If that is your preference then I suggest you give away a large portion of ETH. I think BNB and XRP are the blue chips for crypto but seeing the news about the conflict between SEC and Binance I think it's going to be a bit of a stretch. XRP is also subject to a lawsuit from the SEC though I don't really know how that goes. But what I do know is that these 2 tokens are in trouble with the SEC and this is not looking good.

thats true seeing current circumstance of solana just doesn't seem like its gonna be rising anytime soon.
moreover it has rather been stagnant for quite some time.
the fact that some API providers are closing their service just means maybe the development in the solana blockchain isn't that great.
moreover I think it will be kept overshadowed by newer blockchain emerging though the fact that its market capitalisation still great stands still.

Have you noticed that everything in the crypto industry that offers decentralization, fast transactions and cheap fees is extremely unpopular. I've always wondered why this is the case and people are increasingly drawn to networks that violate the main principles of cryptocurrency, i.e. they are centralized, they are expensive and they are not the fastest. BNB and ETH are the most prominent examples of such non-ideal networks, but at the same time have such a huge impact on the entire crypto industry.

After seeing a discussion in this thread about the level of support for bitcoin adoption in El Salvador, I decided to look for some stats data. Surprisingly, I found publications only about two surveys. One was carried out immediately, back in 2021, and the percentage of disapproval of such a decision was at the level of 67.9%. Last autumn, the same institute conducted another survey, the level of disapproval of accepting bitcoin as a legal tender was still very high, 65.5%. And this despite the fact that the level of approval of Bukele himself was 87% last year.

I thought the government's efforts to spread the word about bitcoin were doing more. It would be interesting to see how the opinion of the Salvadorans has changed this year, because after all, there is a lot of good news related to bitcoin from this country. I hope Salvadorans see the benefits of bitcoin before Bukele leaves office.

Some shitcoin somehow rank the top, tron is one of those. Inspite of top coin, tron is pure shitcoin. It has lots of facilities, blockchain, fast transaction with low fee and all facilities that a potential altcoin shoud have but inspite of that, it is shitcoin. No development, no progress.  Just people including me, using tron network for low transaction fee. Otherwise it get vanished yet. Dont expect anything from it

It may sound ironic but to this day I still prefer to use BUSD instead Tether when comes to stablecoins. Even when getting sued by the SEC, BUSD has managed to keep its peg and continues to deliver FIAT in exchange of their tokens in a reliable way, that is specially remarkable considering it is a coin which is not allowed to print more tokens as the lawsuit against them does not resolve.  The circulating supply continues to decrease and the peg holding its place can be translated to a positive future for this stable-coin in the case Paxos proves BUSD is not a unregistered security whatsoever.

BUSD to this day has proven that was always fully backed.

I have only been into XRP for 2-3 months and I haven't sold yet.

Even I have been left feeling ‘is that it?’ as it didn't even 2x in price after everyone saying it will 5-10x once they win the case. It has even been relisted on Coinbase and that doesn't seem to have done anything.

I will continue holding and wont sell any until I 3x my money at least which would mean XRP going to $1.25.

If I had been buying the last 2 years like many have then I would be disappointed with the outcome so far but I do think we will see another pump soon and eventually get past $1.

Why I think that Dogecoin will go that far?

It's the most beloved of the community ever since the pop up of these meme coins. Maybe you haven't seen Dogecoin in the past, it's a fun coin that everybody loves.

But maybe, not you and you haven't really seen its existence even before. The majority of these meme coins will be gone but Doge will stay.

PS: I don't hold Dogecoin.

Circulating supply is an important issue in the cryptocurrency world. A project circulating supply represents the total number of coins or tokens available on the market and actively circulated among investors. This directly affects the value and market capitalization of cryptocurrencies. We know that low supply creates scarcity in the market which causes the price to rise and more supply can lower the value of the token meaning demand decreases. Investors often consider supply trends when evaluating a cryptocurrency growth potential and determining its attractiveness as an investment. However, other factors such as the project underlying technology, use cases and overall market conditions should be analyzed and then invested in instead of relying solely on the advertised supply.

Altcoins being used mostly for speculation purpose. The fact that if altcoin is also having another usefulness like give native coin user a cheap way to send their money. I remind you how expensive the bitcoin and ethereum transactions are. That's why altcoin gives alternative way for people to send or receive their money with lesser fees compared used native blockchain like bitcoin or ethereum.

Using the blockchain as cloud storage is not really scalable. NFT protocols don't actually store images directly and instead what you are paying for is proof that you own something that is outside of the blockchain. There's been some instances where people's NFTs disappeared from their wallet because Metamask couldn't connect to a third party API. As long as you are relying on centralized databases then their is no guarantee that your NFT will last forever.

Tron has been existing as far back as 2017 when it first launched on Ethereum network before it migrated to its mainnet. But it's total supply is too huge to have a growth recorded by chain that launched after it with limited low supply like Solana. Polygon MATIc with a total Supply of 10 Billion coins and huge utilities even finds it difficult to go above $3 let alone less used chain like TRON network with too huge supply.

Couple of hours ago there is in news on Twitter saying BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) are developing a new currency. It was mentioned by State Duma Deputy Chairmen btw.

As I can see all these things to manipulate BTC right? What are your thoughts about this?

We don't have to wait in the long run, we have seen that it's already a failed experiment, and it just created chaos in the bitcoin blockchain and even created this 'schism' environment. Devs, miners not in conjunction. And for sure even for us investors, specially average joe as it really affected the transaction fee. It is very expensive now, more than in 2017 height of the bull run.

I dont think matic can goes to $20 even in the next bullish cycle. There are so many interesting project like polygon. The 10 billion total coin also whats holding it below $10. Maybe 2030 when matic burn a lot because of its gas fees also with the dollar hyperinflation.

The circulating supply of a cryptocurrency is just one factor to consider when evaluating a project. While a low circulating supply may create scarcity and potentially impact the price dynamics, it should not be the sole determining factor in your investment decision.

Bitcoin isn’t going to close the bracket between the rich and the poor. Today bitcoin is $23,000, it’s not exactly affordable for the poor to buy at this time, only those who were smart enough to seize the opportunity to buy bitcoin in the early days are the lucky ones. Read the bitcoin whitepaper, Bitcoin doesn’t solve the poverty problem, it provides a safe haven from censorship and government control, unfortunately people are more concerned with making profits than using bitcoin as a currency.

Payment sent

Meme coins, characterized by their viral or humorous nature, have gained popularity in the cryptocurrency market. However, their long-term future is uncertain and highly speculative. Here are a few factors to consider:

Volatility and Risk: Meme coins are often highly volatile, subject to rapid price fluctuations influenced by social media trends and hype. This volatility can result in significant gains or losses. It's essential to be prepared for the inherent risk associated with such coins.

Lack of Fundamental Value: Meme coins typically lack fundamental value or utility beyond their meme status. Unlike established cryptocurrencies that serve specific purposes or offer technological innovations, meme coins primarily rely on social sentiment and speculative trading.

Regulatory Concerns: The rise of meme coins has attracted regulatory scrutiny due to potential risks associated with market manipulation, pump-and-dump schemes, and investor protection. Regulatory actions or restrictions could impact the future viability of meme coins.

Short-Term Phenomenon: Meme coins often experience short-term hype and enthusiasm driven by social media trends. Sustaining long-term interest and value can be challenging without underlying technological advancements or utility.

Evolving Landscape: The cryptocurrency market is continuously evolving, and trends can change quickly. New projects and innovations may emerge, potentially overshadowing meme coins or leading to market saturation.

While some investors have profited from meme coins, it's crucial to approach them with caution and consider the speculative nature of these investments. Diversifying one's portfolio and conducting thorough research are key to making informed investment decisions.

The problem with XLM and other coins is that they are in some sort of limbo, new coins are thought by the community to have high potential, while coins that have been around for a long time like bitcoin and ethereum may not have the same high potential but they are reliable.

However XLM is not thought to be anywhere near as reliable as bitcoin, and it does not have the high potential of new altcoins either, and as such it is having problems to try to garner the attention of investors once again.