would be low, especially if developers of the project are anonymous. I'd say the recent actions of a US government agency would only stifle the growth of the crypto industry in the long run. They've gone against mixers, and now they're going after centralized staking. What makes you think they won't go after privacy coins too?

Monero would be better off focusing on censorship-resitance by staying a PoW coin forever. It could last a lifetime if it follows Bitcoin's footsteps. Even if developers defect to PoS, there's nothing stopping the community from rejecting changes to the code or simply creating a new hard fork that would continue PoW mining. Who knows if Monero lives alongside Bitcoin and other oldies for generations? Just my opinion Smiley
1714  Economy / Speculation / Re: What will happen to BTC price if the US defaults? on: February 16, 2023, 10:07:59 AM
They are not going to default, they will do what they have been doing all this time when the nation debt sets a new record, they just increase the debt ceiling and continue printing more dollars.

The only thing that is concerning is the world dumping US dollar which means all the trillions and trillions of dollars they have been printing without it being backed by anything is coming back to America and will become a tsunami hitting US economy.
In which case US will experience Venezuela like hyper inflation but on steroids and it would the time for every American to buy as much bitcoin as they can to flee the sinking ship. That means there is this possibility that bitcoin price could reach levels that we can not imagine now.

I could imagine how easy it is to raise the debt ceiling when the whole world depends on the US Dollar as its reserve currency. This may be more of a drama than anything else. It's likely the US will never default during our lifetimes, especially when most countries depend on the US Dollar. The de-Dollarization process would be a slow and steady one to say the least. You can bet Bitcoin will rise astronomically in price if the USD weakens by a large margin. But when this happens, the world would probably be using another currency (Euro, perhaps?) as its reserve currency.

American decline is happening before our very eyes, so it should only be a matter of time before the US is no longer a superpower. Let's see how Bitcoin will hold off in the long run. Just my thoughts Grin
1715  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Does Bitcoin have life span? on: February 15, 2023, 12:35:14 AM
Fiat currencies have existed for many centuries, and gold has been valued for even longer. Everything has some sort of life span, but it can be long enough to neglect that at some point it will end. The world is changing very fast, and it's really hard to predict where it's going. I don't see why Bitcoin wouldn't prosper in the next several decades, but if something major happens like a quantum computing breakthrough or a global crisis which makes widespread usage of the Internet and electricity impossible, then of course Bitcoin will go away along with lots of other things. Digitalization hasn't been going for long enough to see if it's just a phase in humanity's development or a long-term thing. But if the Internet is staying, I think cryptos are staying as well, including Bitcoin.

Fiat and Gold ain't going anywhere soon, so why should Bitcoin disappear in an instant? After all, Bitcoin is decentralized and censorship-resistant. The economic model of Bitcoin is deflationary, so it should technically increase in price over time. Demand for BTC will never go away, especially when it's the one cryptocurrency that started the "Blockchain craze".

There's no technology that is as revolutionary as Blockchain, so don't expect Bitcoin to die within our lifetimes. Maybe someday it will beat Fiat for good? Just my opinion Smiley
1716  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Will FTX make a comeback? on: February 14, 2023, 11:30:16 PM
Many exchanges fake volume and this was already done by the Chinese like Huobi in 2014, so I bet FTX was messing around with it too.

They had a lot of deposits but mostly from people they lured into the scam by paying them like Tom Brady who got paid to promote it and moved his own money into the exchange thinking it to be legit.

A few days ago I heard they even own money to Netflix. I don't know what that company was doing with FTX but that's apparently a fact. Binance also helped them a lot by investing and promoting them which pumped the exchange more than it should. Many people are guilty here like O'leary and CNBC who kept talking about the generous billionaire all the time.

FTX is dead, it should stay that way and shady people involved in these scams should be avoided like a plague.

FTX should never rise back to glory after betraying its customers. It should stay defunct, paving the way for other crypto exchanges to take over the industry. If it does come back alive, it would be a "miracle" especially when a lot of investors lost trust in it. In crypto land, we should expect the unexpected. Either FTX comes back under a new name, or another crypto exchange or company takes it out of bankruptcy by purchasing its assets.

We can blame Binance for dumping all FTT tokens on the market. What makes you think it won't do the same with other exchange-related tokens in the future?CZ would be capable of doing anything to prevent Binance from losing market dominance. History is known to repeat itself, so I wouldn't be surprised if another big exchange collapses sometime in the future. Just my thoughts Grin
1717  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Monero to PoS? on: February 14, 2023, 11:27:06 PM

Monero guys are the guys who are more concerned about security and privacy. Since POS fails to provide both of these, the consensus will not win to go for POS.

The government is trying to crack XMR so if they switch POS, this is like selling the users in this network.  It would be the end of it and they will dump XMR once this happens.

I really hope so. Else, everything Monero has achieved up to this date will be gone for good. PoS is pure centralization, so I doubt XMR would want to follow the footsteps of other altcoins such as ETH and BNB. If Monero wants to be as strong and resilient as Bitcoin, then it would have no other choice but to remain a PoW cryptocurrency forever. XMR can already be mined by CPUs and GPUs, so energy consumption would be minimal compared to mining with ASICs (if I'm not wrong). Even if PoW consumes a lot of energy, miners can simply rely on renewable energy sources to help protect the environment.

Ultimately, the community will decide the path forward for the Monero project. If there's disagreement among peers, then it's likely there will be a new hard fork that will make use of PoS. Just keep mining XMR as usual. Who knows if you'll get lucky someday? Just my opinion Smiley
1718  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Is it worth staking stablecoins? on: February 14, 2023, 10:20:52 PM
Every gain that it gives is worth it. But most of these platforms have their own risks based on the security that they have. If it's for these De-Fi apps, they're mostly being targeted and sometimes, a bug can be seen and abused by users.
When it happens, the funds are being sucked by those abusers and then if they're hacked, you don't expect something in return through a refund because, at most times, they don't have a reserve. As for the other options, the best possible other options you can make is to convert it to bitcoin.

The fact that there's no way to claim stolen/hacked funds alone, makes me quite skeptical about "De-Fi". But adding a third-party to help solve this, would greatly "De-Fi's" original purpose of "being your own bank". I guess that's the cost you pay for decentralization and censorship-resistance. It will be up to you to DYOR regarding the "De-Fi" app you're willing to deposit stablecoins into, before regretting yourself in the long run.

If the code of the smart contract has not been audited by a reputable security company, then the risk of losing your funds would be extremely high. Even those smart contracts that are audited, have their own set of issues (nothing's perfect anyways). I'd cash out my stablecoin profits as quickly as I can to help prevent losing it all in an instant. Who knows if "De-Fi" improves over time until it becomes a "force to reckon with"? Just my thoughts Grin
1719  Economy / Economics / Re: Economic implications of a US-China-Taiwan conflict on: February 14, 2023, 10:13:05 PM
Economic implications?  If any of the big world powers end up in a war, economics might come down to how many cockroaches you can scrounge up to feed whatever is left of your family, assuming any of us are alive at the end of said war.

But before the nukes start flying, I'd expect severe sanctions to be imposed on all sides, just like with Russia.  As far as the US is concerned, if China were to impose sanctions like that, it'd cripple our economy (or at least put a big ding in it).  I'm hoping none of this happens--for the sake of generations to come, because a war between China and the US would probably wind up as a full-blown world war, and as you probably all are aware we've got much more powerful weapons now than during the last world war.

And yet we have all of these UFOs flying around....kinda makes you wonder if the rumors Abiky referenced are true.  I don't suspect they're from outer space; they're probably Chinese spy-things gathering intel.  Ugh.

I don't think it's in both the US and China's best interests to start a war. It would cause a major blow to the global economy. China's economy has been severely affected because of the pandemic and the Russo-Ukraine war, so I'd expect it to delay its plans to invade Taiwan by a few more years. But if it does happen by 2025 as predicted, then all hell will break loose. The Chinese spying satellite tells us China has ambitions to conquer the world. It is analyzing each country's weaknesses to make a move in the future. Maybe the "New World Order" is upon us (with China and Russia ruling the world)?

I've seen the global situation worsen ever since the COVID-19 pandemic began in 2020. One catastrophe after the other is happening before our every eyes. First it was COVID-19, then the Russo-Ukraine war, and now a possible conflict between the world's leading superpowers. I hope things go back to normal soon, but it seems we're heading into a new reality. I'd be surprised if the US no longer exists in the future due to the accelerating rate of American decline. Who knows what lies ahead for the rest of hunanity? Just my opinion Smiley
1720  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Is it worth staking stablecoins? on: February 13, 2023, 04:14:27 PM
I have some USDT and USDC in my portfolio that I'd want to stake in a "De-Fi" dApp without worrying about it in a long time. There are liquidity pools in Uniswap with attractive stake rates, but there's also Compound.Finance with its lending services. Both of these platforms are built on the ETH blockchain, so gas fees would be astronomically high. I've read about some platforms being compatible with Polygon (MATIC), but I'd have yet to see if it's worth the shot (especially in terms of security/reliability).

Do you know the safest way to stake stablecoins without breaking the bank? Also, do you think it's worth it? Or should I consider other options? Any suggestions and/or recommendations would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance. Smiley
Pages: « 1 ... 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 [86] 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 ... 639 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!