Bitcoin Forum
April 30, 2024, 03:28:20 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 [60] 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 ... 636 »
1181  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Is Crypto another form of gambling? on: June 23, 2023, 04:45:19 PM
Gambling? There are only two options: either your assets vanish or they multiply. However, Bitcoin has no association with that unless you activate derivative functions such as those on Binance Futures.
Bitcoin operates on a trust system built upon Blockchain technology. Its movements are purely driven by supply and demand dynamics.

To this day, many people believe in Bitcoin because it is decentralized and has a limited supply. As a result, demand will persist as long as major institutions continue to adopt BTC.

Thus, everyone will leverage its volatility function to their advantage.

It all depends on the type of cryptocurrency you're choosing. If you choose Bitcoin, there's no risk of losing it all in the long run. It keeps going higher in market price due to the way it was designed. Short-term speaking, BTC will go down. But you should take that opportunity to buy as much coins as you can to prepare yourself for the next bull run.

I'd say altcoins are truly a gamble because they're extremely-unpredictable. Many of them have no real utility and are only driven by hype. This could make you lose all of your investment in an instant if people move on to the next big thing in crypto. The situation is worse with "meme" coins such as Dogecoin, and Shiba Inu. If you're going this route, I'd suggest you diversify your investment to minimize losses as much as possible. Who knows where the crypto market will go to next? Just my thoughts Grin
1182  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Do You trust Tether (USDT) Stablecoin? on: June 23, 2023, 04:40:47 PM
Shipping costs? Are you referring to transaction fees? You are aware that bsc network can move other stable coins as well that are also dirt cheap to use?

Also i don't think many of us are using erc20, for moving small amounts of usdt anyway. Not only it's supported by bsc, you have move it via Arbitrum, Solana, Optimism, Tron, and even Bitcoin.

I am keeping mine in stablecoin if i want to reduce volatility. If i store something in fiat, i feel like i am completely out of the game.

I think that's Tether's huge selling point. It's available on multiple blockchain networks, unlike many of its rivals. Not only that, but the USDT stablecoin has first-mover advantage on the market. It has managed to retain its peg to the US Dollar, even with the banking crisis taking the world by storm.

For Tether to fail, Bitfinex (the issuing company) must cease to exist. And I don't see that happening anytime soon. The company is bigger and stronger than ever. It's likely Tether will remain the sole survivor of the stablecoins group, until CBDCs replace paper money for good. Maybe the US will go as far as adopting USDT as the new "Digital Dollar"? Just my thoughts Grin
1183  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: People are giving too much importance to exchanges on: June 22, 2023, 05:26:00 PM
I think cryptocurrencies are not decentralized, only a few are decentralized, and the rest are centralized. Decentralized exchanges have existed for a long time, but so far, it has not been able to compete with centralized exchanges for several reasons. And I also don't believe in the future, it can replace CEXs, very unlikely. Although many people will not like this, but CEX will never completely disappear, if Binance collapses, there will be one and many others to replace it. This is an area that makes a lot of money, I don't think people will ignore it.

Exactly. I'd say 99% of cryptocurrencies are centralized, while only a small few are truly decentralized. It's all about money these days, so exchanges will list coins that will bring the most profits (even if they're utterly-centralized). This is sad because it strips away crypto's original purpose of eliminating the middleman for good. Even ETH became centralized with the PoS upgrade. It's going to get worse if developers successfully increase the minimum ETH for staking from 32 ETH to 2048 ETH. The number of DEXs are also declining, as CEXs are taking over the whole industry.

It's not that people are giving importance to exchanges, but rather VCs and institutional investors alike. Crypto is now in the hands of Wall Street. Centralization will go on top of everything else just to satisfy the government. There's been renewed interest into crypto from institutional investors, so market prices will only go up in the future. Who knows how far BTC will go? Just my thoughts Grin
1184  Economy / Exchanges / Re: Will there ever be any safe centralised exchange ? on: June 22, 2023, 05:20:09 PM
The thing is that exchanges will be needed as long as people keep getting paid in fiat for their goods and services.

But yeah, centralized exchanges might be stopped by the government when they start putting out the CBDCs.

Even worse, CEXs might become the trading platform for CBDCs after launch. That is if governments are planning to make CBDCs extensible. Sort of like a stablecoin which is programmable and can be used on smart contracts ("De-Fi"). Fiat (either physical or digital) is still the dominating force of the mainstream economy, so don't expect crypto to take over anytime soon. Exchanges (particularly CEXs) will be relavant as long as the world is stuck with the Fiat standard.

Once BTC becomes the standard unit of account (like a reserve currency), CEXs will either cease to exist or switch to crypto-only trading. The crypto world is highly unpredictable, so expect the unexpected. Who knows where the future will lead us? Just my opinion Smiley
1185  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Speculation (Altcoins) / Re: Litecoin's comeback on: June 22, 2023, 05:15:37 PM
Litecoin is one of the potential Altcoins, therefore it is impossible for it to just die because it is still in great demand by traders and investors. it's just that the development team needs to be able to compete with other projects in order to raise its ranking.
However, to outperform Bitcoin will certainly not be possible, if the target is to become the top Altcoin ranking, of course, it still has the potential and hope to be able to compete with other Altcoins.

The competition is pretty stiff these days. There are so many coins out there with attractive features. If Litecoin wants to get all of the attention, the team is going to need to increase marketing/promotion efforts. It's all about the brand. Not the cryptocurrency itself. You can see how ETH is doing better than LTC, even though ETH has a much higher supply. VCs, institutional investors, and whales are all into ETH.

Suprisingly, LTC has managed to stay relevant in the competitive crypto market. It may not have much demand compared to other coins, but it's one of the most accepted cryptocurrencies in the world. Nearly every exchange has an LTC trading pair. It's possible LTC will survive alongside BTC and ETH for generations. As long as it stays decentralized, we should have nothing to worry about. Just my thoughts Grin
1186  Economy / Speculation / Re: What happens next if Bitcoin drops to zero? on: June 22, 2023, 05:11:35 PM
The possibility of bitcoin falling to zero is very unlikely, almost impossible, but that doesn't mean it won't happen, as the future is unpredictable.
In my opinion, whether bitcoin exists and continues to develop or not is entirely dependent on our needs, as long as we always need it, it will always exist and have value. The higher the demand, the higher the value always increases.

BTC recently went to $30k, so going to $0 is very unlikely right now. It'll remain a valuable cryptocurrency during our lifetime. Why would BTC go to $0 when it resembles Gold in every way? There's demand from institutional investors to keep "pumping" the price for quite a long time.

While BTC won't go to zero in the timebeing, it will decline in price due to its extremely-volatile nature. You can take the opportunity to buy coins at the dip and sell them at a higher price in the future. As long as decentralization is preserved, you can rest assured Bitcoin will keep "chugging along" as usual. Who if it goes as far as replacing Fiat in the future? Just my opinion Smiley
1187  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: BEP20 OR ERC20? Preferred token on: June 22, 2023, 04:40:07 PM
It all started with ERC20. This was the first type of token who are in demand but by the time the ETH fee rises, coin devs have came up with a solution and they started to create tokens from other networks. There is also TRC20. I'm not only sure if it came first before BEP20 but right now I think most of the coins are still on BEP20 but coins under TRC20 are also cheap.

The most popular product of it would be the Tether. I always use it more than the ETH version. There is also BUSD from Binance but Tether from TRC20 is much popular. It is accepted on most crypto sites that I visit and also on crypto wallets that I am using. Overall, It's not about the network but it's about how the token is created. There are lots of failed ERC20 tokens before in case you don't know. It happened in the ICO era.

Technically speaking, there is no difference between Binance's BEP-20 and Ethereum's ERC-20 token standards. It's just that BRC-20 token transfers are cheaper and faster because BSC (Binance Smart Chain) has greater transaction capacity than Ethereum (ETH). But that doesn't mean it will stay like that forever. If BSC becomes heavily-congested, then fees will be the same (or even higher) than ETH. I think most people will choose ERC-20 tokens because of their first-mover advantage on the market. These tokens can be used nearly anywhere, unlike Binance's counterpart.

I've previously mentioned something about BRC-20 tokens being inferior than ERC-20 tokens, and turns out, I was right. You can't just make a complex token with the BRC-20 standard than either the ERC-20 or BEP-20 token standards. Besides, ERC-20 is a little outdated. The new ERC-1155 multi-token standard is a much better choice. We may start seeing an equivalent version on BSC soon. Who knows if these two giants (BSC and ETH) will completely change the "De-Fi" landscape in the future? Just my thoughts Grin
1188  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: People are giving too much importance to exchanges on: June 21, 2023, 11:57:41 AM
The thing is that while people keep being paid in fiat for their goods and services, then exchanges are very important for Bitcoin.

When people transition to getting paid in Bitcoin directly, then exchanges will fade away because there would be no real need for them.

The reality is that many people are just "betting" on Bitcoin, so they want to maximize their fiat by "buying low and selling high". That's not going to affect Bitcoin in the long term, it just creates noise in the short term.

Exactly. That's the problem. Fiat is still the standard unit of account, while BTC is viewed by many as a means for profit. If people started using Bitcoin as a currency, things would've changed by now. But that will never happen in a world where banks and governments rule the mainstream economy. Considering that most jobs are paid in Fiat, exchanges will continue to be relevant in the crypto/Blockchain space. Anything good or bad related to a crypto exchange will quickly move the crypto market. It'll be up to you to decide whenever you'd want to buy more coins and "hodl", or sell them all for a profit.

What matters is that crypto stays decentralized so it could stand the test of time. We already have decentralized exchanges, atomic swaps  and even P2P trading platforms, as alternatives to existing CEXs. If CEXs fail, we can still trade our crypto in a breeze. Who knows how the future will shape the entire crypto/Blockchain industry? Just my opinion Smiley
1189  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Is Crypto another form of gambling? on: June 21, 2023, 11:07:20 AM
Only those who invest without proper knowledge could consider this as a gambling but those who study and analyze it call it as trading.
There is a huge difference between gambler and trader when it comes to crypto investment, trader's have skills and invest thorough chart reading while gamblers are the one's who invest through news or FOMO.

I guess we can call it that way. But how do you explain the volatile market prices? Unlike stocks, crypto has wild fluctuations in price that could either make you poor or rich in an instant. The risk of loss is simply too high to bear. I understand traders are making money within the ups and downs, but they're certainly gambling due to the unpredictable nature of crypto. Unless the world ditches the Fiat standard in favor of the Bitcoin standard, I don't see this changing anytime soon.

I'm hoping Fiat collapses so people start valuing things in BTC terms. We don't know when this will happen (if it ever will) as banks will do everything in their power to avoid being left behind in the dust. At least, mainstream governments are beginning to take crypto/Blockchain tech seriously. Who knows what the future holds for the industry? Just my thoughts Grin
1190  Economy / Economics / Re: US Debt Default: Good or bad for crypto? on: June 21, 2023, 11:00:30 AM
It indeed has the potential to do that because although a default was averted several days ago, if it happens at any time, the US will suddenly no longer have (as much) money to spend on stuff. It's not like the Federal Reserve can print their way out of this problem, because there's no point in printing more money after a country has already defaulted on its debts. Federal contractors will be the first companies to feel the hit, and sooner or later, it will spread to all corporations and then consumers, and cause a recession as prices skyrocket.

Exactly. We could say the US debt is like a ticking time bomb. It could detonate anytime when you least expect it. Raising the debt limit would only delay the bomb. But it cannot be avoided. Once it detonates, the US and other countries will suffer badly. It's a good thing Bitcoin was created independent from a central authority (central bank, government). Else, it would've died already.

A debt default will only make crypto (especially Bitcoin) stronger in the long run. It's likely BTC market prices will be in the "millions" once this happens. Altcoins usually follow BTC's footsteps, so they will keeping rising like crazy. I'd suggest anyone to put their money into BTC and other "blue chip coins" to protect themselves against a debt default. I'm pretty sure the cost of living in the US and other countries will rise once this happens. No one can predict the future, so let's hope for the best. Just my opinion Smiley
1191  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: What are the dangers of mixer/tumblers on: June 21, 2023, 10:55:24 AM
I ended up doing some research of my own and simply made my own 'coinjoin' implementation for Litecoin. I started it pretty basic by having the host create the unsigned (final) transaction for all participants. The host negotiates with all participants and the conclusion of that agreement results in an unsigned transaction. From there, the transaction is passed to the first participant who signs it and passes it back to me so I can forward it to the next participant until every signature was added.

I looked into the Wasabi wallet but none of them are supporting hardware wallets. That kinda makes sense as going back and forth with signing (especially with big transactions) can be an annoying task if done manually.

Lastly, how come all online 'mixers' and other bogus is straight-up a scam? Do people really trust these time-based 'mixers'? To me, they seem to either be a honeypot,  a scam, or a scan that hasn't happened yet (exit scam).

Interesting. If you decide to publish the source code or even launch the privacy solution for public use, please let me know. I'd suggest you don't reveal your true identity, or governments will be on your tail. You can see how one of Tornado.Cash's developers was arrested because of his involvement in the project. If he had used a pseudonym, it would've been harder (or almost impossible) to find him. These days mixers are getting scrutinized by mainstream governments, so we should not let our guard down.

I believe all centralized mixers will fail because it's easy enough to shut them down by the authorities. But I cannot say the same about non-custodial or decentralized mixers and/or privacy techniques. Let's see how everything will unfold as crypto/Blockchain tech becomes more popular worldwide. Smiley
1192  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: High gas fee for sending token is still a problem on: June 21, 2023, 10:50:34 AM
Then we have the same problem. I also have coins that I want to take out from MEW and I cannot do it because of the expensive fees, especially in the ERC20 department. I think the lowest is $3-4 just so the transaction would go through without any issues. Because before there was an instance where I paid more just because it keeps on failing. If I remember it right, it cost me $20 in total until I realize that I must not use the lowest transaction service to push through. Now, I don't want to happen again but I lack the amount needed in my old MEW account. Sending it some will be another waste of money and it may not be worth the fees if I do it.
I have not tried the services that you mentioned yet. I may check that out and see if a solution can be done in a cheaper way.

You need to be careful not to end up paying a very low fee that will end up getting rejected by the network. I've used to paid low gas fees on smart contracts a few years ago, only to realize that my transaction got canceled. My ETH was lost because of this. If you want to avoid this, pay a decent gas fee according to network activity. Etherscan's Gas Tracker is a great tool that lets you know ETH's gas fees in real-time.

I know high gas fees are frustrating, but that's the cost you pay for decentralization. Other chains provide low fees, but they're heavily-centralized (eg: BNB and Solana). I guess you get what you pay for. Luckily, there are off-chain (L2) scaling solutions similar to BTC's Lightning Network on Ethereum. Solutions such as Optimism and Arbitrum have low fees and blazing-fast (near instant) speeds. I know on-chain fees won't stay high forever, so all hope is not lost. Just my thoughts Grin
1193  Economy / Exchanges / Re: Will there ever be any safe centralised exchange ? on: June 20, 2023, 07:37:42 AM
There is no way a centralised exchange would operate without a government approval in their locality. KYC is what the government uses to keep track of exchange activities so they could know the flow of funds and assets. Although the essence of blockchain was for anonymity. One could remain anonymous while carrying out a transaction but the fear of  sponsoring terrorist, money laundering and lots more have made the government interface into the system making the centralised exchange the arm of government on blockchain to monitor financial flows onchain.

Of course. Without KYC, I fail to see how centralized exchanges would be able to survive in the long run. Governments will just close their operations for good. With decentralized exchanges, that's another story. There's really no such thing as an exchange (either centralized or decentralized) that's 100% safe and secure. You'd need to protect your crypto by following the necessary security precautions.

Flaws/vulnerabilities will always exist, but if you properly secure your crypto, it'll be almost impossible for malicious actors to rob you. With the FTX collapse, it's likely centralized exchanges will cede control of private keys and/or seeds to customers in the near future. Who knows if this will make CEXs bigger and stronger than ever? Just my thoughts Grin
1194  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: SEC lawsuit caused massive market crash on: June 20, 2023, 07:32:08 AM
Correct, the USA isn't the whole world, and while a possible withdrawal of Binance in the USA will hurt cryptocurrencies, it'll only last for a short period, and the gap will quickly be filled by another exchange. Governments don't care about innovation and technology; they see it as a threat for a variety of reasons, such as tax evasion and privacy, which they are against. While it may seem that purchasing now may be a huge opportunity, current purchases may be a liability because further allegations may hurt Binance on a worldwide basis. There's no guarantee on what will happen next. The situation requires cautious moves, as things may quickly take a sudden turn for the worse.

The US has some crypto-friendly politicians, so all hope is not lost. There's a bill introduced in Congress aiming to remove SEC chairman Gary Gensler from his position. Whenever it'll be approved or rejected by both chambers of Congress (House and Senate) it's yet to be seen. Whatever happens, you can rest assured crypto won't be going anywhere soon. Crypto companies, businesses, and exchanges will move their operations elsewhere if the US continues to treat the industry with an "Iron Fist".

Centralized exchanges are the gateways into and out of the Fiat/crypto worlds, so anything bad related to them will certainly affect market prices in the short-term. Long-term speaking, prices should go all the way to the moon. I'd just forget about the negatives and only focus on the positives. This extended bear market is a great opportunity to grab prominent cryptocurrencies at a huge discount. If you act now, you'll reap the rewards in future. Maybe you'll become the next crypto millionaire? Just my opinion Smiley
1195  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: People are giving too much importance to exchanges on: June 20, 2023, 02:48:17 AM
To start with, I don't believe Binance will disappear. It's a huge global corporation and even having to leave US market completely won't make it go bust. But yeah, people still overreact when some FUD shows up. I dunno why, perhaps Bitcoin is still young as more mature markets are normally less prone to FUD.

Most people that are into crypto are not taking it seriously as a tech. They're only investing into it to make a quick buck in return. It will take some time before the market matures to a point where external factors will have little-to-no effect over a cryptocurrency's price. Binance may've suffered from SEC's actions, but that doesn't mean it's the end of the world. It will move its operations elsewhere and carry on with business as usual.

The one that will end up losing is the US with its aggresive crypto regulations. Crypto is decentralized, so it should be able to stand the test of time. If all centralized exchanges go down (which is very unlikely), we'll have decentralized exchanges at our side. Who knows how far will the industry go? Just my thoughts Grin
1196  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Speculation (Altcoins) / Re: Litecoin's comeback on: June 20, 2023, 02:40:34 AM
Well LTC has also NFTs: Smiley

Ord-Litecoin

While I think Doge is better suited for this whole meme coin/ordinals fad (Disclaimer: I don't own any Doge, too volatile Wink ), it has still not adopted Taproot so LTC had an advantage there. And there seems to be quite some usage of this feature (while it waned a bit after the Ordinals craze slowed down, it's still almost doubling the pre-ordinals transaction density).

Regarding stablecoins: Centralized stablecoins are very easy to deploy on all BTC-based blockchains because there are lots of token protocols (Omni, Counterparty, now also the ultra-inefficient BRC-20 Sad, but also Taproot Assets/RGB may be adopted by LTC). What would be more difficult are algorithmic stablecoins. I'm not totally sure, but I believe that in the past Tether or USDC had also a LTC token.

Well that sucks. I can't imagine how bloated LTC will be once the NFT hype makes a comeback. It will increase on-chain fees, greatly defeating LTC's purpose as digital money for day-to-day payments. Developers should leave NFTs to smart contract blockchains like ETH and BSC, while leaving BTC, LTC, and DOGE alone. Ultimately, the community will decide the best path forward for these cryptocurrencies.

While LTC now has NFT features, there hasn't been any major movement in market prices. The majority is still focused on other coins, particularly those with staking and smart contract features. Only Bitcoin is the exception because it's the one cryptocurrency that started it all. At least, Litecoin has strong support from mainstream exchanges. Nearly every crypto exchange has a trading pair with LTC. Maybe it will survive alongside BTC in the future? Just my opinion Smiley
1197  Economy / Economics / Re: How much longer until paper money is no longer in circulation? on: June 20, 2023, 02:30:26 AM
In most western countries, branches, atms and so on have started to decline in their availability instead of expanding like the past. When this transition is complete, the only way you will be able to contact a bank is digitally or by the phone. Cash won't be available from them, and cash will probably only be able to be traded in with the limited access points available or by established facilities, or encouraged to be spent/deposited as soon as possible.

Governments are going to accelerate the process if they want to have full control of the economy. Their main excuse would be to eliminate (or at least reduce) money laundering, tax evasion, and other illegal activities by phasing out paper money for good. But we all know there are other intentions behind this. Many say Internet access would be an issue for mainstream adoption of CBDCs, but satellites already provide the solution. Governments can spend on the necessary infrastructure to include even poor people in the system.

With crypto becoming popular each day, banks will rush in the development of CBDCs to avoid being left behind in the dust. Once paper money is gone, we'll have no way to achieve financial privacy other than using a privacy-oriented cryptocurrency such as Zcash or Monero. Who knows if paper money is phased out faster than we've previously imagined? Just my thoughts Grin
1198  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: SEC lawsuit caused massive market crash on: June 17, 2023, 07:00:24 PM
The latest SEC lawsuit against Binance has caused a massive market crash, with BNB suffering the most, going as low as $233, the lowest it has ever been in 2023. Bitcoin has also suffered great losses, but it's not as bad as BNB, which hasn't stopped falling since the incident started and got progressively worse for altcoins when the SEC labeled 46 of them as securities to be avoided at all costs. Some of which include BNB, XRP, BUSD, MANA, and plenty of others. Personally, I believe that the condition is starting to become worrying, especially if Binance loses and there's no settlement, which would also have disastrous consequences for the market in general.

The most worrying of all is BNB, which is in freefall and its future might be doomed if no solution is found. What's your take on this? Do you think that a solution will be found to avoid any further losses, or are governments on their way of winning the war against cryptocurrencies?

It's very unfortunate to see how the SEC is reacting against this nascent industry. This will set back the US in terms of crypto adoption and innovation. If the regulating agency keeps pushing against crypto exchanges, they will abandon the country and move to a place where they're welcomed with open arms. Hong Kong and the UAE will be "eating the US' cake" faster than you can imagine. Crypto companies and startups already announced their intentions to move there.

Without the US market, I'd envision crypto market prices going down for an extended period of time. US-based customers will have to find a way to buy/sell crypto with USD through other means (P2P, OTC, etc) as there will be no mainstream exchange (CEX) left in the country. This might force the US-based crypto industry to go underground. BNB might've dipped in price, but it could only be temporary as Binance shuts its operations in the US for good. The question is: Are you buying the dip? Smiley
1199  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: High gas fee for sending token is still a problem on: June 17, 2023, 06:55:59 PM
You can switch to another network like BNB, MATIC or ADA. They have smooth transaction speeds and low GAS fees. BTC is the mother of crypto but with expensive GAS fees and slow transaction speeds this is a problem BTC needs to solve.

The only problem is that these networks are not as decentralized and reliable as Bitcoin or Ethereum. As it's said in the real world, "you get what you pay for". When you pay high fees, you're essentially paying for unmatched security and decentralization. Of course, the network will be congested due to high activity/load. But you'll rest assured your transaction will go through no matter what. Not like Solana that often goes down due to its centralized design (even though you're paying very low fees per transaction).

The future of crypto lies on off-chain scaling solutions (aka Layer-2). It's the safest approach to scale crypto without "harming" the main Blockchain. People are often looking for convenience, so I'm pretty sure they will quickly adopt L2 networks after they're perfected for mainstream use. Who knows if high fees become history some point in the future? Just my opinion Smiley
1200  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Speculation (Altcoins) / Re: Litecoin's comeback on: June 17, 2023, 06:52:38 PM
After all Altcoins were troubled recently, Litecoin is gaining more confidence again.

But can Litecoin outperform Bitcoin or is Litecoin dead in your opinion?

Litecoin can never outperform Bitcoin, especially when it's an altcoin. Demand for LTC is pretty low, because nowadays investors prefer smart contract platforms with NFTs and stablecoins such as Ethereum (ETH) and Solana (SOL). What I do like about Litecoin is that it's much cheaper and faster to use than Bitcoin for day-to-day payments. With a limited supply of only 84m units, we could say Litecoin is like "Silver to Bitcoin's Gold".

The development team recently added a privacy feature called "Mimblewimble" which should differentiate LTC from BTC in the long run. This didn't "pump" LTC's price on the market, probably because of the lack of marketing/promotion from the team. But at least, everything is working as it should. With many exchanges supporting LTC, I don't think the cryptocurrency will disappear anytime soon. Maybe it will live alongside BTC for generations? Just my thoughts Grin
Pages: « 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 [60] 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 ... 636 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!