Bitcoin Forum
May 13, 2024, 03:56:26 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 [49] 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 ... 639 »
961  Economy / Collectibles / [WTB] Sealed Box of Cardsmiths Currency Series 1 Cards on: September 02, 2023, 04:15:24 PM
Does anyone have a sealed box of the Cardsmiths Currency Series 1 release? I want to buy one with BTC. There are a few on sale at eBay, but I think they are overpriced (please correct me if I'm wrong).

Shipping to the US. Please reach out to me via PM if you're willing to do business. I will take the best deal/offer. Thanks for looking. Smiley
962  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: What happens if USDT falls down? on: September 01, 2023, 11:25:43 PM
Governments' involvement with stablecoins? Interesting, but a little too perfect. Why? Centralized groups could shut down something like USDT, but doing so could cause a big fuss among crypto fans.

Now, heres where you're missing the bigger picture - stablecoins are merely an intermediate step! If you will, a bridge. As cryptos spread around the world and develop, they will become the new stable. They will be the gold standard that all other currencies try to match. So, lets say that Tether goes down. Its just a step. The end of one stablecoin wont cause the crypto world to fall apart. Prices going down? Trouble in the short run.

This is how technology has changed. It is bigger than both USDT and government banks. Think big picture, not small. And yes, there may be mistakes in thinking here, but isnt that what forecasting is all about?  So, while we're in the "what-if" limbo, lets not lose sight of the bigger picture.

The idea has always been to replace the middleman. Banks will eventually fail as people begin to lose trust in them. With rising inflation rates, and economic uncertainty, we might see a future where decentralization will be the cornerstone of the mainstream economy. This means no banks and no evil corporations behind everything. People would be in-control of their money via the use of decentralized cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Litecoin. The odds of this happening are very slim, especially when the world is still stuck with the "Fiat standard". Expect stablecoins to be relevant in the time being. Crypto is still in its early days, so let's give it some time and see what happens. Who knows if USDT's rise to glory will be short-lived? Just my thoughts Grin
963  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Why is Monero so unpopular? on: September 01, 2023, 09:42:08 PM
In simple terms, because it's an Altcoin.
The competition in that area is way broader than what it is with Bitcoin. Some investors would say they would rather pick Bitcoin than go through another Altcoin like Monero.
And then another investor would say, if I am picking an altcoin then I'd rather be with Ethereum or BNB. That is the problem.
When all this altcoin came out from the ICO, investors became divided in their beliefs. Some would like privacy but others would like a fast profit scheme while most ended up in a scam or a rug pull.
We all have a different idea of where we put our money. But I don't think privacy is as sweet as other promises especially if it's a short-term profit scheme.

Altcoins are not an attractive investment compared to Bitcoin. That's because they're extremely-unpredictable. Sometimes they're in the "highs", while other times they're in the "lows". Same as Bitcoin, only that altcoins have greater price volatility. With privacy coins such as Monero and Zcash, the risk of loss is even higher. Governments usually "attack" these coins, ending up in massive de-listings from mainstream crypto exchanges. Monero has been attacked since its inception. But it's still around thanks to its commitment towards decentralization and censorship-resistance.

I see this coin ending up in DEXs, as governments ban it from public use. Only those with the "guts" to use such an outlawed privacy coin will support it no matter what. The majority will keep using cryptocurrencies that are approved by mainstream governments (eg: Bitcoin and Ethereum). I'm fine with that as long as decentralization prevails in the long run. Who knows how far will Monero go? Just my opinion Smiley
964  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Only good coins are listed on top exchange? on: September 01, 2023, 09:37:43 PM
Exchanges only list coins that have a good budget. Exchanges are not interested in technology, fundamental properties, utility and other functions of a coin. If a coin has liquidity, then it will be represented on all the top exchanges. Exchanges are interested in volume and liquidity, so don't be surprised if you don't see projects with unique technology or super-fast blockchain on major exchanges. No one is interested in that unless it's funded by someone, and it has no distribution among crypto influencers and opinion leaders.

It's all about money these days. If a coin or token makes the exchange a lot of money, it get listed without remorse. You can see why worthless "meme" coins are listed on top exchanges like Coinbase and Binance. It's not because these coins are serious long-term investments, but rather a way to make short-term profits with trading fees collected from customers. A huge win for exchanges if you ask me.

In a DEX, things are even worse because anyone can list any coin they want at an affordable price (usually an on-chain fee is paid by the user). This opens up the doors for scams and theft. At least, we're not tied to a single option. As long as there's a way to buy or sell crypto, there should be nothing to worry about. Who knows if bad coins are removed from the market, leaving us only with good ones in the long run? Just my thoughts Grin
965  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: BlackRock wants to reduce the price of Bitcoin on: September 01, 2023, 09:30:07 PM
I'd like to reduce the price of Bitcoin so that I can buy some more. Smiley

Everybody wants to buy BTC at a cheap price. But only a celebrity, prominent figure, or big corporations will be able to manipulate market prices at will. You'd need to know the tactics of these players to stay ahead of the game. I don't know if BlackRock is actually manipulating BTC market prices, especially when people use to spread a lot of rumours across the web. It could be true, but who cares? A cheaper Bitcoin, is an excellent opportunity for you to grow your wealth in the long term.

As it's always said, "buy low, sell high". Who knows if the big companies who invested in BTC now (MicroStrategy, BlackRock, Tesla, etc) will pump market prices by the next block reward halving? The sky is the limit to how far BTC will go. As long as you don't invest more than what you can't afford to lose, there should be nothing to worry about. Just my opinion Smiley
966  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: After FTX collapse, some call for a return to decentralized roots on: September 01, 2023, 09:25:37 PM
Low liquidity? The chicken-and-egg prblem. More users equals more money. How hard is learning? That's fine with me for now. Since technology is improving exponentially, we will soon have easy-to-use platforms. And costs? Not to mention CEXs' exorbitant exit costs.

You are right: ease is most important. But it fits differently for everyone. A problem with one FTX shouldnt be used to assess all DEXs. Balance between regulated and decentralized items that work properly is needed. Consider it crypto's yin and yang: centralization and decentralization. It works; It works that way

Its too easy to declare CEXs wont be trusted unless something horrible happens. Remember that opinions change like the wind. Im joking, but in a truly decentralized world, the sky's the limit. DEXs and CEXs living together? Wait and see. However, lets not limit ourselves to one or the other. My friend, we need balance. Always remember that everything has a reason, even if its not obvious.

You do have a point there, mate. Life is all about balance. We can't just discriminate against all CEXs because one turned out to be a "bad egg". Centralization will always be there whenever we like it or not. We just have to prevent it from taking over the whole industry. A divide between the worlds of centralization and decentralization is necessary for crypto to proper.

I believe DEXs will improve over time to a point where they will become as good as CEXs in terms of performance and cost-efficiency. Neither will replace the other as they're completely different things. It's like comparing apples vs oranges. What CEXs will do is provide proof of reserves to gain the confidence of mainstream investors and traders alike. With good regulations, a collapse will have little-to-no impact over the crypto market. Who knows if this will make crypto bigger and stronger in the long run? Just my thoughts Grin
967  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Hedera Hashgraph is ten times better than Ethereum on: August 31, 2023, 11:16:48 AM
I heard recently from one of the HBAR team the reason for the governing body is for reliability. The people that are going to use HBAR most..like FED,Mastercard,Addidas,google and the rest cannot risk any type of fork wars or unknown whales controlling the system.
HBAR design fits its usecase...which imo is huge.
Agree it will go over $1 ...but i think it will go even higher and will remain a part of web.3 for a long time...its only at the start just now.

Also the up coming unlock in a few days i think is priced in and HBAR is very close the bottom.
Im loading up now and if it drops more i will buy more. Smiley

There's no room for forks because the Hashgraph network is built on a DAG (Directed Acrylic Graph). It's a completely different architecture from that of an ordinary Blockchain network such as Bitcoin or Ethereum. This allows the network to process transactions more efficiently while keeping costs low. As I've said before, I don't like the fact that HBAR is centralized. Only those allowed/permitted to run a full node will be able to support the network. It's no wonder why Hashgraph took the attention of The FED.

With "FEDNOW", the US government will be able to proceed with its agenda of launching a CBDC to the public. And Hashgraph will become a part of this new system. People won't get to enjoy the same benefits as with a decentralized cryptocurrency like Bitcoin (which are freedom and financial privacy). Fees may be high on BTC, but it's the best alternative you'll find against traditional Fiat. Staying on topic, I believe ETH will remain the #1 smart contract platform in the world for a long, long time. Hashgraph won't come as close to ETH in terms of market cap and mainstream adoption. Who knows how long will HBAR last? Just my thoughts Grin
968  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Why is Monero so unpopular? on: August 31, 2023, 11:13:06 AM
Again I agree with you, privacy has always been of interest to a small portion of people who are obsessed with protecting their privacy. Such people will never use centralized exchanges, they will go to make Monero exchanges in decentralized P2P exchanges. I don't remember exactly, but I think I've seen some p2p exchanges that work only with Monero and they are still recommended by all those who value their privacy.

I believe Bisq and AgoraDesk/Local Monero are the best P2P exchanges where you can buy/sell XMR without KYC. Unless there isn't any government overreach, these exchanges will continue to operate as usual. Developers of Bisq better remain anonymous and hidden from the public if they want to avoid facing government prosecution. As for AgoraDesk/Local Monero, it's easy enough to take them down by restricting people from accessing the domain (they're hosted on centralized servers, after all). Same goes with Hodl Hodl and any other P2P exchange without a software client.

I've read somewhere that it was possible to do atomic swaps with Monero. You'd just send BTC to the network, and receive XMR in return. All without middleman and KYC-free. Who knows how much XMR will be worth in the future? Just my thoughts Grin
969  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: What happens if USDT falls down? on: August 31, 2023, 11:10:46 AM
This is coming, governments are not going to allow for centralized stable coins to keep on existing much longer, if they can make them disappear then a lot of traders will switch and will begin to use their CBDCs, and this means they will be able to ask them all kind of questions about the source of their funds.

And if they do not like what they hear they can easily block them and keep their coins, but for this future to come to happen independent stable coins need to be destroyed, which is why we are seeing the pressure on stable coins increasing lately.

The only way stablecoins will survive is if governments adopt them as their own. Something like a partnership between the issuing company and the government itself. That would eliminate the need for central banks to reinvent the wheel by launching their very own digital currency (CBDC). But there's a small chance this will happen in the future, as governments always want control over everything. We can say bye-bye to Tether for good once governments decide (especially the US government) to hit the "kill switch". It would be easy enough to shut USDT down because of its centralized nature.

I'm pretty sure a USDT collapse would be a huge blow to the crypto market. Prices will decline for a prolonged period of time. No one can predict the future, so lets hope for the best. Just my opinion Smiley
970  Economy / Speculation / Re: Can 1 satoshi be worth $1 in the future? on: August 31, 2023, 11:07:00 AM
Only if the dollar collapses completely and they print so much of it that the current situation seems like nothing.

No, seriously.  It has to be so terrible, that the current currency value comparably to the 40's will look like a straight line in the chart.

The USD has been showing signs of weakness over the past few years, so anything's possible. Especially now when many countries are moving away from the Dollar (mainly BRICS countries). The more countries abandon the USD, the less powerful it will be. In the event the USD loses its value drastically, Bitcoin will rise all the way to "Mars" in an instant. You can thank Bitcoin's deflationary design for that.

Ultimately, it's all about utility instead of the price. As long as BTC is useful, nothing else matters. Who knows what the future holds for the cryptocurrency? Just my opinion Smiley
971  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: 14 years ago today, the first Bitcoin was mined. on: August 31, 2023, 10:59:15 AM
I'm not sure if this is the first time I've heard of eCash, or if I've heard about it before but didn't understand it as well as I do now. Given that eCash failed to take off as a digital currency, the inventor can be credited as the father of digital currency because he was the one who initially had the idea and proposed it, but he couldn't get it to take off and work. Bitcoin remains the first cryptocurrency to be recognised, as well as the first cryptocurrency to become successful among the thousands of cryptocurrencies that exist today.

David Chaum may have invented the concept of digital currency, but Satoshi Nakamoto perfected it. He solved the "double spending" problem, plaguing eCash in the early days. The latter project became a failure, while Bitcoin became a widespread success. Funny thing, we now have a fork of the Bitcoin Cash blockchain with the exact same name of David Chaum's digital currency (eCash). This is copyright infringement to say the least. Maybe Amaury Sechet and his team will make a rebranding if legal issues arise?

Anyways, I'm glad we now have a way to transact freely across the globe without any middleman. Without Bitcoin, we would've been "slaves" of the system powered by mainstream governments and banks alike. The idea of Bitcoin was to free ourselves from the middleman with a sovereign currency no one can control. BTC by itself is decentralized, but unfortunately, the market is not. CEXs dominate the industry, taking us back to the era of centralized banking. Who knows how Bitcoin will fare in the future? Just my thoughts Grin
972  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: When will the bitcoiners realize bitcoin is just fiat with enforced tax on: August 30, 2023, 04:09:11 AM
When will the bitcoiners realize bitcoin is just fiat with more steps on a transparent ledger with enforced tax aka network fee. When your nation legalizes it like canada you will pay network fee and tax on top, such wow.

There's no such thing as "free lunch". You'd need to pay a fee for your transaction to go through the Blockchain. Otherwise, the network would be extremely-vulnerable against spam attacks. It would result in higher network congestion to a point where BTC will become unusable. Fees are just a way to protect the network from attackers while supporting the miners. I wouldn't call them an "enforced tax" mechanism, but rather a contribution to the network itself. Everyone benefits in the process. Miners will profit, while you get to enjoy financial freedom.

What's disturbing is how every transaction is visible on the public BTC blockchain. You don't want prying eyes knowing your utmost sensitive info. Fortunately, we have both custodial and non-custodial mixers to use Bitcoin in a private and anonymous way. If that's not enough, you could simply convert BTC to XMR for complete peace of mind. Who knows if BTC becomes a part of our daily life in the future? Just my thoughts Grin
973  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: BlackRock wants to reduce the price of Bitcoin on: August 30, 2023, 04:06:09 AM
There have been rumours in the market recently that black rock wants to accumulate more bitcoins, but at more reduced rates and for this they will make the market crash more. I don't know if this news is really true or if it is just a rumour.

This is one dark side of these giants that they will never play fair. They have enough money to influence the crypto market which is still at the very initial stage and move the market according to their wish.


https://www.binance.com/en/feed/post/1026075

I don't see any soild evidence supporting people's claims. It's all "buzz". I suspect big companies/banking institutions like BlackRock and JP Morgan are already doing this behind the scenes. They bash Bitcoin just to lower the price and buy lots of coins at a discount. When they're done, they will talk nicely about Bitcoin to "pump" market prices all the way to the moon. Sort of like how Elon Musk is doing right now with Bitcoin and Dogecoin. This is standard practice among the wealthy.

The ones who get "rekt" are none other than amateur crypto investors looking to make a quick buck. With many institutions joining the game, it should only be a matter of time before BTC reaches a new ATH. The question is: Are you buying the dip? Just my opinion Smiley
974  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: After FTX collapse, some call for a return to decentralized roots on: August 30, 2023, 04:03:18 AM
Or simply put there is no liquidity in DEX, so that is one cons against using them and that is one reason why we are still in CEX despite the many so issues like hacking and losing funds and scams.

And as much as we love DEX in the beginning, I don't think that we can simply go and switch from DEX-CEX, it's not going to happen overnight. And I don't think it will happen in the next 10 years or so.

People won't switch to DEXs because of the low liquidity, steeper learning curve, and higher fees. They're fine with CEXs just the way they are. Don't forget that convenience goes above all else. This little "FTX incident" won't affect CEXs whatsoever. Exchanges will move on with other tactics/strategies to keep attracting customers (like how they've been showing proof of reserves after the FTX collapse).

For people to lose trust in CEXs, something catastrophic must happen (like Coinbase, Binance, and Kraken collapsing all at once). But I don't see this happening anytime soon. I'm fine with DEXs being an alternative than a replacement, as long as they work as intended. With true decentralization, crypto will become unstoppable. Who knows if CEXs will live alongside DEXs for generations? Just my thoughts Grin
975  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: The next trending storyline in DeFi might be RWA on: August 30, 2023, 04:00:15 AM
RWA is short for real world assets. BlackRock CEO Larry Fink mentioned in an interview in the Fox news channel that they can create more tokenization of assets and securities. Similar to the other trending storylines of the past, the next big storyline might be for the tokenization of real world assets and there are platforms in DeFi being developed for this already.

https://coinmarketcap.com/view/real-world-assets/

Will some of these coins be 100x gems? Begin the research hehehe!

...

BlackRock (BLK) CEO Larry Fink said crypto, specifically bitcoin (BTC), could revolutionize the financial system in an interview with Fox Business on Wednesday.

“We do believe that if we can create more tokenization of assets and securities – that’s what bitcoin is – it could revolutionize finance,” he said.


Read in full https://www.coindesk.com/business/2023/07/05/blackrock-ceo-larry-fink-says-bitcoin-could-revolutionize-finance/

Tokenization of real world assets is the future. But it's going to take quite some time before people get used to it. Assets like Gold, Silver, Diamonds, and even real estate, will bought, sold, and even "owned" on the Blockchain. If this become a widespread success, it's likely people won't own anything physical in the future. It will be the dawn of a new digital era.

I think BlackRock wants a piece of the pie of this revolutionary trend. Not only it's getting its hands on BTC, but also on everything Blockchain-related. Could it be possible that corporations will control the world in the future by making use of Blockchain tech? Only time will tell. Who knows when RWAs will take off? Just my opinion Smiley
976  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Only good coins are listed on top exchange? on: August 30, 2023, 03:56:38 AM
No way Roll Eyes
The listing fees of the best exchanges are huge, so any project can be listed for money and it is not the best coin for that.
Moreover one should not rush to invest after seeing the listing on a good exchange because the development of the project will be more dependent on an investor.

There are many coins that get delisted from good exchanges because their volume decreases and investors decrease, the main reason being poor development progress.

It's crazy to think someone would pay a hefty sum of money just to get his/her token listed on a centralized exchange. Only a group of developers that are well-funded (probably through an ICO) will be able to do this. You can see why the crypto market is dominated by "Wall Street" these days. Those with a lot of money hold all the cards to make an specific cryptocurrency project rise all the way to the moon. This is sad because we're moving away from crypto's original purpose.

Regarding your question if only good coins are listed in an exchange, I'd say that's not necessarily the case these days. I've seen "shitcoins" being listed on prominent exchanges like Coinbase and Binance just because they want to follow the hype. This means more money in their pockets as they collect trading fees. Just because a coin gets listed in an exchange, doesn't mean it's worth the investment. You need to do your own research prior to making any investment decisions. Unfortunately, most people don't do this and end up getting "rekt" in the process. Crypto is still in its infancy, so I'm confident it will mature in the future. As long as it stays decentralized, there should be nothing to worry about. Just my thoughts Grin
977  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: PYUSD a.k.a Paypal USD on: August 28, 2023, 04:54:03 PM
Thinking about this, PYUSD might actually become the first legally accepted stablecoin (I don't see why not, given its standing in the finance industry  for over a decade). Also, the biggest reasons I've seen that has made stablecoins become really popular and dominant despite majority of them being centralized is that, DeFi as it currently is lacks the much needed to make it strives that's why stablecoins are important right now. Once we can get that problem solved, I don't see much importance for them.

Exactly. PayPal has widespread recognition as one of the leading companies (if not the leading company) in the financial sector. People will trust PYUSD more than Tether or USD Coin for that matter. It's likely PYUSD's market cap will increase to a point where it will overtake USDT as the leading stablecoin in the market. For what I know, all cards are on the table. Even though all of these stablecoins are centralized, they're still a great way to protect yourself against market volatility.

You'd save money and time by converting your crypto into a stablecoin of your choice instead of cashing out to USD. Who knows if PayPal even goes as far as launching its own crypto exchange in the future? Just my thoughts Grin
978  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Hedera Hashgraph is ten times better than Ethereum on: August 28, 2023, 04:51:02 PM
Dropp built on HBAR to add ETH,POLY AND AVAX for USDC payments that FEDNOW users can soon use  Shocked
When USDC is used on DROPP with the 3 newly added blockchains the USDC will be converted onto HBAR thus increasing HBAR USDC liquidity.
More chains will be added in coming months, SOL is one of em.

I can't imagine how hyped HBAR will be with the "FEDNOW" partnership. It's likely the coin will reach $1 before the end of the year. That's if investors keep "pumping" it like crazy. But it's hard to believe this will become a reality, especially when the crypto market is in a prolonged bearish period.

I wouldn't expect Hashgraph to last a long time because it's centralized. Only BTC and LTC will. Even Ethereum has been compromised. Between ETH and HBAR, I'd prefer ETH because it's less centralized than HBAR. The only downside are the high fees and slow confirmation times. Who knows what the future holds for both cryptocurrencies? Just my opinion Smiley
979  Economy / Speculation / Re: Can 1 satoshi be worth $1 in the future? on: August 28, 2023, 04:45:07 PM
Although it would be wild, it will not happen. As people have pointed out, bitcoin would have to be way too much for that to happen, if we are talking about 100+ years later then maybe it would but we are not going to see it happen in our life time and I think that is the most important part.

I understand that some people will want to see it go as high as possible but that doesn't mean that it is going to be too good. We should just aim at making as much profit as we can and not make some sort of unrealistic amount of money, it will not work at all. I hope that we could do something that would be different, it should be important to just make it work and not hope for 1 satoshi to worth 1 dollar, we just need bitcoin to go up, as simple as that.

It doesn't matter how much a Bitcoin is worth in the future, as long as you're able to profit from it. You just need to buy low and sell high in order to get a ROI. We won't be alive by the time BTC hits $100m, but our descendants will. It would be crazy to think this will happen earlier, unless the USD experiences "hyperinflation". This would mean the end of the US Dollar as the world's reserve currency.

I don't envision BTC taking the USD's place in the future. But who knows? Maybe someday countries will go as far as adopting BTC as their reserve currency? Whatever happens, you can rest assured Bitcoin won't be going anywhere soon. As long as it stays decentralized, there should be nothing to worry about. Just my thoughts Grin
980  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Speculation (Altcoins) / Re: Litecoin's comeback on: August 28, 2023, 04:41:16 PM
exaggeration , Litecoin outperforming bitcoin is close to Impossible , because how can a semi shitcoin can outperform a greatest coin?

and also calling litecoin is dead? what a shameful comparison when you are asking about breaking bitcoin with a coin you called dying or dead

Litecoin is not dead. It's alive and healthy as usual. But I wouldn't call it a "shitcoin", especially when it delivers as promised at a slow and steady pace. It's just that investors aren't that interested into Litecoin these days. All of the attention is on coins with smart contract capabilities, especially those that are attached to "De-Fi" and NFTs. The only exception to this is Bitcoin, because it was the first crypto that started this craze.

I wouldn't expect LTC to make a comeback right now, unless BTC turns bullish again. Just keep calm, buy some cheap LTC, and wait until the market goes back up again. Who knows if LTC goes to $1k someday? Just my opinion Smiley
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 [49] 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 ... 639 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!